How realistic is this? Does getting captured in war really turn you into an ahegao slut?

How realistic is this? Does getting captured in war really turn you into an ahegao slut?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eUFkObwQnBU
youtube.com/watch?v=npwM2touF08&ab_channel=HistoriaCivilis
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Given the horror stories told by traumatized escaped sex slaves from ISIS and other prisoners of war throughout history, I'd say no. It will definetly mess you up, but in a traumatizing way. You don't become a "cock-hungry slut", you're more likely to become someone that now finds sex something painful that brings back horrible memoeries.

...

Grab a history book, motherfucker

>lived her entire life bowing to Roman opression and was dependent on her husband to keep their tribe alive
>when her husband died, Romans came over and conquered them
>saw her daughters get raped then executed
>got publicly whipped and dragged (probably raped as well)

>led a small tribe into becoming a fearsome force
>destroyed Camulodunum (Colchester) and the Roman IX Legion.
>destroyed Londinium and then attacked Verulamium (St Albans)
>only one and last defeat at the Battle of Watling Street
>Kill count: over 70,000 Roman leginarres

Stop using hentai as history source

>Captured in war turning you into an ahegao slut?

No, but they could had just jack him up with whatever "obeying" drug they had to make him that way.

Then again, it's akame ga kill, the story is not exactly a realistic depiction of war.

Esdesu ahegao when?

Why are you redirecting to Sup Forums.

Discussions about war traumata belong on Sup Forums.

Awesome!

Just like discussion of of tits belong to /s/, or maybe the discussion of tanks in girls und panzer belong in /k/, right?

No, they don't. You might be able to squeeze them into /sci/ or possibly /his/ if the topic is based on historical sources or /news/ if the discussion is based on recent sources.
Otherwise it's just a typical off-topic thread that is welcome on any board so long as doesn't overstay its welcome.

Still better than living in a communist country.
youtube.com/watch?v=eUFkObwQnBU

>Americans complaining about other counties torture camps while Guantanamo is still operating

Depends on what was done to you, who done it, and how.
>captured
Being captured doesn't do anything. Being mindbroken do. Though it's hard to make someone into drooling mindless nympho IRL.

Nice double standard.

As if you ever lived in a communist country.

I have no double standard. I have no standards at all.

>slavery and murder is the same as a prison for mass murderers

You're right, Guantanamo much worse.

>Kill count: over 70,000 Roman leginarres
Yeah, sure.

Pic related is the extent of Boudicca's military prowess.

Did they really rape a guy into ahegao?

That's for Watling alone

>The Romans, having concluded that they lacked sufficient numbers to defend the settlement, evacuated and abandoned Londinium. Boudica led 100,000 Iceni, Trinovantes, and others to fight Legio IX Hispana, and burned and destroyed Londinium and Verulamium (modern-day St Albans).[3][4]

>An estimated 70,000–80,000 Romans and British were killed in the three cities by those led by Boudica

Yes. And those 70.000 to 80.000 were for the most part not leginarres [sic]. The significant defeat inflicted upon the Legio IX Hispana killed around 2.000 soldiers.

Yeah, my bad.
Still, 70,000 casualties is a casualty that shook Nero's rule

>mangas
>realistic
KEK

You're a fucking idiot.

>horror stories told by traumatized escaped sex slaves from ISIS
You mean the West's propaganda, which is full of blatant lies? If you pay attention, no way that many supposed "sex slaves" could escape from their captors and tell their tale. They are obviously paid by the media.

...

Note that he's not calling ISIS a nice place to live.
But it's well known that the media are making shit up as they go along.

Yes, exactly this. They lies about everything: the war, ISIS, global warming, the economy, the election, Clinton and Trump...

ISIS are extremist muslims. Islam isn't that nice to women. It's not hard to believe that the west doesn't need to make such stories up.

>global warming
Man-made global warming is a lie, though.

>ISIS are extremist muslims. Islam isn't that nice to women.
Nobody is claiming otherwise.
>It's not hard to believe that the west doesn't need to make such stories up.
Except that it's easier than doing actual research, and that stories of rape victims are always popular.

>Man-made global warming is a lie,
Oh fuck. One of those.

>Nobody is claiming otherwise.
At least president Barrack Hussein Obama did claim otherwise though. He even said ISIS was no muslim.

Then again, the vast majority of religions are not nice to wumyn save for some obscure matriarchal society in remote areas

>He even said ISIS was no muslim.
Well, a country is not a person, so I would have to agree with him.

>Except that it's easier than doing actual research, and that stories of rape victims are always popular
And that makes it completely invalid to believe that they have sex slaves? Pretty much all armies up until now had sex slaves in some way, some modern examples are debateable, but I don't want to open that can of worms. But to believe that those stories about sex slaves used by muslism are made-up is the dumbest.

