Jordan Peterson is a kike snake

Jordan Peterson is a kike snake.
youtube.com/watch?v=a8zLcMGCedA

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/6c9Uu5eILZ8
youtube.com/watch?v=PfH8IG7Awk0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I already knew that. This board just kisses his ass because he whines like a little bitch about "men these days" and this board has a sizeable population of a) women that can't get a date and b) effeminate little dudebros who think they are better than modern men and that's why he's such a hit on here.

Yeah and his future authoring is a con.

still like him and think the decision was justified.

Is she indisputably /ourgirl/?

Hi, leftypol

in 5 years time I am going to be beheading him.....

...

FAITH DID NOTHING WRONG

The way he immediately confessed the betrayal tells me Peterson knows its a betrayal but that he can't risk those accusations from the cultural position he occupies from those masters who still have power over him.

Explain.

this

It's a culture war, and you need to be very savvy about it if you want to win.

kys

With how enamored he is with Solzhenitsyn there's simply no way he's not acutely aware of the JQ.

That's not very nice Ahmed

$15 to answer some questions that won't actually help you all that much.

Yeah, he should just totally come out as a nazi.

>not knowing how politics work
>"Stop supporting your allies, goyim!''

shit shill thread 0/10

what? i don't think you understand the point of future authoring.

Woops was meant to reply to about the 15 dollars.

If your going to be accused of such, fuck it. Self-censorship is just as bad as apologizing for imagined slights. Own it and have a spine for once.

You don't win any war by being a pussy.

$15 is a few beers worth of money. Not very scammy looking.
Did you complete the course? I've heard nothing but excellent results from everyone else I've talked to.

Obvious shills are obvious.


Sup Forums mostly ignores Peterson until he said something that Sup Forums might not like and then suddenly you faggots begin spamming threads expecting us to give a fuck.

Not really. Her political opinions mostly align with ours but she's clearly a massive THOT, filled with botox and spending hours in the tanning bed. Degenerate.

I refuse to believe that that after all Sup Forums has pulled off that there are niggers this unsavvy on Sup Forums

what about loren?

Gestapo Lauren is my waifu.

Better not be calling me the nigger, nigger.

>wanting to hear women talk
lol

He has a pretty clean run so far, and it's very hard for the left to attack him.
Every time I see character assasination attempt against Peterson, it's 100% lies and manipulations which Peterson can easily debunk and demand correction.
(Multiple hit pieces against him had to be altered after he called them out on lies.)

He knows that they don't have ammunition against him and he doesn't want to give them any.
Be aware that this guy is a professor with a job and family, being socially assassinated could be really bad for him.
Let's say he gets succesfully smeared and suddenly he looses his funds, gets fired from all universities and gets banned on patreon.

I would do the same on his place.

All of you retards should be aware that you type on your keyboards anonymously, so you have nothing to loose, while this man has an actual functional life.

Wait a second, isn't the guy who goes on "muh free speech" rants and how he should have the right to misgender students, but then he uninvites some "journalist" because she's too much of a hot property after hanging with wrong crowd of people?

After this whole merchant behaviour regarding personality tests and the like I'm really losing respect for the guy, because his principles don't hold up under pressure. I don't like Faith Goldy either, or any other of those glorified youtubers for that matter, but come on man. Maybe it's time to clean up your own room you quack.

i think her exclusion was wrong but they are still right to question her for "not being a journalist"

there's plenty of journalists that dont ask strong questions. also, she was against people who were thought to be somewhat violent.

just a failure on all parts. i dont throw peterson under the bus for this but it is an oversight

>misgender
>concern trolling
>>>/leftypol/

It comes down to if she was on that podcast to be a journalist or to interview or just to talk.

agree, they shouldnt have excluded her. but im not throwing peterson under the bus for it.

I like him and faith goldy but she has more professionalism to grow into. and i mean mostly as a speaker.

Everybody knows she isn't a journalist, they should've just ackknowledged it and have discussion about journalistic principles while being on the panel, instead of just pussying out. If I had been in the audience I would've liked to hear her perspective, even if I don't agree with it. This is just virtue signaling from their side. Peterson is getting too much of an ego lately, after getting his cock sucked constantly by podcasters and the like.

He's not the second coming of Jung, he's just a dude paraphrasing pop psychology for desperate people who consider cleaning up your room a revolutionary message. Sam Harris has shown if someone talks back to him he'll shrink like tenfold.

The guy literally based his career on critiquing collectivist ideology and Nazism, and you're angry that he holds to his convictions?

