Is he right?

Is he right?

Intelligent, moral people can be atheists but the rest of the plebs need religion?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/bNKSwqgl4HQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Absolutely. Most people can't handle not having an authority figure constantly watching everything they do, or at least thinking they're watching. You see exactly what happens when the masses become godless in the degenerate United States.

Without religion, you need to understand enough philosophy, economics, sociology, biology, everything-under-the-sun-ology to grasp why you should live like religious people do. It's hard work!

Using only your left-brain retards personal development.
The path of logic alone is a relativistic one that can lead one astray and find themselves in a Talmudic cult.
Stephan Mollyjew claimed to have a crazy Jewish mother in Germany, that his dad was Catholic, and as a child he'd be alone in the pews at church hoping someone would talk to him. Since then he's held contempt for all believers because HE NEVER ASKED FOR HELP.

I don't care for this atheist Jew at all anymore after learning you need both halves of your brain to reach enlightenment.

I am agnostic, I learned bout religion when I was 13.. I am a multi millionaire who migrated to an Asian country for tax purposes. I served in my countries armed services as a cost of migration. I have never killed, stole, or hurt children.. I have however fucked a lot of woman and never gave them control of my wealth by infecting them with an anchor parasite, am I bad? am I bad for being free?

Based on what? You can be moral and stupid. I work with tards and most of them behave perfectly normal and friendly. The real question is: why are you so poorly educated as to listen to "not an argument" fag? You can go to a library or online to read about the laws of argumentation and logic from real philosophers, not that retard.

most people like a herd unfortunately. the lack of religion debilitates the fabric of the society. would be lovely not to have a religion at the centre of the nation, but not gonna happen probably. if christianity isnt good enough, we might as well revert to regional paganistic beliefs.

it's more like the other way around. if an ordinary jackass is morally confused and not clearly subordinated to a higher power it barely matters because he's ineffectual and most of his actions are determined by more powerful people, but if someone highly intelligent and energetic loses moral integrity the result is usually a disaster because they can and will wreak havoc on the structure of society.

This is what the jews have been pushing for a long time. They hate Christians because we have continually purged the new and challenged this authority,

Atheism is idiotic. A least a Christian can justifies their belief with Faith. But asthesist actually believe in "proof". Of course if they knew anything about the scientific method they would realise that their is no such thing as absolute proof. And yet they delude themselves into believing their beliefs are proven by facts! And worse yet the stupidest thing about athestist is the belief that a lack of proof of something means it dosnt exist. Agnotism is the default. Atheism is a Faith for people to stupid to realise it.

Please be bait.

The scientific method is based off of repeat observation of measurable phenomena, controlled for variables. It's the closest thing to "innate knowledge" that we'll ever get (thus far).

Religion is just a bunch of writings of dubious origin that make idiots less anxious about their inevitable death.

answer: is the cia full of religious people?

Tards use idea-complexes to define morality. C'mon aquafresh use your fucking brain.

You just said it your self. It's the closest thing. But not the absolute truth. And I'm not talking about religion I'm talking about Faith. To believe in something without proof. Much like I believe reality isn't a simulation in spite of the fact I don't have proof. I recommend you watch this lecture on the philosophy of the scientific method. Science if nothing but theories not truths. Faith is unavoidable in fact Faith is the only means of justice your beliefs. And with that said you "truth" is no more plausible then the Christian belief.

youtu.be/bNKSwqgl4HQ

I think it is more about the need for purpose and direction. Religion also gives certainty.

Like Archimedes quote, "give me a fulcrum and I shall move the world", the fulcrum being a fixed point in the universe. This is religion. It gives every man a fixed point, it gives purpose and it provides a direction.

Remove god and many will also abolish religion as the premise is deemed false.

Now the atheists have lost their purpose, direction and starting point. If you lack discipline, intelligence and principles this is a really shitty spot to be in.

I think this is why American atheists gravitate towards socialism. It gives them purpose and direction and it gives them the sense of virtue. And this feeds the lefts constant need for a struggle. Once you have the first queer trans midget AIDS-infected president and universally shitty healthcare they will move to the next thing.

I think cultural Christianity could be a movement that catches these apostates before they turn to Lenin. After all, you don't need to believe in god to believe in the Christian principles and ideas.

99% of liberals are atheists. I don’t go to church anymore, hardly a bible thumper, but I love fucking with atheists because their overall mindset is 99% country killing alt left liberalism.

I’ll believe in god or a god for that reason alone

>Not refuting my argument
>Unintelligible gibberish post

Hello Stephan

Haven't heard of this guy in a while, is he still active

You're as retarded as the goatfuckers

No, fucktard. They are not the same. You have "faith" in various conjecture whereas the scientific method is a refined abstraction of how humans interpret reality through the theory -> action -> reaction ->refined theory heuristic.

All synthetic proposition are fallible. Just watch the lecture.

Atheism is fine as long as you're not rubbing it to other people and becoming cringy fedora creature.

...

He's so intelligent he forgot about his own country and only cares about other countries.

COHLE and HART enter the church.

COHLE: What do you think the average IQ of this group is?

HART: Can you see Texas up there on your high horse? What do you know about these people.

COHLE: Just observation and deduction. I see a propensity for obesity, poverty, a yen for fairy tales. Folks putting what few bucks they do have in a little wicker basket that's being passed around. I think it's safe to say no one here's gonna be splitting the atom, Marty.

HART: Can you imagine if people didn't believe, what things they'd get up to?

COHLE: Exact same thing they do now, just out in the open.

HART: Bull. Shit.It would be a fucking freak show of murder and debauchery, and you know it.

COHLE:If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother, that person is a piece of shit. And I'd like to get as many of them out in the open as possible.

HART:I guess your judgement is infallible, piece of shit-wise. You think that notebook is a stone tablet?

COHLE:What's it say about life, hmm? You gotta get together, tell yourself stories that violate every law of the universe, just to get through the goddamn day?What's that say about your reality, Marty?

its true

smart atheists are one thing,but stupid plebs without god are another.

its why as an atheist i advocate for more religion,many plebs cannot function without the fear of eternal damnation keeping them in line.

he wants to be a cult leader.
wait .. is he already?

>Intelligent, moral

heh

Moly used to be pretty anti-religious, I find his recent turn towards religion quite insincere. Also he unironically used the term Judeo-Christianity the other day.

>Intelligent, moral people can be atheists but the rest of the plebs need religion?
Sounds very reasonable to me. Molymeme is quite arrogant, but he's not stupid.

It's probably true. But there's a big difference in "I'm atheist for pragmatic reasons" vs "I know for a fact there is no God" people.

The latter group are 100% emotionally damaged people. Their whole position is to ONLY believe things after sufficient evidence has been shown (empiricism) yet on the most important question they've come to a position with zero evidence to back their claim. Its 1000% cognitive dissonance.

Molyneux is pretty anti-atheist especially since lately though.

thank goodness. almost thought he was an autistic fedora which he sometimes is.

When religious people legitimately can't see how atheists can still have morals it leads me to believe they really do need religion. Stop trying to convert people.

Here's your (you)

>yuo cant know!
Kill yourself.