Lombardo said Paddock had a long of ups and downs with money buthe "lost a significantamount of his wealth"since September 2015, which may have been a "determining factor" on why he started building an armory of more than 40 weapons and meticulouslyplanning every detail of the shooting.
>Wait the first story was that Paddock won 5 million, now backtracking.
Lombardo said he still has doubts and questions about how none of Paddock's family or friends say they knew about his plans. He specifically said that "it's hard for me to believe" the gunman's girlfriend, MarilouDanley, didn't know.
"You would think that Mrs. Danley would have some information associated with that, but currently, we haven’t been able to pull that out of her—if it’s in her,"Lombardo said.
He also said the continued comments to the news media from Paddock's brother, Eric, aren't helping.
>Huh, They cleared Danley in the first 12 hours before.
Lombardo also provided more details about the investigation, including that Paddock used several days to bring up all 23 guns up to his hotel room on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino to avoid getting caught.
>Lawyer on Tucker Carlson show stated 2 bellman took Paddock’s ten bags to the suite.
Seems more and more like a FBI/CIA/Mossad/Saudi operation.
Vegas Sheriff Spins Story Once Again
Other urls found in this thread:
newsweek.com
foxnews.com
foxnews.com
twitter.com
I also heard that he shot some security guard in the hall then he phoned down to the lobby and still the police fucked around.
Meanwhile this has all but been forgotten and by that I mean the shooting.
It took them 1 fucking month to come up with this "motive"?
That isnt a motive because there is no incentive involved.
Yeah. He was so but hurt about losing money he wired $100,000 to the Phili[pines so his girl could go “shopping”. Good God. They aren’t even trying.
>Angrily bringing up 23 guns and thousands of rounds of ammo to the top floor of a hotel over the course of a 4 day weekend where every doorway and elevator is monitored by a hundred million dollar security system
O-ok.
How (((convenient))) that he (((lost))) so much money and gave us a good (((motive)))!
>money problems
>spends a lot of money on guns
>wires 100k to Philippines
>kills people because he didn't have money?
>(((Motive)))
I know of you lads still has that screenshot from when an user foretold about it and to watch OSI stocks.
this
hang that fucking sheriff
Why would the CIA do This? There's nothing to gain.
100k isn't that much to a multimillionaire.
kek, nice bait
No really. What would they gain?
That is true. He didn't work at taco bell.
...
Millionaires don’t become millionaires by not having a concept of the value of money.
>checked user
10 bags for one guest doesn't raise a red flag? Bullshit!
OY VEY NOT THE CASINOS
My uncle basically landed into it and blew most of it away. Some people are stupid and not every millionaire is smart.
From?
Rogue agencies working for the (((agenda))) have everything to gain out of this. The largest mass shooting in US history was by a muslim, they couldn't have that so they got the death toll to literally be just a couple of people above the Pulse shooters so that it was still a white man at the top of the list. Also pushing further gun control laws while they can, this will be used to prevent people modifying their weapons at home and to attempt to slowly creep towards the banning of semi-auto rifles, followed by 'excessively powerful' handguns and then any handgun. Its the slope.
I dread to think that there might be a day where a US citizen can't buy an M1 Garand, and then another day where he can't buy a Colt 1911 either. Your history is in those weapons, learn from the mistakes of the UK. I can't get a fucking Lee Enfield... In the UK.
This. How many single males travel with ten bags of heavy suitcases for a 3-4 day trip? Less than 1%.
>used several days to bring up all 23 guns up to his hotel room
And all these days was DND on the door and no one get suspicious?
GTFO Lombardo, do you really think all people are this stupid?
1. Mass shootings don't change gun control dynamics. They never have. Basically a slight majority always remain opposed no matter what. Didn't change with Pulse, or Sand Hook, or Combine, or even this.
2. If they wanted the "white man" to really be hated they would've gone another route. Most mass shootings are already seen as being perpetrated by white dudes. Meanwhile the largest terrorist attack in US history was done by Muslims and that still holds.
Seems like a weak argument to me.
Increased budgets to fight (((threats))). They've done this shit before breh. You don't think gook farmers actually attacked a us minesweeper in the Gulf of tonkin, do you?
They're job is not ask you deal. Vegas is a weird place.
Paddock worked for Lockheed. Doesn’t sound like a dumb man to me.
To bad mass shootings don't lead to increased budgets unless they're terrorist attacks. Besides, they pretty much just have to ask and they'll get it. One guy shooting up a concert isn't grounds for increased funding for the CIA.
Gulf of Tonkin was about geopolitics. Completely different story.
>a weak argument
This has never stopped kikes in pushing their agenda.
Quid pro quo deals like they have done throughout history. Now they are just more brazen operating here in the states against the charter. If the user with OSI and bodyscanners is to be believed, then that is only one source. Then there is the MGM board member that sold 5 million shares (at $34+ pet share) right before the massacre. Put options placed by that paid off for a few. Random weapons stock that had low trading historically rose suddenly in with huge buys days before the shooting. Too many others to mention.
Engineering smarts doesn't always translate to personal life smarts. Even if he was, plenty of rich guys are addicted to gambling or hookers.
Fuck this puppet
Except there's been a real push to label this as terrorism despite no political motive or evidence of one so far. I do find it interesting we've seen little to no Islamic terrorism from se Asia. I understand they're different sects, but there's an angle there.
>Shooting doesn't change gun control
Bumpstocks are on their way out
It's a weak argument to most Americans though.
The MGM guy sold it like a month before though...
MGM corporation specifically has training for every employee on see something say something after 9/11.