Holy fuck, you guys unironically do believe people are one of 'your guys' if they so much as utter the word "jew".

>if he disagrees with the ideology and expects a journalist to atleast ask a few questions then he's just virtue signalling

Admit it, you're livid that your surrogate internet father has 'betrayed' you by doing exactly what he has been doing for decades.

why should he allow women in his discussion circle? women can only repeat others ideas. they are incapable of thinking on their own. he was right removing her.

Worse, you're an honorary nigger.

hes just a leaf
youtu.be/6c9Uu5eILZ8
he makes some good points though

Aw come on. You guys go through such impressive mental gymnastics sometimes. Whatever happened to Occum's Razor? The most likely explanation here is that Peterson just has no problem with Jews and rejects the JQ. Fucking guy was flanked by Jews on that panel. He's their friend.

This guy is 100% post modernism crap. All it took for me to realize this was to listen to one of his lectures on the bible. The guy is a try hard pseudo intellectual that pushes jewish ideology onto college kids. The only difference between him and SJWs is that he knows where the wind blows. Just check his patreon account. That by itself is not even a redeeming characteristic anymore at this point. Anyone with 3 digit IQ can realize this

I wouldn't go that far, but listening to him was refreshing, at least in terms of what I knew about him. He stood up to those gender queers, so that's good. But then again he doesn't has as much integrity as I originally assumed.

Hitler made some good points, does that matter?

I did not claim him to be a secret nazi or anything along those lines. Just that he knows the hypocrisy of not inviting speech when it was controversial because he can't risk that. I think its extremely short sighted to pit one's alliance purely in unironic Nazi larpers. Only retards with no sense of vision do that.

this, but i still agree jordan peterson has no balls. its even more pathetic that they had to a ban a woman and not a guy from stage

...

Occams razor is for lazy fags that are too afraid to think deeply about much of anything.

>Optics

One day you guys are going to realize that the enemy frothing at the mouth and pointing a rifle to your head, dying for an excuse to squeeze the trigger, doesn't care if you're wearing red or black. I just pray it's not too late when you do.

Okay. So it's he's pursuing a strategy for which there is zero evidence. When does the snake actually strike? Will it ever?

He really does have some post modernist tendencies. Like when he talks about "meta truth" and shit like that, but means useful lies. The vast majority of bible thumpers don't have some fancy jungian interpretation of religion, where everything is just a metaphor for whatever.

Are you claiming that I have no way of expanding my allies for when the time comes so should I custom order my fetish nazi outfit now and get angry that people don't join me under my nazi flag?

B-B-But I thought he was /our guy/???

*sharts*

no it doesnt matter
good points are good points.
thats what free speech is for

The sides are already chosen for you.

The pathetic thing about is them being unable to verbally take on some bimbo 4 on 1 and just discuss their issues in public. His whole argument against it seems like the same shit antifa and those other leftist censors have against giving some cunt a platform on their campus. Jordan Peterson might as well join them now.

Sage and hide

Jews fear Peterson, thats why shills are so rustled. Keep barking.

exactly, i'm a christian and his interpretation of the bible made me cringe hard with all his jungian bullshit. He said he read the bible but he didnt, he probably just read genesis and some other books. Because the bible itself says that is impossible for someone that doesnt have the holy spirit to understand it. His lectures are actually solid proof of this.

The Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom and knowledge. Thats just the beginning and its obvious he hasnt even that.

I think what I'm saying is that this is a fight for life or death, and opticsfags come off like they're in a sparring match.

That's a rather lazy and fatalistic take.

loved all his videos
he doesnt shill for jews or christianity too much not the cuck part at least

go jordan

he was more concerned about the fallout because he is making big money. There were other obvious ex SJWs in that stage, particularly the fat woman, so perhaps it was not just his call to make. And decided to fight another day

there is nothing cuck in Christianity. What would that be according to you?

At least he shouldn't call himself christian, well if he does do that. I like buddhism to some degree, but I don't call myself a buddhist or claim my stupid interpretation is representative for the religion.

Jordan Peterson is a complete faggot who constantly says stupid shit.

I have no idea why he has a following, nothing he says is even slightly interesting or original. He talks like a frog, sits like a woman, and seems to believe he is some sort of 1800's romantic-era philosopher or some shit.

He's a faggot and we should meme him to death

He's a meme intellectual

Maybe if you're busy trying to recruit those that have chosen decadence.

