So fucking kids in Alabama is okay?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

sandiegouniontribune.com/news/nation-world/sd-me-menendez-case-20171012-story.html
washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/11/17/im-a-feminist-i-study-rape-culture-and-i-dont-want-al-franken-to-resign/
npr.org/2017/11/16/564229931/no-one-has-been-expelled-from-the-senate-since-the-civil-war
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._McCormack
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It's okay when the alt-right rep does it.

Learn 2 sky high levels of hypocrisy.

Proof please

Yeah as long as it's not sodomy, because that would just be gay.

Innocent until proven guilty > Guilty until proven innocent

Of course not.


But you need something a little more concrete than a couple of used up old hags coming out 40 years after the fact - coincidentally in the weeks before an election - accusing someone of raping them.


Accusations != To guilt, despite how badly you want them to be true.

age of consent was 14 so even if it was true it wouldnt be illegal.

meanwhile democrats fuck children of any age.

Guilty until proven a democrat.
The left still love Polanski

way too much fuckery going on with these accusations. in reality, (((they))) just want the seat. fuck em

All of your leaders are kidfuckers. Surrender the country now.

Didn't Steven Colbert rape a kid?

Assigning guilt to a Republican doesn't require proof, but proof doesn't matter when it concerns a Democrat

>1 post by this ID

Please provide evidence that children were fucked. And, while you're at it, provide evidence that you and every other leftist DIDN's fuck children. We need to exterminate you verminous pedophiles.

>14 year old
>kid

Meanwhile Podesta is fucking pizza slices in his basement

There can be no future for elections when EVERY candidate is accused of fucking kids.

Financial, ie alleged corruption cases =/= serial child molestation with tons of witnesses.

Nope. Age of consent is 16 and he didn’t even fuck any of them. Moore did literally nothing wrong.

The duck isn't accused of underage sex?

you must live there

> he didn’t even fuck any of them
That can be said about every single one of them including Louis CK, Bill Clinton, Harvey Weinsten, Kevin Spacey ...

And Moore molested younger than 16s!


Why are people in here so insanely fucking dumb?

>molested
sure thing boomer

The Dem fucked uneraged prostitutes dude.

Funny how you are willing to defend that, but won't respond to the calls for evidence of your accusations.

Because they’ve been brainwashed to be uncritical partisan shills that will vote for team republican regardlesss of consequences

...

>Alabama: Where if she's not good enough for her own family, she isn't good enough for me
You sound surprised?

Yes. It's Alabama, kid fucking is the state passtime.

There is no fucking evidence of any inappropriate actions by Moore. You are simply believing a smear campaign without proof.

>text
>below it picture
I have never seen one of those before being lies

did you find it on the internet next to Obama's African birth certificate?

then everything is a smear campaign, literally everything

but you owe an apology especially to the Clinton family for hurting their feelings

>then everything is a smear campaign, literally everything

Smear campaigns are fine if there is evidence. But if one works on hearsay alone they can and will happen to anyone that dissents against those in power.

Yes, because only democrats are gullible enough to care about that shit. Welcome to the unfair world of being on the stupid side.

but there is evidence, much more than in other cases

even an ultra conservative Alabama paper confirmed that he was doing those bad things to teens while in his 30's and lied about it

Screen cap, but it makes sense that you weren't clever enough to understand that.

>but there is evidence
>lists more examples of hearsay

I don't know. Do you automatically take allegations to be true?

>but there is evidence, much more than in other cases

Ok, name one thing. Protip: read what evidence is before trying.

>even an ultra conservative Alabama paper confirmed that he was doing those bad things to teens while in his 30's and lied about it

Which paper and what evidence did they confirm it with?

>Screen cap
say no more, it's from the internet so it can't be a total made up lie backed by nothing

surely you have dozens of credible witnesses Fox News or the WSJ could interview

when victims and witnesses come forward with their names and faces it's not 'hearsay' you illiterate moron

Alright, you tickled my fancy. Hers another so you don't work your mind harder than usual.
sandiegouniontribune.com/news/nation-world/sd-me-menendez-case-20171012-story.html

Like I said. Dems are perfectly fine with kid fuckers. As long as they are dems.

