If Whites are so superior how come they were outsmarted by a Jew? :^)

If Whites are so superior how come they were outsmarted by a Jew? :^)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wrhYOYs5JrA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Cringe. Stop spamming this same thread. Sage.

goyims are fucking useless

Because Jews are okay with being sociopaths and fucking over people in order to gain their success.

If Jews had empathy they'd do just as well, probably worse considering the modern world was invented by white people, mostly Scots.

Money and victim complex

>mostly scots

LMAO

Someone's never heard of Scottish enlightenment

>Feynman did nothing wrong
Not his fault you can't draw diagrams or understand that quantum chromodynamics can't work with just white-power

goyim is plural you amerimutt

Jews are white people according to jews.

>whitesvs whites
>whites chimp out
>muh revolution
>beheads the kang and da monarchy and sheit
>created something called muh "liberalism"
>it evolves up to 19th century
>it degenerates whites
>whites demoralized and more prone to degeneracy
>kikes benefit from it
>LOLocaust happen
>kikes migrate to various whitevilles
>kikes pretty much advance their agenda due to muh liberalism
>kikes demoralize whites
>whies be like : muh guilt, muh bbc and everythang from that point onward
present day

dey took our jebs

>Whites
>Empathy

The same way they were outsmarted by the Chinese.

Ironic. Feynman asked NOT to be used as a example of Jewish superiority.

Feynman used an Argumentum ad Consequentiam to reject it. The fallacy goes like this: If I agree with the conclusion that jews are better than other people, then the Nazi claims they they are the master race is also a valid conclusion, ergo I reject that Jews are the master race.

It doesn't mean that Jews or Germans aren't intelligent, it just means the argument is wrong.

BTW, the Jewish high IQ myth is easily debunked with the fact that the average IQ in Israel is 92, and doing a little math on the demographics. If Jews were smart, they wouldn't believe it. It's cognitive bias.

wish richard feynman was still alive

he never considered himself a jew and he was mostly white
the full truth will out
he was based as fuck
absolutely against vainglorious faggotry
absolutely against collectivism
absolutely about doing what's right by yourself
absolutely just and centered
just imagine him and JB Peterson in silk robes, smoking pipes, erections poking out from 'neath the silky luxurious folds of their robes

Whites and Asians are the most empathetic races really..

Take a look at ANY humanitarian effort, it's all whites.

>outsmarted by a Jew?
Never happened.

Feynman is unironically my favorite jew. Maybe one day he'll be /ourjew/.

I'll be damned before a fucking Bronxite claims to be smarter than me

t. new yorker

And it's 95 if i'm not mistaken, and only 30% ashkenazis so it kinda checks out

A FEW YEARS after I gave some lectures for the freshmen at Caltech (which were published as the Feynman Lectures on Physics), I received a long letter from a feminist group. I was accused of being anti-woman because of two stories: the first was a discussion of the subtleties of velocity, and involved a woman driver being stopped by a cop. There’s a discussion about how fast she was going, and I had her raise valid objections to the cop’s definitions of velocity. The letter said I was making the woman look stupid.

The other story they objected to was told by the great astronomer Arthur Eddington, who had just figured out that the stars get their power from burning hydrogen in a nuclear reaction producing helium. He recounted how, on the night after his discovery, he was sitting on a bench with his girlfriend. She said, “Look how pretty the stars shine!” To which he replied, “Yes, and right now, I’m the only man in the world who knows how they shine!’ He was describing a kind of wonderful loneliness you have when you make a discovery.

The letter claimed that I was saying a woman is incapable of understanding nuclear reactions.

I figured there was no point in trying to answer their accusations in detail, so I wrote a short letter back to them: “Don’t bug me, man!”

Needless to say, that didn’t work too well. Another letter came: “Your response to our letter of September 29th is unsatisfactory …” — blah, blah, blah. This letter warned that if I didn’t get the publisher to revise the things they objected to, there would be trouble.

I ignored the letter and forgot about it.

A year or so later, the American Association of Physics Teachers awarded me a prize for writing those books, and asked me to speak at their meeting in San Francisco. My sister, Joan, lived in Palo Alto — an hour’s drive away — so I stayed with her the night before and we went to the meeting together.

cont.

cont.

