Just a daily reminder that Sup Forums is a Christian board

Just a daily reminder that Sup Forums is a Christian board.

Be gone Atheist!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dnrT7yZEV-g
youtube.com/watch?v=yURy_IfInQI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism#Antisemitism
voanews.com/a/orthodox-patriarch-refugees/3287495.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I never understood why christians hate catholics so much

Threadly reminder that daily reminder threads are low effort
But you already knew that.

We come to this site to get away from Jew worship.

Dqaily reminder.

protestants dont believe catholics are saved

daily reminder that Catholics are the only Christians as some fat fuck wanted to marry more woman

For niggers who claim to be so saved they sure are insecure about it
oh wow intense shit man

Nah

Catholics aren't Christians, they don't go through the same process to be saved as protestants. 10 hail mary's and you're done for Catholics

they believe that catholic is heresy because you have to confess your sins to a preist instead of asking god directly, also the whole praying to the saints or virgin mary instead of praying directly to god

Dude fuck protestants desu
They don't have an institution to legitimize their retarded beliefs
Call me when you have a central authority like the pope and an organized church

>21 Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to Him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.”
>23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to Him and urged Him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” 24 He answered, “I was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel.”
>25 The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.”

If you believe what the church use to teach, that Canaanites were niggers, than Jesus compared niggers to dogs. Sounds like /our guy/ to me.

IF there's a Providence it's far beyond given the patterns of life and coincidences - what religion shapes it to be, especially Christianity forcing God to appear like some absolute good personal entity, that always accts per individual basis with the absolute good.

I think Providence, or w/e because I cannot even come with a concept for that it's just something you pretty much receive is like an infinite spring from which all beings of the entirety of reality drink.

All is balanced out so that everyone receives andthat's it.

>Be gone Atheist!

Stop that.

im not religious

daily reminder theist vs atheist threads are divide and conquer

>call me when you are a corrupted organization that uses God's name for as a front
>call me when that organization is run by pedofiles
Sure, user

...

Is christianity jewified? should I only read the OT then ?

Cuckstianity is anti-white.

I want to end degeneracy.

Lol, is this a meme? You're saying one's beliefs aren't legitimate unless you have those "requirements", or did you misspeak?

FUCKING BASED

Amen, and faggots too

youtube.com/watch?v=dnrT7yZEV-g

Go play with niggers somewhere else, Jew worshiper.

Pagan gods are white gods. All incarnations of the Jew God are anti-white.

First step: Get off your knees, worshipping a kike, in a dark room where the soul may not fly to its true heights

>That pic
kek

We should have a Pagan-chan though

Don't need to change much. Have the same waifu, just exchange the cross with a thor's hammer and have some flowers on her head.

She will make an excellent may queen

That's rich comming an analcuckist, you're the biggest nigger lovers on Earth.

Seems very true. I'll also say it's sad to see people still being churchist and religionist.

Pastor Anderson!! NOOOOOOOOOOO!1!!1!

God isn’t real

>protestants dont believe catholics are saved

Untrue.

The majority of Protestants believe that the only requirement for salvation is to have faith in Jesus. They believe that the idea that someone can do something during their earthly life to save or damn them is overconfidence in free will and it takes agency away from God. All of the disagreements between Catholics and Protestants can be boiled down to the belief of whether our earthly actions (aside from simple faith in Christ) play a role in our salvation. The Catholics believe it does, Protestants believe it doesn't.

This means that although Protestants think Catholics are wrong, they also believe that they are still going to heaven.

Any Protestant who says that Catholics are damned is either misinformed or part of some sect with exotic theological beliefs.

Why would you want to claim a board that's satire anyway?

Reminder that Christianity is total bullshit

This way user :3

...

...

...

>when was 13 years old, I wanted to stay home playing videogayms during Sundays, instead mommy took me to church, now I hate Christianity 4ever.

Are you denying that the 30 years war allowed the Turks to rape and enslave the Balkans for 500 years? Something they have never recovered from even today

...

...

>Hahaha, I'll use some Hollywood psychology, mmmmmm
>you probably hate christianity because ur mom xD

gtfo, kid

Amen

God isn’t real, sorry.

