Trump's FCC passes rule allowing for even more media consolidation

wtf Sup Forums i thought Trump was going to enforce anti-trust rules

Other urls found in this thread:

reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet/fcc-plans-to-vote-to-overturn-u-s-net-neutrality-rules-in-december-sources-idUSKBN1DG00H
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Who fucking cares. Media is dead. It's all internet even now, and will certainly be so once grandma finally dies.

fuck yourself. Fuck Net Neutrality. Fuck anyone who shills for the tech companies. I rather he BTFO of all you technokikes.

ok, cnn needs to go

They're all already owned by a total of 4 companies. So...

FCC shouldn't even exist. I want to see hams cry in the streets.

>rule is implemented to stop monopolies
>monopoly happened anyway

I was just going to say, aren't most of the broadcasting companies owned by like 2 guys?

This.

I thought you didn't have any laws on this?

>potentially

wtf i love monopolies now

>net neutrality
>tech companies
Tech giants don't want NN dumbass

google wants it
facebook wants it
amazon wants it
netflix wants it

also supporter of net neutrality

MoveOn.org[5]

/thread

Laugh all you want but this sand nigger is going to throttle your internet and charge you out the ass for internet bundles and probably even to go on Sup Forums if comcast or the other providers don't just censor it. This pajeet is making it closer to some chink chinese government.

he's a commie and so is his wife's family
>i hate net neutrality
>bunch of pedos
>huge deficit
>no wall
>a plague spreading
>rocket man
>lost jobs in september; must have been many last in october because ZERO news on this
>grabbem
>no fucken tax returns
>indictments

Pajeet is coming for you America:

reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet/fcc-plans-to-vote-to-overturn-u-s-net-neutrality-rules-in-december-sources-idUSKBN1DG00H

Wll you mobilize to stop it?

...

>rule to stop monopolies
>monopolies happen anyway
>rule to allow monopolies
>????????

I've been mobilizing to support the end of NN. get fukt shill

Have to keep an eye on the government trying to control and regulate the internet.

Once all media is consumed by the small handful. There may be a crack down on internet freedom.

one fake jews fake news to rule us all. blow moore and dolan? here's your zionist brainwashing? stand against the upside down star party? shut em down
>MERGA!

Enjoy you cable package of pre approved websites!

>BRAIN THE GWAMP!

disinformation

EMAILLLLLLLLLLLS
>his entire family does em too
they knew what they signed up for

...

nice specifics. fucking shitbag liar. you killed even this board now. congrats. i always told you you were malignant cancer. fucking molech party. bannon was a commie too. youre all russian bots for Dugin whom despises the west

>AS REPORTED BY THE WASHINGTON POST, A NEWSPAPER OWNED BY AMAZON.COM CEO JEFF BEZOS

REALLY MADE ME FUCKING THINK

you are the spawn the russians don't even want anymore. But the rainbow flag will disguise the socialism

no worries. we wuz gommie kangz nao

We dont know do we? Trust a giant corporation? When have that ever worked out...

>sign of covenant
>literal molech stars on only his logo and not the democrats'
putin's a pedo. investigate epstein ffs. nice nambla donations? it's like you want to kill yourself and be raped in the process. hence the satanic masonic chaos frog. order out of gurnald y'kno?

so you feel comfortable in giving a liberal government the power to police the internet?

All I know is it would upset redditors and nothing will really happen
Even if it fucked over the internet, we need to get off this shithole anyway

they absolutely want it retard. That way ISPs can never threaten big business conglomates like Kikebook and Jewgle

the two party system is a farce. you work for nationalist globalism. you cant defend yourself so you just ask him what he's asking you. in reverse

"only selected websites will be available"

there was no net neutrality forced by the government
this never happened

mergers still have to go through the FTC and SEC, so the media mergers are still subject to strong federal oversight, so this is no biggie

i dont understand what youre saying. go take a shower you smell like sulfur. im gone

also Trump just hired an anti trust lawyer to run the FTC so I believe soon enough the tech companies are gonna be broken up.

Mueller also investigated those comapnies so I believe some of those indictments coming in are gonna be from the tech firms.

Maybe like Eric Schmidt, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Jack, Spez. I hope they all get indicted.

