3000+ years ago Europeans were savages akin to niggers

>3000+ years ago Europeans were savages akin to niggers
>China and the middle East had actual civilizations
>therefore, Europeans are inferior subhumans!!!!!
This is the exact logic used by you idiots on here to attack the non-western world.

the difference is we're right. You faggot

that article headline is so fucking stupid it hurts

>women articles

Mehmet pls

China and the middle east didn't colonize the entire world

do you have a link to that article?

They could have, they could have wiped the floor with Europe and enslaved everyone. Funny how you think enslaving people makes you superior. Means the non-whites conquering the West are superior.

First of all, the article is incorrect.

Too much lifting can KILL anyone.

Too much lifting heavy things can create a psychological perception that one must eat more to accommodate the 'gains' (thinking in terms of deficit), and they over-eat and stress out their liver. This in turn stresses out the heart.

The stress is ultimately on the heart, and AA have higher rates of heart disease, due to bodies unable to digest high-concentrations of fat and complex grains as efficiently.

>Whites have the greatest variety of dietary genomics.

They dont need to lift as hard for equalitive muscle strength with AA. They need to lift twice as hard for muscular definition (given types of body fat), they need to be half as active to burn off fat.


The genomics of the 'white' population differ generally from those with black skin, due to the geographic locations of the majority of their genetic ancestors survival needs. If the mother is white, then the child should carry more 'white' dietary genomics, given that the entire mitochondrial system is the mothers.

>akin to niggers
>implying niggers domesticated animals, had wheeled vehicles, worked metal, were kangz, etc.

>They could have
but they didn't lol

>They could have, they could have wiped the floor with Europe and enslaved everyone
they fear the white warrior

Too Much Work Can Kill Black Men, Scientists Find

Do not fall for Jewish lies

So? How is that in any way a counter argument or a dismissal of the fact you're using the exact same logic, based on shoddy historical reasoning? And most of Europe didn't have colonies.

We moved on you still have a shit tier culture

>"They could have"

HURR DURR WHAT ARE CASTLES

Yeah, and China is coming back to number 1 spot again.

theres no proof china had ancient civilizations.

you are the single biggest fucking retard on this site your point is so dumb I cant comprehend why the fuck you care in real terms the middle east is as civilised as fucking Africa and china has adopted western attitudes to the market which doesn't mean its number 1 Americas army could fucking windmill china easily and this concept of subhumans is dum sub cultures is more accurate and the middle east has a shitty culture

there is proof they invented a bunch of shit before the west like movable type printing presses and they had the iron age a few hundred years before the rest of the world

also their record history is older than europes

proof from lying chinese is not proof. if they were advanced for thousands of years before, they wouldnt be a 3rd world shithole today. even blacks have advanced more in less time than chinese.

The phrase 'coming back' was lost on your low IQ chav brain. Your grammar is atrocious, and you invented the language. Kys. Times change. You were once savages that were educated by the Romans, now you're marginally better off than Rome. America and the West are dying, your lands are conquer and you're being replaced by foreigners. There's nothing you can do about it. You had 500 years of history to shine and it's now over. In 100 years, Asia will be the super continent, as it always was in human history

Except this is not Chinese proof or faking, it's supported by contemporary Western historians and archeologists specializing in China, you dumb leaf.

(((contemporary western historians))). sure thing ching chang chong. keep telling yourself you were an important world super power before everyone else and just forgot to keep going.

>no arguments, just unverifiable conspiracy drivel
Thought so.

>overexerting yourself is harmful
>therefore don't exercise at all
Nice try kikes.

you posted zero things to refute. just false claims that are easily proven false by the fact china is a shit hole to this day and always has been despite supposedly 3000+ years of "advanced civilization". clearly they were not advanced. clearly they didnt have 3000 years of civilization. clearly its fake. you need to prove your statement. obvious lies dont need to be dignified. burden of proof is on you for making a false statement.

>3000+ years ago Europeans were savages akin to niggers
nope

and look up the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture of SE Europe

>They could have
>implying they didn't tried
Read about Charles Martel and John III Sobieski you uncultured faggot

>read about history less than 1000 years ago when you're talking about 3000 years ago
How low IQ are you?
And actually, Lithuanians fucked the mongels about 300 years before Sobieski. You uncultred pleb.

Honestly don't get your argument here
>Hey, if middle easterns are superior, why did they lost in 700 AD and 1600 AD?

>HOHOHO, we're talking about 1000 BC lol
>Also, westerners won in 1300 AD haha

The west was technolocially inferior 3000 - 5000 years ago compared to China.
This is a fair comparison. The only reason Western countries got colonies was because of technological superiority. When China was at its zenith 3000 - 5000 years ago, Europeans were hardly better than niggers, China would have stomped you all. Understand it now, low IQ pleb?

What is the Mongol Empire?

>Mongols are Chinese
>Mongols 3000 years ago

Well, that doesn't explain why did they got surpassed and buttfucked.Did you know that the inability to evolve is a clear symptom of being shit?
If what you say was true, they would be exploring the galaxy.
Also, your lack of understanding where Europeans come from, when civilizations started to bloom, and which factors are needed for a civilization to progress makes me think i'm consuming my keyboard for nothing here.

...

To be perfectly clear and fast, since i have to work now,
1)Europeans from 5000 years ago are not the same as today (Indo European migration)
2)If country A didn't conquered country B, it's only because country A was unable to pull it off (Macchiavelli)
3)China kept rising and fall for the past 300 years without ever having a stable governament and being raped continuosly

Yeah they also invented gun powder but never thought to use it as a weapon beyond fireworks. The chinese are a clever but simultaneously autistic race. They also were shit tier warriors against any foreign army

I mean yea China has been around for a while but last I heard they couldn't get their shit together for more than like 500 years at a time?

I mean if all you're doing is cycling through new leadership without any innovation even a 5k year lead isn't worth much

Dan i'll take evolution for $200.

the "west" didn't exist in 2000BC, you had different Europeans doing different things, just like not all of China was equally as developed

ancient China was not more advanced than the CT culture of SE Europe
shit, iron metallurgy appeared among the Celts even before it appeared in China

He's Asian so hes going to stick up for his fellows. But he knows he is wrong, dont worry about it bro.