There are christians on this board and non-christians.

You're an idiot if you don't think God exist.

A song for you.

youtube.com/watch?v=yURy_IfInQI

Agnostic atheism is the only logical position, prove me wrong.

(agnostic because nobody can really know anything with absolute certainty, let alone a god)
(atheist because a belief in a god is not justified so i dont believe and im not claiming there is no god, thats irrelevant and if you claim i do, you are putting words in my mouth and misrepresenting me)

Christianity allows child brides. There is literally no reason to prefer Islam.

>Luke 14:26 "If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters--yes, even his own life--he cannot be My disciple"
Stop projecting, user.

Got some evidence he’s real?

Life is evidence, if he didn't exist, nothing would exist.

Tell me how nothing can create something? Logically only something came from something..
and something very powerful and intelligent.

Whatever, not like i can say anything to change your mind, that's up to you of course.

so the universe is god then? nobody is saying the big bang came from nothing, but you are saying god came from nothing (no he is eternal), why not just say the universe is eternal? as far as we know there was no time before the big bang so basically, the universe HAS always existed, no god needed.

sounds like a whole lot of assumptions and moving of some goalposts, if that is your best reason for believing in a god you really need to rethink some things.

So why is it necessarily a Christian God? What makes you more correct than Muslims or Hindus?

If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then Jews don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power
> Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades

Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.

Nobody once ever said the Big Bang came from nothing. Try again.

> Around 400, St Augustine, one of the most influential and foundational figures of Catholic theology, preached that the Jews must be protected for their ability to explain the Old Testament.
> Jews must be protected for their ability

> Pope Gregory the Great (c 540–604) brought Augustine's teachings into Roman Law, by writing a Papal Bull which became the foundation of Catholic doctrine in relation to the Jews and specified that, although the Jews had not accepted salvation through Christ, and were therefore condemned by God until such time as they accept salvation, Christians were nevertheless duty-bound to protect the Jews as an important part of Christian civilization.[6
> While a "persecuting spirit" often existed among the general population through the Middle Ages, Jewish communities often had to turn to the Holy See for protection.[7] Papal Bulls reiterating the duty of protection were issued by various Popes,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism#Antisemitism

Christians protecting Jews is not a "corruption of Christianity", all the way back to St Augustine Jews were seen as part of Christianity. That is why Jews never had to leave Europe even when they were constantly expelled numerous times from every kingdom by angry farmers. Papal edicts helped them move to the next kingdom and eventually get back to the first one.

> but muh synagogue of Satan

The only result of Christian "enemty" against Jews was giving them an absolute monopoly over high finances, and protecting them from angry farmers.

And how can it be otherwise? If Jews are the enemies of Christianity, the synagogue of Satan, then it is the duty of Christians to love them and protect them, "love your enemies and provide them with help" was clearly said by both Jesus and Paul, and the early christians like Saint Augustine openly agreed

voanews.com/a/orthodox-patriarch-refugees/3287495.html

> Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of Orthodox Christians, is urging Europe to stop trying to divide what he calls economic migrants from asylum seekers.
> Bartholomew is scheduled to visit the Greek island of Lesbos on Saturday along with Pope Francis, and Athens Archbishop Ieronymos, the head of the Church of Greece, to raise awareness about the troubled state of refugees and migrants in Europe.
> The symbolic visit is intended to reiterate the Christian moral duty to show hospitality to strangers, Bartholomew said in an interview published Friday. He added that countries in Europe should find inspiration in the generosity shown by Lesbos residents.
> Illegal immigrants make 10 % of the population of Greece

daily reminder that the orthodox patriarchs are exactly the same shit of other christians, and they have repeatly condemned right wing movements like Golden Dawn

But why would it be otherwise?

Christianity rejects all wordly concerns altogether, and right wing concerns ARE wordly concerns

Who ever said i worshiped a christian god? Lmao all i said was
Sup Forums is a christian board.

Whoever has the "right" god i don't think anyone knows for sure.. but i am sure god exist.

Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):
- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...

... he isn't kidding, or meaning the opposite, but setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
While christian churches seem to be very well of this (including orthodox leader Patriarch Bartholomew), Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!

Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"

But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!

That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".

Yes, correct, it didn't come from nothing, one mess up and life would't exist, life is far too complex to be by chance.

Christian Morality attacks the foundations of the monarchy and capitalism, thus its spirituality is left-wing

Jesus saying that for the rich, powerful, strong (i.e. a monarch) it is almost impossible to go to Heaven, while the poor will inherit the Earth, you have a recipe for spiritual marxism that will become the real deal as soon as the Church losses its ability to prevent people from reading the Gospel directly
Under Christianity, a hobo is holier than the king, a beggar is holier than an entrepreneur, that contradiction can't last, and it didn't last

It is not an accident Europeans were the first people to violently remove their monarchs to replace them with utopian ideologies
it is not an accident either that every christian church outright rejects whatever version of "true Christianity" you may claim to be the truth.

The people devoted to the cult, working for it 24 / 7, spending their entire lives on it think that your interpretation makes no sense

They think that when Jesus and Paul said something they actually meant it, the people joining religious missions because the Gospel inspired them, the people that go to Africa and adopt babies, the people that actually wanna follow the lives of the early Christians like John Chrysostom (which you constantly claim is a "true Christian" because he didn't like jews, while ignoring everything else he ever said) and live a life of self-denial and poverty to feed others, people like Mother Teresa that lived surrounded by filth and excrement in India...

But you don't. You wanna pretend to be a christian while living a life of a roman
Jesus himself said that if you wanna be like a roman and love your friends and hate your enemies, then pretend to follow him, you are a hypocrite
What kind of argument can you even make to actual devoted christians that go on missions to Congo and India and even DIE for it, to tell them that their version of Christianity is corrupted and damaged by jews?

I exist because i can write you this reply. I'm eternal and all powerful. I'm the reason Sun sets and sunday comes after saturday. I decide what digits you get. There is no way you can disprove that.

>but i am sure god exist.
>with no evidence
dude, your ignorance is showing, not cool man.

- there is no "white genocide", what is really going is white suicide, with christian morality as its main driver
the abortion issue is a perfect example of white christians openly fighting against their own interests by wanting to increase the birthrates of blacks and other democrat sub-groups that do abort
Tell me: do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks? (The entire South would be deep blue for starters)

- That Jews took control of european finances and loaning and then global finances by proxy, is another example. If the Churches had not been issuing numerous edicts to give a monopoly of high financing to Jews, jews would have not become so powerful.

- Support for Israel is a third way Christian Morality screws whites over, and it is far from a recent occurance or corruption. As early as 1600s, puritans already believed that a jewish Israel in the middle east was a prerequisite for the Apocalypse. As early as the 400s, Saint Augustine was calling Christians to defend the Jews,

- Christianity does not allow for racial divisions among Christians either "there is no jew or greek" makes it quite clear.
Citing Paul made extremely easy for the anti-segregation preachers of the 60s to get the majority of whites on their side
It also makes no historical sense, christian preachers from 1700s (before the supposed "jewish take over of Christianity") actively travelled to dangerous parts of Africa and South America to convert tribes even when it very often costed their own lives, and when they were converted they fought against conquerors for equal rights for the new christians (see: bartolome de las casas). Numerous preachers of all churches were massacred in Japan (which remains immune to the moral paralysis that is destroying Europe... really makes me think).

...

He exist because life exist, c'mon it's common sense something powerful exist, don't be such a close minded fool.

so where's that evidence that God exists?

>almost all Christian traditions are pagan

thoughts on this fellow christians

lol. whatever faggot

Besides, why are you so sure he doesn't exist? did you pray for a new xbox game and you never got it, now you're 100% he doesn't exist? lool

this has been debunked so many times already

Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.

Christianity didn't even have gentiles among its ranks until Saul (Paul) decided to spread it among gentiles 30 years later.

Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome

Indeed, why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?

Can you point to a single point Jesus made that would not be denounced as SJW, marxist and jewish by Sup Forums if it wasn't Jesus saying it?

There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut!
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor!
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied!

You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!
The doctrine of the Jews worked well. Thousands of ethnic groups have disappeared yet Jews remain around. Jesus' attacks against Judaism are the same of Chomsky attacks against Zionism: jews that hate other jews, but following their ideas would allow Jews to control us.

