Let's Create an Ideology!

Our biggest issue is we have no proper group for what Sup Forums, the rightwing western world, rightwing youtube, reactionary generation z etc represents. There is only an idea:
>Progressivism is shit.

Alt-Right was the label given to the people who support this idea, but the "group", as in the physical manifestation of "Alt-Right" is just Richard Spencer and the various peoples who follow him, Identity Evropa, and various other groups, including NatSoc groups.

However NatSoc, White Nationalism, Race Separatism etc. etc. are only half or less than half of what the people (meaning me, you, people in real life) want. NatSoc, WN, TradCon, Libertarian etc are mostly ways people want to see the country run, but doesn't cover the largest aspect of what the movement has been about, especially among younger people, which is:
>Progressivism is shit.

I feel like there's little to no way to create a group that specifically attacks Progressivism, since Progressivism itself is not a group—rather, it's a set of constantly changing ideals made on the whims of whatever the collective assume to be "the disadvantaged". Progressivism is and ideology, and attacking an ideology is usually pointless, since people believe what they want to believe. The best thing we could do is create options.

An option, and one I think could actually work for us, is to turn this idea:
>Progressivism is shit.
into a nameable ideology. Into something we can actually say "that is what we believe", alongside the various other beliefs.

>I believe in [Progressivism is shit] and I'm a libertarian
>I support national socialism and I'm also [Progressivism is shit]
>I don't really have extreme views, I like democracy. Also I support [Progressivism is shit]

See where I'm going with this? Alt-right is the name currently being given to something like this, but it's not good enough.

>TL;DR: What's the name of our Ideology?

Large government allows for corruption regardless of intent.

National urbanism.

It would basically be a political movement based around the idea that ultra high IQ, ultra educated, highly civilized, genetically diverse city people are superior in every imaginable way to rural and suburban retards.

bump of coke for more ideas

Bump

mandatory euthanizations for anyone who starts a thread

Cocaine
Cocaine
Cocaine
$10 bill?

I believe that people are inherently good, obviously excepting people that are born with mental deficiencies.

I also believe that, however, many people will do horrible things if they are able to find conscience in doing so because they either believe that the ends justify the means (Many Nazis are guilty of this) or if they can put the blame onto someone else (many corporations are guilty of this). While people are generally good, large groups of people can easily become evil, even when every person in the group is a good person. With this aside, even though it would seem logical to limit corporate power as a result of this, the problem is that to take power from large groups of people in corporations, you would have to give the government (another large group of people) the power to do such a thing, which is just as inherently corruptible as the corporation which you are trying to limit. Government, however, is necessary in order to achieve three things:
-The defense of people
-The protection of individual rights
-The enforcement of contracts
Of course, that's the overall government. In order to balance it, a federal system is optimal, with self-governing states that answer to this federal government beneath it.
And any extraneous laws would be down to (but severely limited) the states, but moreso the counties and cities within.

Right-wingness

>Progressivism is shit.

this already has an ideological name, its called reactionary

thats what all that is and what converts people into all those right wing ideologies