Instead of calling people that are in interracial relationships race destroyers...

Instead of calling people that are in interracial relationships race destroyers, why not instead call them race creators? They are creating a new cross-breed hybrid race that may very well be superior in very many ways (however that is going off on a tangent).

The main point I'm wanted to make is that so long as they keep track of their ethnic mix, so that they can then tell their future kids what their race mix is and to keep track of whether they are an original race or not, there's no reason that having more races isn't a good thing. More races doesn't mean that the original races need to be eliminated.

...

>cross-breed hybrid race

dude. that's inbred, not race-mixed. Inbreeding is the polar opposite of cross breeding.

Hybrids don't produce 1 to 1 hybrids. You either go towards Evil Albinoid or Nig Nog. All the while producing shit SJW that are in deep need of some Allah Ackbar type treatment. Raise any type of animal in Nature and you would figure it out faster than any (((Professor))) could lie about it.

Are you sure it's inbred? It looks to me as if it might be the result of a tiger shagging a leopard.

But tigers and leopards are different species, whereas humans are all one species.

i was just guessing but turns out im right
www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/kenny-white-tiger-reveals-price-inbreeding/

He's good looking and he's happy to boot. Cannot be said for the target audience of Sup Forums.

They're Brazilians.

Same stupid Habsburg logic though.

Because that would be a lie

...

No one calls them "race destroyers", its race traitors. And regardless, when you destroy a superior race to create an inferior one, "destroyer" would in fact stand out more

Your b8 is trash, saged

you aren't creating an inferior one necessarily. for example, a high IQ indian might marry a white woman from europe and have a child. this child could be well above the average intelligence of a typical white person and so in this case, it wouldn't be worse than 2 average intelligence white people from europe having a child of average intelligence. in fact you can argue it is better.

Its worse, because the child will be an identety-less mutt that wont belong in either india or europe. All mixed race abominations tend to be globalists because of this too
Come to my beautiful country and take a look at your superior race mixed masterrace for yourself.

This is Operation Yao Ming tier stupidity

but i mention keeping track of identity in my OP

So? Doesnt change what I said at all. And its never done regardless. Mixed race mongrels are literally worse than niggers

typically worse*

>you aren't creating an inferior one necessarily
Yes, necessarily. Your anecdotal example is irrelevant in terms of population averages. There's literally no rational reason for a white person to mix with any third world trash genetics. It's mental-illness tier.

>People who racially mix are suddenly going to put value in whatever mix the mutt comes from

How the fuck have you not died from meth.

in this case they aren't breeding with a person that has the national average intelligence though.

>mongrels
>new race

>More races doesn't mean that the original races need to be eliminated.

God damn you leftists are fucking stupid as shit

If you treat all races as human in spite of many of them having low IQ, they will outbreed us in our own countries and make us a minority because they're too fucking stupid to not breed like rats

It has downs syndrome

the science in the above article thinks otherwise

Google out breeding depression. Mixes never work.

There is such a thing as inbreeding and also something called outbreeding. Both of them are generally bad(not always but often enough to probably not consider it a smart idea).

White - Black, White - some asiatic races, White - Abo could be considered outbreeding.

White - latin with predominately white genes, white - asian with white genes, white - other white are generally good and creates stronger and smarter children.

except that one time the human race was created when a neaderthal mated with another monkey

the problem isn't really iq. like iv'e said these children typically score higher on athleticism tests and iq tests. the problem is more with identity.

>they're too fucking stupid to not breed like rats
that's actually not stupid but a valid strategy in democratic countries
majority wins

i call them miscegenators op

Homo sapiens weren't created from a mix of them and Neanderthals. They were genetically Close enough to produce fertile offspring, but you can bet that the product was worse in both Neanderthal's natural environment and homo sapiens natural environment.

Likely took over a millennia, but modern Europeans don't have anything greater than 4% Neanderthal DNA.

no they aren't they already studied this, you are retarded.

Should really just be common sense. No one race is 100% in every attribute, so mixing (which has already been going on for millennia) is just logical.

...

