Now i am not trying to defend this faggot but I really don't understand accusations made 36 years after the fact

now i am not trying to defend this faggot but I really don't understand accusations made 36 years after the fact.
other accusations made against other public figures are not even made by the victims but from third party where the victim didn't even want to complain. its fucking pathetic.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AJYb0Yom5UQ
youtube.com/watch?v=REH5wNFpE40
twitter.com/1mjas/status/929207755889631232/video/1
youtube.com/watch?v=4s1iQODC5OI
google.gr/search?q=eighties pride parade
youtube.com/watch?v=6hDSOyuuSi4
youtube.com/watch?v=FWwHqvTEFaM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Ohhh my

Make the Left live up to their rules

People didn't have the support then they do now.

30 years ago, gay sex was an unthinkable degeneracy. Today, information is widespread enough for people to know it happens in every culture, all the fucking time.

Waiting 36 years is pretty fucking gay and forced.

It only seems forced to you because you don't know what the attitude towards gays was back them.

Men used to go to 'pride' parades Shia style--with brown paper bags over their faces.

I agree entirely. If someone raped someone last night and the victim immediately went to the police and an investigation occurred, then we should take things seriously. Sure maybe they waited a few hours or maybe a few days or week to report it but that would be credible.
What’s the point of waiting 10, 20, 30, or 40 years? Hell the statue of limitations is 7 in most places it seems like. You couldn’t have said something the first 7 years?

...

A few things, some of which may have already been said.
1) Make your enemy live up to their own standards
2) Don't stop them when they are making a mistake.
3) It is still innocent until proven guilty, unless there is an admission of guilt.

...

They've had 36 fucking years to say something dickhead.Being a fag has been acceptable for decades (unfortunately)

I'm totally okay with it in this case, because this piece of shit has been holier than thou'ing all over the place talking about how Trump is some kind of rapist for joking about grabbing pussies.

Meanwhile he's drugging people and literally raping them cosbystyle.

Posted it before I could, but yes, it's rule #4.

I hope it brings this loud mouth leftist faggot down, he deserves no sympathy for spreading degeneracy. I've been gloating to all the leftists I know that use to share his trump bashing posts.

But what if the victims don't self-identify as gay?
How long has it been common knowledge that gay men can actually rape straight men?

he grabbed some dude's sleeping dick 40 years ago? Big fucking deal. What Louis CK did was medium bad. Weinstein definitely a creepy power play molester. The rest is a big over-reaction

FRAKE NEWS

SEE PIC RELATED FOR 100% PROOF

Says the gook who wanked that kid off on stage...

He's condemning Moore who is being accused of rape from 40 years ago...

You have no room to argue this on without being a massive fucking hypocrite.

Fucking this.

I, and probably most people here, don't really care about what he did, but the fact that he's so fucking smug all the time about others whilst they are doing less than what he did.

Make him live up to his own standards, and fuck him.

Doesn't matter, the left eating their own is exactly what was bound to happen anyway.

agree.
george put the moves on a guy, he said no and wanted to leave, george said ok.

Fuck him. Hold that faggot to the same standards he holds everyone else to.

>And suddenly, all the libs complaining about Roy Moore went silent

George Takei himself on live radio reminisces about being touched and having a sexual encounter with an adult camp counselor.
Zero shame, makes light of it, as if it's okay.
Of course he would in turn prey on young boys.
He takes degenerate acts by gays as a joke and acceptable.
This faggot rides on a high horse while being a disgusting old pervert. I'm glad someone is calling him out.

If you think Trump didn't harass any women, then you must think George is innocent.

It's fucking perfect, Roy is accused of rape from 40 years ago by a woman that accused 3 other unrelated men of rape, and the left demands everyone listen and believe and that Roy drop out, now Tekei is accused by a man from the exact same time period who has never accused anyone else of rape, they are in a double bind.