We really shouldn't be suprised. Dems are perfectly fine with all sorts of sexual abusers as long as they are dems.

washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/11/17/im-a-feminist-i-study-rape-culture-and-i-dont-want-al-franken-to-resign/

Why would kid fucker be any different for them? Especially if they pay for them right?

try harder with your d&c shit you (((faggots)))

>when victims and witnesses come forward with their names and faces it's not 'hearsay' you illiterate moron

Any anecdotal support of an assertion out of court is hearsay. Wikipedia is too hard to use I know

Examples of hearsay:

"This man molested me and here is my high school picture"

Youre technically right. I suppose it would instead fall under the category of "unsubstantiated claims"

>get raped
>never do anything about it, dont press charges
>(((coincidently))) decide to raise a shitstorm years later when the accused is running for a hotly contested congressional seat
>still dont press charges because reasons

Its almost as if their claims are baseless and wouldnt survive scrutiny in court. No indictment = nothingburger. Go ahead and take a bite.

Funny how that yearbook already disappeared

Cuz it was proven fake on the first day

>regardless of consequences
That's fucking rich. The consequence of the Democrats being in power will be the permanent end of American prosperity as the demographics descend into a Brazil-like profile, complete with the attendant Brazil-like crime rates and poverty. The moral grandstanding of the left is leading us all to disaster.

Post some pics of 14-year-old girls, and I'll be the judge of whether they are are kids or not.

the witness testimonies are piling up

>Ok,
no, it's not okay for somebody to be this fucking dumb

the election was not rigged and Roy Moore is a child molester

For science right?

Some user claiming he was a socialist just posted Roy's cell# on Sup Forums. Seemed genuine but no word on if it's legit.

All that shit you typed is just conjecture based on falsehoods.our government is more conservative than ever and whites are still around

can you even read, you fucking moron?
>not convinced they are false


> Dems
oh thank God, then defending a pedo is perfectly fine!


Hands off OUR pedo filthy Dems!!

>the witness testimonies are piling up

There you go using big words you don't mean

Testimony is sworn, bears penalties of perjury if proven be a lie, and is subject to cross examination. You mean assertions are piling up, which means nothing to me because assertions can happen to anyone, especially those seeking public office and acquiring enemies on the way

>no, it's not okay for somebody to be this fucking dumb

Thank you for understanding your problem

>conjecture
It's inevitability. Look at Brazil, look at Mexico. That's our future thanks to the hyper-moral left who would fall on their swords before being called a bigot.

We have already established you have no proof.

Do you honestly get paid by the post? Who are you trying to convince? People that come to this site are bombarded by sources and evidence that people decide to nickname "redpills" for their claims. You have nothing.

The only people who are going to buy into the shit your spewing is the guys you circle jerk with on a discord planning your posts on this site. The only anons to side with you are the ones who are shilling right along side.

I am honestly curious here. Why waste your time? You are far to ill prepared for what anons on this site use to argue against eachother? At what point are you going to realize you aren't even playing the same game, let alone in the same league?

you're a redneck simpleton defending the indefensible, not a lawyer

>out of court
you are in a court right now, you're a juror in this case

sorry you can't outsource your morality to 12 other people

> Examples of hearsay:
witness testimony is not hearsay, see my first point

Hearsay isnt evidence nigger. Its not in court - its not a sworn statement. Its literally he said/she said.

>but there is "evidence"
>"much more" than in other cases
>literally zero evidence at all, just claims that are entirely unsubstantiated

Keep chewing that nothingburger. Btw collecting rare pepes and unironically using flags doesnt make you fit in. Instead of protesting just take note and apply yourself better next time you make this thread.

