>heh stupid christfag prove that god exists
Ontological argument
>w-well even if he exists why should I worship him?
Pascal's wager
>*sweating* haha u believe in unicorns. epicurean trillema, nietzsche, dawkins!
Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
his name is allah kafir
>heh stupid Christmas-spirit-fag prove that Santa exists
Ontological argument
>w-well even if he knows whether I'm naughty or good why should I worship care?
Santas wager
>*sweating* haha u believe in elves. epicurean trillema, nietzsche, dawkins!
Santas coming to town verse: So! You better watch out, you better not cry
kek
...
>>*sweating* haha u believe in unicorns. epicurean trillema, nietzsche, dawkins!
Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
>heh goyim, trust me this shitty rustbucket car is worth 10k, You'd be an fool not to buy it.
...
...
What does that have to do with anything, user?
You're not even American lmao
>What does that have to do with anything, user
the fact that majority of "religiously unaffiliated" voted for fucking obamer and clinton
stop pretending to be a fucking retard, its very thread related
>Pascals wager
How many hundreds of thousands of times has this been proven to be rationally unsound?
With even the most microscopic of understanding of world religions you would know that hundreds of other religions promise some form of punishment or withholding of reward for non belief or practice, rendering the most basic core principle behind pascals wager invalid.
It's literally sub-brainlet tier reasoning.
>Ontological argument
Has been utterly debunked
>Pascals wager
Is outdated and lack all possible scenarios (there are infinite, not 2)
Christcucks are definitely as retarded as the sandnigger muzzies
user, this thread is about your jewish deity's existence. This doesn't change regardless of how coalburners of the soul in the most jewified and niggerfied country in the west choose to vote.
except they never givew a proper argument
>Flag checks out
Now go bomb a café, mohammed.
whatever you say
What's it with Christians and their inability to argue their position like proper people?
I need some spiritual inspiration. I'm going through a dry patch.
>What's it with Christians and their inability to argue their position like proper people?
>makes no arguments and claims
>buttblasted because others dont argue with him
are you pretending or just legit retarded
>makes no arguments and claims
I made one here - first sentence. I'll back it up with the OP Why did you feel the need to shit up your already poorly made thread with completely unrelated pictures about American voting patterns? You realize that they gave women voting rights, allowed jews to take over finance and freed the niggers when they were almost entirely Christian, yes? The consequences of that are that they're now barely white, which is fitting since that's the destiny for all countries that were stupid enough to adopt your anti-white ideology properly.
here ya go mate
so your argument is that my posts are unrelated? do you ever read the thing you are about to post or just post whatever will give you the most attention
>b-b-but christians vote for BASED right wing parties therefore you should worship dead kike on a stick!
All of those parties are controlled opposition. They all do nothing if they actually win any power.
>so your argument is that my posts are unrelated?
Initially, yes since you were denying it for some reason even though it's quite obvious that American voting patterns have nothing to do with your jewish deity's existence.
I now added some more in the previous post - you know, the one you replied to, of which you conveniently ignored half. Once again This behavior is even more embarrassing than being a coalburner of the soul in the first place.
>This behavior is even more embarrassing
wow i feel ashamed i am sorry master, im sure you are not baiting me at all
look at the pic i posted for aussie user if you want to amuse yourself, now begone
>They all do nothing if they actually win any power.
but you ignore the fact that average normalfaggots dont know that so they vote for [insert party here]
>>b-b-but christians vote for BASED right wing parties therefore you should worship dead kike on a stick!
i was making fun of americans/atheists, you would have to be retarded or an american to consider this an argument
>believing in jewish mythology
>believing in jewish mythology
That's atheism.
Stop larping any time.
>Santa is the unmoved mover
>actually using the brain meme in a serious manner
That's not how it works and just makes it entirely cringy. Especially so with bogposting.
>Ontological argument
Disproven.
>Pascal's wager
Blackmail.
>Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Psalm 14:88 The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God.
Enjoy your kike sandreligion.
how?
Fuck off you dirty Muslim rape baby
>Pascal's wager
>living your short, insignificant life shilling to some god you can't even be sure exists instead of living it how you want to
nice meem
Atheism is the belief system designated for whites and Asians by the chosen people. That makes part of Judaism essentially.
Think of a special variant of Christianity for black people, where white Christian pastor would tell them to believe in a flying spaghetti monster.
A sta ako sam procitao Bibliju i saznao da Bog postoji i da verujem Isusu, da li sam ja jos uvek budala?
You are just projecting
Atheism was created by greek philosophers
Christianity is the belief system designated for whites by Jews. Paul was a pharisee
That you will deny this can only mean you are insane
What will you choose? Your feelings or your truth?
>Atheism was created by greek philosophers
Nothing of current atheism teached to Whites has anything to do with Greek philosophy.
>Pascals wager
Not an argument since thousands of religions have existed claiming to be correct.
>Quoting Jewish fanfiction
> who is Nietzsche, the guy that inspired Fascism?
>use others dont argue with him
Atheism in Europe literally took root at Renaissance and Enlightenment Era, which was rediscovery of classical philosophy, who were also atheists.
If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then Jews don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power
> Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15]
en.wikipedia.org
Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.
> Around 400, St Augustine, one of the most influential and foundational figures of Catholic theology, preached that the Jews must be protected for their ability to explain the Old Testament.
> Jews must be protected for their ability
> Pope Gregory the Great (c 540–604) brought Augustine's teachings into Roman Law, by writing a Papal Bull which became the foundation of Catholic doctrine in relation to the Jews and specified that, although the Jews had not accepted salvation through Christ, and were therefore condemned by God until such time as they accept salvation, Christians were nevertheless duty-bound to protect the Jews as an important part of Christian civilization.[6
> While a "persecuting spirit" often existed among the general population through the Middle Ages, Jewish communities often had to turn to the Holy See for protection.[7] Papal Bulls reiterating the duty of protection were issued by various Popes,
en.wikipedia.org
Christians protecting Jews is not a "corruption of Christianity", all the way back to St Augustine Jews were seen as part of Christianity. That is why Jews never had to leave Europe even when they were constantly expelled numerous times from every kingdom by angry farmers. Papal edicts helped them move to the next kingdom and eventually get back to the first one.
voanews.com
> Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of Orthodox Christians, is urging Europe to stop trying to divide what he calls economic migrants from asylum seekers.
> Bartholomew is scheduled to visit the Greek island of Lesbos on Saturday along with Pope Francis, and Athens Archbishop Ieronymos, the head of the Church of Greece, to raise awareness about the troubled state of refugees and migrants in Europe.
> The symbolic visit is intended to reiterate the Christian moral duty to show hospitality to strangers, Bartholomew said in an interview published Friday. He added that countries in Europe should find inspiration in the generosity shown by Lesbos residents.
> Illegal immigrants make 10 % of the population of Greece
daily reminder that the orthodox patriarchs are exactly the same shit of other christians, and they have repeatly condemned right wing movements like Golden Dawn
But why would it be otherwise?
Christianity rejects all wordly concerns altogether, and right wing concerns ARE wordly concerns
Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):
- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther
When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he isn't kidding, or meaning the opposite, but setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
While christian churches seem to be very well of this (including orthodox leader Patriarch Bartholomew), Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!
Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"
But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!
That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".
Wow, better start killing white people for worshipping that gay freemason wall street founder ““““messiah””””. I have awakened. Check your privilege Christcucks