As we approached the lecture hall, we found people standing there giving out handbills to everybody going in. We each took one, and glanced at it. At the top it said, “A PROTEST.” Then it showed excerpts from the letters they sent me, and my response (in full). It concluded in large letters: “FEYNMAN SEXIST PIG!”

Joan stopped suddenly and rushed back: “These are interesting,” she said to the protester. “I’d like some more of them!”

When she caught up with me, she said, “Gee whiz, Richard; what did you do?”

I told her what had happened as we walked into the hall.

At the front of the hall, near the stage, were two prominent women in the American Association of Physics Teachers. One was in charge of women’s affairs for the organization, and the other was Fay Ajzenberg, a professor of physics I knew, from Pennsylvania. They saw me coming down towards the stage accompanied by this woman with a fistful of handbills, talking to me. Fay walked up to her and said, “Do you realize that Professor Feynman has a sister that he encouraged to go into physics, and that she has a Ph.D. in physics?”

“Of course I do,” said Joan. “I’m that sister!”

Fay and her associate explained to me that the protesters were a group — led by a man, ironically — who were always disrupting meetings in Berkeley. “We’ll sit on either side of you to show our solidarity, and just before you speak, I’ll get up and say something to quiet the protesters,” Fay said.

Because there was another talk before mine, I had time to think of something to say. I thanked Fay, but declined her offer.

cont.


As soon as I got up to speak, half a dozen protesters marched down to the front of the lecture hall and paraded right below the stage, holding their picket signs high, chanting, “Feynman sexist pig! Feynman sexist pig!”

I began my talk by telling the protesters, “I’m sorry that my short answer to your letter brought you here unnecessarily. There are more serious places to direct one’s attention towards improving the status of women in physics than these relatively trivial mistakes — if that’s what you want to call them — in a textbook. But perhaps, after all, it’s good that you came. For women do indeed suffer from prejudice and discrimination in physics, and your presence here today serves to remind us of these difficulties and the need to remedy them.”

The protesters looked at one another. Their picket signs began to come slowly down, like sails in a dying wind. I continued: “Even though the American Association Physics Teachers has given me an award for teaching, I must confess I don’t know how to teach. Therefore, I have nothing to say about teaching. Instead, I would like to talk about something that will be especially interesting to the women in the audience: I would like to talk about the structure of the proton.”

The protesters put their picket signs down and walked off. My hosts told me later that the man and his group of protesters had never been defeated so easily.

(Recently I discovered a transcript of my speech, and what I said at the beginning doesn’t seem anywhere near as dramatic as the way I remember it. What I remember saying is much more wonderful than what I actually said!)

cont.

After my talk, some of the protesters came up to press me about the woman-driver story. “Why did it have to be a woman driver?” they said. “You are implying that all women are bad drivers.”

“But the woman makes the cop look bad,” I said. “Why aren’t you concerned about the cop?”

“That’s what you expect from cops!” one of the protesters said. “They’re all pigs!”

“But you should be concerned,” I said. “I forgot to say in the story that the cop was a woman!”

Why do people using this lame ass strawman?

Easy answer, cuckstianity.

>pic related
The story of his frustrating last assignment followed by his subsequent death alway struck me as suspicious.

youtube.com/watch?v=wrhYOYs5JrA

If you don't see a young white couple in this image then you're a retard.

>Asians
>Emphaty

Kek.

Western and southern Asians, yea

Jews were kept out of society during the Christian middle ages, literally kicked out dozens and dozens of places, time and time again. The inquisition was founded to sniff out Jews who lied about their conversion. Only with Christianity on the wane the influence of Jewry grew. With the abolishment of king and priest, the mercantile class reigned supreme and guess who feels like a fish in that water.

And even if, hypothetically, Christianity was in favor of Jews, it is still the foundation of Europe and its culture. But dr. Pierce is not interested in that, he just wants a pure bred race. Neo-nazis (and neo-pagans who argue the same) are as subversive and materialist as Marx and Freud, only less succesful.

With enemies like that, it's not that hard for Jews to come out superior.