Islamic state is actually significantly active in SE Asia right now, the media just rarely mention it. Everywhere there is Islam, there is extremism regardless of sect.
From where? Not even Democrats have pushed hard on this as terrorism.
Most people don't give a shit about bumpstockd though. Even the NRA is open to it precisely because of how no one basically use them.
Occam’s razor does not point to this being the act of a disgruntled man that lost money because they are way too many statistically improbable coincidences that have already been stated above in this thread.
I appreciate you trying to offer a flip side of the argument and giving us excuses for Paddock, but it’s clear the evidence is stacked in favour of the “inside job” theory.
>Lombardo said Paddock had a long of ups and downs with money buthe "lost
Stopped reading here. Learn to write like a white man you fucking ape.
Yeah but again it's not really their job. They're employees are mostly Filipino maids that barely speak English. And they get probably dozens of weirdos a week. A guy carrying 10 bags in a Vegas hotel isn't particularly off the charts.
Bumpstocks are a novelty and hardly anyone uses them. Won't matter, and the NRA is being smart to let the lefties ban them.
I've yet to see any real evidence of this theory.
you know you could take over the entire nation corrupting Sheriff's departments
copy/paste.
Did not really think I would have needed to proofread and edit Newsweek.
>but he
What's your fucking problem, gtfo to rebbit if you can't read.
>Angrily buy a gun in July so you can commit an act of mass murder a few months later.
I understand that. I see news about se Asian Islamic violence in Asia, just not in the west so much if it's happening. Being able to frame this as terrorism from there creates a whole new "front" in budgetary terms.
Media was heavily calling it a terror attack shortly after (muh white terrorist). Public officials not so much, but that's because there's been no plausible political motive put forth.
Print media has no proofreaders anymore. They think spellchecker is enough.
Maybe some opinion pieces, but everywhere I checked it was mass shooting.
...
News organizations file lawsuits alleging Las Vegas Police officials are violating public records law
The lawsuit, one of two filed late Wednesday in Clark County, Nev., district court, demands police hand over body camera footage, 911 call recordings, dispatch calls, evidence logs and surveillance footage obtained from the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino.
“Under Nevada law, all video and audio recordings made by police-worn body cameras are public records subject to inspection,” in addition to 911 call recordings, the lawsuit says.
Vegas police say they have video footage of Paddock in hotel
"Security footage obtained by police from Mandalay Bay is still being investigated and Paddock was not seen in the presence of any other individuals while moving around the property, Lombardo added."
Always ask "Who benefits?"
The government clearly doesn't benefit, it's Republicans across the board.
Even if the "Deep state" was real, it doesn't benefit, because A: Republicans control everything and won't change the law. and B: Mass shootings have never changed gun laws, and we've had hundreds.
The only people with clear, obvious, 100% provable benefits are:
>Gun manufacturers (Sales and stock prices soared after the shooting, like they do after every shooting)
>NRA (Donations skyrocket after shootings)
>Gun Lobbyists (Their funding/paychecks goes up)
Think about it this way: With Obama no longer president, gun sales are down, way down. People don't feel like they need to buy guns before they get banned. But days after the shooting, every single person with a gun was trying to buy a bump stock.
>"Security footage obtained by police from Mandalay Bay is still being investigated and Paddock was not seen in the presence of any other individuals while moving around the property, Lombardo added."
This contradicts what they were reporting when they said they were trying to identify a woman that he was seen with. That women they labeled as an escort later on. More likely it was his handler.
odd aside
>multimillionaire
>drops tens of thousands of dollars every time he goes to vegas
>wires tens of thousands of dollars to his whore in SE Asia
>goes on a killing spree with tens of thousands of dollars worth of guns and ammunition because he one a couple thousand on one of his vegas trips
Remains of a failed observation wheel project.
Pls post COMPs, Eric is my crazyfu
Holy fuck, vegas is so dystopian looking in the daytime
why the fuck are you surprised that he could hide something. I spent 2 years hiding the fact from work mates that I had broke up with my long term girlfriend because she cheated on me. I also hid the fact that I became a drunk after and was deeply depressed from them and my family. I couldn't hide the girl friend thing from my family. The only reason it came out was because I couldn't keep spending the massive amount of money I was on booze. I got too far behind on rent I got evicted and finally had to ask for help. This vegas guy could of been like me but instead of the booze and decided he was just going to shoot a bunch of people. Maybe he hated the casino because they enabled his gambling addiction
Nice Try
Sheriff Edition
>Maybe he hated the casino because they enabled his gambling addiction
If that was the case then he would have targeted he casino itself, not concertgoers. The issue is the cycle of new and contradicting narratives being put forth by law enforcement even after a month. I am expecting to hear something different in a weeks time that will conflict with this current one.
user, that's a giant leap of logic to equate quietly drinking away your sorrow with acquiring a lot of guns and going to a hotel and murdering a bunch of presumably innocent strangers.
The two aren't even remotely similar.
no I am saying he was probably not mentally stable and that could of been a reason. The main point i was making is that some people can put up and act and not show what they are dealing with
do you fucking understand how money and investments work? you could have lost enough that he would loose it all soon enough. So he used what he had to stock up on guns and plan out a mass shooting for whatever reasons
trust me at one point if I could of got guns I would of turned up at that bitches place and shot the shit out of her and her family. The difference is becoming a drunk means that I was never clear minded enough to come up with a plan to enact vengeance during that period in my life
Bump to keep this discussion going, we need real answers not the LV bullshit/cover-up swill we've been getting.
/pol morons still focusing on oswald, heh.
so easy.