I have 3 questions I'm curious what the answers are

I have 3 questions I'm curious what the answers are.
What's wrong with Libertarian Socialism?
What's wrong with Market Socialism?
What's wrong with Libertarian Market Socialism?

Libertarian Socialism
emphasizing workers' self-management of the workplace. NOTHING GETS DONE people stave to death

The thing all 3 have in common with their names: Socialism.

I lik socializmm
FRe moni

Source?

Nice argument.

>What's wrong with Libertarian Socialism?
Planned economy, nonsensical value system, and no incentive to work.

>What's wrong with Market Socialism?
Defeats the whole purpose of socialism.

Socialism is a good system, until you run out of other people's money.

What's wrong with decentralized and or participatory economy.

Is making money is not an incentive to work?


>What's wrong with Market Socialism?

It's still socialism though. Do you have an argument against it.

Socialism isn't redistribution of wealth. No one is touching your money. Read some theory my dude.

>spacing this much the sentences

Go

back

to

plebbit

>Do you have an argument against it.
One of the main purposes of socialism is to stop the exploitation of workers, yet market socialism demands that the workers compete in a market, which forces them to make profits, which forces them to lower their wages to less than what the labor value of their work is worth so that they may compete in the market. They are literally forced to exploit themselves just as bad as they would have been in a capitalist economy.

fuck you caught me. im new to this.

You're are literally arguing why its better to have non-market socialism. Argue as a capitalist. Unless you want me to write why it's not forced exploitation.

In liberalism the State can't intervine and all welfare must be provided by the private sector. The socialism establishes that the welfare must be provided by the State. From the economic point of view, in a libertarian country the State is in service of capitalism, while in a socialist one is at the service of everyone.

Non-market socialism sucks because of the reasons I already said, nonsensical value system and no incentive to work. You can't be paid money as incentive in non-market socialism because there's nothing to spend your money on, there's no markets.

t. neocon who thinks he knows everything because he can quote Maggie Thatcher and Milton Friedman

>Non-market socialism sucks because of the reasons I already said, nonsensical value system and no incentive to work.

It's literally just capitalism with cooperatives. It's the same incentive?

Also you can have money in decentralized economies?

Everything

>It's literally just capitalism with cooperatives
No, that's market socialism.

...

>What's wrong with Libertarian Socialism?
It is a contradiction in terms. Socialism requires a centrally-planned economy, which is antithetical to any kind of liberty. Pick one or the other.

>What's wrong with Market Socialism?
See above.

>What's wrong with Libertarian Market Socialism?
See above.

So markets are centrally planned?