Think about it

Think about it.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/845291728626241536
youtube.com/watch?v=80__LLZK4zg
twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/929579876872605697
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apples_and_oranges
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I don't get aids because there's more than one bookstore chain, but you can get aids, herpes and a lot of other bad shit from a slut wife who sleeps around

He's using the bad analogy fallacy. Kinda an idiot. Is he a cuckold? he sounds like a cuckold.

> false equivalences

oy vey

I'm gonna us "monopolize that pussy" on my next Tinder match

I'll report back in several months probably

That has to be the most retarded comparison I have seen today

how can someone who fancies himself the gatekeeper of all logic and objectivity say something so fucking stupid?

Yeah let's get a real doublethink thread.

Can you believe in cultural appropriation without also believing in private property?

>no date
>no link
no bump

so.... Stefan is a cuck confirmed

his wife is enjoying some nice bbc

agree, but it has some truth

twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/845291728626241536

this is an interesting question leaf

personally i dont think that the state should guarantee private property, neither cultural property

I don't oppose monopolies and and get angry about affairs
checkmate stefan

Why do people think analogies are real? Very rarely is it possible to apply one situation to another. Most things are specific to a certain time/place/person.

>relationships are a competition and affairs are proof that the cheated partner is worthless
Literally what the fuck is Molymeme on about? How the fuck does he justify supporting monopolies exactly, let alone supporting fucking adultery?

so monopolies are right under the right circunstances?

>monogamy
>monopoly
>same thing

but you should be angry when cheated on

is he retarded or just a cuck?

Maybe, maybe not. Depends on the situation.

Because they don't like when people break a contract

Think about it.

so facebook naturally becoming a globopoly next year (they return to china) is ok in your opinion?

Both. I think Peter Molyneux stole his brain.

I oppose burning down rainforests therefore I also oppose breathing because both consume oxygen

>people who like google are cucks

I'm neutral on the issue because I don't use social media. They can do what they want.

Same entomology

The problem with "cultural property" is that it is essentially technology. Is anyone really going to suggest that we can never learn and adopt anything from one another? Live this way if you choose, but you won't live long I imagine.

that's not me

youtube.com/watch?v=80__LLZK4zg

ALERT ALERT ALERT

Portal seen over Norway. Approximately same time as ME earthquake.

I think he's just being a troll, desu.

NOT

>molymeme shilling for plutocrats
Why is this guy considered redpilled? He was a fucking Randian/lolbertardian cult leader too, which everyone seems to have forgotten including Molyneux himself.

Molyneux is a materialist jew who only cares about muh shekels like every other lolbergtardian.

That really made me think about it.

yea i agree with you with this

i just said the state shouldnt guarantee it aka patents or minority rights

He's saying that there is nothing ethically wrong with monopolies. If monogamy is ethical, so is any other monopoly.

Goddamn you people are fucking stupid.

Lol I've been watching this guy become progressively more worthless for many months now, here is his new low.

its from march

he is just a racist cuck
maybe because of that he is racist

Is that an argument?

If you're not in an open relationship, can you even call your self a libertarian?

#CucksForLiberty

>entry into a market is the same as a human relationship
lolbertardian autist detected

What is the Jew's point?

>If monogamy is ethical, so is any other monopoly.
Whether something is ethical or not is typically determined on the fly by emotions (evolved social instincts). You can't make up a rule, extend it arbitrarily, and expect physical reality to conform to your autism.

I really only see objectivists fiercely defending monopolies and, surprise surprise, Stefan is an Ayn Rand cultist.

He's not racist though

a couple months back he sort of was
>race realist or whatever you want to call him

>personal relationships are the same as your relation to capitalism
why are libertarians so dumb?

Shit equivalent. You dont hold a monopoly on pussy when you have a wife, you own a franchise.

>t. can't into abstract principle arguments

If it's voluntary, there's literally nothing wrong with a monopoly. If i provide the most value, and people only choose my services, no wrong has been committed.

If a an individual in a relationship voluntarily wants to divorce, that's fine too.

>forced entry into a market
>forced entry into your wife

not quite "moral", i would posit

He's a cuck lolbertarian
He says that we should just let Europeans be genocided

If anything he is racist against Europeans

I like his tweets because you don't have to watch some video for 30 fucking minutes to determine what he's saying is stupid.

>He says that we should just let Europeans be genocided
lol wat?
i missed this

i am sort of an anarchist so i have simpaty for libertarians

Corporations are people goy.

>abstract principle arguments
These are useless. The real world is not made of abstract principles, it is made of ad-hoc rules for specific situations.

>If a an individual in a relationship voluntarily wants to divorce, that's fine too.
"no". Marriage is a contract that stipulates life-long monogamy. It doesn't go "til death or second thoughts do us part"

Stefan is really getting good

N O T A N A R G U M E N T

Despite the fact it's a false equivalence, the analogy itself is shit.

A monopoly would be one dude in the whole world getting all the women.

twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/929579876872605697

>anarchist
What do you mean by this? Do you agree that Europeans should have the right to defend their land against invaders AKA kill the "refugees", or are you only Anarchist as long as third worlders are free to exploit Europeans?

>a voluntary contract

>exploit
well in an anarchist world there wouldnt be "benefits" so

imo the transhuman agenda should override everything else

if anything i am in favor of battling islam, building a secular world, stopping population growth in india,middle east and africa (the last places with such problems)

Is he asking for someone to fuck his wife?