>want
If they really wanted it, they would lobby strongly for it and it would be law.

This
like it even matters at this point

>Every media outlet consolidates into one solid group...that's completely ignored by thinking adults.
>Meanwhile, startup companies are free to establish themselves based on merit stemming from actual journalism.
>FCC dies a death 60 years in the making.

I don't see a problem.

exactly.

>threaten
The only threat these giants face are from other products directly taking their market share. Google and Facebook would prefer to pay a toll to Verizon/Comcast than to have a new service eclipse them with a better search engine or a more well-liked social networking site. Truly, they did benefit massively from NN, but they would only pretend to weep for its demise. Closing up NN entrenches them further if anything. All they're doing by promoting NN is building PR because everyone hates Comcast.

media was already consolidated into one hands, it's called google

FCC APPROVES NEXT-GEN TV

>The new standard, dubbed ATSC 3.0, would allow for more precise geolocating of television signals, ultra-high definition picture quality and more interactive programming.

In five years the broadcasters can decide to use the new standard, forcing people to get a new tv set as the current sets cannot handle the new standard.

>“That means every one of us will need to replace our television sets or buy new equipment,” said Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel.

That's what happens when content is both created and distributed by a single body.

>the scowling Scott

...

How is this a bad thing? Please, let these companies monopolize and watch how every single reader of each magazine/tv station/newspaper that they own drops in sales once people realize every piece of media they own is purported by the same corporate entity.

They have laws they need to adhere to, so yes. More so than a company that can do what it wants.

I need my shithole, nothing else to do.

Fox is about to do 2 massive mergers, one in UK and one in US. They are going to own most news media on both sides of the pond.

That's why.

keep on sucking that boot faggot

So what. msm conglomerates work as a monopoly.

No net neutrality literally, explicitly means that ISPs can censor sites at-will and charge you extra to use them, this includes Sup Forums. They will charge you extra for the privilege of using search engines, Youtube, wikipedia, all the shit you take for granted as useful parts of the internet.

You can freely disregard any anti-NN people as factual, actual bought shills, contrarian trolls who have nothing to lose themselves because they aren't in the US (as if this shit won't become worldwide if it takes off here), or dumbasses who have no idea what it really means and entails. It means Chinese "internet" that you actually have to pay more for. There will be no more default internet that just exists that we share worldwide. PERIOD. It means MORE control over you, FAR MORE, not less. It means no right to just use the internet like you always have and to be fine with an oligarchy of the current big-name sites killing any rivals before they even exist and just reigning over you forever, letting them get shittier and shittier with nothing you can do about it.

If you are against NN you literally are fine with giving ISPs an excuse to kill the site you are reading this on right now by just deciding they won't let you access it if it's considered "dangerous" by state or government law. That's what being non-neutral means - sites are judged, users are judged, sites are CONTROLLED. You think I'm kidding? You think I'm memeing you? I most definitely am fucking not. The end of NN is an existential threat to not just Sup Forums but the internet as we know it. Simple as that.

OLIGOPOLIES ARE GREAT FOR COMPETITION, GOYIM

To be fair they were allready pretty consolidated, just look at the past 30 years. If anything if they all become one entity, which they pretty much are, it becomes that much easier to completely disregard anything broadcast or reported by them.

wanted* it you stupid retard
they no longer care, they are consolidated

they only keep saying it for the optics
"oh, we wanted to keep it but couldnt, sorry folks!"

say bye bye to Sup Forums you retarded partisan

fuck off kike. The only thing going bye bye is the kikes and their control over the flow of information online?

Why should we support Net Neutrality if the companies that support it have censored everything they deem shouldn't be seen en masse? How come they can be the arbiters of truth?

Fuck you and fuck net neutrality.

you are the kind of individual this is talking about

ISPs HAVE NEVER DONE ANYTHING OF THE SORT.

BEFORE NET NEUTRALITY GOT BROUGHT UP DID THAT SHIT EVER HAPPEN?

I HOPE YOU PEOPLE LEARN A FUCKING LESSON BECAUSE WE WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS BULLSHIT.

Pretty soon all the isp’s will be owned by those media companies and with net neutrality repealed, they’ll be able to control what you can and cannot read on the internet.