Why are white people so disrespectful of the Flag?

Why are white people so disrespectful of the Flag?

This is a slide thread

yeah but u can protest and burn it : ) because thats ur freedom : ) u just cant wear it...

>Slide thread

I'm right here, you fucking coward

>MUH STRAWMEN

The law is unconstitutional, as congress is not specifically delegated power to make law regarding the treatment of flags by citizens.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Never even mind the whole 1rst amendment issues. regulating clothing.

>The law is unconstitutional

Why hasn't it been brought to the supreme court then?

Pretty sure that applies specifically to an actual flag, like you can't take a flag that is in use, or made for the purpose of being flown, and use it as clothing or a blanket. Clothing that is meant to be worn either has the flag as a small image, or a "flag design" as shown in the OP image. The clothing may have red and white stripes, and a blue field with white stars, but that doesn't make it a flag.

>Ceci ne pas une flag
If that's the way you want to justify the hypocrisy of "MUH FLAG" fags, then that's your look out, user.

When is a flag not a flag though? That's a pretty nebulous line to draw. is it the material? Probably not, given that a paper flag is still a flag. Is it the symbolism? Again probably not because an American Flag bikini still makes one think of the USA, it's still the national symbol.

And beyond that, isn't the line as to what is and isn't a flag a subjective one instead of an objective one? Some people would count cushions and bikinis and stickers and the like, some wouldn't.

Ultimately, I don't give a rats fart, I just enjoy the mental gymnastics flag fags put themselves through to justify why some things are ok, but other comparable, or lesser things are somehow beyond the pale.

It is considered a flag by U.S. Flag code when the dimensions are exactly as outlined therein. That's why flags that are raised up off of federal land can fly in the rain, since they're shorter.

>Make a flag code
>Federal government doesn't even follow it

You are supposed to get angry at her

The laws means you cannot use a literal flag for that. You can use the flags likeness as you please, however

eat a cock liberal faggot

>make a flag code
>government skirts it to avoid having to do work

The Government does follow it. That's why they have Colors and shit on federal land.

Has anyone ever been charged and convicted of violating that law?

"The flag" is specifically mentioned as being of certain dimensions. If it doesn't fit those dimensions it's an interpretation of the flag and it isn't "the flag".
It's pathetic when niggers don't even know the history of the country they leech off.

Why are niggers even allowed to exist?

Why do black people hate Tomi so much?

They attack her as if she is a major voice of the right, when she is really just some literally-who who works for Glenn Beck and his shitty network that nobody watches.

Why do non-veterans weigh in on the subject?

It's very simple - you can't disrespect a symbol of freedom by exercising the very freedom for which it is a symbol.

The catch-22 of Old Glory is - it's impossible to disrespect her, because whatever you do, you're exercising the freedom for which she stands.

I'd RATHER people were reverent when handling her, but then I'd rather people didn't fly off the handle when a libshit kneels during the national anthem, because this is a conservative trying to punish wrongthink.

However, you have to understand why the flag is mentioned so often by both parties - because it's almost the only example of most conservatives getting pissed off at the same time.

According to a Pew study, only 12% of Republicans said that the party's views were agreed upon by nearly all Republicans, while 80% said there is a wide variety of ideas.

Compare that with Democrats, where a staggering 58% said the party's views were the views of nearly all its members. That's fucking frightening.

So with Republicans, there's very few ways to get them all united on an idea, but we slog ahead because we respect ideas even if we think there are better ones. There's even fewer ways to get us trying to police thought. But the one thing that unites those is attempting to desecrate the flag.

Saying a libshit can desecrate Old Glory is giving the libshit far too much credit.

Freedom is literally freedom to be an asshole. You don't need freedom to be a saint - you can do that just about anywhere. When a libshit cuck burns a flag or wipes his ass with it, he's saying "Thank you, brave men who fought for my freedom. I'm too much of a pussy to ever actually fight. If the country were made of men like me, I'd never be able to do this without going to jail. I'm a giant quivering pussy who needs America to throw my adult temper tantrums. Thank you, great men who allow me to be an overgrown faggot baby!"

You're welcome, liberals and NFL players.

>According to a Pew study, only 12% of Republicans said that the party's views were agreed upon by nearly all Republicans, while 80% said there is a wide variety of ideas.
>Compare that with Democrats, where a staggering 58% said the party's views were the views of nearly all its members. That's fucking frightening.

This isn't true at all. Conservatives hated Trump but in the end all rallied around Trump. Liberals who supported Bernie literally fucked off from the polls, Black Lives Matter fucked off from the polls, identity politics extraordinaires fucked off of the polls, that's why she lost bigly.