There wouldn't be benefits, but Europeans would create safer, cleaner and more socially progressive societies. Better infrastructure and better everything.

Without being stopped, the non-Europeans would still flock to Europe/North-America. Should Europeans be allowed to stop these people from coming into their anarchist societies?

In that mono means singular.

Having a singular option for trade or service is not the same as choosing a lifelong partner.

>Should Europeans be allowed to stop these people from coming into their anarchist societies

maybe for a time, i mean i wouldnt like islamist in my streets neither; that beeing said i find it iroinc how most poltards want a safe space instead of getting the fight to the muslim world for the soul of this earth

and also raging how the us government has done everything it can to sabotage secular regimes in the middle east

there is nothing wrong with lgbts, christianity isnt truth, fascism isnt in the best interest of the individual

Nah, I get that. Thing is though, in marriage, you always have competition. She starts being a bitch, you can claim alienation of affection or incompatible differences and leave. Monopolies kill competition through legislation, so competition doesn't even get created to begin with.

Roughly as he put it: If the pandas dont want to raise their own numbers, then fuck the pandas. you can't care for somebody more than they care for themselves.

F A L S E
E Q U I V A L E N C E

>I want my wife to stay loyal because of stds

Please take a step back and look at how much of a cuckold you are

will he commit suicide if his daughter defoo's him in the future

he ran out of stuff to parrot from smarter people now he's having to make up his own stuff and it's not going so well
(see: every youtube pundit ever)

>He's saying that there is nothing ethically wrong with monopolies. If monogamy is ethical, so is any other monopoly.
maybe he should cut the rhetoric and just fucking say that

Another reason would be that I want my kids to be biologically mine.

>maybe for a time
What do you mean by this? Shouldn't Europeans be free to chase away non-Europeans from their societies if they want? Aren't you an anarchist?

>there is nothing wrong with lgbts
Lesbians and gays are one thing. Transexuals is another. Parents pushing their children to have a sex change is also a very different thing. Don't lump fags together with mentally ill people.

>christianity isnt truth
True, it's reform Judaism

>fascism isnt in the best interest of the individual
If it's what takes to prevent the ethnic replacement of Europeans, then it's in the interest of Europeans. And ultimately the world.

whats molymeme's almond status?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apples_and_oranges

I fucking hate alt right intellectuals. We need people that actually know wtf they're talking about, stop making any retard famous just because they align with us

but an argument was made in the same sentence. does the argument become negated if prefaced by a set-up?

Marriage is contract. Having an affair violates the contract.

>I want my kids to be biologically mine.
Why?

This.
I don’t get it. Is normie saying that I shouldn’t be angry if my wife sleeps with others? How the fuck is this natural?
What the fuck is even their point????

Wouldn't the appropriate analogy be someone only shopping at one store, rather than there only being one store to begin with? His equivalence implies there's only one woman in the world.

> Many people who fiercely oppose market get angry if their wife is used by others. Let`s think about it.

liberal degenerates are socialist in the streets and capitalists in the sheets

>What do you mean by this? Shouldn't Europeans be free to chase away non-Europeans from their societies if they want? Aren't you an anarchist?
well in your logic then they have the right to fight back, and whoever sides with them

let me rephrase
Wasnt Europeans the ones that invited non-Europeans into their societies because they wanted?
>it was the jooos

>caring for your own sexual health and the sexual health of you partner is cuckold

b8 harder kike

so what he means is that he is an advocate of women getting monopolized.
specifically his wife.

>if killing insects is okay killing humans is also okay

this is how shit your argument sounds stefan

But he's completely right you fucking slav nigger. You're just so stupid you think that one reason he listed means that's exclusively the only reason he wouldn't want a whore wife.

This is the most retarded analogy I've ever read

> Why is this guy considered redpilled?
He larped his way into philosophers during gamergate by going for the low hanging fruit.
He is no more of a philosopher than average pol user.

Also picrelated. He is an obvious shill.

So he's saying his partner is a public necessity and commodity that anyone with enough money should be allowed to reduce her to the cost of capital to the highest bidder.

He also ignore regulatory capture of democracy by capital.

Put simply he is using a completely nonsensical analogy as his woman is not a finite natural resource or his woman does not allow the functioning of the basic necessities of life.

And to think his namesake makes good blenders

that's a mighty goofy false equivalency.

>if you don't support predatory business monopolies then y u b monopolizan yo wife's sweet pussy boi gimmie summadat

Should vagene/benis be considered a commodity?

Molyneux is just being unrealistic. This shows he has zero understanding of human psychology and social interactions. A true autist.

Then governmental monopoly is ethical too right?

>implying we arent in that path
>you didnt hear that now implanted uterus are going to become a thing

lolbertarians don't seriously follow this hack right? You cunts need to sort your ideology out if you want the rest of the world to believe that you're not retarded. Think about it

>corporations are just people goyim,
Marriage is two parties working together for the benefit of a third (mutualism). A monopoly serves its own interest at the expense of the third.

Why normies suck at metaphors?

>well in your logic then they have the right to fight back
Not morally, no. They don't have the moral right to ethnically replace another people, especially when the other people is better than them and create a better world around them.

>Wasnt Europeans the ones that invited non-Europeans into their societies because they wanted?
Majority of people oppose mass immigration, probably in every European country. It's the elites and a loud minority that get a lot of media attention that "invite" them, not the people.

Basically the elites, the media, the publishing/movie industry and the educational system push for it. Had it not been this way, no way this kind of immigration would be accepted.