Thoughts on "Fourth Political Theory"?

Thoughts on "Fourth Political Theory"?

Other urls found in this thread:

mourningtheancient.com/truth-6.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=T7dogNFCENI
mourningtheancient.com/truth.htm
onceuponatimeinthewest1.wordpress.com/about/
youtu.be/zkw8nwHG2GM
aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-fascism/
fifthpolitical.wordpress.com/about/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

from what i gather this theory is ok with marxism to acheive destruction of rival states....fuck off kike

Not really. 4TP is ok with marxism agains liberalism but 4TP is against marxism (too materialistic for 4TP) too.

Aleksander Dugin is an anti white filthy jew bitch bolshevik terrorist. He hates white europeans and has openly in video/audio format called for the genocide of Ukrainians, does that and the term "BOLSHEVIK" not ring the bell of HOLODOMOR 2.0 you fucking retards / or feds (that'd explain why you shill, unless you're just retards).

National Socialism, Hitler's way, IS THE ONLY WAY. Retard (OR ZOG-FED). mourningtheancient.com/truth-6.htm

4th political = a diversity of struggle unified under the banner of the fourth option in an attempt to destroy Eurocentric ideals of liberalism that have become imperialistic in a way that destroy the diversity of culture and the identity as a human being. A unified force of anti liberalism without a dogmatic ideal to provide the room for cultures, religions and nations to create there own framework that works best for them.

JUCHE BUT FOR EVERYONE

Holodomor deserved to die for burning their crops and not planting more. Literal retards.

Purge chaos.

(ID: pIDhzDlm) is a ANTI-WHITE ANTIFA PRO-ZOG PRO-ISRAEL PRO-JEWTIN PRO-SOVIET ZOG PRO KIKE DUGINIST terrorist

Wtf?

This is how you tag a response, I thought the JIDF would teach this in orientation.

BOLSHEVIK ANTIFA Duginist Communist Putinist (ID: pIDhzDlm) says WHITE EUROPEANS DESERVED THIS.......
youtube.com/watch?v=T7dogNFCENI

Hitler was right
mourningtheancient.com/truth.htm

Preserve white liberalism goys! It's white so it has to be right! I can't self critique my own ideas or movement!

(ID: pIDhzDlm) is crying in pain as he strikes you by saying that the Holodomor Holocausts were something that White People deserve and he supports Putin who wants to Holodomor Holocausts white people against so (ID: pIDhzDlm) is 1. a fed or 2. a retard. End of story viewer.

Dugin is correct, and it's happening regardless of peoples' dislike of it.

The fractures are already spreading throughout the neol-liberal global establishment. It is facing spirit-death) Mouse Utopia), and it's increasing failure to deliver on the promises of the progressive technocracy (where's my flying car? I played the game and all I got is this shitty iPhone, hooray!).

The good news? People will largely be able to form whatever communities they want around whatever identities they want... as long as they are strong enough and smart enough to advance and defend them.

The nanny state and the cultural tyrants of corporate individualism (which is ironically a hive mind - see nu-male meme) is increasingly unable to deliver on the core mandates of what we believe to be the legitimate function of the state. Confidence has broken down, and the slow death of declining birth rates and the increasing, yet divisive and dangerous, importance of immigration will be the nail in the coffin of the modern order.

Putin doesn't mind holodomors because he is a soviet zog puppet himself as the soviet union never fell they just gave that illusion and you retards fall for it. soviet union was an ISRAELI ZOG. So if Israel still exists, the Soviet Union never ended. Retards.

British and American ZOGs installed the Soviet Israeli ZOG anyways. And the Palestinian ZOG known as Israel. You guys are fucking retarded or feds.

You follow Putinist and Duginist material.
Filthy Bolsheviks or ZOG-feds is all we got in this thread.

> 4th Turning
> 4th Generation Warfare
> 4th Way (or 4th Political Theory, if you will)

PUTIN FOLLOWS DUGIN DUGIN IS AN ANTI WHITE CRIMINAL WHO WANTS TO DO THIS TO WHITE PEOPLE AGAIN:
youtube.com/watch?v=T7dogNFCENI

>khohol is too retarded to link posts properly

Yawn Jews allow rouge minor political movements to identify potential dissidents. There’s lots around today so let’s control guns. Grow up. Saged

Show your real flag

>"Fourth Political Theory"
Never read it. What is the alternative exactly, or is it laid out generally?

Reading a review and got to this:

>From Liberalism Dugin would eliminate the over-emphasis on the individual and keep its sense of freedom; from Communism Dugin would reject the material dialectic and retain its emphasis on class struggle but keep its remedies to alienation produced by Liberalism. Because its system is almost wholly based on virulent racism in one form or another, although that tendency is also shown in liberalism, Dugin would just eliminate Fascism altogether, keeping yet modifying its over-emphasis to nationalism to a general sense of community.