>And that makes it completely invalid to believe that they have sex slaves?
No one in this thread claimed that. You are attacking strawmen.

But you still believe that it's still more likely that these stories are made-up and ISIS doesn't have sex slaves?

>Does getting captured in war really turn you into an ahegao slut?
No. Real rape is traumatic and if drugs are introduced, it's only to force the victim into dependency so they will comply for more drugs.

>But you still believe that it's still more likely that these stories are made-up
I know how much the media likes to make up stuff.
>ISIS doesn't have sex slaves?
Again, in caps this time: NO ONE IN THIS THREAD CLAIMED THAT.

The fact ISIS keeping sex slaves maybe true, but there being many sex slaves escaped and told their story in details is quite hard to believe. Note that Muslim women don't have the tradition of telling their life's stories to strangers.

Even in your autism, you are wrong. A country can be a muslim country even though countries don't have minds, just as china can be said to be a chineese country even though countries don't have dna. As it turns out, words have meanings.

Muslims respect women, it's a fact. All western leader know that.

so you take issue with the media's unethical journalism independently of whether or not the statements they make are true or not. now that's some autism right there matey, you sure pick the strangest stuff to get worked up about

Oh, alright, so ISIS still has sex slaves, because why wouldn't they, but the stories for the purpose of telling are just inventions based on the real stories of the sex slaves, probably slightly changed for the purpose of propaganda and done with actors.

>Note that Muslim women don't have the tradition of telling their life's stories to strangers
wat

Just no.

>Islam is 'peace'
>Islam doesn't condone rape and murder

Mhmm. Shouldn't you be at a BLM rally now, little cuck?

>so you take issue with the media's unethical journalism
I wasn't even the one who made the original post. But I agree with him that modern journalism is a joke.
>independently of whether or not the statements they make are true or not.
But if I can't rely on them to find out what's true or not, then whether or not it is true is irrelevant to the question of whether or not they are shit. They are shit.
It's like saying a die is a good way to figure out the answer to maths questions because a die just happened to show the right number once.
You still have to actually do the math in order to know that it is indeed the correct answer. If you don't, you'll get 5 out of 6 problems wrong and your final mark will be an F.

>the vast majority of religions are not nice to wumyn
uhh, no.
Quite the contrary actually.
>Zulu
>Mali
>Ethopians
>Mongols
>Mayans
>Apache
>Hopi
>Nez Perce
>Himalayans
>Java
etc...

Religions of peaceful people tend to favor equality and a religion only starts becoming sexist/racist when used as a tool for warmongering politicians who need blind followers

>>Zulu
>>Mali
>>Ethopians
>>Mongols
>>Mayans
>>Apache
>>Hopi
>>Nez Perce
>>Himalayans
>>Java
>etc...

LITERALLY WHO

>Saying the truth about the untruthful media
>Must be part of the BLM
Wut?

you don't have to sell me on the value of justifying your true beliefs m8, i'm just at awe at your reverence for proper journalism. my spidey senses are telling me the jews are somehow involved

lmao that's like saying the vast majority of the un isn't the us. the only religions that can be said to represent "religion in general" are the strong impreialistic abrahamic ones

Java is a programming language. It has no gender bias.

>the stories for the purpose of telling are just inventions based on the real stories of the sex slaves
We don't even know if they're based on any "true story" or not. Probably just popped out the head of some feminist journalist based on their rape fantasies.

There are more than 3 religions.
And those 3 are the only ones who uphold sexism and racism

The vast majority of culture and beliefs would have followed true equality until the west and Islam thought how to be cruel

Now that's some bullshit.

excellent bait my good man

I already told you why it's pretty believable that this shit happens right now in ISIS controlled territory.

You are again missing the point.

No really.
Equality was so deeply rooted among Africans that when the Mali king had to reinvent the rules of the Koran just so his people would convert.

Seriously, just use commonsense.
Sexism is nothing more than a way to increase the moral of warriors. But in the long run, it wastes 50% of the labor force

>I already told you why it's pretty believable that this shit happens right now in ISIS controlled territory.
And why is it, anyway? ISIS isn't the only islamic country in the world, so why do only them have sex slaves? The theocracies of Iran and Saudi Arabia for example are islamic too, why didn't the media say anything about they having sex slaves?

The Egyptians had gender inequality long before Islam was invented.

>Africans
>putting all those different cultures into a single group

>so why do only them have sex slaves
they're at """""""war""""" you dumb goy

Making Saudi Arabia angry is not a good idea when they have so much actual influence.

