So now that the dust has settled (that dust being Hugh Hefner's disheveled corpse)

So now that the dust has settled (that dust being Hugh Hefner's disheveled corpse)

What's your opinion on Playboy showing an oiled up 10 year old girl in one of their magazines?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Climax_Corporation
photo.fr/magazine/numero-130
xhamster.com/videos/fruhreifen-report-6707950
youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html
johndoe4693.tumblr.com/post/166939615188/playboy-published-child-pornography
twitter.com/JohnDoe4693/status/923433361275785216
twitter.com/JohnDoe4693/status/923434223180091392
mobile.twitter.com/playboy
youtube.com/watch?v=alIJOtyHAGM
youtube.com/watch?v=ujlvV7AuF0w
archive.fo/RCejE
archive.fo/K1LH2
youtu.be/GcvzlYOXWos
youtube.com/watch?v=rrjvifKXQy4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States#History
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teri_Shields
twitter.com/AnonBabble

This is real?

It wasn't as bad as the CP-disguised-as-period-piece called Pretty Baby.

...

>implying it wasn't Sup Forums approved.

Not in the actual Playboy magazine, but the company did publish photos of Brooke Shields nude and oiled up in a bathtub when she was 10.

They published pictures of her when she was ten, fully naked and oiled up. But it was called "art" so it was "ok"

they used to advertise incest and child porn in the back of dirty mags back in the 70s.

I WAS THERE

I'm not as old, but I think you're telling the truth. I heard wild storied about late 60's early 70's sex magazines.

starting to think Playboy was always a hooker catalog

The 70s were a different time. In the 70s you could walk into any newsagent in Australia and buy a magazine full of "tasteful" nudes of nuclear families.
An image of an 11 year old boy or girl naked was not considered pornographic because treating it as pornography was the process of sexualising children, and no one (obviously) was aroused by it.

I don't now why people are thinking they jsut stumbled on some incredible unknown secret and now the game is up for the media. They did this openly, it was a different time.

I know for sure it wasn't illegal, and that sex clubs were open to kids coming in and siblings fucking each other. I saw it on a documentary about one of the more famous ones in NYC.

this is the company that made the ones I saw advertised...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Climax_Corporation

>Between 1971 and 1979 the company produced 36 or more 10-minute films for its Lolita series.[4][7][8] These films featured young girls, mainly with men, but sometimes with women or other children.[4][7][8] The participating girls were mainly between the ages of 7 and 11 years; however, some were younger.[4][7][8] Titles included Incest Family, Pre-Teen Sex, Sucking Daddy, and Child Love.[7]

I can't fucking believe this was legal in the western world in the 70's.

15 yo brooke was best brooke.

wow

MAGA

You know the rules, faggot. Pix or it didn't happen.

I believe you. That's degenerate and disturbing.

Any more info on these Theander brothers? It’s fucking disgusting, inconceivable.

Photo Magazine in France published a couple of layouts based on that Brooke Shields bathtub photoshoot. Their official website still proudly displays their July 1978 cover of a topless 10 year-old Brooke covered in suds:

photo.fr/magazine/numero-130

By definition, wouldn't anti-incest and pro-age of consent be the degenerate ones?

...

ITT: Newfags discovered the 70s
There were child and teen sexual exploitation films all over white countries in Europe, you bitch.

Underaged losers.

Little girls>>>adult women
>Fact

...

Someone shop a benis

sick fucks

>Der Fruhreifen-Report
xhamster.com/videos/fruhreifen-report-6707950

Brooke wasn't even the only lolita "sex symbol" of the '70s. French model Eva Ionesco began posing for her photographer mother Irina at the age of 5 and her nude preteen layouts popped up in magazines all over Europe, including the Italian edition of Playboy. Apparently, it was Eva Ionesco that inspired the Brooke character in Pretty Baby.

Also tellingly, both Eva and Brooke were pushed into being child sex symbols by their mothers...

...

brooke shields was a smoking hot 10 year old. she was also nude in blue lagoon when she was like 14. Her mother sold her to hollywood pedos.

