Tfw once you move to the right you can never go back

Tfw once you move to the right you can never go back

Other urls found in this thread:

freebeacon.com/national-security/chinas-secret-military-plan-invade-taiwan-2020/
youtube.com/watch?v=gorSUDnX1qk
telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/13/britain-needs-to-stop-freaking-out-about-transgender-kids/
dailysignal.com/2017/07/03/im-pediatrician-transgender-ideology-infiltrated-field-produced-large-scale-child-abuse/
newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2017/01/transgender-kids-why-doctors-are-right-be-cautious-about-childhood
m.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTyfPrUlOE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Do you enjoy living a lie? If the answer is yes you can easily go back to the left and continue living aie

Why would you ever wish to be a retard?

Did you forget your exhentai password?

...

Thinly veiled sadpanda thread?

if you get disabled and lose your job and aren't rich you swing left really fast, trust me.

Nobody becomes disabled and says "Yeah just let me crawl in a hole and die, I don't want to take other people's tax dollars to live"

w-w-w-which one is this

(C79) [Aneko no Techo (Koume Keito)] Ika Musumeshi (Shinryaku! Ika Musume) [English] =Pineapples r' Us=

bless you

It's actually the biribiri translation, not pineapples.

Yeah, the closest you can get is becoming a progressive Libertarian
Feels bad, especially since my family was so poor growing up and were on welfare for a short time after my dad died.

How do I get pass the panda?

Pretty much. Going right is like sucking a dick - once you try it, nobody will ever respect you again.

freebeacon.com/national-security/chinas-secret-military-plan-invade-taiwan-2020/

>Do you enjoy living a lie?
but once you know the truth there is no way you can convince yourself to believe lies again, because you know the truth

Fucking hell, is that for real? I'm sad that the RoCcers didn't get to retake the mainland.

won't get to retake the mainland*

It is real, but China's Military is basically a Political Tool. Even if they barraged Taiwan with missiles, which they plan to do; they would immediately get a response. Namely; the USA.

pretty much. Going right is what happens when you have a good chunk of money that you want to keep away from everyone else including the government and stop caring about other people. You got yours, fuck everyone else.

Maybe once you get older you'll understand that there is no invisible hand and idea behind voting with your wallet is plutocracy.
That and how fucked the climate and our economy is because of all this market freedom.

youtube.com/watch?v=gorSUDnX1qk

Being willing to accept gibs doesn’t automatically turn you into a nigger-lover who cheers for faggotry, gun-grabbing and race-mixing

as far as I've known, that's not what the core of leftism is about but rather having a larger government that provides social services including social safety nets, which results in higher taxes

the core of conservatism is SUPPOSEDLY smaller government more freedom, and lower taxes. However the REALITY of conservatism is just as large of a government as leftists (but devoted more towards the prison system, law enforcement/police, and military rather than social services), and the ONLY freedom they care about is the right to bear arms, they CLAIM to love freedom of speech and freedom of religion, but only if that speech doesn't go against their narrative (see right wingers flipping out over people kneeling for the national anthem, it's a big nothingburger, if you don't like their political statement you just.. don't associate with those people but forced "Patriotism" is meaningless. Patriotism needs to be a freely made choice) and it's not so much a freedom of religion but freedom to be Christian. If you're any other religion but Christianity they want all kinds of restrictions against practicing other religions.

The hypocrisy of the right is part of why I can't go right

Do I like guns? Yeah. Shall not be infringed.
Do I like states rights? Yeah, but see Republicans only seem to like states rights when the states in question are trying to ban gay marriage and abortion. If a state wants to legalize weed Republicans want to put the federal boot on their neck. Hypocritical as fuck.

The left I at least can see they mean what they say when they say.

Really though I have some issues I lean right on and some I lean left on.

All the problem you point out with the right cease to exist once you remove multiculturalism and faggots.

Not at all. I have no desire of living by biblical law just like I don't want to live by Sharia law.

I don't give 2 shits about gay people they want to get married I don't care it's not my business to tell them what they can or cannot do. You won't see me at a pride parade but you also won't see me telling them what they're allowed to do or what they're not allowed to do between consenting adults. I just don't care, therefore, legal gay marriage, knock yourselves out.

Meanwhile on the right they'll say "I don't care about gay marriage" then do whatever they can to keep it illegal. "I don't care about weed" so why not legalize it? Nope they want to keep it illegal so obviously they do care about what other people are doing.

The real, actual core of each philosophy, is that the left wants a government regulated economy, while the right wants government regulated morality. Left wants regulation on businesses. Right wants regulation on individuals.

You just see the surface, and let prejudices make your decisions when that's not even what the parties are about. Republicans aren't 14/88 race war now kill all niggers. They're the fucking party of Lincoln.

Left vs right is economic at its core, not about race, or faggots or any of that other shit, That's extraneous. Both Democrats and Republicans are authoritarians .

