Can someone unbiased explain what white privilege is? And if such a thing exists, then are all whites therefore racist?

Can someone unbiased explain what white privilege is? And if such a thing exists, then are all whites therefore racist?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pOl1fFMseLw
archive.is/c2h4l
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>reported to the @DallasPD
LOL. What the hell are they going to do about it?
"...Uh... okay? Who cares?"

It's not ok to be white, ok? Don't you get it? Now go get knocked the fuck out.

These people are dying within a gas chamber of their own farts and enjoying it. Let them die.

White privilege is like Black privilege but unlike Black privilege it is fictional

Subsidizing niggers shitty existence.

lol
>being cucked in your own country
america is shit

Here's the basic bluepill gestalt
-USA was built on the backs of slaves and colonialism
-USA to this day is racist from the heart of its very institution
-USA was "designed to put down people of color"
-this is "systemic racism"
-all whites, regardless of belief or ancestral origin, participate in and benefit from this racist system
-system also implants racist ideas in the heads of all whites
-system needs to be reworked from the inside out before racism can be solved

That's why you're all trying to get over here

white privelige
>most whites have families that have been here for a long time
>they have the benefit of owning property prior to immigrants, and that's completely reasonable
>pro-white government didn't give out loans to minorities, mainly blacks until the 30's, and that was a very rare exception even then, so it was impossible for minorities to live outside of slums or their own communities, lasted until the 60's even more in southern states
>(most) whites (assumed by minorities) have the benefits of getting paid for school, since their parents are well off, so the rate of their success is increased, middle-class citizens have a higher success rate, even transitioning into upper-class than lower-class citizens

white racism
>belief of superiority of their race over others
>acts of charity is a form of superiority, treating others as lesser than you by giving them free things because you are better than them
>therefore all whites are racist, regardless of how nice they are

Non-white moderate here.
Social politics are a waste of time, really.
It's just a tool the government uses to pull at your emotions to take away your attention from more important matters.

Except the system won't be "reworked" until all whiteys are out or dead

Well that's the thing, when you ask these people what the game plan is they draw a blank and rattle something off about "recognition" and "starting a dialogue" or "listening and understanding"

>system needs to be reworked from the inside out before racism can be solved
stripping motivated people of their freedom and dignity, then rubbing their noses in it, frequently has violent consequences.

Good question. I don't even know what white privilege is and I'm white. Unless, you have to be in the multi million or billion dollar league.

Stick to the plan

You parents and grandparents worked hard to leave you something to help you get started in life. Their parents spent all of their money on booze and drugs, leaving nothing for their children. Now they're jealous and they want to take the money your parents and grandparents sacrificed to save for you. That's "privilege".

Nope!

Wow they really are dumb niggers if they take pride in being dumb niggers

>911 what is your emergency?
>I FOUND A PIECE OF PAPER THAT SAYS IT'S OKAY TO BE WHITE ON IT

White privilege is a fictional term used by subversives to create division

"white privilege" is the term that niggers and liberals use to describe any disparity between white people and shitskins.
The same gap could be rationally explained as the result of nature and nurture, but instead the left turns it into an evil conspiracy that literally all white people are implicitly in on.

pretty much this. im mexican and my mom just bought herself a new tv and more clothing. we are on food stamps. parents sold their cars instead of giving one to me. i gotta save up for one but you cant get a job without a car.

I'm glad this is turning out like this
The various media personalities can talk until they're blue in the face about the sociological motivations or groups behind it, but all the ever shrinking moderate, majority white population is going to see is governments and campuses tearing down signs that say "it's okay to be the color you are."

>unbiased

ok.

nonexistent. whites are less likely to be accepted into college, less likely to qualify for grants or other forms of financial assistance, and less likely than other *groups* to be elected into office.

any percieved "privilege" we have is actually the results of our own gusto and determination. you reap what you sow.