They either have to condemn Tekei, which they can't do because he's gay and they love him, or stop condemning Moore, which they can't do because he's conservative and they hate him.

i am not saying he is innocent i am saying allegations made 40 years after the fact are bullshit. i am mad at the victim for not speaking out sooner.. we wouldn't know about this faggot existence if the victim spoke about it at the time.

youtube.com/watch?v=AJYb0Yom5UQ

pipe down faggot

this clip has Takei basically admitting what hes been accused of

GOD HATES STAR TREK, LAND OF THE SODOMITE DAMNED

some motherfuckers were obviously PAID to do it

"they let you"

v

"ZzZzZzZ"
*fondle*

He is guilty of crimes that he has not faced trial for.
Doesn't matter how long ago they were.
Doesn't matter if the 'victim' cares.

He is a criminal, and deserves to be punished if found guilty.

It's not pathetic, this is the system and norms the Left created, let them enjoy it.

Takei: Dubious allegation of sexual assault from 40 years ago, reported by Faux News
Trump: Literally recorded bragging about sexually assaulting women

>fag is psychologically damaged from abuse at a young age
>goes on to abuse young boys themselves

I just can't believe this

It got Cosby.

Literally grabbing a woman by the pussy.

>It got Cosby

It got him a hung jury

Brad held the victim down.

pretty standard.. most pedos and rapist were victim themselves

Er I mean a man by the dick

Live by the sword, die by it. He was the one calling out Trump for this shit.

This is absolute bullshit. I lived through the eighties, and remeber it well (back when Canada was still 90% white) and NOBODY was attacking gays, certainly not anymore then anyone else got assaulted/robbed (which was infrequent to begin with). NOBODY was gay bashing, it wasn't a regular thing, and most polite society didnt discriminate against gays..

Did gays get robbed /assaulted .... sure, at the same percapita rate as straights.
Was there people who hated gays, sure ... at the same rate thiere is today. It was NOT mainstream, and gays even then had no problems "coming out". There were gay bars and gay people openly and most people just ignored them. Many people where like me at the time, I didnt ask, I didnt care and I didnt want it in my face. People in those days kept their sexual persuasions in the bedroom where they belong.

And this is the reason so many have become like me today, anti-fucking-faggot, because we dont want thier disgusting lifestyle shoved in our faces. Today I refuse to hire or associate with faggots, because they chose to shove it in everybody's face, all the fucking time.

As for Takei, one look at him tells you all you need to know, he a fucking faggot pedo if I ever saw one. Physiognomy is real. Hes afucking pedo. It will come out, sooner or later.

"they"
"let"
"you"

>Victim
Little George Takei was attracted to the adult man. And was okay with it and doesn't think it was molestation.
Watch the video and try not to puke.
youtube.com/watch?v=REH5wNFpE40

>we want tolerance
>we want equality
>bake the cake you fucking bigot
>say my pronouns or go to jail cis-het scum

video of George Takei's admission of guilt

twitter.com/1mjas/status/929207755889631232/video/1

very incriminating

You don't understand even fundamentally how cultural Marxism works, eh?

Hold liberals to liberal values, that's how you defeat them. There is a culture war.

Save it before it's gone.

who cares, burn it all, I bet picard never raped anyone (geordi probably did tho)

"they" isn't really the women though is it? It's establishment and the law letting you do it because you're rich. That's what Trump meant. The proof is the numerous women who came forward describing his pussy-grabbing behaviour, along with the fact that they most definitely did not consent for it to happen.

>statue of limitations

Levar Burton probably wrote rape fiction for others to read.

His fanbase on FB are fucking cringe worthy liberal sheep. They ate his story up in 2 seconds but everybody else who is pointed at right now is guilty

couln't even stomach more then three minutes

can we just gas these people already?
at what point have we all heard/seen enough?
a bunch of faggots and jews sitting around talking about molesting children, as if its funny, I'm not "shocked", Im not "outraged", I just want them gone, gone from this green earth and the wonderful place it could be. These pieces of genetic trash are so disgusting, on so many levels, they have forfeited the right to share the same oxygen supply as the rest of us.

It's made from Italian marble

This is obviously consensual and thus completely meaningless in the context of sexual assault.

Antithetical unless he's saying he would surprise buttsex a guy

youtube.com/watch?v=4s1iQODC5OI

Reshaping history is what Marxists are known for.
I've heard them claim "millions" of blacks were lynched down South, which is absurd.
Also, factually more whites were ever lynched than blacks.

Rule 4

yep.

Sure it is until the guy says otherwise.