Dan Schneider Sr.?

>Do something morally egregious
>turn it into a social justice movement
>convince tards to back you

Reminder: naked 10 year old Brooke was "art," as ruled by a judge.

Also Lara Wendel...

>(((art)))

>europeans

...

>Brooke Shields
>(((American)))

The Shields photos were smuggled as art. Yours were sold as straight up porn, you sick fucks.

the only reason it ever became illegal was because the U.N. pressured everyone to make it illegal for there to be any industry that made profits from sexualizing kids starting in europe.

>Photos
Um sweety, Pretty Baby is a feature film. American film.

Reminder: magazine covers like pic attached were perfectly legal and could be found on newsstands all over Europe in the '70s

When did that happen? I'm flabbergasted that this was apparently able to be done comercially out in the open in the 70s, the Color Climax stuff especially, as it didn't even have the veneer of 'art' like the Brooke Shields stuff.

we need to go back. were there a lot of mudshits in europe back then?

Reminder: magazine covers like pic attached were perfectly legal and could be found on newsstands all over Europe in the '70s

Hey, you googled it all by yourself! Now all you have to do is relate it to my post and I'll overlook that extra chromosome of yours.

...

don't worry

Reminder: magazine covers like pic attached were perfectly legal and could be found on newsstands all over Europe in the '70s

you see I would much rather have some tasteful ((artistic)) nudes of a lolita. Mudshit rapists need to be burned to death.

That is really fucked up.

Look at the thread that is relatively slow. Can't argue children are hot and then moralfag users will report and mods will delete the thread anyways.

no that shit would have been in a porno shop not a newstand. people still hated pedos back in the 70s they could just get away with it more back then.

Wrong. Der Spiegel is one of Germany's biggest culture/political magazines. This wasn't porno.

>DER SPIEGEL
No wonder the absolute state of the West if this was the 70's

Anons have to understand just how far the Left pushed the sexualization of children toward the mainstream to fully understand just what their end game is. To understand just how they'll always ALWAYS try to push things if their bullshit is allowed to go unchecked.

you guys should become pedophiles and download videos of 13yo girls get fucked and cummed inside already.

Nothing wrong with sexualizing little girls.
Only brainlet muslims don't sexualize children.

what do you think this is?
AnonIB in 2012?
I'm sorry but I already fell for that honey pot

Stop being a nigger. Brainlet Muslims have an entire culture of sexualizing children. Their fucking prophet only married a 9 year old girl.

...

louis malle also made black moon iirc, which had a 15 year old girl topless a lot

i had to watch it for a french film class, fucked me up

dude was a creep

>Wrong. Der Spiegel is one of Germany's biggest culture/political magazines. This wasn't porno.

That's not sexualizing, that's being family focused in relationship. Muslims are too conservative to sexualize even women.

Get on social media and red pill normies on the reality of Hollywood:

Hollywood publicly promoted Pedophilia for decades. They have been getting away with this shit for years but the Spacey scandal is the start of (((their))) downfall.

Shirley Temple was abused for years in the entertainment industry and is the earliest example of a child being exploited by Pedophiles in entertainment.:
youtu.be/rrjvifKXQy4

Playboy publicy sold child pornography. Possibly involved in a child prostitution ring in the 70s.
theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html

Exposing Playboy - Social Media:

Tumblr (For feminist rage)
johndoe4693.tumblr.com/post/166939615188/playboy-published-child-pornography

Twitter:
twitter.com/JohnDoe4693/status/923433361275785216

twitter.com/JohnDoe4693/status/923434223180091392

Make sure to comment on Playboy Magazine Twitter posts about their history with CP:
mobile.twitter.com/playboy

Strategies used by shills are easily identifiable, for they draw attention away from the topic of the OP and generally consist of the same people. Some of them even use the same meme flags, but those that don't can be recognized by their writing style and accusations. Most of them resort to Critical Theory and Rules for Radicals tactics, some spread pastas.

