Shills btfo

Roy Moore yearbook fake
thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/fake-analyst-says-judge-roy-moore-signature-inside-gloria-allred-accusers-yearbook-forged/
>old thread

Other urls found in this thread:

newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

...

...

...

Anyone who doesn't believe this Moore shit is just one rotten hit job is a faggot and/or retarded

It all reeks

Because the poster didn't say: This image shows the change in ink color, which shows us that the actual yearbook message was written by somebody named "Roy", and that the rest was added later.

Confirmed forgery 100%

It's pretty much done at this point. Look at the old thread, fucking shills are going ape shit.

You guys reek of desperation.

Ah my bad. I wanted to get everything posted before the thread got kike spammed.

you reek of nigger cum

On the contrary. This is fucking great. When this gets out, watch the media try to pretend the whole thing never happened.

Nice cumback imbecile.

Now you actually compare them so closely, they look basically identical to me. Obviously sometimes people change the spelling of a venue too. Seems conclusive that Moore is a pedophile who was preying on young teens right across Alabama.

Why are you defending a pedophile so vigorously, OP? What kind of shill are you?

The message

To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say "Merry Christmas" Christmas 1977

Love, Roy More D.A.
12.22.1977

S'alright. The context is like, the sixth post, and that really is the proof positive.

I mean, there's a difference between "knowing" something is bullshit and "PROVING" something is bullshit.

When what gets out? Your delusional conspiracy angle? All I see here is some Olympic-medal winning mental gymnastics at work on Sup Forums.

That whole thing is written in blue ink. The page is being angled into the light. Even up at the 1977 you can see it become blue at the ede
the top of the R in Roy is bluer, so is the y

you glow in the dark, buddy

Because he'll help send more beaners home

this.

The message is still creepy in itself.

All I see is projection and desperation because you have to be the ultimate contrarians and defend a pedophile. If the guy wasn't an R you would have already turned on him.

Ah yes... A different Roy who signs the first letter of his name almost identical to Roy Moore. A different Roy who lived in the same area at the same time of the yearbook in question, like Roy Moore did. A different Roy who who just so happened to have the same first name as the guy who recently got called out for creeping at malls whose name is also Roy.

Makes sense man.

>Because he'll help send more beaners home
You seriously believe that the promotion of pedophilia is a cost worth paying for the removal of a handful of Mexicans? If so, you've devolved into insane degeneracy, user.

>Calling out the obvious is mental gymnastics
Actually, it's you who are in desperation mode. You seem to have a lot invested in not letting Moore get elected.

>If the guy wasn't an R you would have already turned on him.
no shit sherlock
shareblue isn't sending their best

The "Moore is guilty" theory would now require:

>He signed his title to a note written to somebody he was supposedly close to
>He got his title WRONG (DA rather than ADA or DDA)
>He changed pens between the words "Roy" and "Moore"
Yes, this is a pretty crazy conspiracy theory, isn't it?

Only a desperate idiot would believe this, let alone try to sell it to others.

Hey guys.
Guys

GUYS

Forensic handwriting is basically a pseudo science.
You lost this time, just accept it and move on.

No republican will ever be elected again. I'm looking forward to the deficit producing tax breaks billionaires and corporations won't be getting.

Yeah but i want him to win still. Fuck that Doug Jones faggot

if some roastlet had to get diddled for us to make america white again, that's a price i'm willing to vote for. stay cucked nerd

The quality of the shills has been horrible tonight. They must be having some money problems.

Worst I've seen so far

See
You're a faggot.
I mean, you knew that, but it needs to be said occasionally.

Mostly because he's apparently a pedophile, or as one user so clearly pointed out an "androphile" which is a totally okay!

I for one don't want to live in a fucking shithole like Iraq where our leaders rape our fucking kids bro.

show your real flag you degenerate

I don't see it. I'm open to it. Prove my eyes are lying to me.

show your flag

>Roy Moore secretly part of Clinton pedo ring
>Clintons double agents plant false flag yearbook forgery
>Pol larpers spin their wheels over obviously fake signature and pedo gets away

u wot m8

Real handwriting forensics is cool shit man. It goes beyond the way something looks, down to pen pressure and tilt and shit.

