IT'S HAPPENING: jew strategic document on the unmaking of white america

cis.org/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/5yeSC
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yuq1gu2CEm8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Admit Jewish dominance on media:

>It is also true that Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry, theoretically a boon in terms of the formation of favorable public images of Jews and sensitizing the American people to issues of concern to Jews. But ethnic dominance in an industry does not by itself mean that these centers of opinion and attitude formation in the national culture are sources of Jewish political power. They are not noticeably "Jewish" in the sense of advancing a Jewish agenda, Jewish communal interests, or the cause of Israel. And television, the Jewish industry par excellence, with its shallow values, grotesque materialism, celebration of violence, utter superficiality, anti-intellectualism, and sexploitation certainly does not advance anything that might be confused with Jewish values. It is probably true, however, that the situation would be worse in terms of the treatment of Jewish themes and issues in the media without this presence.

Why jews promote open border:

>It would be the height of ingratitude, moral amnesia, and gracelessness for a group that has historically benefited enormously from liberal immigration — as well as suffered enormously from illiberal immigration policies — to be, or to be seen to be, suggesting that we cruelly yank the rope ladder up behind us. It is also, frankly, in our own best interest to continue to support generous immigration. The day may come when the forces of anti-Semitic persecution will arise once more in the lands of the former Soviet Union or in countries of Eastern Europe and Jews will once again need a safe haven in the United States. The Jewish community requires this fail-safe. We will always be in support of immigration; the question is whether it should be open-ended or not? The question is what constitutes the smartest approach to supporting immigration?

Nativist movements are the enemy of jewry:

>>The white "Christian" supremacists who have historically opposed either all immigration or all non-European immigration (Europeans being defined as Nordic or Anglo-Saxon), a position re-asserted by Peter Brimelow, must not be permitted to play a prominent role in the debate over the way America responds to unprecedented demographic change. Nor should the anti-immigrant demagoguery of some black leadership be permitted to go unchallenged. To allow this opens the door to inter-ethnic conflict and a potential white ethnic (and black) backlash of unimaginable proportions, including a potentially large, violent component, especially if the economy continues to sour, joblessness rises sharply, and anti-immigrant attitudes harden.

They see the trend on unmaking white america, and will keep pushing immigration further:

>It is a demographic transformation that, most experts believe, will result in a majority non-white population sometime before the end of the new century. A new American nation is coming into being before our very eyes, and many in the Jewish world are worried about it; some are even terrified.
>For the most part we continue to mouth the traditional policy line affirming generous — really, unlimited — immigration and open borders, though our own constituency is deeply divided on the policy, supports it with diminished enthusiasm, and even our legislative advocates seem to do so without conviction.

Jews fear that with new minorities battling for influence on america, they will lose the grasp on the benefits the gave to Israel

>Even with these caveats, an era of astoundingly disproportionate Jewish legislative representation may already have peaked. It is unlikely we will ever see many more U.S. Senates with 10 Jewish members. And although had Al Gore been allowed by the Supreme Court to assume office, a Jew would have been one heartbeat away from the presidency, it may be we'll never get that close again. With the changes in view, how long do we actually believe that nearly 80 percent of the entire foreign aid budget of the United States will go to Israel?

...

Fighting between minorities is good for the jewish bloc

>The very scale of the current immigration and its great diversity paradoxically constitutes at least a temporary political asset. While we remain comparatively coherent as a voting bloc, the new mostly non-European immigrants are fractured into a great many distinct, often competing groups, many with no love for each other.

They brag and admit as being the most influential political group in america

>Not that it is the case that our disproportionate political power (pound for pound the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America)

Americans don't want immigration, but jews will guide them into it, and 'educate' them about it

>It was recently reported in the Tennessean that Buchanan's Reform Party has, unsurprisingly enough, made all-out anti-immigration a central plank of its platform, calling for a 10-year moratorium on all immigration. It must be admitted that this attitude clearly resonates with a majority of Americans. Every time representative samples of Americans are presented this option on opinion surveys of all sorts they support it, though usually it is couched in the context of a five-year moratorium. We are not advocating surrender to the thoughtless mob, but we are advocating the design of policy closer to where the American people actually are with regard to the issue, at the same time that we morally educate them to extend the parameters of their sense of community.

They fear Islam infiltration in america, because it would ruin them forever

>The great danger Islamism poses to the United States in particular, its savage hatred of America and American values, are impossible to overstate. Islamism is a monster capable of the most despicable and atrocious acts of violence against its perceived enemies. This reality has now been experienced and witnessed directly by the American people in the horrific events of September 11: the destruction of the World Trade Center, the attack on the Pentagon, and a failed attempt to blow up the White House, with a death toll topping 6,000. These crimes of mass murder, most probably the work of Islamist terrorists operating with state support in Islamist Afghanistan, is the worst single act of terrorism on American soil in the history of the United States. It is also one of the greatest single assaults on innocent human life in modern world history carried out in the name of religion. The tragic enormity beggars the imagination. Recently, the anti-Islamist Pakistani émigré newspaper Pakistan Today featured on its cover a group of Islamists, their faces covered, aiming rocket-propelled grenades and carrying a sign that read "America, we are coming." They have come; they are here among us. And there is no reason to believe these enormities are the last we will witness, even in the near future.