The Right will always be unified because to be a conservative you must believe in order, hierarchy, and pragmatic sacrifice. The Left as it is now will always be fractured because each "Identity Group" believes its cause to be the most important: the feminist group, the Black group, the gay group, the illegal group, and so on. You simply won't see the same sense that Republicans have of submitting to the will of the party majority in Liberals, because their personal politics preclude sacrifice or discussion.

Republicans are fundamentally aligned against what liberals do, and will ALWAYS get out and vote. Liberals are fundamentally aligned according to particular identity group preferences and will flee the polls the moment a candidate says something vaguely critical about their beliefs.

>This isn't true at all.
You don't agree?
>You simply won't see the same sense that Republicans have of submitting to the will of the party majority in Liberals, because their personal politics preclude sacrifice or discussion.
Oh - you actually DO agree, but you didn't think I was saying the same thing as you.

I was, but my post wasn't in-depth about what conclusion there is to be drawn from the stats. I was actually skimming over what you did an EXCELLENT JOB of explaining in-depth.

boohoo

>.02 shekels

KIKES from Soros shillings.

Saged.

we should probably update the flag code to reflect current cultural attitudes about the flag

i disagree with a couple major republican ideals but that's not gonna stop me from putting the right guy in office.

Unlike other races who are very uppity about what's socially acceptable to wear during Halloween, white people like to have fun and use all kinds of "shocking" costumes.

I mean - focusing on the "order, hierarchy, and pragmatic sacrifice" is EXACTLY why we Republicans are able to have and debate a great variety of ideas.

It's easy to debate things when a respected hierarchy with strong leadership is in place. The groups can make their cases and arguments, things might even get a little heated, but at the end of the day the leader will make the call. And even though the leader's call may not change your mind on the issue - you follow.

The idea of "follow" is a foreign concept to the liberal. Hillary didn't have followers, she had a goddamn cult. How many liberals have eaten their own in the last year? I lost count. They devour each other over the tiniest infractions. Of course 58% of them are going to agree with each other - they have no clue what it is to respect a person enough to follow them. They just tearfully worship their muppets.

Communism is banned, too.
See if that stops universities from churning out Marxists.
Illegal immigration is banned, too.
See if that stops sanctuary cities.

Same.

Honestly, I'd vote for a moist towelette if it came out strong against free trade, immigration, and rapefugees.

Instead, I got THE GODDAMN SAVIOR OF HUMANITY.

Jesus.... calm the fuck down, universe... I just wanted solid import tariffs... my back hurts from carrying all this goddamn winning around every day.

Bump

>it's a libshits pretend to care about the flag-code thread
BOOORING

Thanks, I knew the porn was being posted for a reason

You ignorant cunt, it is not "drapery" to uplift the Colors in your hands. This is little more than legalistic shits trying to score legalistic points when you don't understand both the letter and the spirit of the law.

The woman in the photo is in harmony with both the spirit and letter of the Flag Codes.

Kill yourself.

>The catch-22 of Old Glory is - it's impossible to disrespect her, because whatever you do, you're exercising the freedom for which she stands.
t. cuckservative

I don't think there's any hypocrisy, one is destroying the flag while one is wearing it's design. As pointed out by there are, in fact, specifications for a flag being a flag, and I don't believe any clothing will meet that criteria. You're trying to say wearing a flag designed piece of fabric is equivalent to burning an actual flag, which is not the same at all, legally. Now if they were to burn a flag that doesn't meet the specifications of being considered a flag, then it would be legal for them to do so and there's nothing that can be done, as it would be similar to wearing a flag design, as those people would be burning a flag designed piece of fabric. Its a weird, but significant, distinction.

>haha white pppl r dum that flag reprezents slavrey and jenicide dats y we burn it
>y r u whering da flag u cant do that wtf reeee

damn Tomi looks hot

who else thinks Tomi > Lauren HuSouthern

Doubt it. Only time you would ever get busted for it is if you did it while working at like the FBI/CIA/NSA/congress/etc.

Honestly, most law enforcement probably would look at you and just look away because you are a waste of their time and that's assuming they know of this flag code.

i don't know much about her politics but she's inconceivably hotter than (((lauren southern)))

black twitter has meme'd her into being a literal NatSoc nazi just because she's a pretty wypipo and called nigger thugs what they were: thugs

Niggers can't stand a pretty white woman making a modicum of sense, they go full chimp-mode