Ex1: Someone mentions the Brooke Shields edition of Playboy, when she posed oiled and with full make up in a bathtub, including full frontal nudity. She was 10 years old. "You think a 10 year old is sexual? Seems like you are the pedo here." (Pressure flip)

Ex.2: Dude who posts a pasta with a clown everywhere trying to sound creepy - pic related.

Ex.3: "child porn wasn't illegal back then". Does that make it right? First I'd like to remind you the goal of most threads is not the discussion of what constitutes abuse of minors(and I use that term because shills like to post about hebophilia and the like to distract from the topic at hand), second I'd like to also remind you lawmakers and enforcers can be bought. That's why the system is corrupt. Sup Forums autism is the chance to change the game.

Pt 1/2

Shill tactics
Pt. 2/2

Ex.4: using art, such as paintings from the Renaissance, as an example of how not all nudity is sexual - think of The Birth of Venus by Botticcelli. The shill doesn't trace a distinction between, for instance, a painting of a naked nymph surrounded by nude angels and photographs of a 10 year old girl with full make up, with her body oiled and displaying full frontal nudity in a bathtub. The shill normally puts the two in the same category. Further, he goes on and on about how the viewer projects the sexuality(trying to pressure flip such as in Ex.1), though he does so through still not making a distinction between the two aforementioned examples. Some shills will even go as far as saying it should be accepted as a natural effect of demand in a capitalist society.

Ex.5: Black pills such as "nothing will ever happen" and "these people are too powerful, give up" are also common. Also mentions of alleged "mass hysteria" or "paranoia" over pedophilia.
And of course, when they get too desperate or lazy they resort to classics such as "nothing burger" and "sleepy".

> Threads either have the goal to act upon shared knowledge or to spread said knowledge.
If the thread is dedicated to discuss what constitutes abuse then it's expected that it's discussed. Otherwise, it's distracting from the topic at hand, and should be treated as such. The latter constitutes the vast majority of threads on the topic of abuse of minors. Human trafficking/pizzagate threads often are targeted by the same types, who use the same tactics. Learn to recognize them so as not to derail useful investigation.

of course they dont really care about the kids. they've been abusing them for years since the hippies started this shit.

>censored by myself
why do we need to know that

Dan 'Star in a week if I can tickle your feet' Schneider:

UNSUPERVISED POOL PARTIES
youtube.com/watch?v=alIJOtyHAGM [Open]

CHILDREN FORCED TO HAVE FOOT FETISH AUDITIONS
youtube.com/watch?v=ujlvV7AuF0w [Open]
> About Jamie Lynn Spears getting pregnant while working with Dan at 16
Inb4 "the father is Casey Aldridge"

> "Casey is being paid off to be the family’s fall guy while the real father remains unidentified,” Star magazine insists.
They say the real reason is that an older man could be charged with statutory rape if revealed to be the father of an under-aged girl’s baby."

Sauce: archive.fo/RCejE

Angelique Bates in All That
> “I was only 12-years-old and that’s when my nightmare began,” Bates recalled. “I was physically, emotionally, mentally abused in front of the producers and cast members. Sometimes they could even hear me yelling, but nothing was done to help me." -Angelique Bates, actress at "All That", produced by Dan Schneider.

> Sauce:
archive.fo/K1LH2
youtu.be/GcvzlYOXWos [Open]


Miranda Cosgrove was 11 years old when she started working with Dan Schneider in Drake & Josh in 2004. Then 14 when iCarly was created.
Amanda Bynes was 10 when she started working with Dan Schneider in All That in 1996. Three years later she worked with him on The Amanda Show.
Jamie Lynn Spears was 14 and Victoria Justice was 12 when they started working for Dan Schneider in Zoey 101 (2005).

Fucked up but not worse than what they did to Sherley Temple
youtube.com/watch?v=rrjvifKXQy4

dafuq? This was a thing? seriously??