White privilege is basically just “the Jews” for nonwhites. Some invisible thing that nonwhites can blame for everything wrong in their lives. It’s not an actual thing.

It is simply a term of division fostered by leftypol. That's it. There is no deeper reason for the term although a biased person would argue otherwise.

Every group of people in history that couldn't sway people based on the merit of their argument have engaged in these same tactics. The end result of this type of persuasion is always totalitarianism.

The other method of obtaining a mandate is by putting forth a well disciplined argument to the masses. The end result of this type of persuasion is always a democracy/republic.

Meняeтcя ли Aмepикa?

Meняeтcя cтpaнa Aмepикa.
Пpидyт в нeй cкopo Heгpы к влacти.
Cвoбoдy, чтo cтoит y бepeгa,
пoд нeгpитянкy пepeкpacят.

Haчнyт пocмeивaтьcя Бeдныe
Haд вcякими Mиллиoнepaми.

A нeкoтopыe
бyдyт
Бeлыe
пытaтьcя пpитвopитьcя Heгpaми.

И yвaжaтьcя бyдyт Heгpы.

A Caмый Чepный бyдeт cлaвитьcя.

И кaждый Бeлый
бyдeт пepвым
пpи вcтpeчe c Heгpoм
Heгpy клaнятьcя.

1958

America is changing
And negroes soon will be in power
The Liberty that's by the shore
Will be repainted in black colour

The poor will start to joke about
Those different millionaires

And some of whites will try
Pretending that they are negroes themselves
And negroes will be much respected
And the blackest will be glorified

And every white will be the first
To bow to negro
Whenever he meets one

1958

Not much rhyme in english but the meaning is there.

Yes it is. White people tend to be smarter and more reasonable than niggers and spics. Jews tend to be just as smart as whites but come with schemes to subvert us and reduce our number so that they can fit in more yet grow more powerful in their subversion of the increasingly ignorant masses.

There's a reason why shitskin countries suck, and it can't all be blamed on whitey.

white privilege is having better opportunities the black and brown people such as jobs, schools, family wealth.

but wt privilege isnt alway true since there are whites who have shitty jobs, schools and shit families.

hench white trash is the anti white privilege.

Racism is the biggest sign of unintelligence. Stop speaking like white trash you make whites look bad

Manifest destiny 2.0 when?

...

>>re all whites therefore racist?

do you really think someone's moral character is defined by genetics?

if so, you're racist.

>System reworked
Communism and no white people

There are other countries that have this set up. Why not go there?

...

>an someone unbiased explain what white privilege is?
Your existence.

White privilege is a term for white achievement and civility.

If "privilege" is real, then that implies it is a comparable scale. So, "privilege" is as followed:

Jewish Privilege >
White Privilege >
Black Privilege >
Asian Privilege >
Hispanic Privilege >
Indian Privilege >
Muslim Privilege

This is how you destroy their ideologies - by putting it under a microscope.

The trouble is that white privilege has two meanings.

When directly challenged, white privilege means that there are certain aspects of having white skin in modern America that are to your benefit. This is banal and uncontroversial. Under this definition, any attribute could be a privilege under the right circumstances.

But when not forced to abide by that definition, the leftist adopts another. This one is best thought of as analogous to original sin, except you can't be rid of it by accepting Jesus. In this, you are an evil tyrant whose entire existence hinges on prosperity stolen from your betters. You are scum, the worst of the worst. And don't dare ask for reasons or quantifiable values, this is real shit, cracka.

Use context clues to figure out which one is being directed at you.

Joking aside, it's not intended or used as a serious theory outside of very far left, very esoteric academic circles. It's just a piece of rhetoric. Like "They hate us for our freedom, it's designed to rally the troops into a frenzy that substitutes for rational thought or good morals.

privilege is definitely real just like black crime is real.
But think about it: isn't privilege tied to demographics? As in, the majority is privilege because it's the majority. There are historical privileges too, but if you follow the logic of these revenge politics, you'll see that the only possible end goal towards reducing white privilege is reducing the white population.