> We want to be accepted
> We want 50 genders
> We want to be allowed to marry
> We want the gov to pay for our mental trannies
> We want to teach children about gay sex
> We want to make it legal to fuck children

Marriage and family morals are already failing and letting fags in on the action does not help.

In summary: Fuck off m8

the buck stops at them having the same rights as other people. No, nobody gets free surgery and hormones

Sex ed is supposed to teach the biology of the act, and more or less to explain the risks of the act. So as far as gay sex goes they need to explain the increased risks of STI and HIV from it.

and no, children are off limits, and parents should be able to protect their children from pedophiles, whether gay or straight with a shotgun to their face if needed.

I don't care what 2 consenting adults do in their own home, I honestly don't, so as far as I'm concerned they can do whatever they want to each other, as long as I don't have to watch it. Now on the streets? they need to be held to the same standards as straight couples. 2 straight people fucking in public is illegal, 2 gay people fucking in public is illegal too.

Kissing and holding hands or hugging, don't care.

P.S. You're also a cunt.

Yeah, it's all good clean fun.

>No, nobody gets free surgery and hormones

telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/13/britain-needs-to-stop-freaking-out-about-transgender-kids/

dailysignal.com/2017/07/03/im-pediatrician-transgender-ideology-infiltrated-field-produced-large-scale-child-abuse/

newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2017/01/transgender-kids-why-doctors-are-right-be-cautious-about-childhood

we don't have that. We have private healthcare insurance.

Even in the military, if you want something like breast implants they'll do it but the government is not paying for it unless it's to replace a breast lost in a masectomy for breast cancer.

>we don't have that. We have private healthcare insurance.

Oh, that makes it all fine then.

and when I say I don't care about what ADULTS do, I mean adults. Kids should never have transitional therapy kids aren't ready to make that decision.

...

Most faggots were abused as children. It's a vicious cycle and you are encouraging it without even realising it.

I wish panda had a "search by popularity" option, people upload so much shit and copies that it's hard to sift for good stuff

You can go back, like I did, if you make the effort to understand the arguments of both sides AND THE FLAWS IN THOSE ARGUMENTS. When you do, you'll discover that most of what the right believes is based on false assumptions.

Oh Jesus H fucking nigger christ. being gay isn't a choice you fucking ignorant mong, they're just born that way. It's epigenetics.

yeah same, I'm not a pedo, I was just born with a liking for lolis

Go check the stats for your self. You won't like what you find and will just dismiss it, but at least I tried.

Give us some examples pls.

that I don't know, some research goes either way but regardless of whether or not it's congenital or a chosen fetish Pedophiles can't be accomodated to harm children that's a line in the sand.

But gay people? You tended to know who was going to be gay even growing up, at least by puberty you could tell the boy with the lisp who hung around the 2 ugly girls as his primary friends was going to be gay.

what about retarded children though? they'll never be able to consent, does that mean they'll never be allowed to have sex? so at that point they might as well become dickwarmers and be useful for society, it's not like they can double not consent because they're younger

I would say just keep moving right and sooner or later you will be on the left side again. then I remembered that the earth is flat

It slep time bunner

>being gay isn't a choice

>100% of gay people were like that from the start
>0% of heterosexual people later developed an interest in the same sex
>Individual choice has never played any part in it at all

I like you Sully, you're a funny guy.

And they say that hentai is not degenerate and better than 3D. Fucking weeaboos.

I moved back. Just takes truly thinking about what the right believes and the flaws become apparent very quickly.
The core of right wing ideologies seems to oft be the failure to understand that healing the cause preemptively is always better than treating the symptoms post-fact. Hence why socialized services and wealth redistribution over leaving everyone to fend for themselves and buying more guns for self-defense result in healthier overall societies.

Libertarians are selfish children especially ignorant of this and what their society invests in them.

A society where capital guides policy like the US everyone but the ultrarich get gradually fucked deeper and deeper into inequality. Anyone who isn't part of the 1% and votes for the Republicans is voting to get ass fucked just so colored people could have it worse. Convincing half of america to vote based on their racism and proven failing economic policy was the greatest scam ever.

Free markets are still important for innovation and wealth creation - full communism is just as retarded an idea as anarchocapitalism, but it must be sandboxed by a government stronger than the forces of capital accumulation. Capitalism without morality is ruinous to all.

yeah that pretty much means they can't consent to sex. They're like children that never grow up afterall.

an extremely small minority might choose that lifestyle but the overwhelming majority did not. Why would you choose a lifestyle likely to get you discriminated against and possibly beaten and killed? That makes no sense.

What planet do you live on? Being a fag is fucking celebrated these days. Your more likely to get your head kicked in for being a trump voter.

that's just denying their basic human rights though, you can't tell someone that they'll never be allowed to have sex because they're not smart enough to put benis in bagine so at that point they might as well just start it below aoc

You spend way too much time on Sup Forums. Gay people are still beaten and killed, trans have it even worse.

I personally don't like trannies but I"m not about to kill one.

Well with the 45% that kill themselves I'm surprised there are any left. Maybe that's why they always come after the children in he end.