Should be the alt-right poster girl

Should also do face-fucking porn

If you couldn't tell this after seeing him once you shouldn't be here.
By the way please pay $10 for my online personality test.

Didn't he say "we" made the decision? If he was against it and then claims he wasn't in public he's a liar and a flip flopper. Not to say that he can't be trusted anymore on certain issues.

Yeah this a slight sellout but it seems more like he is the messenger. I somewhat agreee with him. He's trying to legitimize his cause and that involves distancing himself from anything potentially damaging. I believe in his head its an ends justifies means kind of deal but still somewhat disappointed in his decision but I can see the reason why.

In general though, nobody is perfect and up till now Jordan Peterson has been amazing. Aside from the political stuff his lectures on symbolism and the bible series are grade A.

Will keep an eye on future developments regarding this and him though.

>Jews fear Peterson

Let's say that were true. I truly doubt it, as I have little reason to believe it, but I'll suspend disbelief. Let's assume it's the truth. Does that truth preclude the possibility of Jews co-opting him? And what would a successful co-opting look like? How would it begin? Might it begin by pressuring him into supporting of certain voices from the public debate, especially if those voices can be linked to counter-semitism? Have Jews never co-opted before? Is it not their stock and trade?

He's a fucking faggot

He won't even say "Yeah I'm a Christian and everything in the bible 100% happened and if you don't like it then I hope you roast in hell you filthy sodomote"

No, he apologizes, and dances around it like a faggot "Weeelllll....I...uhm...have had to come to my on reconciliation of my faith...but the bible...it's a...book...with morals...and people have read it through history...so...it's...a moral culture thing, and I'm a christian but I don't believe the crazy stuff so please don't bully me"

0% respect I hope he gets gang raped by a pack of AIDs ridden niggerfaggots

why are these people so afraid of the dailystormer? the only thing they can do is shut it down, they avoid them like the plague

He already has a patreon, if his intention behind that stupid online test were to help he could've just linked to it or whatever with some comment about, if you like it please donate.

It's okay to be white

If I was in his position , I'd do the same.

The dailystormer is fucking hilarious

If I were some sort of public figure, I would want to interview those guys. By far some of the weirdest and most extreme media people in the west.

In this case it is justified. Fuck this guy.

Is it not obvious. TDS speaks frankly about the Jews. When a Jew rat steals some cheese, very few people say, "Hey, that rat is stealing the cheese!" TDS does. As such, they need to be punished. Anyone associated with them needs to be punished.

What's more mystifying is why people who call themselves identitarian right-wing refuse to acknowledge what is transpiring before our very eyes.

You're trying way too hard to pretend you're a regular here

youtube.com/watch?v=PfH8IG7Awk0

Can someone tell me why the questions-part is always a massive cringe when Peterson is done talking? They even say ''keep it short'' and these faggots give their boring life story how they found Peterson, and instead of asking good questions they make some uninteresting statement that nobody but they care about. Why do they talk so much? Can't they fucking KEEP. IT. SHORT! For FUCKS sake.

It's like if they really are there to hear their own voice from the speakers.

t. Peterson cuck

you won't win a civil war if the military, government, police, media AND population are against you.
it's okay to be white is good optics, it gets regular people on our side and against the left. nazi larping is bad optics, it scares normies.
in a fight of life and death the pragmatism of optics is more important than ever.

Don't think "the jews" are co-opting on purpose but has been making his rounds the world of podcasters, and their sentiments seem to color off on him. You know, like hey maaaan I totally like your message maan, take a vape maan, hehehehe, you're so cool. "They" just erode you little by little saying shit like, hey man I totally agree with you BUT... and then the compromises start. If he doesn't fold they go like "oh, I thought we were friends?" and if that doesn't work suddenly you ain't on those podcasts anymore wondering why and when you reach out they say some vague shit about their "schedule" or whatever. Fuck, I'm sure they might even say "let's do it Pete!" just to have someting unfortunate happen that ruins their schedule the last minute. Oh, I'm so sorry, maybe next time. Good luck with your lectures Jordan, bye!!

Meanwhile that tool got himself comfortable with his new lifestyle as psychology rockstar and dreams about that solid gold jacuzzi he likes. His kids got comfortable too, but then... bam! Money dries up again because his original supporters got tired and he isn't on podcasts anymore either. When he's desperate enough he'll gets a few tastes and the schedule opens up again, if he acts nice you know. Because friendship and all.