Keeping the theory of class struggle is the absolute bullshit and saying Fascism is based on racism is total ignorance. Seriously what the hell.

Class struggle is a part of fascism where it's solution is class cooperation through national syndicates to protect both classes???

The core of his thesis is rally this -

There have been three monolithic ideologies in modern times.

>Liberalism (The first and oldest)
>Socialism/Communism/Marxism (It rose to challenge liberalism)
>Fascism

Fascism died an untimely and early death in its struggle to compete. Marxism died in it's old age. And now, liberalism (neo-liberalism, really) is the only player left. But it has essentially "died" as well, because it has transformed into a new, zombie-like organism that essentially just lives to consume. It has placed "self" (individualism) as the highest moral and ethical standard, and so, all if does is prate about "human rights," and attack anything tt perceives as threatening its primacy over the mind of humanity as the only valid perspective.

Fukuyama's 'The End of History', basically.

Dugin posits there is a "Fourth" way, one outside the boundaries of and not defined by modern totalitarian neo-liberalism. A looser confederation of non-homogeneous actors with self-determination, and true individual identities (identities they may or may not be to a degree collectivist.)

People are already collecting and grouping around this new identities that go beyond nation states, or black-and-white political ideologies.

NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG NAZBOL GANG

Oops. "Really", not "rally."

Sort of but you're mixed up. Marxism doesn't have a focus on class struggle unique but rather says that the separation of classes is what innately causes conflict. Hence the interest for equality. When Dugin apparently speaks of retaining Communism's "emphasis on class struggle", it means keeping the theory of class conflict. Fascist models (and Corporatist models) say that struggle between classes is because of classes being unjust to one another rather than the stratification being the actual injustice and so they focus on getting all classes to work together towards a common goal.

There's no 4th political theory. Dugin is a Nazbol.
Nazbol is communism in a white ethno state (which failed, see Ceausescu) It's still socialism garbage.
Fascism is the 3rd option, and still the best. Why do you think it's banned in EU or Russia?
Fuck Dugin and his negro loving bolsheviks

>thinking the swastika represents fascism
>thinking communism is socialism

Do better, user.

Basically the same pseudo-capitalist mix with neo-communism (e.g. China). Pushed by Chinese, Russian and Israeli elites.

Eurasia = Soviet union 2.0

onceuponatimeinthewest1.wordpress.com/about/

youtu.be/zkw8nwHG2GM

Sorta.

That's what he advocates for Russia, in a sense. (He's also deeply traditional, in many ways.) It is kind of a Nazi Germany 2.0 (although less militaristic, at least in theory.)

But he alludes to larger coalitions of peoples who might pursue different paths. The core of his position is a challenge to modern liberalism. Fukuyama said the end state of human colonization is the shit we have now - "democratic capitalism." (It's not really democratic OR capitalist, in the truest sense.)

Dugin would beg to differ. So would I.

Think of it more as a return to a type of... global federalism, I guess. I believe it will happen regardless. Too many cracks in this modern Babylon. Power has been consolidated into some weird corporatist hegemony. This is unstable.

Hence, the 4th Way. NOT a monolithic, global ideology.

It doesn't seem like a proper philosophy to me, just a framework to justify Russian nationalism. Which is fine for them, but I can't imagine it being applicable to white Americans.

National Socialism was the German form of fascism. It represents it as well as the fasces or iron cross do.

Jew garbage from a garbage Jew.

>Look how unique I am stealing NatSoc memes and replacing the Swastika with the Serp i Molot while replacing National Socialism - a proven system - with Communism - a proven failure! Woooo yeah! gibs me money and do (((chaos))) goyim!

This ideology appears to be chaos undivided

In which case I'm pretty sure it's what the globalists are already

They're no different from a slaanesh/tzeentch cult

Dugin would likely agree with you.... many replacements
Think of it less as he's arguing for a REPLACEMENT to modern golbal neo-liberalism, but more as... many replacements, I guess would be apt.

What he advocates for Russia shouldn't be necessarily construed to be true for all peoples/places. It's like, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Cooperative federalism, or tribalism, or whatever ideals peoples coalesce around. Just not having a single overlord dictator (neo-liberal establishment 0 corporations/state/media/education/etc.)

Fascism has nothing to do with race or people, it's just an economic and political model.
NatSoc may ADOPT parts of that model in circumstances when it would most benefit the people, which is what Hitler did, but it isn't it in itself. And in terms of philosophy, NatSoc is completely separate.

Don't let them do this wordplay shit, it's the same deal as with "socialism".
Marxism is pervasive in all areas of academia.

This

Here's a good article that explains it in more detail, since I'm tired as fuck and have to be up early tomorrow
aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-fascism/

Never stop questioning

Stick with the third position.

I think Fifth Political Theory is more relevant.
fifthpolitical.wordpress.com/about/

idk just go read hoppe to save yourself time