Apart from SJWs, who don't really hold many true liberal values anyway, as authoritarianism is not a liberal trait, and most of them claim to be socialist/communist/anarchist/Marxist/etc anyway, why do you hate liberals?
I mean actual liberals who believe in free speech, meritocracy and individualism, not neolibs like Obama and Hillary.
They don't really have any power anymore. If you aren't a self-loathing gynocentric cuck who stays quiet and does what he's told, you get kicked out of most left wing groups.
guys can we just guys hey guys cmon guys guys cmon guys hey guys hey guys
niggers
Because it leads directly to SJWs. I hate to go full Moldbug, but if you give the people any amount of power whatsoever you are setting yourself up for a slow decline into anarchy or communism.
dont have anything against people like that
they dont really exist though
every leftist i know is just a retard authoritarian boot licker convinced he or she or xe is on the right side of history
Kikes are always dishonest. Do not talk to them. They are evil
[sa] green plant [ge]
they doesn't seem to believe in conservative free speech and are happy when the jewish lobby shut down non liberals.
What are you talking about user?
maybe you referr to people like locke or adams.
then i respect them.
as soon i see a liberal confront a jew n a gun duel for the freedom of its country i'll change my ideas and attitudes towards them.
untill then,rope.
rubin was just eagerly agreeing with fucking molyneaux, he is not a liberal
Liberalism is gay and jewish just like rubin
How about the fact you actually try and promote anti racism, and multiculturalism, Islam, pedophilia, witchcraft, and sexual degeneracy. Nobody likes you. Go home.
>actual liberals who believe in free speech, meritocracy and individualism
There are no liberals who believe in those things.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
i believe in killing niggers and kikes
Do you like authoritarian socialism?
If not, you must necessarily be an authoritarian anti-socialist fascist.
What you individualist retards don't understand is that your positions are untenable. In any system that permits freedom of thought, radical leftists without fail weaponize this freedom and subvert it to their own ends. If you do not actively fight these people, you will be taken over by them. They are incapable of backing down.
Collectivism is human nature. We evolved within tribes for millennia. There's nothing wrong with racial and cultural collectivism. Economic collectivism is cancer, yes, but it is only whites that understand this consistently. If you want to preserve meritocracy, you must have white racial collectivism
You belong on the lamppost next to the rest of the commies.
>you gotta be an authoritarian not to be an authoritarian
>collectivism is human nature, oh except economic collectivism
The absolute state of American brainlets
Not edgy enough and it's not fun anymore to make fun of le feminists
I have no issue with traditional liberals aside from pliitical disagreement. Since traditional libs tend to be civilized they understand that you can talk politics then be friends after.
I'm a traditional liberal and one of my good friends is a full blown anarcho communist. I honestly enjoy our arguments, which we only have while drinking because it ends up being more humorous than anything.
Because it's one step away from
>socialist/communist/anarchist/Marxist/etc
As long as these are stomped and free market is in place it'll be fine.
It's not a document or a flag or an ideology that kept this country glued together for almost 250 years
>vote democrat goy, you'll see "progress"
>vote democrat
>receive the opposite of progress
Nobody likes false advertisement, there is a reason why you've garnered such a terrible reputation over the years.
>OP picks word with massive permutation to describe subject to be debated
There is no universal definition for liberalism. You are here to weasel when we try to pin you to your term and contain us in your definitions which will change with your whims. You are quite the sage.