Have you ever spent more than two minutes in the same room as a Mexican? These people need to go home.

smelly dumb flag hider scum
reveal yourself

>Literally arguing that Roy Moore changed pens mid-autograph
>ignoring that the OP image itself demonstrates how the word "Roy" is completely different
Seriously, this is the point where you're supposed to re-evaluate your failed strategy, shill.

Could that just be lighting man? Whats the source of this

Looks the same color in the OP pic

Except for the fact you have two different styles of writing and a wrong title, literally doesn’t add up.
On top of all the inconsistencies in the actual signature (the Y being the most apparent), her story saying she was assaulted 2 years later but someone a signature in a yearbook is proof?

I see your point but I'm going to need more than what they've shown. I've seen many political hit jobs, and this reeks of one.

Yeah, black pen does have a blue sheen under light.

the two sets of 77 are clearly written with two different pens and they are at nearly the same level

Murica, normal non child raping deep south, we'll shoot a fucking pedo, murican.

You mean the one low quality image that contradicts all the other images?

I mean shit dude, if you're going to vote R no matter what at least man up and admit it. That's respectable in its way... this fucking defense though...

>a person's handwriting never changes over 40 years

Could be both inks looked the same to the eye but one didn't shine like the other due to age. It's clearly not the same ink.

If the guy wasn't an R, he wouldn't be getting these accusations.

>seems conclusive
and it seems that you are a shill

>Shills get btfo mightily on a story nobody was believing in the first place
>Start throwing shit against the wall randomly
This thread is pretty based.

Look pathetic trumpling...

Let the pedophile get elected. Libshills will shit themselves.

Can I get a rundown on this? I haven't been paying attention to this scandal.

So you're admitting that the yearbook is false?

I would say the signature is legitimate. The direction of the pen strokes, the beginning of the o in "Moore" matches, I would say that one is him standing, and the other sitting. the flourishes are not incompatible.

jesus pace yourself man, you still have a lot of shilling to do

>The message is still creepy in itself.

No it isn't. 1977 was before the entire intersectional feminist movement. The Cold War was in full swing and people were not overt communists.

The whole 'sexual harassment in the workplace' shit started in the 1990s because companies started introducing HR departments in the 1980s - primarily to address the office politics and constant bitching created by more women in the workforce.

Until the mid 1990s it was perfectly common and acceptable to give women compliments - and even use terms of endearment like 'darling', 'love', or 'sweetheart' to complete strangers (like a waitress).

In a 1977 context the message is not creepy at all. It's a shame men can't call women 'Sweet' and 'Beautiful' anymore. Partly because they will get called sexist or a rapist, but mostly because modern women aren't sweet or beautiful - especially in college.

Even the range of colors in the pixels are all grays and pale hues

there's not even black in here

>Muh image quality!
Jesus, is this where we are now?

It is fascinating to see the kind of stupid shit you'll say under pressure.

I think at this point we can make the call that Moore is a fuck.

>>Multiple allegations. (Could be lies)
>>Yearbook. (Could be forged).
>>Banned from a mall for trying to hit on kids, as reported by police. (This you can't fake)

Unless the "conspirators" have a time-machine I think its safe to say Roy is a pedo.

Pictures from the news conference. That could be the case (though I doubt it), but with all of the other holes in this; it seems fairly obvious at this point that it's fake. Either that, or somehow the chick hit the jackpot in "weird coincidences."

apparently the whole thing was made up, and rather poorly at that. Some weaponized autism was unleashed and the shills are tripping over themselves hard trying to find a way to SHUT IT DOWN.

point taken.

Read the first six posts.

Victim says Moore signed her yearbook, but she's proven to be lying due to ink coloration.
This tanks the rest of her accusation.

paper is also clearly bent in this photo though
rounded edges have minute differences in color

>Can't fake
Then why, after 40 years in politics, did it just now surface. It's an accusation, the media runs with it, and it becomes truth.

