When you realize Robespierre was in the right

The elites would rather blow everything up than cede control

Indeed. He and Napoleon are often misunderstood by casual students of history.

He's way too redpilled for Sup Forums. I have a feeling most people here don't even know him

Napoleon was a tyrant. Besides obliterating the Unholy Mountain-Jew Not-Empire and thrashing Muslims he was the same old shit.

He's a leftist, cherrypick the good shit and burn the rest of his collectivist tripe before it becomes contagious.

Hahah where do you think you are.
This is a board for Amerimongrels who LARP as Nazis and worship an orange baboon who can't pull out Jewish/corporate cock out of his mouth.

nice proxy kike

Back in those days the left was all for freedom. The right wanted to keep France enslaved by the nobility and the catholic church, they were asking for the terror.

>says the nigger with a meme flag
Убиј ce.

the Enlightenment was a mistake

Power of nobility stems from their warrior roots.
Over time, they just became a parasitic class, entrenched as a ruling class by inertia.
If Enlightenment and revolution was a mistake, they would have prevailed. However, their heads rolled, so no, it was not a mistake.

The mistake was that Robespierre didn't crack down on counter-revolutionaries hard enough

What a cunt.

It was a symptom of overdomestication, overcivilization, ratcheting individualism, presaged by the Reformation and culminating in the suicide of the race that we get to be witness to

You're looking too deeply for roots of modern day problems.
You're also misunderstanding that progress (in absolute terms) of history and society has a power of it's own, masses of people and culture cannot be easily controlled, there's too many factors that influence too many things.
If something occurred, there were reasons for it, and they were usually massive and widespread. Conspiracies never achieved much.
That's the problem of this board, it dabbles too much into wishful thinking, conspiracies and shadows, when things are actually plainly in the open to see.

To address your point, saying that Reformation was a ''mistake'' is laughable. There were some pretty convincing reasons for it. ''Good'', moral reasons if you want.

So what, a more ''just'' Stalinism, of sorts?
I don't how that would pan out.

I don't think you understood my post at all, brainlet.

I did understand your post, but given from your response, I guess you are the brainlet here.
You're just seeing things you wish to see.

Stalin killed people so he could keep opressing them, Robespierre killed people because they were a serious threat to the freedom of France.

Civilization and Empire is what allows the genetic process of self-domestication to occur. Do you understand how this works? Has nothing to do with conspiracies.

Off with his head. My hope is that modern liberals get the same treatment.

Nope, Stalin was a fanatic Marxist. All he did, he did it for his country. You and I might disagree with his methods, but he was dedicated.
Do you really think a man who was only after power, would join a fringe extremist group, and live like a vagabond for decades?

So how is it a ''mistake''?
You're pretty much saying it's a cyclical thing. Have you been reading Spengler?
But why are you calling anything a mistake then?
There are no mistakes, with that kind of outlook.

I'm more optimistic than Spengler, I think we are the first to actually have a chance to break the cycle of Empire and become aware of the dysgenic effects of civilization and technology.

In that context applying the construct of agency to my race is useful.

I think you don't give enough credit to conspiracies.

You give too much credit to conspiracies. You're American though, so no surprise. Your country is paranoid and obsessed with conspiracies. That part of your national identity is expressed on pol everyday, any thread with conspiracy fags will have 90% americans. Conspiracy thinking is a sign of emotional thinking and low iq.