Was Christianity Communism of it's era?

We all know (except for christcucks) that (((christianity))) is a Jewish sect which is now also the forerunner of multiculturalism and race mixing.

But today I stumbled upon this excellent article called "Communism is Neo-Christianity" from pro white website National Vanguard.
nationalvanguard.org/2015/11/communism-is-neo-christianity/
archive.is/VxigB

The question I want answer for is, what was it like when Christianity was first introduced to Europe by Jews for the goyim to follow. Was Christianity Communism of it's era? Well, let's find out!

Other urls found in this thread:

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a2.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism#Antisemitism
voanews.com/a/orthodox-patriarch-refugees/3287495.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
m.youtube.com/watch?v=EWB3s2X0L6Y
westmont.edu/~fisk/articles/TacitusAndPlinyOnTheEarlyChristians.html
archive.is/v3vXu
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Communisms condemned by Traditional catholicism

>it's another judaizers are representative of Christianity episode

Read Christianity and communism - Jewish twins by Ben Klassen.

Wait, shouldn't Christians be happy about revelations then? All you need is the mark of the beast to get anything you want, so why don't Christians support that?

Read the catechism and it is basically communism. People seem to think that it's just pope Francis that is bad, but really the entire thing is trash.

The main diffrence between communism and christkikenity is that christkikenity promises you a heaven after life, and communism a heaven on earth, both don't work.

the first proto communist philosophy was Thomas Moore's Utopia 1516. That was where western philosphy started going off the rails.

Wrong. It was the Catholic church

>The question I want answer for is, what was it like when Christianity was first introduced to Europe by Jews for the goyim to follow.
Race mixing was common, racism towards fellow Christians of different races and ethnicities was strictly forbidden.

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

This verse from the (((bible))) was used to prosecute any Pagan man who wanted to stop this Christian degeneracy.

They were able to prosecute Pagans. Sure. But this degeneracy and madness was not sustainable. Without the Pagans who built it, Rome was just a burden on rest of the Europe. Rome fell soon, then the plague (christianity) spread to rest of the Europe.

Then there was Byzantine empire, it was not even the height of Greek civilization. It was multi racial just like any other (((christian civilization))). It did great harm to European people.

Remember there is no concept of Race in Christianity. "There is neither Jew nor Gentile." Nature worship and ethnic nationalism is a European Pagan value.

You need to know that new world order is not new. Jesus the Jew tried to achieve it by creating Christianity. Jews like George Soros and Sumner Redstone are known for pushing for the NWO in the 21st century but the goal is always the same. Destroying the European Pagan man and our culture through mass immigration, miscegenation and degeneracy

...

Catechism of the Catholic church: vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm

>Every form of social or cultural discrimination in fundamental personal rights on the grounds of sex, race, color, social conditions, language, or religion must be curbed and eradicated as incompatible with God's design.

>Their equal dignity as persons demands that we strive for fairer and more humane conditions. Excessive economic and social disparity between individuals and peoples of the one human race is a source of scandal and militates against social justice, equity, human dignity, as well as social and international peace

>Socio-economic problems can be resolved only with the help of all the forms of solidarity: solidarity of the poor among themselves, between rich and poor, of workers among themselves, between employers and employees in a business, solidarity among nations and peoples. International solidarity is a requirement of the moral order; world peace depends in part upon this.

Some real leftist degenerate shit in there. This is the sort of communism that they teach to kids in Cath*lic schools.

IGNORE ALL SHILL THREADS
>in all fields

How is it shilling when we quote the official teaching of the Cath*lic church in the catechism?

More: vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a2.htm

>Human interdependence is increasing and gradually spreading throughout the world. The unity of the human family, embracing people who enjoy equal natural dignity, implies a universal common good. This good calls for an organization of the community of nations able to "provide for the different needs of men; this will involve the sphere of social life to which belong questions of food, hygiene, education, . . . and certain situations arising here and there, as for example . . . alleviating the miseries of refugees dispersed throughout the world, and assisting migrants and their families."

>The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

It is your Christian duty as Cath*lics to welcome refugees into your home and give everything your ancestors built for you to niggers.

Christianity "preys" on the weak ones. Remember that the Roman Empire had a huge slave population. And what do Christians say? That a Christian can't own another Christian. Then there's another vulnerable part of the society: women. They were easily persuaded by words of "equality" and "fairness", in fact women are easily to convert even today: just look at all the women converting to Islam. Women simply have no loyalty to their people. Notice how historically a lot of kings converted due to persuasion of their wives. In general, promises of eternal paradise (something that is only rarely mentioned in pagan mythology) were really appealing to the old, unaccomplished, sick etc. members of society.

In conclusion: Christianity was perfectly designed to prey on the weak and and appeal to the lowest common denominator, and that's why it succeeded so much.

Christians knew that the rich "privileged" pagan men wouldn't convert willingly, so they focused their propaganda efforts on women and minorities. They were basically the original SJW's.

Jewish ideologies always pick peasants and women as their foot soldiers. Christianity was the Communism of ancient Rome.

Christians have always courted the weak, the oppressed and the despised and used them to overthrow the strong and noble.

Christian priests in Europe today will try to court the migrants and rally them to topple the white establishment.

AND IT'S OUR JOB TO STOP THEM AND FINALLY GET RID OF (((CHRISTIANITY))) IN EUROPE FOR GOOD.

t. christ-shill

Should I stop exposing (((your))) evil? Never.

If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then Jews don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power
> Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades

Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.