Therefore, privilege is a zero-sum game, because demographics are a zero-sum game. Protecting privilege should be a right for every demographic, in their native country.

I honestly cant tell if this person is fucking joking or serious. That's whats so funny about this whole situation

Anyone cared to make a montage with all the epidermal reactions from non-whites towards those few words ?

>Well I'm not saying gas chambers didn't exist, I'm just saying they weren't used for mass murde-
NEGATIONISM
Nah man I'm not denying they exis-
NEGATIONISM
>Racism antiwhite doesn't exist
Well ain't that a bit negationist ? Denying that something actually exists.
NO. RACISM ANTI WHITE DOES NOT EXIST

Real negationism right here.

t. not even white

>white cop
>professionally polite but wondering how long they'll take that next call

>10% of the world's population
>Being white is wrong

Why is the rest of the world jealous of white people?

Basically this, that white people have a head start which balances the equation in their favor. I see it more of a money problem than a race issue. Poor white people get shit on just the same, the rest is shitty shitskin culture and genetic propensity.

Kek who did this?

White privilege was a thing 50 years ago. Now being white is a detriment in this society.

shut up nigger

Every non-white subhuman use white privilege as a weapon to shut us down goyim and get gibs.

White privilege
>Whites built modern civilisation and didn't instantly give half of it to mudhut savages, fucking racist white dogs are oppressing me.

>t. not even white

it IS okay to be white you fucking racist XD

It's the privilege of being driven into extinction. HAHAHA.

You idiots still don't know it's Russian propaganda trying to destabilize your education system. They've been doing that to us for years before communism fell.

Dude

Although typically used in retarded ways that cannot be explained of defended there is a grain of truth in it, but it is more about upper middle class having privilege.

Civil rights act is only 50 years old,and people who come from moderately wealthy families really do have an advantage. So white privilege. But it would be so much better to describe it as privilege without the racial connotation. But I can tell you the upper middle class really does have advantages as compare to a normal person.

Looked at the twitter and looks like a fake lads. it's probably a Sup Forumstard stirring shit

You'd be surprised what kind of retarded shit people call the police over.
Once you are forced to interact with the dregs of society you quickly realize that it's not just different races that might as well be different species, but that even within the races there are such massive differences that it's hard to even ascribe sapience to some of them.

UGHHHH

Its not fucking privilege though.

Those upper middle class families worked for what they have. Their homes, Their possessions, their community, etc;

Upper middle class people work, they dont get gibs. If theres any privilege its the poor who get it.

The word privilege is stupid, you should actually use the word "advantage." Its way more accurate and it doesnt imply that they receive something for nothing.

white privilege means that because the success of my race i get special powers over other people that have zero contribution to the White society. You muds don't like it? FUCKING LEAVE.
btw, what's with all the 56% burgers in this thread, this used to be a white board...

>You muds don't like it? FUCKING LEAVE.
Pretty much what diaspora should be told every time. If they don't like it, they are free to leave and go to any place they perceive as better.

It stems from the social philosophy bastardization of egalitarianism. If you believe that all people are equal and yet there are distinct groups that perform better than others the only logical explanation (other than "not all people are equal") there can be is that this group benefits from privileges and the group performing worse suffers from oppression.

...

Should I do it, I live in Cambridge uk. I can do it at night.

look who's talking...

isnt this the reaction pol wanted?

