JUST

JUST

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/kQImE
newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
youtube.com/watch?v=xLS5z8Ds62s
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I like how when the allegations hit he went on Hannity and basically said "In a week they'll probably accuse me of something else" and then one week later Gloria Allred comes out with her fake victim and fake tears for a press conference. Shit's as phony as a 3 dollar bill

>dem donor Jew does a thing
>HA HA LIBERAL HYPOCRITES
>far right republican does the thing
>FAKE NEWS

Jesus, they make it sound like his dick is in her right now and he won't pull out.

archive.is/kQImE

Theres literal proof they have paid women to accuse him and one has a signed yearbook dated as DA when he wasnt DA at the time and the signature changes colour from the rest of the written message in an obvious forgery. its a huge push to discredit him. And as the link shows, they arent covering anything except this fake story. As long as the public hears he did something, it doesnt matter if he did.

Shut the Fuck up dumbass bitch. Im voting for Roy Moore no matter what dumbass ShareBlue cunt says. Fucking idiot.

...

Don't bother. Sup Forumsacks are deluded. If the Obama wing of the Democratic party had done a sixteenth of the ridiculous shit the alt-right scions like Trump and Moore had done, they'd have gone postal by now.

Not at all actually, completely different witness legitimacy issues.

yes, clearly, because in one case the witnesses are accusing a Jew and are therefore trustworthy

And you faggot libcucks never provide any evidence, at least we dig a little deeper to find out the truth, you faggots just assume guilt without even bothering to do the legwork and investigate. All you've been doing is just spamming the board with Moore as a pedophile and yet there hasn't been one shred of evidence to back up those claims, and yet, you keep spamming the board like butthurt faggots

If you believe claims with no proof, you are a lemming who will follow any narrative.

If you believe claims with emerging proof of falsehood but it doesn't support your opinions so you continually believe the claims against evidence, you are being willfully blind to the truth.

So which is it? Are you just incredibly stupid or a paid shill?

>guy has highest approval rating of all high profile figures in Alabama
>won a billion fucking races over his 30 year career
>everyone loves him
>elected chief justice twice
>based as fuck no-bullshit fundamentalist christian
>never accused of any misconduct ever

>decides to finally go national and run for senator
>"BREAKING: JUDGE ROY MOORE ACCUSED OF RAPE OF 12 YEAR OLD!!!!!!!!"
>somehow the accuser has Hillary's old lawyer
>somehow they use the same script as the Trump accuser who turned out to be a hoax

hmmmmmmmmm really made me think guys

>poltard defending a pedophile
I'm shocked

Was Roy convicted of anything or charges brought against him in courts?
I mean did he at least settle with his accusers like Bill Clinton did?
No, okay then there's apparently no case to be made against him except for smearing him in media.
Is there a way for him to get back at his accusers and the media who is smearing him? If not there should be.

Has anyone contested the stories about his activity picking up little girls at the local mall? newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall

That goes way beyond contemporary accusations and frames his behavior as something that was common knowledge as it was occurring. You're the same kind of autistic faggot who prattles on about secret pedophile cabals and codes involving cheese pizza - only now there's evidence and witnesses and it's inconvenient for you. Actually fucking kill yourself.

Don't think too hard, here bro I got a nice glass of kool-aid made with fresh municipal tap water for ya with your name on it ;)

>if
solid source m8

Accusation = truth
right shill fag nigger?

Gloria Allred often represents victims of sexual harassment and assault

or do you not read the news?

Obama ended freedom of association and saw a neighborhood that was too white to be a problem the government had to fix. So they built and gave free housing to niggers to move in and ruin the neighborhood and whites fled.

This is not freedom of association and is proof of white genocide by definition.

i'm fully aware. the press conference was really fun.

>"BEFORE I BEGIN -- ME AND MY HUSBAND BOTH VOTED FOR TRUMP, SO YOU CAN'T SAY THIS IS A POLITICAL HIT JOB!!!"

>"NOW ONTO MY ACCUSATION: ROY MOORE RAPED ME WHEN I WAS 7 YEARS OLD AND I WORKED AS A BARTENDER AT A LOCAL ALABAMA STRIP CLUB!!!!!!!!"

>"NO, I DON'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE, WHAT ARE YOU A MISOGYNIST?!?!"

Her daughter did great work for Harvey Weinstein, absolutely, upstanding family.

>Obama ended freedom of association
I don't even know which bullshit nonsense you're even referring to. I don't even think Obama was all that - you fucking imbeciles are too far up your own ass to see that these "anti-establishment" (read: shitty at politics) retards are exponentially less concerned about constitutional protections. Throw yourself in an oven.

And how she cries, lol. I didn't know that one groping could make a woman cry for the next 40 years.

Were any of those locals democrats?
What you ask of others you should probably do yourself.

So he's still inside her?

>lol that pathetic child, she should have grown a thicker skin, getting fondled by a kiddy fiddler more than twice your age is literall nothing

Freedom of Association in America has been dead since 1965

Listening to that shit multiple times on NPR yesterday and I noticed it sounded very, very scripted.