You have to go back

I don't know why they beat around the bush so much. It comes off as cowardly: She was rejected for being an ideologue rather than a journalist. However in their ramblings they make it very clear that there is bias in play in regards to certain ideas. As Jordan is very much against Nazism and totalitarianism generally it's not hard to see that him being picky of her not asking any hard questions is just him having bias.

He can go fuck himself, however. I like Faith in all the stuff I've seen.

The problem is, as I see it, so very many of you opticsfags confuse good optics for weakness. And the complication with that is, nobody wants to follow the weak. What Peterson did here was simply weakness. There is no actual rational justification for what he did. He simply cowered to the Jews and their influence, which is ultimately the most mighty power we face. If we cannot even confront that power we are lost. It doesn't matter how good you think it "looked." In fact, you have to entertain the possibility that not everything you believe 'looks good' does. Sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it just looks like what it is -- retreat.

I agree with you 100% You are either a Christian or you arent. The guy is basically recognizing the importance of the bible. yet is not willing to live by its moral code, because he doesn't really believe it. Just like Jesus told the pharasees:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

>Read Gulag Archipelago goy
>Kike shill

Kek. He does a bad job at it.

If it doesn't help you, it's basically your fault. The whole point if the exercise is to help you take control over your life. No one can do that but you.

Jordan Peterson is pushing young men to improve their lives and make something of themselves. I don't care if he doesn't like one tradthot "journalist", he's doing a lot more than most

I would argue that this specific occasion was one of those "compromises" that you speak of. Think about the situation here starkly. Peterson is scheduled to appear with Jews in a public event. Peterson and the Jews decide to exclude one of the scheduled speakers, who happens to be a gentile, because that speaker was interviewed on a prior occasion by a public known for persistently pursuing the JQ. The excuse Peterson gives at the actual function is that he knows it's hypocritical, but he did it anyway because said speaker did not live up to the rest of the panel's -- which includes Jews -- personal expectations of "journalism" -- a broad, and if I may say vague term, especially these days -- because the speaker in question did not ask "hard" enough questions of the interviewer. Now ask yourself, would this chain of events had occurred if the speaker was interviewed by a publication that was centered around Jewish identity? Or even Mexican identity? The message here is clear, and do not mistake it, because this is the message that is meant to be sent -- challenging Jewish identity is off-limits. Not challenging identity, but Jewish identity specifically. That, in particular, is a bridge too far. Why? There is no logical sense in that. And yet Peterson bent the knee before it anyway.

This shouldn't be a black and white judgement of people. He was in the wrong and was cowardly. Regardless, that doesn't say anything on his other work and it only partly speaks of his entire character.

It's politics dude. That Saad guy is friends with Joe Rogan, Joe Rogan is friends with Joey Diaz, Joey Diaz is friends with some other guy, and so on. If you go on the Joe Rogan podcast and piss him off you won't get on the Joey Diaz podcast etc. They don't call it black balling but that's what it is basically. If you're cool in their eyes all those other sycophants within the network will do you a favor, but then you'll have to do them a favor as well. If some more important than you guest is mad at you, all he needs to do is give Joe Rogan a call and say some shit, or threaten or he will not come on again.

That silly nigga is religious

JBP is a kike, only useful as a vessel for Jung. He is a kike, Saad is a kike, and they all use the Talmudic reasoning of their supposed "enemies," Cultural Marxists.

i was talking about optics in general. in the sense that "this is a life or death scenario" (which i ultimately agree with) doesn't mean we should go out and start murdering political enemies. you do what's appropriate for the time, and "it's okay to be white" was pitch perfect.

as for Peterson, he is not redpilled on Jews in the way a lot of people here delude themselves into thinking. he speaks with venom about Hitler and the Nazis, he clearly hates totalitarian ideology and collective guilt, he speaks about this at length constantly, yet dozens of people on here continually assure themselves that this is all an act, and that bringing up Solzhenitsyn is a dogwhistle just for us. it's impossibly unlikely, at best he's conflicted about Jewish influence in the USSR, which is undeniable, but he openly does not attribute this to them as a racial or religious group, as 90% of his colleagues and interviewers are Jewish. Pinker, Haidt, Saad, Rubin, Haier, Amitay are all people he talks to or about, plus the bloody Old Testament series he's doing on top of that. he's more redpilled than the average normie, but he would detest 95% of what goes on on Sup Forums.

I don't think it's some grand conspiracy, but it's probably fair to assume it was personal to the people on the panel, and consequently they pressured Peterson a little. Maybe a few nudges here and there.