I have to ask you "christians" of Sup Forums, what are these supposed teachings of Jesus that supposedly got corrupted by kikes? "Hate your enemies"? "Save treasures for tomorrow"? "DO resist evil"?

The opposite of everything Jesus said?
I mean really, is "but kikes killed Jesus" your only argument?

Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!

But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!
wtf I guess I love ISIS now!

dude, no, life isnt proof of god, life is proof of life, you cant prove his existance, what makes you think you can prove his link to life? im baffled how you can make these claims and be serious about it.

>why are you so sure he doesn't exist?
im not, when did i say i was sure he doesnt exist? when did i even claim he doesnt exist?

once again, putting words in my mouth, so very dishonest, you should feel ashamed.

Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god.

If unmarried men followed the words of Paul, there would no be any civilization to begin with, people would stop marrying as it would interfere witgh their mental masturbation being a "good person" by telling others that they will go to hell

See:
> 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
> Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.
> 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.
t. Paul the Pharisee

Paul makes it EXTREMELY CLEAR that the main concern for every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe, and his main worry is that Christians may not devote 100 % of their time to the spread of the cult

the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian

Jesus made it even clearer:

> "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't become my follower"- Jesus

beware of this jewish retard

The West is not dying because people don't go to church, or because gays fuck their butts (heck, even muslims fuck each other all and goats the time, and they are the civilizations expanding the most right now, while the west collapses)

The West is dying because of pathological altruism, and i quote Paul himself in his interpretation (insofar whenever Jesus said this you always say "Jesus means the opposite"):

> 14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse.
> 17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”[d] says the Lord. 20 On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
> if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
> In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”[e] 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Your Old Testament morality has nothing to do with the Jesus and Paul that you claim to follow, and no church father ever pretended otherwise

You are a larper that does not give a fuck about what Paul actually said, and needs to pretend that Mosaic Law applies to him
Yet I am quite sure you work in Saturday and eat pork, lol

If you wanna be a jew, and then go on and convert to Judaism, and stop pretending that Christian Churches want anything to do with you

You're making it really easy to assume.


It's like the guy in front of me ordered a bucket of chicken and watermelon with grape kool-aid and expect me to NOT assume his skin color.

You're obsly coming off as atheist or else you would of agreed with this comment i made.

The following timeline, set in periods of around one century, will explain why Christianity is a religion of EARTHLY POWER, which doctrine declares that the strong will inherit Heaven, and the meek will fall. This will explain why ONLY Christianity defeated Islam and Judaism and conquered the World. Only Christianity allows a nation to expand, defeat Islam and smash jewry, and create empires; lack of Christianity leads to collapse.

> 63 BC: Rome conquests the Mediterranean coast, including Judea.
> 4 BC: Jesus is born
> 73 AD: Rome has smashed two jewish rebellions. Rome extends all the way to Persia.

> 235 AD: Rome has overextended, and faces a crisis
> 337 AD: Rome converts to Christianity.
> 476 AD: Rome falls anyways.

As you can see, converting to Christianity makes your nation stronger. Romans were NOT REAL CHRISTIANS, that is why the EARTHLY POWER didn't work for them.

>being a paganfag
>being a Christcuck
>2017

We will see now how the remaining Christian Kingdoms will use the EARTHLY POWER to stay unconquerer, and defeat Islam and Judaism.

> 638 AD: The Holy Lands and North Africa are conquered by Islam.
> 711 AD: Spain is conquered by Islam
> 800s: Charlemagne has decided that Jews should be the only bankers of his Empire, and the Church starts a series of edicts to protect them from peasant revolts, allowing them to move to a different christian kingdom, until new edicts let them back to the first one
> 902 AD: Sicily is conqueered by Islam

As you can see, converting to Christianity makes your nation stronger. North Africans, Palestinians and South Europeans were NOT REAL CHRISTIANS, that is why the EARTHLY POWER didn't work for them.