The co-worker from the attorney's office on the record is a registered independent you fucking idiot. Greg Laget and most of the people interviewed identify as hard right conservatives.

kek
>tfw I read that in Rainier Wolfcastle's voice

>it was common knowledge
>yet the girls were scared to come forward because no one would believe them
>oh and it somehow never came up before in his political career

This is logical in libshit land.
>Oh shit Judge Moore is on raping spree should we call the cops?
>No the cops are impotent in the face of his political power, only one man can stop him...

Why do you think nobody ever came forward publicly about Weinstein until somebody high-profile spoke out against him? Or Bill Cosby? Or Kevin Spacey? Or Louis CK? Or any of these men with the power to ruin careers/lives?

Only in the UNITED STATES OF PEDOPHILIA!
BAHAHAHAHA!

So this is what Ameripedos are always talking about when they say freedom!The freedom to be a pedo in America!

USP!!!
USP!!!
USP!!!

>Why do you think nobody ever came forward publicly about Weinstein until somebody high-profile spoke out against him?
Uh, because Weinstein would literally sic ex-Mossad agents on the people that crossed him?
Are you claiming that Weinstein sent out his ex-israeli intelligence wet-works goons to intimidate these girls in the 70s?

Umm.. was Mr. Moore very handsome 30 years ago ? I understand teenage crushes, and all that, but girls generally go after musicians, or actors, or an art teacher.... but a freaking judge ?

>weird.
>pic related: best thing to come from Alabama

IT JUST KEEPS GETTING WORSE

Just don't let him take your daughter out for ice cream. Seems simple enough.

He was literally banned from the mall for openly cruising for teens lol

It doesn't matter now whether or not these allegations are true. What matters going forward is what the Senate will do about it if he wins.

If he wins, even after these allegations, then the people have decided that Moore is a suitable representation of their community. The Senate would have no business removing him from his seat.

But... the Senate does have the constitutional authority to do so, if at least 2/3 are in agreement. If they do decide to oust Moore, the Senate will have essentially overruled the democratic process. This would almost certainly be challenged all the way to the Supreme Court, and would be very interesting to see pan out.

On the other hand, if these unverified accusations prove to be enough to sway the vote in favor of the opponent, it would mean that voters prioritize merit over ability... which historically is very bad for a democracy.

It's a lose-lose, unless he stays of course.

So nobody is ever afraid to speak out against a powerful man unless he has a personal squad of Bear Jews?

Democrats you have a corrupt Senator under trial. You have another accused of stalking women and you always seem to forget about that rapin Bill, why should the American people trust you.

I'll claim that a fundamentalist federal judge who has 50 churches singing his praises (in a letter from earlier this year, edited to look up to date), who had open crimes ignored by the police, is a genuine threat you do not fuck with even if he is a pedo, yeah.

>s-s-top it
>things are the same when I say it is
>don't criticize my analogy

>so what if my guy's a pedo
>so what if my guy's a pedo
>so what if my guy's a pedo

desu i was pretty mad when the bimbo explosion was used against herman cain
nigga didn't deserve this

...

And there's literally no proof other then some Jew Yorker article. Again, provide evidence to back that shit up other then obvious fake news leftycuck shit papers making up fake stories and then maybe I would agree otherwise you're just making shit up

every Sup Forumstard wants to be able to hold out hope that they too can wife up a 14-year-old without interference from the pesky government

The Senate was always intended to be a check on the democratic process. Senators were originally appointed. Direct election of Senators makes no sense.

ANTIFRAGILE MOTHER FUCKERS

Old Roy is gonna win no matter what they throw at him.

Meh, if he loses republicans will just have to start doing the same to every single democrat.
Suddenly Biden and everyone else will have 100 cases of rape against them.

it IS whataboutism though. Tons of people who don't support Moore also don't support the Clintons. It has literally nothing to do with any of this unless you're simply looking to excuse pedophilia, it's the only thing that argument tries to do.

>one shred of evidence to back up those claims
he running for congress tho

SICK BASTARD

whataboutism is a Share Blue/Media Matters term you fucking retard, also there's no proof so fuck off

This kind of hypocrisy is common with Republicans so it's not too surprising.

Has he actually been proven to be a pedo?
As far as I know it's just a bunch of old hags making unsubstantiated claims.
Every election you have these people crawling out of the woodwork.

>washington post and establishment republicans literally want the republican candidate to give up the race to a democrat

wow imagine moy shoock

>five different teenage women
>one was bragging about the relationship in real time
>banned from mall

His actual defense is "why haven't they spoken up before" which was hilariously the go-to line for MGTOW defending Harvey in the immediate breaking of the story. Gotta love fat neckbears lusting after the idea of cruising for teens.

>I'm literally not going to engage your argument and instead I'll bring up things your "side" has done wrong, because nothing matters and we should all do whatever the hell we want

Yeah, a Breitbart poll. I'm sure that's reallllllllll accurate.

