Is there any proof that IQ is linked to race when cultural and sociological factors are accounted for?

Is there any proof that IQ is linked to race when cultural and sociological factors are accounted for?

Other urls found in this thread:

thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/race-and-iq/
amazon.com/Bell-Curve-Intelligence-Structure-Paperbacks/dp/0684824299
youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6872626
nature.com/nature/journal/v247/n5439/abs/247316a0.html
gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
docdro.id/e2pEr1E
pastebin.com/Q1hMEC4a
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
amazon.com/gp/product/110746143X
unz.com/jthompson/intelligent-brains
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Lahn
nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/461726a.html
hhmi.org/news/could-interbreeding-between-humans-and-neanderthals-have-led-enhanced-human-brain
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016028969290028P
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Ew
>would I bang her?
Of course
>would I hold her hand at the mall?
Of course not.

Long read, but provides substantial research addressing soscio-economic status, poverty, and all that
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/race-and-iq/

Yes

America.

if you don't know it already then you don't belong here, newfag

yep, jews had worse history than niggers and look where are they now, sage

thanks

touchy touchy

See here

I know there is a gap, that's not what I'm asking. You guys are so primed to start screeching at anything that even remotely resembles a challenge to your worldview here. it's hilarious

>my first bait thread got BTFO so I modified it a little and reposted

Kill yourself you brainlet sandnigger

Who is she?

this is my first thread on this topic

no clue

I'm providing evidence that there is a gap despite cultural and sociological factors such as median family income are accounted for. How is that not what you asked?
We're primed to be able to help people that aren't like us by telling them things that challenge their world view and cause them to REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

Mhm, I'm sure this wasn't you. Saged.

yeah whatever u say champ.
anything that challenges our worldview? and what would that be u fucking idiot?

seriously neck yourself retard u already got data on second post so scram brainlet

black bitch with vitiligo?

Only about 100 years of data.

And thousands of years of History to look at.

it wasn't

amazon.com/Bell-Curve-Intelligence-Structure-Paperbacks/dp/0684824299

White women with black asses are gross.

Thanks for posting that. Been meaning to look into this.

they're pants

IQ is mostly genetic

...

What are the odds two brainlets that can't be fucked to do their own research would ask such similar questions in such a close time span? Very unlikely. Thus I must conclude you are a retarded faggot that got BTFO and tried to tweak your OP a bit to make the obvious underlying question more difficult to answer. Watch fucking brainwash and then stfu moron.

youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q

...

ok but it wasn't me

But we know that money doesn't change cultural and ethical attitudes, and those are often cited as responsible for the socioeconomic disparity. The question is whether there's any studies on IQ that correct for that sort of thing.

My guess is it would be very hard to correct for cultural factors like attitude to childrearing but would love to be proven wrong

Yes the Minnesota Transracial adoption study confirmed that.

psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

>(1976) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude that Black children raised in wealthy White homes show better intellectual performance in their youth than Black children raised in Black homes. This supports the idea of youth malleability in the area of intelligence.

>The White children in wealthy White homes performed even better in an amount matching the Black-White gap that can be seen in tests of IQ and academic performance outside of this experiment.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6872626

>(1983) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude their experiment from the 1970s by testing the children again as adults.

>Regardless of youth results, both races regressed to their respective racial means. The White-Black gap still existed and was not reduced.

>These findings show that IQ malleability in youth exists, but it levels off as individuals age and subsequently regress to their racial means.

>These results further prove that there is a genetically heritable component to IQ and that there is an innate difference between different racial groups in this arena.

nature.com/nature/journal/v247/n5439/abs/247316a0.html

thanks guys

kek
>pantz bantz

Anytime

Who cares if there's proof as long as the information supports my belief system which is always aligned with the dominant political authority?

proof is here , but you ignored it.

You can also consider the fact that the mean IQ of biracial children is almost exactly in between the mean racial IQ's of their parents.

Or the fact that there is no significant male-female IQ gap in the middle east, despite women not being allowed similar education and career options as men.

...

hey now that you've had time to actually read all those sources that kind user linked you in your first thread, how about assessing them?

here, let me jog your memory

there was a study of 2 black female twins and one was placed in a white middle class household and the other stayed with the mother

in adult years the iq gap between the siblings was 3 points

even if blacks got EVERYTHING a middle class white kid gets they still cant compete

wasn't me but thanks for the link

We're missionaries. Of evil. Evil truth. It's our job to induct people.

attention whores will be attention whores

They're pants that show what a black ass she has.