Hollywood has been able to hide and bury harassment alligations for decades to a point where local law enforcement was being paid off. To put the level of power Hollywood has, weinstein literally had ex mossad agents intimating his victims to stay silent.

Unfortunately for Hollywood, news isn't controlled by a few outlets anymore. This stuff spread through social media before Hollywood got in front of it and now it's a runaway train.

thing is, even as far back as I know, the eighties, they had tolerance, they had equality, nobody cared, and everyone, striaght or gay, generally didint discuss thier sex lives publicly, it wasn't considered "polite", and thats not to say we didnt discuss it privately, we just didnt prattle on about it in the lunchroom at work!

Gas the fags, they are cancer.

So by your own logic the "Grab them by the pussy" in the sentence before that, the "them" must mean the same people, because that is how pronouns work.

Don't forget the Matthew Shepherd story, where a homosexual guy was killed over a bad drug deal. They spent years claiming it was gay bashing. He was a poster boy for anti bullying legislation. It was later everyone found out the drug connection.

In the 80s I think it was more about open gay slurs being used. People just had no issues publicly saying they hated homosexuality. Now it's not like that. I don't remember anyone getting violent though.

google.gr/search?q=eighties pride parade

Trump says "they let you grab them by the pussy."
ergo, they are allowing him access to their pussy because he's rich and famous.
A consensual act.
George Takei on the Howard Stern show has grabbed men's cocks because he's rich and "powerful".
If Trump is guilty in the eye of liberals so is George Takei.

Less about the veracity of the claim, more about holding shitlibs to their own standards.

>I never met him defense
Well that's easy to fix. Just have to prove they actually crossed paths.

I'm not a rapist. Not a pedo. And I was hunting daddy's at 14.

Of course, I was molested by a woman. My babysitter at age 6. I've never liked women since.

It will encourage more recent victims to come forward

It's because the whole Illuminati Cover Up machinery is losing power.

Did you know that Takei's first sexual intercourse was with a blond man at camp when he was underage? He talked about it, but i think YouTube deleted the videos.

It'll immunize politicians of accusations in the 2018 elections.

Comes down to relvance...

It makes sense that they waited. Unles so many people accuse a high-standing person it will be easily brushed off as BS.
Now it's even worse for men.

They say in Sharia a womens word is worth half a mans. Well in western society, in the case of abuse and rape, the testimony of a man is only worth a third of a womans.

A man is expected to fulfil four major roles; provision, creation, strength and protection. If any of these fall from the man's execution he is no longer seen as a person.
In the case of abuse and rape, the victim would be in a situation which strips their abilty to protect themselves and the experience is seen to only occur to weak people.

Celebrities come and go and so does their pay. If the victim was to push for conviction at a time where a celebrity is popular, probability for success would be low but the costs for courts etc would be extremely high esp for damages/defamation.

TLDR: it all comes down to duration of power, relevance and money.

B-but why? When they can be sanctimonious hypocrites?

Anyway this whole thing is just another moral panic. You're going see a lot more accusations come out before it's over. Anyone with even a little bit of clout is going to be accused of sexual misconduct.

deleted:
youtube.com/watch?v=6hDSOyuuSi4
youtube.com/watch?v=FWwHqvTEFaM

>it's he-said she-said
>I believe she-said when the he-said is trump or Kevin Spacey or Moore.

>"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

Press T for thanks saul Alinsky.

>not trying to defend this faggot, but
>defends this faggot

Sure, for criminal purposes it matters a lot if a crime happened a lot time ago. It matters much less for moral purposes.

Really doesn't. It's possible for somebody who committed a crime to later change as a person and realize it is wrong, but not bring it up because it would complicate the life they've built since.

That having been said, raping somebody, being accused 30 years later, and fervently denying it actually does leave you being a piece of shit who hasn't changed at all.

That having been said, I don't think we'll ever get the public on George Takei. He's too powerful a force within liberalism to ever get them to turn on him. He could have raped a 12 year old yesterday and said he didn't, and they'd all believe him because it's convenient to believe their anti-trump star trek star is a pure innocent angel.

How do you know he's not cringing on the inside and extremely uncomfortable? Takei is in a position of power, how could the man say no?