Just got the image off Google. Didn't make it myself.

even still
it begs the question

I have some of the photos

i always knew i hated the 70s

Oops didn't see this already posted

Normies have no idea how many pedos are in Hollywood. If this information was well known, Hollywood wouldn't survive. It's obvious they still do sick shit behind camera.

all for it

nothing dirty about the human body

INB4 anyone from the last threads on this topic recognizes me and call me "CIA nigger".

what happened to brooke shields was pretty terrible. feel bad for her. her mom must be one evil rotten cunt. and so must hugh heffner, everyone involved in the production of the film "blue lagoon", "pretty baby", and everyone who stood by while this girl was paraded around sexually for public consumption as a child lolita for her entire childhood.

>I can't fucking believe this was legal in the western world in the 70's.
It wasn't well known and the population still despised it. Pedo politicians were definitely behind it.

sauce?

bump

also including the people who work for New York Magazine, People Magazine, all of their readers, and everyone who ever watched those films without stopping and throwing up and saying "my god, this is so horribly wrong", and everyone in the media who covered it in a nonchalant fashion

Of course, knowing what I know about a lot of the stuff that goes on in the industry, I recognize a lot of the familiar symbolism in these old pics. For example, check the "one-eye" Illuminati gesture here, which anons will recognize from all the pics of models and Hollywood stars who do it today.

her mom was a pedo. people forget that woman are pedos too and abuse kids all the time not just men. you can tell she thought her daughter was hot.

Probably to point out that the images are not censored despite being CP.
You can find some of the photos uncensored on Google search. It's (((legal))) because (((art))).

no sadly this is totally bullshit. people on reddit flipped out at me in the last thread when i pointed this out, but child pornography and statutory rape and sexualization of children was actually pretty normalized in the US during the entirety of the 20th century. its only in the last few years we've started to give a shit about this. it was literally legal to fuck 10 yr olds up until the 1920's

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States#History

>While the general age of consent is now set between 16 and 18 in all U.S. states, the age of consent has widely varied across the country in the past. In 1880, the age of consent was set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7.[2] The ages of consent were raised across the U.S. during the late 19th century and the early 20th century.[3][4] By 1920 ages of consent generally rose to 16-18 and small adjustments to these laws occurred after 1920. As of 2015 the final state to raise its age of general consent was Hawaii, which changed it from 14 to 16 in 2001.

The only reason the (((tribe))) ever allows success to come to anyone working in any media-related field is when that person either intentionally or accidently fulfills one of (((their))) protocols. That's it; the ONLY reason. In the case of Hugh Hefner, the publishing industry welcomed a pornographer into the fold because he was doing something (((they themselves))) were also doing: perverting Goy happiness at every turn.

i said people on reddit, sorry, i meant people on Sup Forums. flipping out at someone for pointing out pretty verifiable historical facts though is a fairly reddit-tier thing to do and that's exactly what Sup Forums pulls when it comes to this topic

Her mom was also Jewish. She sold her daughter as a child prostitute and Brooke Shields was definitely molested behind camera.

Also the use of mirrors, which you'll find in a lot of these Eva Ionesco shots done by her mother. Apparently, mirror symbolism is a big call-out symbolizing Monarch sex kitten slave handling.

>tfw you unexpectedly bump into Dan Schneider
Totally natural response.

There are also chan imageboard that allows nude pics of little girls, I frequent them at night to fap to kids.

Fuck off CIA nigger.

Well that explains Hollywood

>Discussion of topics I don't want discussed is not allowed and everyone who does so is a shill!
The only one trying to censor/shut down discussion is you user. Historically marrying younger girls was the norm, and only recently has this changed in the west

a nude body of a kid is not cp if its not sexualized. parents let their kids run around nude all the time.

Not a kike, according to any of the sources I've found. For example, Wikipedia says:

>She was the daughter of Theresa (née Dollinger) (1905-1998), a house cleaner, and John Schmon (1904-1983), a chemist. She was of German, English, Scotch-Irish, and Welsh ancestry

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teri_Shields

The fact that she was a goy pimping her little girl out just makes this even worse.