Discuss

Discuss

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
rawstory.com/2017/11/psychology-study-finds-trump-stands-out-as-a-low-analytic-thinker/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

[citation needed]

Confirming lower scenario

Always thought so

He has a big head, so he is a genius.

i am not sure i understand, but let me share my theory

leftards are in between 105 and 125ish

below 105 we find blue collar workers, right wing

and above 130 we find turbo autists, which are also right wing

as we see, the left is in a intellectual limbo, trying to awake, but they cant, and the blue collars, well, they just want jobs

>tfw to intelligent too be right wing

oh yeah i get it, you are saying the exact same thing

i think its because 100 -120 is the zone where you believe you are smart, and your ego blinds you and makes you a pseudo intellectual faggot

we only mean whites when we discuss left/right wing, right?

because there's a lot of dumbcunt niggers who vote dems.

the left is a business, just like coca cola or McDonald's. You see, businesses have audiences. 100 through 115 or so are their target audience, since that's the average for the voting class.

no you retard, it says really smart people are right wing,

people who believe they are smart, are lefties

and dumb people who know they are dumb, blue collars, they are right wing, because they want jobs

>mfw took iq test and scored both 103 and 134
>almonds activated

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect

Typical "poorly educated" drumpf supporter. NOONE over 100 IQ would ever be right wing, only retards who think their smarter than they really are!

>I have a theory even though the data out there shows me that I'm wrong
>Sup Forumstards in a nutshell
like pottery

Can confirm. Lefties are smart enough to know the issues but not smart enough to actually research on a sight that isn't CNN HuffPo, BuzzFeed, etc. Right wingers are either muh suburban and rural retards like the Nazi LARPers or smart people who actually take time to search for all sides of the argument and find the right answer which is almost always the right's answer.
/thread

Useful Idiots and their masters

But right wingers make more money on average and the income is more evenly distributed. It's the obscenely wealthy and the obscenely poor which create the leftist average.

The Dunning-Kruger effect isn't connected with intelligence (fluid g) so much as it is with knowledge (crystalline g).

Higher intelligence brings with it evolutionarily novel behaviors, which are more prone to failure than traditional behaviors. See: liberalism, atheism, individualism, feminism, etc. Even very intelligent people cannot out-think the superrational directives encoded in tradition and religion without a great deal of actual knowledge to work with.

Not bad

You actually just described leftists. You guys always say this but the statistics are the exact opposite.

Geniuses tend to be libertarian because they see that a society filled with rational people of the same intelligence would be fine with total freedom but they unfortunately don't realize how retarded the rest of us are

...

Daily Reminder

Dylan "WaterMelon Valhala Dispatch Service" Roof measured in at 125 on his IQ test

/thread

neat but blacks are ~95% Democratic

so much for that

>the left is full of people who have fallen in love with their own (often perceived) intelligence and Dunning-Kruger Effect victims.
>somehow better than other side

Left wing IQ can easily get below 100 as well.

I don't think I would be as far to the right as I am without swallowing red pills. You could argue that it was IQ that made me sit through them all but I would suggest there's a knowledge element. Many smart people can lean to the left simply because the truth has been hidden from them.

124 Iq brainchad can confirm

I was actually pondering this the other day. I rationalized it the following way: Low IQ people, (IQ

...

Maybe communists but your typical urban sophisticate with a BA in English Lit is probably around 100-115

Clarification, people with an IQ in the range of 100-120 see the effects of natural hierarchy but intellectualize the cause of it as being due to nurture/socioeconomic factors.

Metal Gear?

That pic. But unironically.

IQ < 100 : too "stupid" to think much or understand complex concepts, rely on "instinct".
100

Yes. Individuals with an IQ exceeding 120 are also able to transfer this raw, natural instinct into economic and political systems that allow these instincts to be harnessed and utilized in a productive manner.

135 iq and I sit center right libertarian

yes - leftest are just smart enough to outsmart themselves in situations where instinct AND logic dictate otherwise.

This thread is about humans.

Because you think the holohoax is real
Faggot

95% of niggers and shitskins vote for gibs (= the left), by default the left is sub 90 IQ

IQ > 300: Bogpilled

1. People that are normal working class follow the nature of man. They see gays and know this is wrong instinctly ,they see trannys and see they are mentally ill. They dont really know why its just a natural instinct.
2. The liberal upper middle class ,rebels against this norms. " I have this gay friend and he dindt start raping my little brother ,he didnt waved a 10 inch dildo infornt of me ,so why do you dont like gays ,user"
3. The really smart intelligent people grasp the real concept ,why that tranny over there is not "compeletly normal" ,they see the psychological damage these people have ,they see real stats ,they connect dots ,theycan look thru propaganda.

