If not this one then I'll be using WN's, came a whole minute and a half before yours
Justin Wright
Real thread with new links:
Austin Cooper
Stop putting noncery in the OP for fucks sake.
Matthew Kelly
No good reason. Was better than half of the threads on the board tbqh, better than BLACKEDposting and Sup Forums-tier memes
Jeremiah Hughes
Israel isn't catholic, but Britain is Holocaustianity.
Lincoln Lopez
>I know more about the British constitution than 99% of burgers and probably 85% of Brit/pol/. That's a worrying claim considering you're suggesting the Monarch starts legislating. >The Diana thing has NOTHING at stake outside of who gets to curate the museum monarchy. The media pressured the Monarch to lower the union flag to half mast above Buckingham palace. This was against two well set precedents. The first being that only the Royal Standard may be flown from Buckingham Palace and only when the Monarch is in residence. The Second being that the Royal Standard may never be flown at half mast while a Monarch lives, the suggestion being that the Crown passes upon the instant of death so that a Monarch is never dead unless the monarchy is over. So despite these well set Royal precedents, the media and the public upon its bandwagon, forced the Monarch, despite their protest, to not only fly a union flag where no flag should be flown, but also to fly it at half mast. >The entire history of the constitution hasn't been a check-valve. Desperate times call for, at least, thought-experimenting possible scenarios. Any political action by the monarch will increase an already growing Republican movement as monarchy is believed by most to be contradictory to the sacred calf of democracy. >And I'm careful to make sure it's not treasonous as we're focused on the next ascension. Meaningless in this day and age. >Larping is the seminal stagevto everything of worth. LARPing prevents the actual realistic prevention of further degradation. >It's a process and I assumed it'd be fun, but did not expect to run into the deep, deep programming that things can never hangs, unless its uncontrollable descent into the bowels of irrelevance. I want better for you fuckers. Now you're just rambling.
Jonathan Hall
there's only one link in that thread that isn't in this one, though
Tyler Cooper
Thread got nuked because of animenoncing!
State of him!
THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF HIM
Michael Davis
I was the dickhead yank talking about the monarchy. Doubt it was me
Lincoln Jenkins
Nothing wrong with a bit of ironic camp anime. Always seems to flush out the sexually-insecure.
Ayden Green
>making another anime thread even though that's the reason the last one got nuked
State of you.
Sebastian Diaz
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD REAL THREAD
Colton Price
I found it funny when normies got angry at the sight of the "okay" hand gesture and I find it funny when people get extremely insecure and heated over a picture of a clothed cartoon girl.
William Mitchell
>sees a pixel drawn in japan and spends the next two hours spamming the thread full of nonsense in order to "improve thread quality" the absolute state of anti-anime posters
Benjamin Howard
State of you.
Matthew Wright
Fucking postman knocked on the door as I was making it
Grayson Cox
Haven't you got kids to be looking after? Why are you getting angry on an internet forum?
Adam Bailey
That's not me.
Chase Gutierrez
You're missing the point that the Diana thing was of no consequence. You guys are so caught up in the museum aspect you can even see the purpose of a monarch today. So why do you care if taking chances caused republicanism, worse case? You've already said the institution is just ceremonial. Are you that interested in thinking like a museum curator rather than a blood subject of a potentate who tries to make right? As for legislation, the king in parliament would simply have to ascended with such power that he gets parliament to grant a temporary protectorate period for him to administer. Sure, it would "break" the constitution temporarily, but much more extreme deviance has occurred in you history. Again, desperate times, let's have done imagination. I can tell you that GCHQ for example has people who game plan this shit.
Thomas Stewart
Oh you're the confederate LARPer, good to know. How's the kiddywinks?
Benjamin Murphy
That's it! You guys think like you're living in a museum, with only hopes to preserve past as you know the future is lost. The Curator Mindset. This mindset can't imagine; impossible.
Jason Adams
You seem to be unaware of how utterly stale and frozen our political system (and current social climate) is. There is no ability or appetite for change in the general populace, as heartbreaking as that is to come to terms with. The rot has set in.