Jews will aim to keep the borders open, even for Islam, while battle it on other terms, they just can't or won't stop promoting 'tolerance' and 'open borders', no matter for who

>The Jewish community's role in confronting the rise of Islam in America is (at least) fivefold. We must (1) seek to expose the real nature of our Islamist enemies, (2) attempt to support the emerging free thinkers within the Muslim community, and (3) work assiduously against Islamist political agendas, even as we seek (4) to reduce prejudice against Muslim immigrants. But, again, (5) we should be seeking reductions in the number of immigrants from Islamist societies given their enormous antipathy to Israel, Jews, America, and the West in general. And we should be especially vigilant in opposing the admission of those Islamists seeking asylum from political repression in countries where secularist governments in such places as Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, Uzbekistan, etc. are struggling against attempts to overthrow them by Islamist religious fanatics. It is nothing less than monstrous that the planners of the first bombing of the World Trade Center and the would-be perpetrators of other terrorist acts often entered this country with refugee status.

Jews and Identity Politics:

>We Jews need to be especially sensitive to the multinational model this crowd (many of them Jewish) is promoting. Why? Because one person's "celebration" of his own diversity, foreign ties, and the maintenance of cultural and religious traditions that set him apart is another's balkanizing identity politics. We are not immune from the reality of multiple identities or the charge of divided loyalties, a classic staple of anti-Semitism, and we must recognize that our own patterns are easily assailed, and we need to find ways of defending them more effectively as the debate goes on. Much public opinion survey research undertaken in recent years continues to indicate that large numbers of Americans, particularly people of color, assert that Jews are more loyal to Israel than the United States.

>For Jews, it is at best hypocritical, and, worse, an example of an utter lack of self-awareness, not to recognize that we are up to our necks in this problem. This has been especially true once we were sufficiently accepted in the United States to feel confident enough to go public with our own identity politics. But this newfound confidence carries its own costs; people are observing us closely, and what they see in our behavior is not always distinct from what we loudly decry in others. One has to be amused, even amazed, when colleagues in the organized Jewish world wring their hands about black nationalism, Afrocentrism, or with cultural separatism in general — without considering Jewish behavioral parallels. Where has our vaunted Jewish self-awareness flown?

bump you fucking niggers

NO! SHUT IT DOWN!

THE GOYIM WILL KNOW!

They need to know

i bumped the last thread so im bumping this one too

But this is from 16 years ago. I guess Kikes made up their mind to try to destroy this country instead? At least my own personal suspicion has been confirmed that they expect us to absorb their greasy tribe once Europe wises up enough to throw them out.

END ALL ISRAELI DUAL CITIZENSHIP NOW!!!

Kalergi plan is even older. I was told that Merkel won the latest Kalergi Prize.

The world is ruined, there is no resistance at all, just the fucking muslims, but those are blowing Europeans up.

The document talks very eerily about the fear of Islam taking over. Islam takes no shit. I guess just like fascism.

Maybe we need to bring monarchies back.

bump you fucking faggots

Archive link: archive.is/5yeSC

Americans, whatever happens, take your country back. You have restored our hope. Without the ones they think they have as slaves they'll be dead water. Do not falter. Do not fear. You outnumber them. No social shaming can lastingly harm you. The constitution makes resistance legal. You are collectively the hope of those of us Euros who still hold out. Remember, you do not strictly need leaders. If they turn or even only seem as if they turn on you, turn on them. You have the weapons. You have the cities the kikes raise their offspring in. That day of liberation will soon dawn. When it is come, kill their women first and burn all bodies. May the almighty speed your on your path.

Bump

Bump

...

>I suspect that MTV, for better of for worse, will prove more powerful with young Muslim immigrants than the mullahs, and that the remarkable material and cultural attractiveness of American life will cause the new immigrants to follow (mostly) in the footsteps of their predecessors. Free of Old World constraints, most new arrivals will in time choose individual freedom over subservience to outworn forms
These kikes revel in the degeneration of society

They wanted to make the muslims soft by the power of western degeneracy. It seems that only Islam is a real perceived threat to them.

bumpiing redpilled thread

Pacify whites ,
Fucking Jews .
Post this dailies

Bumpy bumpy

...

jesus the arrogance of this text, and the excessive and unnecessary wording
they truly like to hide behind words

>Jewish supremacist writes nutjob work
>it's freely viewable online
>thinking they'd be dumb enough to allow this
>thinking this one nutjob isn't just one nutjob but is somehow representative of all Jews
>extremists of every variety publish their shit online but obviously it's not inclusive of the views of everyone from whatever creed said extremist is

Yes but Jews must live in fear of a shoa, so the Jew must cause a reason to fear the shoa, but still avoid getting shoaed. It resonates with the inherent schizophrenia of Jewishness, even if your average Jew might not be down with supremecy.

The jew typically has freakishly high verbal intellect but very stunted visuospatial. That's why you see a lot more jewish lawyers than mechanical engineers. They truly are parasites in our civilization.

I had to buy a kike lawyer once. It was funny when I'd point out a technical lapse of logic in his wording he's immediately go from friendly discussion to full autist kike at me for being wrong. He would never back down, thus giving me the opportunity to control what he'd agree to without it violating in his mind what he had said.

I think the verbal intellect thing is overrated. They're just a race that thrives on jewing each other and not getting caught, so they have a lot of practice and think with a level of criminality that I guess a lot of well-meaning people aren't trained to expect.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yuq1gu2CEm8

...

She's a real cutie in a walking dead kinda way

I feel an urge to "throw acid" on her face.

...