> Around 400, St Augustine, one of the most influential and foundational figures of Catholic theology, preached that the Jews must be protected for their ability to explain the Old Testament.
> Jews must be protected for their ability

> Pope Gregory the Great (c 540–604) brought Augustine's teachings into Roman Law, by writing a Papal Bull which became the foundation of Catholic doctrine in relation to the Jews and specified that, although the Jews had not accepted salvation through Christ, and were therefore condemned by God until such time as they accept salvation, Christians were nevertheless duty-bound to protect the Jews as an important part of Christian civilization.[6
> While a "persecuting spirit" often existed among the general population through the Middle Ages, Jewish communities often had to turn to the Holy See for protection.[7] Papal Bulls reiterating the duty of protection were issued by various Popes,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism#Antisemitism

Christians protecting Jews is not a "corruption of Christianity", all the way back to St Augustine Jews were seen as part of Christianity. That is why Jews never had to leave Europe even when they were constantly expelled numerous times from every kingdom by angry farmers. Papal edicts helped them move to the next kingdom and eventually get back to the first one.

> but muh synagogue of Satan

The only result of Christian "enemty" against Jews was giving them an absolute monopoly over high finances, and protecting them from angry farmers.

And how can it be otherwise? If Jews are the enemies of Christianity, the synagogue of Satan, then it is the duty of Christians to love them and protect them, "love your enemies and provide them with help" was clearly said by both Jesus and Paul, and the early christians like Saint Augustine openly agreed

voanews.com/a/orthodox-patriarch-refugees/3287495.html

> Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of Orthodox Christians, is urging Europe to stop trying to divide what he calls economic migrants from asylum seekers.
> Bartholomew is scheduled to visit the Greek island of Lesbos on Saturday along with Pope Francis, and Athens Archbishop Ieronymos, the head of the Church of Greece, to raise awareness about the troubled state of refugees and migrants in Europe.
> The symbolic visit is intended to reiterate the Christian moral duty to show hospitality to strangers, Bartholomew said in an interview published Friday. He added that countries in Europe should find inspiration in the generosity shown by Lesbos residents.
> Illegal immigrants make 10 % of the population of Greece

daily reminder that the orthodox patriarchs are exactly the same shit of other christians, and they have repeatly condemned right wing movements like Golden Dawn

But why would it be otherwise?

Christianity rejects all wordly concerns altogether, and right wing concerns ARE wordly concerns

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult to them.


In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself
Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply

Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in
Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies

Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople
Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

you really arent making the jews look good
in fact they look like outright sociopaths raping people that are too nice for their own good

t. never put down a rabid dog

Excellent information. Before Christianity, people naturally associated with their race. Christianity changed all that. It made people reject their ethnic and racial identity in favour of a purely religious identity.

White guilt has Christian roots , and the Anti-Whites who think they are secular are even more zealous about Christian moralism (i.e. self-sacrifice) than those who continue to practice it as a religion.

Retard. Read a history book.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=EWB3s2X0L6Y

Christianity cares about equality, but the details are very different from communism. Look at distributism for a Christian alternative to capitalism.

Oh look its lefty/pol/ at it again

>We all know (except for christcucks) that (((christianity))) is a Jewish sect which is now also the forerunner of multiculturalism and race mixing.
shows how much you know about the subject you're talking about

saged & exit
fuck this shit

Judens of jesus era were not the same as the Kazan Talmuds you see today

Read the catechism and it is basically Traditional Catholicism....................... You're flat out lying now shill.

they pretty much are

Exodus describes them creating using superstition (ala Christianity) to convince the pharaoh (Charlemagne) that they should be given a monopoly over grain (in Europe, banks)

They are basically the same people

Suck negro dick
>in all fields

Christianity was indeed communism of it's era. In fact I would go as far as to say it was worse than communism.

TACITUS AND PLINY THE YOUNGER ON THE EARLY CHRISTIANS:

The originator of the name Christ was executed as a criminal by the procurator Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius; "and though repressed, this destructive superstition erupted again, not only through Judea which was the origin of this evil" but also through the city of Rome, to which all that is horrible and shameful floods together and is celebrated.
westmont.edu/~fisk/articles/TacitusAndPlinyOnTheEarlyChristians.html
archive.is/v3vXu

When most of the Europe was still pagan. Announcing to your family that you had become a Christian could get you disowned.

As it should be - coalburners are a disgrace, be it of the flesh or the soul.

>one post by this id

>2 post by this id

>three post by this id

Faggots

>muh fedora
Epic argument christ-retard!

If christianity is so similar to communism why do communists push for atheism and hate christianity?

khazar theory is crap pushed by jidf shills. It was invented by a Jewish science fiction writer.

The theory does have very Jewish origins and even other Jews don't really buy it, the ones who call themselves geneticists. Information on Khazar empire is patchy, spotty. Language, religion, ethnic background, likely plurality of all these things existing in the region people refer to when they bring it up today.

From what I have read Koestler made it up to make the goyim think it waksn't today's Jews that is the same tribe that killed Jesus (which pisses off some Whites, and it used to piss me off too but not anymore).

Even if it is real, which seems unlikely considering the theory's origin from Koestler, Jews interbreed with hosts to embed themselves and I don't see how one tale of them doing that to one tribe back in the day really matters. It certainly doesn't change how I look at them. But I see Jews pushing the notion so it matters to them that we buy into it.

My main problem with it aside from its dubious origin is that it is a story of a bunch of non-Jews converting into the religion of Judaism and then we are to believe that those people are the Jews of today.

I know Jews are a race not a religion. The whole khazar story just has Jewish b.s. all over it..

Because there is neither greek nor jew user.

Because they're not the same, its just some shill trying to confuse the uneducated populace, any person with some theology thinks this is a joke.

You're thinking of Christian Identity.