> 1095 AD: Now that the Crusaders have started, you will truly see how Christianity made Europe strong. Islam will be defeated with extreme ease,.
> 1204 AD: Byzantines were NOT REAL CHRISTIANS, they didn't pay their debts so it is OK to sack them.
> 1291 AD: The Crusaders were NOT REAL CHRISTIANS, that is why God abandoned them.
> 1453 AD: Greeks were NOT REAL CHRISTIANS. That is why God punished them with Ottoman conquest,

As you can see, converting to Christianity makes your nation stronger and prevents Islamic conquest. The problem is that we have had not any REAL CHRISTIANS so far!!

Now we are going to enter a terrible period for the history of Christianity: the Renaissance.

Old documents rescued from the sack of Constantinople introduced Western Europeans to ideas that preceded Christianity. Pagan art adorns European museums once more: Venus of Boticelli (1485), the erotic Leda and Swan paintings of Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Corregio, Triumph of Galatea of Raphael (1514), Danae of Titian (1544)... The works of pagan philosophers are printed and read among intellectual circles.

This abandonment of Christianity can only lead to the destruction of Europe! Christianity is what has saved Europe from Islam all along.

> 1492: Spain finally expells Islam from Europe after 800 years of occupation. The Age of Discoveries starts.

WAIT!!! I just remembred Renaissance era Europeans are THE REAL CHRISTIANS! That is why they could finally expel Islam from one country!

> 1524-1647: European war of religion. Germany loses 33 % of its population over biblical disagreeements. Islam conquers the Balkans.

No... Wait again... Everyone knows that Christianity is what saved Europe and made it UNITED AGAINST ISLAM, so these CAN'T be REAL CHRISTIANS.

Ugh, now we are arriving to the Modern Age... the most secular period for European history...

> 1700s: Enlightenment philosophers spread ideas of separation of Church and State, and freedom of thought. The Industrial Revolution starts, vastly improving the living standards of most Europeans
> 1789: The French Revolution starts a series of secular and nationalist revolutions in Europe which break the back of the Churches. By the last of these revolutions (1871), the Church has lost all its directly-ruled lands and the Pope has declared himself a political prisioner in Vatican City once the new nation of Italy is created.

Wow... just wow... NOW things are going to start to get BAD, very BAD. This weakening of Christianity can only mean Europe will be conquered!!!

> 1901: After the Boxer Wars (1899-1901), European Empires have just conquered Africa (Scramble for Africa, 1881), Asia (minus Japan and China, but extracting heavy concessions from the latter) plus Australia in one century, while expelling the Ottomans from Europe (Russo-Turkish War, 1881). Darwin has published the Origin of the Species.

I mean... YAY!!! This only proves that the Social Darwinists of the late 1800s are THE REAL CHRISTIANS. Christianity made Europe taker ove the world. That is why the New European Empires christianized everyone from Morocco to Indonesia... wait... they didn't?? But... Christianity conquered the World!! Of course they did!!! The 1800s were all about DEUS VULT!!!!

> 1964: The Jews that Charlemagne provided with vast economical power have completely hijacked our civilization.

DAMN IT!!! It would have never happened if you had adopted REAL CHRISTIANITY!!!!

> 2100: Europeans are replaced by the Global South

Well, Europeans were not REAL CHRISTIANS so it is okay that they got replaced by BASED AFRICANS

Yet another thread in which his pasta remains unrefuted.

i am saying im an atheist, but not the kind of atheist you think, you see, you dont understand atheism and its sad that you really think you do, i think i have told you this in the past, but you just dont get it or you refuse to understand as it would make it harder to attack my position.
See if i care, keep attacking your strawman and when you are done, tell me when you are ready to have an actual conversation, i'll wait 10 minutes.

Ironically, Christianity is the only reason why Jews are even an issue today.

duble fagging once again.lol

This is true ;__;

Oh it's this faggot again

its not the first time i see it and its not the first time i dont read it, i dont even know what side his on.
I'd be willing to have a conversation but if i wanted to read walls pasta i would look elsewhere.

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult to them.


In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself
Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply

Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

Saint Augustine openly called for the protection of the jews, which, according to Sup Forums christians, are "Christianity's only true enemy"

Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in
Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies

Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople
Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.

Plain and simple.

Raptor jesus died for our sins

No he didn't