Dmitri Alperovitch is going to get on the stand and PROVE that Russia hacked the DNC server. THIS IS IT! RUSSIA IS FINISHED!!
archive.is
wsj.com
HAPPENING: U.S. PROSECUTORS ARE CHARGING RUSSIAN OFFICIALS IN DNC HACK
Parker Phillips
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
thehill.com
archive.is
wsj.com
archive.is
wsj.com
theatlantic.com
cnbc.com
archive.fo
politico.com
archive.is
archive.is
wired.co.uk
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
Alexander Turner
THE FIRE RISES! THE EVIDENCE MOUNTS!! SETH RICH BTFO!!!
"CrowdStrke was not the only firm to conclude Russia was behind the attack.
Other companies independently discovered evidence that linked the attacks to the same culprit. SecureWorks found an improperly secured URL shortening account used by Fancy Bear while investigating other attacks by the group. That account contained evidence of nearly 4,000 phishing attacks Fancy Bear waged against Gmail addresses — the attack that ensnared Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email account among them.
In the end, Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect and other CrowdStrike competitors all confirmed Crowdstike’s results."
archive.is
thehill.com
Wyatt Barnes
"The report’s publication underscores how important the Obama administration believes it is for the American public to understand how the intelligence agencies arrived at their conclusion, he said.
Some parts of the report were left out of the declassified version."
THEY ARE FINALLY GOING TO SHOW THEIR EVIDENCE IN COURT!!
archive.is
wsj.com
Aaron Moore
>In the end, Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect and other CrowdStrike competitors all confirmed Crowdstike’s results."
Why weren't the servers turned over to law enforcement to analyze? How can anyone be accused of a crime without law enforcement even examining the evidence?
Leo Jenkins
Groan.
Kevin Gutierrez
US Prosecutors must be working directly with CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect and other CrowdStrike competitors. The evidence is public. It's just classified.
Bentley Richardson
>consider
Tyler Jackson
>US Prosecutors must be working directly with CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect and other CrowdStrike competitors. The evidence is public. It's just classified.
you just made that shit up, scumbag. the DNC refused to give the server to the FBI because they didn't want to produce evidence of criminality, nor did they want to prove to them that it wasn't hacked by the Russkies.
you are pathetic.
Justin Barnes
Stop trying to talk like the people on here. It's obvious that you don't belong faggot
Christian Evans
>It's just classified.
It's not.
>US Prosecutors must be
Why must they? The Feds have cybercrime specialists that could have analyzed the DNC servers last year. Why didn't they?
Brayden Jenkins
lol exactly.
>we've got smoking gun bombshell evidence that will prove the central DNC narrative and finally dethrone Trump
>better "consider" going forward with this
lolololol you fucking libtards are so fucking dumb.
Ian Barnes
>clinging at straws this hard
trumpcucks are a sad bunch.
Ryder Carter
Fancy Bear was not Russian. It was someone trying to pretend they were Russian. Just like Guccifer 2 was a Bernie supporter DNC staffer. Wikileaks KNOWS who gave him the emails, friend. And they were not from "hacks".
Adam Young
"President-elect Donald Trump said Saturday he wanted to press U.S. intelligence agencies to make sure they are correct in asserting that Russia was behind a cyberattack aimed at disrupting the 2016 presidential race."
What ever happened with that?
archive.is
wsj.com
Adam Martin
>>clinging at straws this hard
>trumpcucks are a sad bunch.
so I'm clinging at straws but he says the reason the FBI didn't get the servers is because they got it from 5 different private companies? absolute fucking baloney
Thomas Roberts
>Why must they?
Because the Feds never examined the server.
>Why didn't they?
Because the DNC never allowed the Feds to examine the server.
Carter Murphy
>Fancy Bear was not Russian
proof? links? are you going to appear in court on behalf of the US prosecutors?
Aaron Carter
This is just a show trial.
Ryder Bell
>Drumph and Pootie r dun!
>Durrrrrrrr
Bentley Cook
Robert Mercer has jumped ship. It is over for little racist drumpfkins. By the end of this year, Trump, his family, Bannon etc will all be indicted, removed and jailed . They are all pawns in Soros-Mercer Chess game and Mercer just resigned from the game
Game over Pol
Lincoln Jenkins
It's going to happen. Just you watch. RUSSIA IS FINISHED!
Jacob Moore
>8 posts by this ID
what did soros mean by this
Justin Phillips
>just a show trial
WTF How could that be. THEY HAVE EVIDENCE! IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED!!!
Ryan Myers
>the DNC never allowed the Feds to examine the server.
If the DNC felt a foreign government hacked their servers, why wouldn't they want the Feds to examine the servers?
Aiden Ortiz
But how can they be hack? The news told me that was not possible and I was an idiot for thinking they could be.
Cooper Hernandez
Faggot
Brandon Myers
every bit of evidence in that server is not admissible in court. chain of custody much? when the ukranians investigated instead of the FBI they ruined evidence.
Jaxson Cox
US Government is not aware of how proxies & vpns work, and how anyone from anywhere could use a russian proxy and pretend to be russian.
Our government is so inept.
Carson Baker
true. but they already determined from download speed it was hacked from the USA
Luis Williams
pure bullshit.