Don't you think its funny the girl or whomever have had YEARS to come forward and present a case but they never do until it's some fucking election time closing in and they all of a sudden come out with their shit fucking evidence-less claims. The thing is they never get prosecuted for making up their lies. We need to hold these accusers accountable. If they make the accusation, it has to go to court and both sides present their evidence. If the accuser cannot prove the case and loses, they need to do the same amount of prison time they tried to get their accuser of doing.

das rite

Congrats on not actually contradicting my point about whataboutism. "It's a shill term" for a longstanding debate tactic used by highschoolers to avoid getting grounded for smoking pot in mom's garage. And it doesn't matter if he's a pedo if your argument is "what about bill clinton" who we can all agree is a rapist, as you're drawing an equivalence between them yourself.

That said, he's a fucking hebo who cruised for high school chicks because he's a gross faggot with no social skills. He's a fundamentalist icon for being incapable of talking like a normal person and also shouting out bible verses that appeal to the same religious people that would vote for a casino owner.

Read it again. Libcuck claims hypocrisy, then Bill Clinton is brought up, and libcuck deflects with "whataboutism." Clinton is not brought up to deflect the actual accusation against Moore (which are disputed based on red flags in the stories as well as the timing).

Now you're getting it.

show me one liberal whose opinion matters that still defends Bill Clinton's behavior

Almost certainly true.

It's definitely wrong but Doug Jones really has no chance.

The dam burst with Harvey Weinstein, before it might not have come to light but shit's different now.

>he signed her yearbook
that's unequivocal proof he raped her!

t. KKK Grand-Master

Muhammad did worse.

It's hilarious how hard they're trying to meme these allegations into existence. They forge forward on these smear campaigns that have no evidence, and then wonder why trust in the media is at an all time low. Shocker.

the funny thing is he didn't even have sex with anyone

sluts on tinder are 100x worse these days

Its amazing, WaPo miraculously finds victims of Moore sex abuse while doing a report for the Alabama special election, media seeming in lock step, coincidentally John Oliver does a segment on some BS leftist talking point 'whataboutism' completely unscripted and unrehearsed. I didn't care about the election until now and I need Moore to win now

Except that won't happen. Democrats and Republicans are the same party, they only appear to be two parties to public in order to divide them.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

Right. Definitely shareblue. Idiot.

...

You think you're an artful dodger, but all you are is a dumb ass nigger tangled up in a watermelon patch.

still waiting

I think it's just sad. Do they honestly think this will convince anyone? Like they have to know that their shills who come here are more our playmates, than our actual ideological opponents. They're not swaying any opinions with this kind of blatant propaganda tactics.

Okay then, define "liberal who matters" first. Since that's your defense that no one who matters is doing this. What a shitty qualifier but whatever.

>Theres literal proof they have paid women to accuse him and one has a signed yearbook dated as DA when he wasnt DA at the time and the signature changes colour from the rest of the written message in an obvious forgery.

Do you have proof of ANY of this? Or are you just a paid shill?
>1 post by this ID
>leaf

Oh I guess that's that

Gotta love beta virgin leftycucks still not providing any evidence

you haven't even shown me a single liberal who defends Bill Clinton's behavior with women, so I'll keep waiting

Don't you dare doubt my narrative goyim!

Fake stories. It is McConnel's idea of attacking Bannon. It will backfire on dirty swamp Republicans like it always does.

Oh please, every single leader in the EU is also a pedo.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves mohammed.

why would they, they did it for a good half a decade and spun it as "everyone lies about duh seks lmao"

youtube.com/watch?v=xLS5z8Ds62s

But I'm sure you'll say Sally Kohn is a literal who that doesn't matter so you win the argument.

Yes because lefty shills like you make everything a catastrophy nothing will be a scandal. I applaud the lefts stamina on keeping up the fevered pitch of the hysterics but no one believes you anymore. You've gone past crying wolf, past saying the sky is falling and gone straight to evangelical the 'end is nye' alarmism for a year.

Also, he signed it Roy Moore D.A. and he was not D.A. at the time he supposedly signed it.

If moore is innocent, then kevin spacey and weinstein are innocent.

>Also, he signed it Roy Moore D.A. and he was not D.A. at the time he supposedly signed it.
proof?

>several dem donors get caught in sexual harrassment and pedo rings with lots of proff
>UHHHH DRUMPF IS STILL BAD MKAY?
>Republican candidate gets bullshit claims with no credibility or proof against him RIGHT as he is about to win
>AHAHAHAHA DRUMPFLETS LMAO
You are a the definition of a useful idiot.

>replaying with whataboutism
Pedo States of America?

lol that goober on the left of the screen was just so tickled to be able to bring up Slick Willy in that conversation.

They could be. This is why we have court people are innocent until proven guilty or confess. However, Weinstein and Spacey pretty much admitted it. That fag Star Trek guy also admitted grabbing men live on the radio.

He was Deputy District Attorney in 1977, not District Attorney.