It's Marxism at a cultural level. They see the world as a battleground between different groups that insist on their collective power. Whites have not been organization since the war, but nevertheless the Marxist sees in them a (potential) power bloc. When that happens the Marxist evaluates to what degree that power bloc is successful and prominent, and then assumes this is because they are oppressing and reducing the rest. If you consider only the micro world of twitter, then this would mean there are "too many" white tweets, so that blacks don't have a "voice". That means every single one of the whites is now responsible for the group's behavior, and every single one of them can be told to shut the fuck up. That's what it means to have "systemic privilege": over-representing or over-success as compared to some other group. Note also that they define the groups, but then claim they haven't defined anything and are only responding to aggression. That's why they can be as nasty as they want to whites, because each is responsible for collective aggression and removing him (or the tweet) clears the way for others. It's pure evil, but ah well. The key is victim mentality, everything as self-defense against white people. A white homeless guy on the street who froze to death is HORRIBLE if people talk about it, because it removes from the volume of people talking about blacks. That's it.

It refers to a statistical socio-economic advantage. Black kids are poorer, go to shittier schools, and have more fucked up parents, etc.

It also refers to a certain implicit bias that most Americans including even blacks have that is not racism but an aritfact of the human mind processing and informing decisions by association. If you watch a black person passing by you late at night more closely than a white person, which even liberals do, it's because we associate blacks more with violence or crimes like mugging. Of course, you are also much more likely to get mugged by the black man, so no smoke without fire. The association itself is subconscious and automatic and not racism. Deciding to act on your feeling of discomfort and shoot on him unprovoked would be racism but merely the feeling that the black man is more dangerous is not racism.

Really draws a dividing line. The leftish thinking who see this as a subtle but meaningful act of white supremacism, and the rightish thinking who see this as an innocuous phrase spun into hatespeech. Further polarizing society, which in hard enriches the elites as we remain divided.

This is the reaction Sup Forums wanted

youtube.com/watch?v=pOl1fFMseLw

Also to add: you can see this in action when a leftist PHYSICALLY CAN NOT separate "it's ok to be white" from "it's not OK to be non-white". Saying one means denying or ignoring or "marginalizing' the other. They are angry at an innocent message because all they see is how it fits into society, and since society is "white" this message can only be further confirmation of white's supremacy and oppression. They can't get out of it . Normal people see something innocuous and wonder why it should be said, leftist see whites rubbing their supremacy in their face since they can only connect it to all of society.

And to counter that, they're the exact same people who'd say Black Lives Matter doesn't mean all lives don't matter. You could open wine bottles with the knots they tie their brains and tongues into

black privilege is being able to succeed professionally with 20% of the ability of a white person b/c muh racism

It fits perfectly with marxism: black lives matter is important to chant not because of the content, but because it is VOLUME. If you counter it with "all lives matter" you have missed the point, since the point is to get everyone talking about black lives. It doesn't even really matter what BLM is about, cops or not, and people don't really care anymore either. But the BLM crowd is still around, and their allegiance nowadays literally means "fuck whitey". For them chanting BLM is not hypocritical because "awareness" is just marxist codespeak for "volume". You don't chant WLM because whites have institutional power so their grievances (deaths) are already taken care of according to them. All discourse is a power struggle for volume.

>tfw solidly blue collar family
>go to top research uni
>everyone thinks I'm wealthy b/c white
What do I have to do to distinguish myself from these upper middle class faggots?

>Zahra is eager to work with residents to help foster their passion for social justice and social change. Zahra is passionate about issues concerning the intersection of gender, race, and religion, among other fields in social justice. She also looks forward to connecting residents interested in becoming better changemakers to the many opportunities offered at Taylor.
Zahra is a Gender and Sexuality Studies and Public Health double major and an Arabic minor with the goal of pursuing law school and eventually working in international human rights law.

archive.is/c2h4l

Nowadays many people in our Western society desperately want to belong to a "victimized group". It's basically a first world sickness where people actually experience a very comfortable life with so few serious problems that they start imagining problems, making them up or exaggerating them. Everything that is being said or done has to be about them and in their minds they twist it in such a way that it confirms their victim status. It is mind-boggling how racism for example is made up to be a huge issue in countries that are the most welcoming to foreigners and least racist compared to others, how womens rights suddenly becomes an issue in countries where they experience the most equality and even advantages for being females. It really looks like we have had it too good for too long.