>was perfectly common and acceptable to give women compliments

Yes, in the 80s it was perfect acceptable to give women more sexual compliments than now. Which means that when Moore was banned from the mall he wasn't even being creepy by today's standards, but by 80s standards.

>Banned from a mall for trying to hit on kids, as reported by police. (This you can't fake) Source?

,also >we

Do we have any Moore signatures from the 70s or 80s?

Does blue become black in the OP pic?

The OP pic shows that roy is spelt differently i dont wana get stuck down a dead end looking at the color when we have better proof.

Where are all these pics from? Anyone got the source?

>The message is still creepy in itself.
>No it isn't.
This is beside the central point.

He never wrote that.
We could probably find the guy named Roy who did.

>what is lighting

You can't be serious, you realize that can still be black ink in real life, correct?

Attention autism simulator 2017: I challenge you to find the oldest legitimate signature by Roy Moore that you can in order to push this even comparison further.

he wasn't the DA on 12.22.77
he was simply licensed to practice law
yearbook was released in august 1977, girl still carrying it around four months later .... unlikely
two different color inks in signature
signature looks fake
christmas holidays and girl is carrying around her yearbook on dates to get it signed....

Am I supposed to believe this shit
Democrats and journalists just dont get it, but let me spell it out for all you shills

when you lie about stuff it makes it alot harder for people to belive you about anything in the future. At this your credibility is completely shot to hell

Not sure about that. I don't think they'd transfer school records over from all the way back in 77.

>>This past weekend, I spoke or messaged with more than a dozen people—including a major political figure in the state—who told me that they had heard, over the years, that Moore had been banned from the mall because he repeatedly badgered teen-age girls. Some say that they heard this at the time, others in the years since. These people include five members of the local legal community, two cops who worked in the town, several people who hung out at the mall in the early eighties, and a number of former mall employees.

newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall

The 7s are nothing alike. 12.22.77 and Olde Hickory House are a girl's handwriting. If he were going to designate his position, it would be J.D. not D.A.

Moore's campaign has a month. (and unlimited time once he's senator)

Either way, bitch is gonna lose everything.

THere's that one in the yearbook every ones talking about.

*comparison even further

Yes thats exactly my point
Whether it appears blue or black in this image is basically irrelevant, its all the lighting

My point is that its a uniform color

Go back they must

Yes, I agree that the color shouldn't be the main focus, especially when using photographs instead of the real physical deal. It's gonna look different depending on lighting, no matter the color.

Any actual documentation for that, or is it a "take my word for it, I'm a journalist?"

The word "Moore" and the rest might actually BE a very good forgery.

But once you nail down that half the signature is in different ink (consistent with a yearbook signature with the first name only), the whole thing is dead anyway.

Further major investigation just makes it look like there's still doubt.

No I don't think it looks right

...the yearbook would have a roy in it somewhere. Then you track that guy down (to find out he died last week).

>including a major political figure in the state—who told me that they had heard, over the years

So straight slander then.

Additional information on the yearbook signing:
you get your yearbook in May or June, not December, the end of the Alabama school year.

Then why has this never come out before? He's been in politics his whole life and no one has bothered to do opposition research on him?

,also "Wilson declined to divulge his sources" = random nigger.

Can't he just be a bad speller?
Are you really suggesting he can't have changed his signature extremely slightly since 1977?

You sick fucks are actually defending pedos now. Take a good hard look at yourselves Sup Forums

But you can reference past significant events in them, that's kind-of the point

"Woo! Spring break 2009!"

Yeah, no.
They are about as different as it gets, fuck all everything else in the photo.

Saved. Good point.
At this point the allegation has so many holes in it, it's almost sad.

>the color shouldn't be the main focus
Seriously nigger? We should focus on the aspect that regular people can see with their own eyes that blows the entire thing right the fuck out?

Protip:
This signature is written on the inside cover of the book. Its a firm, flat surface, and the light in the photo is hitting it evenly.

There is no doubt that the inks are different colors.
Shit is a forgery 100% proven.

Everybodies heard goy see:
Oy vey its just like Weinstein