Nathaniel Campbell
>Sup Forums started ww3 via shitposting on twitter
Gavin Parker
/thread
Camden Roberts
>US Prosecutors must be working directly with CrowdStrike, Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect and other CrowdStrike competitors.
why would they be doing that when the US government has its own cyber experts?
Tyler Ramirez
>absolute fucking baloney
>Because the Feds never examined the server.
>Because the DNC never allowed the Feds to examine the server.
6 months after the hack? You realize that server event logs get overwritten continuously. What did you expect the FBI to find after all that time? I'm convinced that private security firms are far better at understanding cyberwarfare than the current government.
theatlantic.com
Ayden Hill
He looks familiar.
Juan Harris
That's the question, isn't it?
If you were a political party in the US, right in the middle of a major election, and you found potential evidence of vote tampering, wouldn't you want every single fucking alphabet agency looking into it?
Yet somehow, the DNC, one of the two biggest parties in the US, didn't.
Brandon Cook
see
“This theory assumes that the hacker downloaded the files to a computer and then leaked it from that computer,” said Rich Barger, director of security research at Splunk.
But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.
“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.
>archive.is
>thehill.com
Bentley White
DRUMPFYDRUMPFCOFEFEDRUMPFKINS LOLOLOLROFL #IAMWITHHER
Elijah Gray
Some states watched in real-time as Homeland Security tried to hack into the voting machines.
But the news won't talk about that any more, will they?
Isaac Scott
Nice purple shirt, Dmitri, you freemason scum
Jace Mitchell
They don't need to. Obviously Dmitri Alperovitch or one of the experts from Fidelis, FireEye, SecureWorks, Threat Connect or another CrowdStrike competitor is going to appear in court. Probably all of them!!
Jaxon Gray
link??
Liam Foster
What data did they use to confirm this allegations?
The manipulated data CrowdStrike produced and was paid for by the DNC? The data that at the same time proved that it was not hacked just copied locally and that those Russian links were fabricated? They messed up big time.
In really want a source for the analysis of the other firms.
Adam Butler
(cont'd.)
Now here's what I find real interesting...
During the voting process, Homeland Security tried to rig voting machines:
cnbc.com
After the election:
politico.com
The same people who tried to hack into voting machines, are now working with the companies managing the voting machines. Coincidence?
Austin Gonzalez
That's light blue, get your eyes checked
Jordan Nelson
See
Juan Barnes
>are charging
>consider
Luis Diaz
>/prosecutors-consider
you are so right for the 100tthhh time. Sage
Aiden Perez
(3/3)
So in conclusion, not only is the Russia narrative most likely bullshit, it's covering up a larger issue: There are state actors inside the government who are actively sabotaging the democratic processes.
Whether Russian intelligence committees had anything to do with it is moot, considering that we have proof that our own people are doing it, and only speculation and heresay that the Ruskies did it.
Additionally, it looks like 2018/2020's going to be a rigged game.
Hunter Robinson
>What data did they use to confirm this allegations?
When CrowdStrike came to the DNC, it moved quickly. Using a system called Falcon, a two-megabyte agent installed on systems without the need for a reboot, it profiled every action that occurred at a programme level on the hundreds of machines owned by the DNC. One clue might be a programme behaving abnormally; it might be the unusual transfer of millions of documents. "We're not looking at any personal data, any documents or emails," explains Alperovitch. "We're just looking at what is being executed."
"Almost immediately, Falcon started lighting up with a number of indications of breaches of the DNC network"
Dmitri Alperovitch, founder of Crowdstrike
Every action at a system level on the DNC's computers was recorded and checked against CrowdStrike's bank of prior intelligence (the company processes 28 billion computer events a day). "Almost immediately, Falcon started lighting up with a number of indications of breaches of the DNC network," Alperovitch says.
archive.is
wired.co.uk
YOU CAN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IT'S CLASSIFIED SO JUST FUCK RIGHT OFF WITH YOUR BS INQUIRIES. DMITRI ALPEROVITCH IS AN EXPERT!! HE IS GOING TO APPEAR IN COURT AND SEND THE RUSSIAN HACKERS STRAIGHT TO JAIL!!
Hudson Powell
CrowdStrike checked its records, seeing whether the methods used for the hack matched any they already had on record. They did. Two groups, working independently, were secreting away information, including private correspondence, email databases and, reportedly, opposition research files on Donald Trump. "We realised that these actors were very well known to us," Alperovitch says. This is because of a handful of small but significant tells: data exfiltrated to an IP address associated with the hackers; a misspelled URL; and time zones related to Moscow. "They were called FANCY BEAR and COZY BEAR, and we could attribute them to the Russian government."
Xavier Wood
>Almost immediately, Falcon started lighting up with a number of indications of breaches of the DNC network
In order for that to happen, there'd have to be special software injected into DNC computers. And if that's the case, a simple software integrity check and a few commands would've shown that too.
So again, why didn't the alphabet soup agencies get access to the servers first? We could've known within a day or two, whether or not those computers were tampered with.
Adam Hill
Additionally, if there was unusual network traffic, any fucking junior sysadmin fresh out of high school could've seen that shit.