shit in your hands, and fling it at them

White privilege means you get the higher paid job instead of Muhammad Abdallah or Tyrone Angel with the same qualifications.
Do you see oil dynasties run by negroes? No.
Does this make you racist? No.
Should you be aware of this? Yes.

basically when god made all the genders and sent them down to the garden of eden and gave them a bunch of rules but didnt really explain why. eventually a talking snake came along and all the genderqueers ran to their safe space, leaving the white male to enjoy all the apples. now, 6 thousand years later, all white males everywhere are finally being forced to repay their debt in apples.

White privilege is living a normal life among your own kind. Or at least it used to be.

>have the benefit of owning property prior to immigrants
Indians, Flips and Nigerians out-earn whites on average.

>Can someone unbiased explain what white privilege is?
White privilege is the belief that whites are privileged in the sense of not being subject to systemic and societal racism.

The basic premise of white privilege on which all the following argumentation rests is that all races are equal in ability.

Under that premise, disproportionate earnings, disproportionate literacy rates, school drop-out rates, disproportionate amount of people finishing college, etc. are all cited as evidence of systemic racism which white people are not subjected to leading to better performance.
The same line of thinking also applies to gender pay gaps, less women in science, etc.

Other people might argue that this is more an issue of certain races (or genders) being less likely to exhibit the necessary intellectual ability to perform well, but obviously these should not be taken seriously as they happen to be so called "Nazi shitlords".

It's leftist make belief.

> It is mind-boggling how racism for example is made up to be a huge issue in countries that are the most welcoming to foreigners and least racist compared to others
But the point of cultural marxism is not that the whites, or majority, aren't nasty to others. The point is that their existence as the supreme group, the one who is successful on average, makes them BY DEFINITION oppressive of the others. They believe in uniformity of people and hate hate hate how white families leave things to their children, thus saving up wealth. These people are not just looking to be victims, they sincerely believe that if everyone on the TV is white then they are being marginalized. That's what cultural marxism does: there is no sunlight between a white school shooter, white oscars, white bankers, etc. The mere fact that these people exist and have power means they oppressed others. If you compare it to communists' ideas about inequality = oppression you've got it down. The only reason why there would be more white movies than black movies isn't that blacks don't make movies or that whites make better ones, but the simple reality of systemic oppression. So when we see someone crying about systemically racist whites, we see a narcissist who wants to be a victim. But the marxist truly believes that she is making an objective observation about reality: whites on top, oppressed below. So the black marxist gets to feel victimized when a white shoots up a school, because it is the exact same thing as why most of the people on her bus that morning were white and she couldn't find a seat.

So working smarter and saving/using resources wisely a privilege?

> Russia/Population 144.3 million (2016)

Yeah, your family leaving you wealth and working hard for your opportunities means you won the "lottery at birth", and so your accomplishments are not "truly" your own, like shaniqua's would have been. They hate "privilege" because they hate wealth, family and inequality of skill/effort. Of course someone born to a wealthy family is privileged, how is that an insight? But it's an insight because they don't just mean "he is well off" but "he won the inequality lottery and deserves none of his accomplishments".

You cannot get an unbiased response to this. Having white privilege doesn't make you racist. White privilege is just the unearned advantages one has from being born white in a majority white society. White people are understood as the norm and everyone else are others. Being white, you are less likely to be killed by cops. In Florida, a white person has never been sentenced to death for killing a black. It is not as simple as economic advantage. It's multifaceted and fuck those people who say it's inherently bad to have privilege. You did not choose to be born white. Just acknowledge there are some advantages you did not earn and just move about your life as normal.
Really the only disadvantage is that white people in America have no sense of ethnic identity because they traded their people's culture to be called American.