But most dumb niggers/shitskins are left wing.

>the data out there

Well the smartest people I know are all right wing, but so are the biggest retards I know.
So you're probably onto something

"no"

This is Dunning-kruger zone

The results showed that not only was Trump’s analytic score far less than his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton (23.8 vs. 42.8), it was also much lower than his Republican candidate opponents — Ben Carson (39.1), Marco Rubio (48.7), John Kasich (48.9), and Ted Cruz (62.1). Moreover, Trump’s average analytic score was more than 3 standard deviations below that of the average Democrat or Republican from the last five election cycles, making him a clear outlier.

rawstory.com/2017/11/psychology-study-finds-trump-stands-out-as-a-low-analytic-thinker/

Left Wing
>80 IQ niggers
>90 IQ beaners
>120 IQ liberal white academics and kikes
Right Wing
>100 IQ white working class
>120 IQ conservative businessmen and professionals

It's even more than that. People having success in life are often motivated by something as simple as competition. That's what a lot of leftist ideologies disregard. Competion is healthy in a way that your natural instinct about having to participate in something against others, or even with them, should be to come up as the first, the best, the most qualified for the task. And that competition spirit should be up for everyone at all time and for everything. And if someone is outclassed in certains domains, he should not give up because he can always come first at something else, or just try to improve and reach the others.

Let say you need to survive on an island with 3 other people, naturally you should thrive to be the one coming up with the highest ressources. Why ? First to prove you are better, which is the "not thinking more than that" tier, but also, if you were to cooperate, if you gather more ressources than the others, you can actually increase the survival chance and comfort level of everyone if you wish to. And if the others also have this competitive spirit, your island would be fucking Eden in no time in the end and without even sharing anything. "Oh ! this guy built a fucking shack with bed, counch and has a shit ton of food... I want that too... Time to work hard !" is the mentality we should all have. Not fucking up others progress, nor helping them to the point they expect everything handed out to them.

Why did you write "right wing" on the left and "left wing" on the right? I don't like it.

The sub-100 IQ right-wingers are the kind who unironically think Israel is our greatest ally, Jews are God's chosen people, that the world is only 6000 years old, trickle-down economics actually works, etc.

people like you are the reason why german isnt the language of europe now.

High IQ people tend to be right leaning in their political views.
From this book. Read it.

All that IQ means nothing if civilization collapses from liberal retardation because of Muh feels over self-preservation.

>demorat
>smart
choose one

I do agree with this as an introductory concept to a somewhat more complex truth. The important understanding is not necessarily the ranges themselves, but that ideology is a waveform. There may, in fact, be a high end that swings back left, but there is the rub for me--neither side is 'good' or 'evil.'

Instead, I think intelligence and a rich life of experience and observation can lead one through many cycles of enlightened right and left thinking.

I think true nirvana is breaking free from the cycle entirely to become a standalone unit somehow. I'm not sure any human can accomplish the full control of their own inner cycle of values.

I think a sign of stupidity is having a low IQ and a static system of beliefs. This means you are naturally low on the intelligence scale and not experienced...you really lack any credibility to make political decisions at this point.

?

>left is high IQ!
The left is the shitskin party.

But I took an iq test and got over 100
Checkmate

For a really good time look at IQs by state.

Kojima was onto something when he used Memes in his works.

This... I think it was Knuth that said no design no matter how carefully crafted will out perform trial and error.
Of course I'm paraphrasing.

on average, libertarians have the highest IQ

but high IQ doesn't really mean all that much

Left
>niggers and parasites
>slightly above average people who think they are really smart
>smart jews who hate western civilization

Right
>Really smart goyim
>people who know they aren't smart so just listen to smart people

What? Did you quote the right person?

>yfw its right because its always been that way so its right.
>yfw its wrong because its always been that way
>yfw it was actually right all this time because not only was it supported by uncommonly known facts, but the people that came before you were just as, if not more intelligent than yourself and wanted it that way for a reason

>black people vote democrat
>the left has a higher IQ

well which is it?