Oh come on. And the years 400AD - 600AD? Wouldn't be anything like as dramatic.

>Is there any proof that IQ is linked to race
That's really the majority of evidence. Socio-biological conditions vary across borders and continents, but IQ is consistent with race, regardless of environment. Blacks don't get smarter no matter where you raise them, and whites and asians don't get dumber because they're raised in poor regions. Certainly, sub-optimal conditions prevent people from reaching maximum potential, but that impact isn't as profound as genetics.

>Human Accomplishment - Douglas Murray
gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
>Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn
docdro.id/e2pEr1E
pastebin.com/Q1hMEC4a
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/

>psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

thanks

IQ isn't dependant on your culture or sociowhatever.

IQ tests are meant to challenge the recipient's ability to comprehend new information when presented with it.

>Oh come on. And the years 400AD - 600AD? Wouldn't be anything like as dramatic


Tell me more.

For $35 you can have the state-of-the-art:
amazon.com/gp/product/110746143X

Or just find a book review:
unz.com/jthompson/intelligent-brains

Twins
Adoptions

yes. they make tests that are culture neutral.

No, there is no way of telling whether black people are bad if you take blackness out of the equation.

Some new IQ tests can be taken by illiterate people too.

Yeah I don't buy that. I'm a race-realist, but, there's something to Flynn's objection that people living in a high-tech society's IQs climb (the FLynn effect). /something/ in the surroundings makes people better at IQ tests - 100 years is way too fast for evolution.

>gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
/Charles/ Murray

400-600 you find the advent of things like improved metallurgy, rudimentary breeding practice, long distance financial guarantorship, siege enginering, deep earth mining, hydraulic pumps

in china you have gas mining, fluid dynamics for gasses,engines, atermills, block printing,

you are a stupid fucking nigger. you made mud huts and nothing more. you cant figure out arithmetic

According to charles murray atleast 50 percent is hereditary.

no it isnt. during the plague half of europe died. mostly peasants, and mostly people that had poor hygiene

it left the more intelligent upper class in europe to have 5 times as many kids, not all of them can become nobility, BUT if they become peasants they'll become leass filthy, leass violent, more productive peasants

the industrial revolution came almost immediately after

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Lahn
> His research on the microcephaly-associated gene, MCPH1, led to the hypothesis that an archaic Homo sapiens lineage such as the Neanderthals might have contributed to the recent development of the human brain.[2] His research also suggested that newly arisen variants of two brain size genes, ASPM and MCPH1, might have been favored by positive natural selection in the recent human history.[3] This research provoked controversy due to the finding that the positively selected variants of these genes had spread to higher frequencies in some parts of the world than in others (for ASPM, it is higher in Europe and surrounding regions than other parts of the world; for MCPH1, it is higher outside sub-Saharan Africa than inside). He has advocated the moral position that human genetic diversity should be embraced and celebrated as among humanity's great assets.
You are a massive faggot OP.

Adopted Blacks raised in upper class White families don't see an IQ boost at all.

IQ is made up bullshit, only retarded social science majors care about it. And racists will believe anything that reinforces their beliefs

>Science is finding evidence of genetic diversity among groups of people as well as among individuals. This discovery should be embraced, not feared, say Bruce T. Lahn and Lanny Ebenstein.
nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/461726a.html

This. Big unproportionate asses are disgusting. Only niggers and mexicans like huge asses.

brainlet

>what is google image search?

leaf

lol nigger in jail
color me surprised

>Promoting biological sameness in humans is illogical, even dangerous
>To ignore the possibility of group diversity is to do poor science and poor medicine
>A robust moral position is one that embraces this diversity as among humanity's great assets
nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/461726a.html

>Is there any proof that IQ is linked to race when cultural and sociological factors are accounted for?
just look at their contenient. Not once in human history were they ever the dominant force.
>inb4 hurr durr slaves
Slaves were not a very large portion of the African population and were sold by other slaves
>Hurr durr colonization
Liberia.

this is probably what you are looking for, have not read it though, so cant confirm

Incorrect pic. Niggers didn't have clothes 2000 years ago. Retard.

meant "other Africans" and not "other slaves"

>Might mating between an ancient human and a Neanderthal - perhaps occurring in only a single instance - have introduced a gene variant into the human population that enhanced human brain function? That question is at the heart of a new study by researchers at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the University of Chicago.