One thing that fascinated me is where do Asians fit on this narrative they conjured? Its pretty obvious that the Oppression Olympics has subgroups who don't work to better their next generations and cry over inequality but Asian subgroup seem to completely avoid being awful in that same way in Western societies and work towards prosperity for the family and future. They're discriminated just as much or more than whites in certain fields and count as POC but unlike brown and black it's like they're wholly invisible in the Oppression Olympics or any identity optics as a subgroup. So what's up with that?

It's funny how libshits always seem to forget about the CIA selling crack to inner city blacks to fund illegal wars. I've never once heard BLT's or antifags bring that up.

Thank you for reporting this on Sup Forums, Mr. user.

The police will be at your house shortly to begin your anal raping & re education.

>being white you are less likely to be killed by cops
>don't commit crime
>don't get killed by cops
Gee what a mysterious privelage I was given. Sure has nothing to do with me not playing stupid games with cops at all it's just because of being white I guess you fucking incompetent idiot.

White people work hard to get what they want
Other people think they can get what they want without working hard

White people don't get privileges for free we fucking earn them and lazy minority's get jealous

Their answer to that is the same as their answer to everything: since people are equal, inequality comes from evil. They don't *actually* care about the mechanisms by which whites oppress blacks, causing them to fail society. The fact that whites reign supreme and blacks don't is proof that it is happening, and any small sign of it can be taken as evidence. So they don't sit down and think "is there any anti-black affirmative action?" even though to us they seem like hypocrites cause there *is* affirmative action for blacks. No they sit down and think "who is doing well, who is doing poorly?", and since there is only one answer to that question, every place in society where blacks are on bottom is proof of oppression by whites. Asians do not fit this narrative because they don't suck in society. They might have just as much of a hill to climb as blacks (probably less) but since they are simply able people there is nothing to be done, no implicit evil to be detected and corrected.

It's a mistake to think of systemic racism as something that can be described in detail as a bunch of measures. Their entire point is that there is no pro-black measure too extreme until the inequality is corrected, and there is no pro-white measure too evil in the same way. You should not think of hypocrisy in front of the law, because their entire point is that it's necessary to be hypocritical to "fight back" against white oppression, until blacks are kangz again. In the same way, when people talk of "oppression olympics" they don't actually mean that those lower on the scale have more active measures / aimed at them. Those people are literally just the most useless people in society, and so they are oppressed the most. Make sense yet? It should at some chimp-brain level.

>-USA was built on the backs of slaves and colonialism
>-USA to this day is racist from the heart of its very institution
>-USA was "designed to put down people of color"

If you believe we started this way

>-system needs to be reworked from the inside out before racism can be solved

Why the fuck are you still here? LEAVE

Read this guy's comment and let the insanity sink in: >unearned advantages one has from being born white in a majority white society.
See? Unearned. Fuck your family, fuck your society, fuck your heritage, and fuck getting a head start in a world of EQUALS. You can also immediately tell that this person is white and a cuck, and doesn't belong here:
>Just acknowledge there are some advantages you did not earn and just move about your life as normal.
Now who really believes that it is sufficient to simply 'acknowledge' your privilege, i.e. openly ask for forgiveness? (only faggots talk about acknowledging anything). And to see why he's a liberal moron you can consider his last sentence:
>Really the only disadvantage is that white people in America have no sense of ethnic identity because they traded their people's culture to be called American.
"White people in america", for which he is thinking about red state republicans. He himself didn't trade anything, because he's a cosmopolitan atheist feminist+ whatever. Who believes that republicans willingly traded their white identity to be american, instead of it being stomped out of existence by non-stop violence and aggression since '45?

How do I know that tweet is from one of our troll accounts.

Fuck no. There's an Indian girl at my work who we all pitch in to drive to work and back because she actually has skills that we want. If you bring something to the table you can make shit happen. Stop feeling sorry for yourself faggot

>who we all pitch in to drive to work and back because she actually has skills that we want
You're not serious are you?