Justin Anderson
It would break the constitution irreparably, the Monarch is the only link between government and God we have. Once it is gone it is gone forever and we are a Godless society. We've broken all of our institutions by "taking action", Church is decaying and the grounds of the elderly and unfashionable, Education teaches us to hate our own achievements and praise those of aliens, State is a mess of utilitarian pandering with no aim to do anything but win votes. Monarchy is all that is left of England, but even it is being massively eroded by Americanised globalism. Matched with an ignorant electorate unaware of what the Monarchy is for, but arrogant in their own assumptions of the purpose of institution, it is very much on the verge of collapse. You keep demanding action when action will kill all we have left.
You state you know our ways, but your only argument is nebulous terms that mean what ever you want them to mean, stating I'm viewing monarch as if in a museum without telling me what that means, viewing a Monarchy by its past? This is a common law nation, precedent is everything to it. Saying that I fail to understand the purpose of monarchy, yet you fail to tell me what I misunderstood or what is its purpose, this coming from someone who disregards precedent but yet claims to understand British Constitution.
Cooper Jones
Catalonia just unilaterally declared independence. Get the popcorn ready lads, it's actually happening.
Michael Howard
I've gathered this from Brit/pol/, sadly. Which is why it's crucial to strike while irons hot. I simply can't think of anything else to break the BBC coma than the death of the sovereign. If a small elite forced there way to power THEN, lead by a charismatic monarch, one with a plausible claim by noble blood (assuming they make the strong case that Windsor let the ancestral proples down)... that would be the rare fissure in time and circumstance where history can be made. I'm aware the odds are tiny. My hope is that some potential is lurking and jogs the imagination...
Juan Robinson
trying to fight back against desiring that many people die on both sides solely so i can have a spectacle to look at desu
Jacob King
Should I just get straight into it, or prepare?
Luke Williams
Kaczynski was right.
Elijah Wood
I'm probably overly cryptic due to phonefagging. Let me see if I can add to our understandings of each other. When I talk about the museum monarchy/curation, I mean that all of those arcane flag laws, when to fly, etc., are interesting culturally, ceremonially, and such, but they are an example of the trees blocking the forest. I'm larping about one of the largest events in your history, flag esoterica has no scale in this discussion. Does that make sense? As for god, I agree, and is exactly why this is needed. I'm advocating for nothing less than neoreaction coming out of this move (I'm advocating in British because you DO have the institution to do this, unlike the US). So while I acknowledge it's a giant risk, the reward is restoration of all of the Britain that you value. Rather than clinging myopically, and with a scent defeatism, to what remains (as least for today). Point is, hunkering down is NO STRATEGY. You will steadily lose. You want God again? You have to have the power to destroy to cultural-Marxist state. All of your problems COULD be fixed, if we got a pre-1688 monarch to take the reigns. So nevermind HOW for now, can we at least agree if my plan DID happen, that good things could be possible?
Ryan Ross
Anyone got the Sup Forums reading list?
Thomas Morris
Salmond: "I'll always defend the BBC"
Gabriel Bailey
I forgot to mention I think the purpose of a monarch is to stay back, delegate ministers powers 98% of the time. But sometimes thing get back enough that they can't be fixed via democracy, and should be fixed by a monarch. Otherwise what's the point of having one?
Sebastian Ortiz
Shame he was so shite with his explosives.
Brayden Garcia
You would need the same environment, technology and media play a huge part.
Jonathan Thompson
It would likely require a media blackout initially. I'm going to wander in and declare myself king. It would require elite British collaboration, of British patriots, in preparation of the event. Military/CoE leaders would be nessesary, I think the media could just be commandered at the time, temporarily of course. SJWs would be purged, but we could even break up the BBC monopoly and have competing free press, with the exception of criticizing the new monarch during the finite protectorate period authorized by parliament of course.
John Morris
I'm Not* Going to wander in... damn I need a bigger keypad...