>The new research, which was published online during the week of November 6, 2006, in the early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), suggests that human evolution was not just a matter of spontaneous advantageous mutations arising within the human lineage. Human evolution may also have been influenced by interbreeding with other Homo species, which introduced gene variants, known as alleles, that are beneficial to human reproductive fitness, said the study's senior author Bruce T. Lahn, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute researcher at the University of Chicago.
hhmi.org/news/could-interbreeding-between-humans-and-neanderthals-have-led-enhanced-human-brain

Cultural Marxists BTFO.

a common african insult is that a given nigress has a "long black labia"

even loincloths never have been a thing in africa

IQ is linked to amount of Rick and Morty episodes you watch on daily basis
saged

Nature/nurture is a false dichotomy and environmental determinism is retarded. Lamarckism doesn't work.

Delet this White Boi.

Would you suck her dick though?

>thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/race-and-iq/
you're the one screeching nigger

pic related, also the minnesota trans racial adoption studies were a great longitudinal study done to examine this. the researchers didn't get the results they wanted so no further research was done and so called "scientists" have been trying ever since to explain away the results using lies, misrepresentations and mental gymnastics.

I'm pretty sure colour photos were possible in 1969

Also I'm pretty sure sepia came BEFORE black and white, right? So surely 1896 should be sepia, then 1903 should be black and white, then 1969 should be colour film, then 2012 should be colour digital

Niggers? Stupid whores.

she's been BLACKED and has a pudgy butterface without makeup

They've all be blacked at this point.

pretty much every serious IQ research ever

There are people who unironically prefer right to left?

most psychology studies are bullshit and psychology is in the "replication crisis." was this ever replicated?

Yes, there is strong reason to believe that when we finally discover a genetic basis for intelligence that this will be linked to race. Until then, leftists are free to continue creating excuses for the persistent IQ gap between Blacks and Whites. For some people creating excuses for Blacks is a full-time job.

>shitty schools
>poverty
>drugs
>culture
>Jim Crow laws
>systemic racism
>not being able to get a cab
>old White ladies clutching their purses

The list of reasons for Black failures can fill a phone book. They will never admit that perhaps we aren't all equal. We know alcoholism is inherited. We know that personalities are heritable. We know that intelligence is heritable. But every race MUST be equal. Our entire way of life and many people's vision for the future of this country depends on it.

That one study may be inconclusive, but combined with everything else it points against the egalitarian, environmental determinist argument.

It's more about culture. Because we live, breed and build our culture around like people, people of the same race/ethnicity generally share the same culture.

Black culture is very shitty, and produces shitty people. That doesn't mean black people are inherently shitty. Raise a black dude in a white family and, ignoring external racism, he'll be just a good a person as the people that raised him (most of the time)

>Get to Indian IQ
>"Uhh.. Indians have an iq of 110 vs 100 for whites, but that's probably because they study longer!"

Whites are such insecure autistic faggots lmfao

>Is there any proof that IQ is linked to race when cultural and sociological factors are accounted for?
Yes. IQ levels hardly change even if a white family adopts a black child. Blacks get bad IQ scores in every single country on Earth, it can't be racism everywhere. The converse is true for East Asians. There are even physical differences. Whites have bigger brains than blacks by about 2 deciliters. The gene that causes brain growth is present in whites and Asians but not in blacks. And then there are the obvious questions that what are the chances our skin color and body physique would change through evolution, but our brains wouldn't. Especially considering how brains are our most distinctive organ, and the easiest way to change how a human acts is by changing his brain.

There's simply such overwhelming evidence from admittance to schools, success in tests, wages paid, IQ tests, historical developments and the states of current countries that if you don't believe in differences in IQ's you simply don't want to.

The Black-White IQ gap exists even when both races are raised in identical environments
>sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016028969290028P

How stupid is that bitch? Those are not abs.That's a fupa and her rib cage. She has at least 20 kilos of excess fat spread around her body, and it's obvious, regardless of how she contorts herself.

No. None at all. Race is a social construct, but all white people are racist. Shalom.

White gives rise to more geniuses than any other race. Scientific discoveries, technological advancement and the development of our societies speaks for itself. Whites flourish, Indians shit in streets.

Whites have only been inventing and innovating for the last 1500 years because the Islamic horde ruined ancient Indian progress.

Look who your CEOs are despite Indians making up a tiny portion of American population.

Go shit in San Fransisco streets you inbred American subhuman garbage

Size matters.

yeah just talk to a slow person asshole.