Obama had one of the highest illegal immigration deportation rates in modern presidency history yet all you Alt gay fags always screams Dems are for MUH OPEN BORDERS with no evidence of such

...

>(((coincidently))) decide to raise a shitstorm years later when the accused is running for a hotly contested congressional seat

that's not factually true, at least one of them talked about it all her life

and this also coincided with the Hollywood scandals and a giant shift in the media when they finally care and report these cases

I don't think it's political, he's really a bad guy who molested many many women in Alabama

Because the Democrats champion sheltering and aiding illegal invaders among themselves. They are the party of importing the third world, or sitting idle while they do it themselves. Obama did enforce the existing laws at the border, but as I understand it also played bookkeeping/redefinition games to achieve those "record high" numbers as well. It's only a matter of time before America is minority white at this point and the left is far more likely to do nothing or accelerate it than the right.

>giant shift in the (((media)))

Woah.

>you're a redneck simpleton defending the indefensible, not a lawyer

You don't have a basic dictionary understanding of the words you use. I suppose retards like you are more complex than the rest of us.

>witness testimony is not hearsay, see my first point

There is no testimony.

The only crime committed here is I have to wait until dec 12th to taste your salt.

This. How much hearsay do we need before /pol believes us?? I'm starting a mass text about it to help add more evidence

AL here.

Moore will win.

>that's not factually true, at least one of them talked about it all her life

And how do we know that? Oh wait we don't. That's hearsay too.

the dam broke with the Fox News and the Weinstein scandals and the others not because there's an election in Alabama.

is this not clear to you?

of course women started talking, expect more politicians to be vetted this way from now on

Its Alabama, does it really surprise you

you just really really want this pedo to get away with it because it's "our guy"

fuck you, you evil moron.

>the dam broke with the Fox News and the Weinstein scandals and the others not because there's an election in Alabama.

The first accusation came from the washington post that actively sought out the alledged victim.

Did the washington post feel a moral obligation to find victims of sexual abuse because of #metoo? Why did they look for someone who had something bad to say about roy moore a month before the election?

Based user what’s your opinion on the Al Franken controversy?

>expect more politicians to be vetted on the basis of how the (((media))) portrays them

Do you niggers even proof read the shit you put out? Do you not see how saying this completely discounts your arguement? Theres no indictment. When there is, youll have a story. Until then, its just some random women claiming they were raped (years ago) with zero evidence. If they were sexually assaulted, they would have gone to the police. Or go to the police now. Instead, they spout claims and expect the public to disregard the united states constitution and accept the premise of "guilty because i said so".

Why do they say that 14 year olds are kids?

>you just really really want this pedo to get away with it because it's "our guy"

We know you're not native to Sup Forums retard.

And I'm actually not interested in who Sup Forums supports. I'm interested in who assblasts you the most. Since moore is getting in office I'm glad there's no senator term limits. Alabama is going to elect him until he dies. And every vote he makes is a reminder that you are utterly powerless.

>actively

you would know, because you're not mad with wingnuttery to the point of being a pedophile apologist

>because you're not mad

Yes I know. Times are good

Hows your butt holding up

>We know you're not native to Sup Forums retard.
much more native than you, degenerate shilling moron

> Since moore is getting in office
the senate will remove him anyhow

he wouldn't be McConnell's first btw

>1 post by this ID

>much more native than you, degenerate shilling moron

Ask your supervisor on how to best use Sup Forums words and phrases

>the senate will remove him anyhow
They can't expel him for poor conduct before he took office. The supreme court shot that down a long time ago.

>npr.org/2017/11/16/564229931/no-one-has-been-expelled-from-the-senate-since-the-civil-war
>The Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in Powell v. McCormack that a chamber of Congress cannot bar a duly elected member whom the other members regard as distasteful, even one accused of stealing public funds. The court was especially doubtful about conduct that occurred prior to the beginning of the congressional session in question.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._McCormack

Get fucked lmao

only if they're white and their momma are single