Yes, Knuth's Algorithm. This actually takes me back to Dreyfus's critique of AI research in the 1970s. He actually used the phenomenology of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty to demonstrate that an AI designed piecemeal by humans could never be intelligent. Had some influence on the path that second-generation cognitive science took.

Holy fuck can you even make a legible chart?

if post_by_this_ID == 1 and user == OP:
OP = faggot

Oops!

High IQ is correlated with high openness, and high openness is correlated with liberal views. It is disingenuous to ascribe their liberal views to their intelligence, when it is simply that people with high openness are more likely to be intelligent.

They don't arrive at their worldview though intellect, but though a psychological predilection that correlates with intellectual curiosity and general-intelligence. Conservatives often have low openness and are intellectually dispassionate, this doesn't mean they hold their views out of stupidity.

120: Communism failed, it has been tried

Will you provide us with these statistics please?

but what is a leppo?

>normies gonna normie

Although not strictly stated, i believe this chart only refers to people

I was very close to buying it.

Stupid: you
Smart: me

Accurate

who cares :)

>Only refers to people

What does IQ have to do with ability to be a good person and contribute to society?

IQ is a measurement of potential success, or the potential ability to be a productive member of a society.

129 reporting in

>people who cant figure out OPs shitty chart getting offended
I guess we knock which kind of right they are :^)

A lot.

145 iq here make way niggers and jews

your doom is at hand

i agree fully

i believe a lot of liberalism derives itself from a need to feel ELITE, so they settle into where they feel comfortable (and complementary drives); "intellectual," highly social, etc

they assume everyone is dumber than they are and that everyone who isn't them inherently has bad ideas because if they don't have bad ideas, and there's dignity in blue collar labor, they don't have any inherent value.

it comes from insecurity. weak fathers probably have something to do with it.

>intalgent
>can't even get quads
baka desu senpai

damn

You're right, sorta. There's more than just IQ at play though. There's emotional factors, and behavioral ones as well. But I'd say your image is fairly accurate.

My theory is social stockholm syndrome...

Its gotten to the point where you simply cant be outspoken about being right in the cities because there are so many savages...

The cities officially dont belong to whites socially anymore...

It used to be the savages respected the white hang out spot even though they made anti segregation laws

Now literally every white hot spot in a city turn into niggerville in two weeks when those savages cruise social media finding out where whitey is meeting...

its fucked

i was just being salty and shitposting. My grandfather died yesterday and my fucking vulture family didnt even give him a funeral. I really didnt have a point, so hats off to you for not feeding in.

Dumb people rely on tribalism, and vote for their tribe. Semi smart people rely on ideals, but their ideas about reality are too simple leading to mistakes. Really smart people are more practical, and recognize the dangers we are heading towards.

np man just let it off. Sucks hard. Honoring the people that really lived meaningfull lives is important and another thing we lost in this mad society

I don't think IQ has much to do with it.

I would be willing to bet

>a large part of intelligence is the ability to see patterns and learn from mistakes either directly or vicariously
>somebody that's highly intelligent, if they end up having a problem (ie no money) will do what it takes to not be in that situation again
>associate not working/working in a job that doesn't pay well with not having enough money
>gets a better paying job because they're intelligent enough to learn the skills required to do so

Conversely:

>a person with low intelligence who doesn't have enough money
>could be relying on handouts (ie niggers) , may be working a shit paying job but is too stupid to do anything else
>may even have blagged a good paying job but isn't able to learn that paying for a million subscription services, buying a new phone every year and spending a fiver every morning on shit coffee is raping their wallet
>these people perpetuate handouts because "I don't have enough money" so vote in parties that offer them shekels
>this allows the lazy and stupid to remain lazy and stupid and still be comfortable! and makes the country look more attractive to illegals/other unwanted shitskins because of handouts

Stupid people being allowed to live and breed in first world countries is one of the root causes of the fall of the west. Who do you think it was that even enabled the Jews to even fuck your county up so badly in the first place? The biggest consumers of mass media, the idiots. The ones that would rather watch Netflix than read a book. The ones that preferred watching ultra reactionary bullshit "news" on TV and online to reading about it in a newspaper, which meant that newspapers had to dumb themselves down to stay relevant. Unfortunately, it's a wheel that has already started turning too much to be stopped now. Perpetual motion exists, it's just the cycle of human stupidity.

50-60: anarchy
60-70: traditionalism
70-80: fascism
80-90: socialism
90-100: democracy
100-110: socialism
110-120: fascism
120-130: traditionalism
130+: anarchy