>what is regression to the mean

Sage

Because the trend is that it is devolution. The dominant genes are the darker ones as they are the more original human genetics. The tendency is always reverting to the mean. If the mean IQ of the black race is lower than others, then that's the direction the average results are going.

The real solution is more selective breeding among lower IQ races. This will boost the average IQ of those races over time and then there will be truly more parity among the races. As things stand now, low IQ breeding is being encouraged while high IQ breeding remains limited and selective.

We know all of this because humans have been breeding animals since before recorded history and have created some astounding breeds of animals over the tens of thousands of years. Humans have also made astounding advances over the tens of millions of years when conditions favor intelligence over brute strength and aggression such as in areas where food is more scarce and when the seasons affect the necessity to store food rather than eating it all at once. That necessity has led to all manner of advances such as ways of preserving food whether by cooking it or burying/pickling or other means such as cheese making. Of course agricultural advances are also a hand-in-hand development made by strategic survivors of hard times and harder locations.

Meanwhile, back in the jungles of the planet, the IQs remain low because there, only brute strength and basic organization are all that is required to continue to eat and reproduce. This has guaranteed the continuation of low-IQ people and does nothing to reward or benefit higher IQ anomalies. Since those traits are not valued, those traits are not selected by their society.

Bring us into the present and look at the culture which is coming out of Hollywood and other communist ideology sources. What traits are they encouraging for selection?

Fucking your sister to keep royal bloodlines pure is logical too, still disastrous.

makes sense

But Interracial relationships give birth to mixed races which revitalizes the genes. HYBRID VIGOR

>low IQ breeding is being encouraged while high IQ breeding remains limited and selective
You can't change this dynamic because IQ is causative not corollary to it.

Between Asians and Caucasians, there's roughly 20% of neanderthal DNA floating around.
Even though an individual may only have 4%, the different races have different portions of the Neanderthal genome.

>hybrid vigor
humans are not plants

Hybrid vigor only lasts for one generation, then regression as garbage genes coalesce.
Advanced genes are mutations by definition and usually recessive.
The "best" genes are rarely dominant.

...

Donald Trump D0X in image.

Fuck Donald Trump

humans are dogs though

>one study found purebreds to be twice as likely to suffer from cancer than cross-breeds

pedigreedogsexposed.
blogspot.com
.au/2011/01/hybrid-vigour-fact-or-fiction.html

no

?

LATAM disagrees.

Breeding a low IQ race with a superior IQ race will produce a race somewhere in the middle. White people don't stand to benefit from it.

are you now pretending to be retarded? no, humans are not dogs

it's unbelievable you'd even write something as stupid, but here we are

lol you actually took that sentence without giving it any further thought? they are mammals just like us so you can be sure the same principal applies.

yes mutts live longer and have fewer health problems.

I've seen enough Americans to know that you want to have atleast 3 generations of white dna inbetween you and the regressive nigger genes.

I don't have to give it any more thought, because I'm not the one struggling with the subject - you are

this shit is inane

"principal"

Fuck intelligence by itself only the west (and therefore white people) have brought the world into modernity

Within a geographically and genetically defined population, the different alleles worn by the individuals become "used" to one another, meaning there is no downside to the creation of an inter-dependance between themselves, as the new individuals will almost always have basically the same allels.
The cross breeding between two individuals of different populations is so that these inter-dependant alleles do not meet one another, resulting in less fertile and "functioning" individuals.You can verify this by looking at graphs representing the fertility of the individual relative to the genetic remoteness of its parents. The "sweet spot" between consanguinity and too much genetic differences seems to be around 3rd degree cousins.
So "race mixing" does create a new race. A malfunctioning one.

Sure you can. This society has historically been based on the premise that people are responsible for themselves. But since the welfare state was introduced and institutionalized, the incentive for low IQ breeding is clear as it is being SUBSIDIZED.

You have no valid reason to be against him. And as time passes, Trump proves your beliefs are invalid. Are you really that stupid? Ideology over reality?

You can't. IQ measures abstract thought. Low IQ will always breed more by definition because they're not constrained by future problems.

Why not crossbreed with a mound of kangaroo dung? That would add at least 20 points to the Aussyfag IQ.

Fuck off and die nigger.