Why aren't you an individualist, Sup Forums? Adopting a group identity interferes with your ability to think rationally...

Why aren't you an individualist, Sup Forums? Adopting a group identity interferes with your ability to think rationally. You become susceptible to groupthink.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

i would adopt liyu to be my cute daughter (male)

I see those oestrogen pills are finally starting to work, Sven

Look at you faggy individualists, banding together to talk about how unique and unlike the others you are. You disgust me.

There is no community of individualists.

Because a community of individualists will be killed, enslaved or just out-competed by a community of collectivists.

>group of people who share the same ideology of individualism
hm...

because identifying as one brings you into an even faggier group

Humans are social animals.

Sharing similar beliefs doesn't mean we associate in any way.

...

...

because groups exist and have an effect on national stability. sheep dont adopt wolves into their flock for a reason. denying the existence of groups is how your civilization collapses.

Keep telling yourselves that at your next meeting. Your little group is pathetic and just as collectivist as those you look down on.

>Adopting a group identity interferes with your ability to think rationally.
Now come work for XYZcorp, ancuck.

tbqh i'd become full ancap if it meant being full on hoppe mode
killing all shitskins and niggers before hand i mean

...

I want to give her happas babies

>meme flag trying to fool us

>her
toplel

>toplel

its kek nowadays

>kek
top zozzle

>be individual, join my group!

Because I can be both an individual and pet of a group(s), there's no need for aboslutes because im not autistic.

Hoppe IS full ancap. You're making a distinction that isn't there.
>killing all shitskins and niggers before hand i mean
Why? Freedom of association exists for a reason. Plus a race war is kike D&C/pointless killing that only leads to more goys dead.

that's bullshit and you know it

I am an individualist, that's why I'm against the erosion of nation states - it's part of my identity.

nice pick and chose of hoppe nigger
or did you just unintentionally choose to forget him saying that an ancap society can only emerge from a homogeneous society of conservative individuals with high IQs
fuck off nigger

Nice rebuttal "keep telling yourself that"
I'm sure you've won many arguments

And then group will come over, wreck your enlightened ass and seize all your shit, and there is nothing you'll be able to do about this because group is incomparably stronger than some egoistic fuckboy. But at least you arent susceptible to groupthink.

One individual gets the fuck beat out of him even by a group as small as two people.

I am an individualist but I'm not an ancap, I still adhere to the social contract of democratically-decided society.

Because I'm mediocre and need a group identity to feel like I'm worth something, that I deserve to succeed in life merely by virtue of my birth.

It can be anything really, not only my race, but also a religion, my country, or some ideology that conveniently supports my mediocrity and gives me a meaning in life, one that I'd otherwise never have. It's only thanks to group identity that I can be proud of being a civilization builder like others that came before me and belonged to the same race, creed, and nationality, but were exceptional rather than useless like me.

Indeed, God forbid I ever have to produce something of value myself without indirectly associating with the achievements of my superiors through group identity.

That'd be Hell.

I believe what is right and true, I don't choose my beliefs like fashions.

what an exceptional waste of your time lad
literally spending minutes of your life constructing an elaborate strawman based on shitty conjecture

Some redpills are too big to swallow, I guess.

Individualism > Nationalism > Internationalism

>if i use a buzzword my shitty strawman based on conjecture will seem more accurate
top zozzle
even if your conclusion was right, which it isn't, the way you got there was so logically retarded that i'd rather kill myself than accept it as truth

Individualists tend to see great men and women throughout history as products of their own brilliance and tend to want to accomidate a liberal environment in order to produce more greatness, all i see in collectivism is you taking credit for other people's accomplishments based off of your skin colour, a disgusting intellectual perversion.

>i'd rather kill myself than accept it as truth
I'm sure you would, that's the whole point of my post.

nationalism isn't the worship of embers you pathetic strawmanning faggot
it's the preservation of fire
it's pushing yourself to be exceptional because of your ancestors achievement not thinking you are exceptional because of their achievements
but using erroneous strawman arguments against it is easier than pushing yourself to be exceptional

Nice response ignoring my first post and the second half of my second post. You really got me, you kangajockey.

>Adopting a group identity interferes with your ability to think rationally. You become susceptible to groupthink.

OKAY

I am a nationalist who defends liberal values, of course I understand the plight and progression of humanity, it doesn't mean I want the government to raise my kids.

>the zenith of pseudo intellectual hubris
i bet you actually legitimately feel smart because you used an out of context quote right now
literally sad that you confused
>your method of getting to a conclusion was so bad i'd rather kill myself than believe it
and
>your post was so against my beliefs that i'd rather kill myself than believe it
sad that you people legitimately think you are anything other than niggers

I'm an individualist who believes collectivism is good for a society

So you're a communist?

>it doesn't mean I want the government to raise my kids.
if you think that this is the end all be all against collectivism you don't know what those terms mean

I do, I'm just being typical to definitions, I could have extensive convos about it irl but we're on Sup Forums so I'm being scarce.

then you're bad at arguing if you can't condense your argument in a short paragraph
also
arguing irl
shiggy diggy

>taking Sup Forums arguments seriously

write a fucking book, i might read it, I'm not giving you any relevant attention here.

>the backpedaling
>the desperate anime reactions
>the inability to cope with one's own mediocrity
>"n-niggers"
Wonderful

>>the backpedaling
never did this
>the desperate anime reactions
>it's desperate because i don't have any arguments lmao
>the inability to cope with one's own mediocrity
>it's true because my argument is built upon this conjecture
>"n-niggers"
you are intellectually a nigger
>Wonderful
it's even more wonderful because of your response my negro friend

You are a disgrace to the Gadsden flag.

>>taking Sup Forums arguments seriously
why wouldn't i
it's fun and you're practicing rhetoric
don't come to Sup Forums if you don't want to do this

okay, yankie.

supporting a lifestyle that embraces divide & conquer tactics

Most of us are trolls out for ourselves.
This is the only place on the internet I don't constanly get banned and kicked off of.

>individualist
>abandoning the very thing that made humans the dominant species on Earth
Good Good goyim! Leave collective organisation to the Chosen Ones! You don't need community you are your own god hehehehehe.

Ideologies are autistic.But im not some faggot centrist,when and or if the shit goes down i'll go with the RWDS, fuck commies.

groupthink isn't entirely bad. whats your argument against that?

Because
>No nation, so constituted, can endure.

Groupthink is like monarchies and dictatorships. It can be the greatest thing ever, or the worst thing ever. Depending on the group that's thinking.

The problem isn't the Groupthink.

The problem as with all other things, is how far people take it.

When does it not go as far as it can?

>Be individual
>Get on hormone therapy so your singular group has a woman for reproduction

The problem isn't how to make full use of that idea. The problem is whether that idea has any utility for the circumstance. If it should not be applied.

Group identity isn't about the death of the individual, but the realization of our individual identity within that group; we're social animals and it's only through our connections with others that we achieve the full flowering of ourselves as individuals.

Do you look down on mothers for taking care of their children? For finding meaning in providing for a child?

Sage.

Get on social media and red pill normies on the reality of Hollywood:

Hollywood publicly promoted Pedophilia for decades. They have been getting away with this shit for years but the Spacey scandal is the start of (((their))) downfall.

Shirley Temple was abused for years in the entertainment industry and is the earliest example of a child being exploited by Pedophiles in entertainment.:
youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4

Playboy publicy sold child pornography. Possibly involved in a child prostitution ring in the 70s.
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html