>Egyptians had gender inequality
lol
Does the name Cleopatra and Hatshepsut ring a bell to you

>"""""""
Stop that.

Nice bait Sup Forums

So Sati was some else's fault?

You mean the same Cleopatra that had to avoid marrying her much younger brother because otherwise he would have been in power?

why would i stop using such a hot & juicy meme

It's not only a problem with islam, forced prostitution exist as well in countries that aren't muslim. But ISIS are at war and will take woemn from enemy combatants. This just happens. It hits especially Yazidis
>Captured women are treated as sex slaves or spoils of war; some are driven to suicide. Women and girls who convert to Islam are sold as brides; those who refuse to convert are tortured, raped, and eventually murdered. Babies born in the prison where the women are held are taken from their mothers to an unknown fate.[107][108]
>inb4 >wikipedia

They are at war with the Shia Iraqis and Alawite Syrians. Do they keep sex slaves too?

Nope.
The Cleopatra whom the people followed and admired regardless of gender

>avoid marrying
>Egyptian women were free to choose the men they married and they could also divorce their husbands

Why are you replying back? This guy is clearly trolling.

>Making Saudi Arabia angry is not a good idea when they have so much actual influence.

Not now when the oil price is dirt cheap.

That's meant to bait Sup Forums, it's not Sup Forums, though.

Because you are making cute anime girls cry.
Do you want that?

.The Devi Sukta hymn of Rigveda, a scripture of Hinduism, declares the feminine energy as the essence of the universe, the one who creates all matter and consciousness, the eternal and infinite, the metaphysical and empirical reality (Brahman), the soul (supreme self) of everything.[1][2] The woman is celebrated as the most powerful and the empowering force in some Hindu Upanishads, Sastras and Puranas, particularly the Devi Upanishad, Devi Mahatmya and Devi-Bhagavata Purana.[3][4][5]
Sati is a mourning custom. But sexism is illegal under their religion

>>avoid marrying
>by prostituting yourself to the Roman emperor and becoming his puppet
>later getting entangled into Roman politics, losing your children to Roman civil war and having to commit suicide upon the shift of power in Rome

Yeah, she was a strong woman that needed no man.

who knows, keeping sex slaves requires some level social acceptance you won't find in tame soldiers but the null hypothesis in war is they do whatever the fuck they want and can do unless proven otherwise

>2016
>Still believing wikipedia

These are invaders that like to show videos of burning people alive and have a cultural belief that women are lesser. Why is it so hard to comprehend that they might not be nice to the women of their enemies.

The original argument is that the media biased fabricated sex slaves stories about ISIS. If other forces in the war also keep sex slaves but the media only condemn ISIS, it means that argument is right.
>show videos of burning people alive and have a cultural belief that women are lesser
You understand they didn't do that for no reason, but as a kind of psychological warfare, right?

I don't know where you got that prostitution theory but every article I read said that they Cleopatra fell in love with Ceasar.

>Imma execute civilians but rape is too low even for me

i didn't make the original argument you unrefined goddamn animal

>a kind of psychological warfare
ah yes the famous tactic that never works and only makes your enemies stronger and even more ferocious

>Cleopatra fell in love with Ceasar.
You mean articles written by Hollywood?

>every article I read said that they Cleopatra fell in love with Ceasar.
1. She needed an ally fast.
2. She smuggled herself past the guards.
3. They fucked on the first night and then he kept her in power.

They are no civilian, but either spies, criminals or enemy combatants, user.

>yes the famous tactic that never works and only makes your enemies stronger and even more ferocious
Are you saying terrorists are stupid?

Oh, so that's what gave you the idea.

Still, I see no sexism there. Just a political rivalry between rightful heir

how dare you draw such implications

>Just a political rivalry between rightful heir
She needed an ally because she could not refuse the marriage on her own, and her brother would have been in power after the wedding. The Egyptians had a funny system. It was the woman's offspring that would become the next ruler, but it was the man who was in charge. That's why they had so much incest. The guys wanted their own children to succeed them.

youtube.com/watch?v=npwM2touF08&ab_channel=HistoriaCivilis

Probably the greatest revenge in history

Nope.
History says that they both outright hate each other. Hence, their political rivalry began and ended with Ceasar killing Ptolemy XIII at the Battle of the Nile

>ah yes the famous tactic that never works and only makes your enemies stronger and even more ferocious
Except it works. Humanity's been doing it throughout its history, as soon as when wars stared.

>History says that they both outright hate each other.
Obviously they did. It was a power struggle.

well if humanity is doing it then it must be a good idea

They were already married together, though
Their political strife had no hint of sexism in it

At least there must be a reason why they keep on doing it for that long.