They're retarded, they're on the same level as children, they don't get rights. Retarded people can't own guns, vote, or drive, they can't sign legal documents in their own name, etc.

I would if I could get away with it

well if they don't have rights, then there's nothing to violate is there? :^)

I like you :3

No homo!

Not true at all. Look at most leftists when they're hit with logic and facts. They repeatedly show their cognitive dissonance.

I moved back to the left. I realised that the main reason why society was breaking apart was because of modern capitalism. If you change the material and technological level of society you cannot expect traditions to stay the same given that human biology is constant.

want to get married, no homo stuff

nazis always hated capitalism though, that's not a move to the left, it's just listening to what hitler said about anything ever

fugg

You were never truly on the right then.
How can you go back when you know that about 60% ( at least ) of the world population are parasites. People that rely on the subsistence of greater minds and harder working people.
What are benefits? What is aid?

when the right is currently voting on a bill to give the 1% a massive tax break while hiking taxes on lower income and middle class, it's pretty easy. The Republicans are the party of the OWNERS, not the workers.

Democrats used to be the party of blue collar workers and middle class but they've been deviating from that unfortunately.

in other words, voting conservative in America is voting to give your boss a tax break in hopes he'll give you a raise (here's a hint, he won't)

That's the difference between the right and the left: the right dismiss people as parasites, while the left instead examines what it would take to make those people more productive, and tries to provide it.

I've honestly never seen a thread more deserving of this overposted image.

Literally dumbasses voting based on hating non white people and gays. Not even taking the economics into account.

>Yeah! Repeal the death tax!
It's like talking to a wall trying to reason with Cletus and Jethro that they were never going to be subject to the estate tax anyway.

Cletus you drive a truck for a living and barely make above the poverty line. Why are you so adamant that the estate tax has to go?

>B.because it's the DEATH TAX!

And in providing it fails to actually address the root cause, Parasites. Instead it allows them to continue on with this.
I live in the UK where we have had a welfare state since the 1950's.
We have created a class completely reliant on handouts, How has the left helped these people be more productive?
Your compassion is admirable and Im sure you think yourself a good person but I doubt you actually do anything other than virtue signal about why its the right thing to do.

RURAL

I am the boss. I'll take that tax break, pleb. For you I have more work & longer hours.

with no more pay, yeah that sounds about right.

At one stage I believed that lower taxes were very important because they provided greater incentive for business activity. But then I began to wonder: if it's true, how come Britain isn't much further ahead of France? After investigating more, I began to realise that incentive is rarely the limiting factor; a lack of opportunity is usually a far bigger barrier. Worse still, the opportunity cost of tax cuts often means that more important things (including education, infrastructure and low interest rates) got neglected.


>We have created a class completely reliant on handouts, How has the left helped these people be more productive?
The left haven't been in power since the 1970s (as New Labour had fallen for the right's economic narrative hook line and sinker). Did that "class completely reliant on handouts" exist forty years ago? If so, please explain who you're referring to? If not, how do you seriously expect the left to address the problem when the right are in control of the country?

I wonder if in 10 years when Cletus realizes that the Republican Tax reform actually raised his taxes rather than reducing them, if he'll finally snap and we'll have a french style revolution where we just parade down the streets with our former owner's heads on sticks.... cause that's kind of what we're headed towards, or worse, a bolshevik revolution.

You need to go back.

...

If technological progress allows us to produce such a surplus relative to the labor/resources required that we can start turning needs into rights - are people parasites for being given the advantage of it?

The desired end point of society should be where production is automated to the point you have to give "the parasites" basic livable income because there's no full-time jobs left and so people can focus on education, raising children, contributing to culture/science. Or just lounging around like animals all day if they have no other ambition.

The UK could be a fair example of why that might not work. But do we truly agree that it's because the natural state of a human is to be a parasite and productivity must be coerced?
Friends I have in the UK have told me long stories about how dysfunctional and free of standards your educational system is. One of my friends couldn't work out how much 15% of something was even when I put up a hundred quid if he managed to. I guess I'm wondering whether it's nature or nurture - your lower classes being what they are. How can you expect ambition if your culture does nothing to impart it?

>not being wealthy
pleb

born in this country and killed sandniggers for it. You can go back.

wealth is always going to be relative, only a small portion of people is ever going to be wealthy. You'll always be outnumbered severely and once people wake up to that fact and stop putting up with your abuses, I'm sure your head will fit on a stick too.

Because it's not like the guy on the right employs and pays the guy on the left.
But guess you would rather vote socialist, so that you can also enjoy 50% taxes, just like we do in EU.

except the super rich voted overwhelmingly democrat.......

You're so incredibly naive that it's amazing.

There is no right in your statement, absolutely none. You're saying Left and extra Left and then calling one of them right. No Western political party has right wing policies, not a single one of them. They simply have different shades of the left.

You are clearly a fedora because you don't understand what religion is. Religion is so that the average person isn't a fuck nut. You hand them a package of morals and a guide of how to live their life. They will follow it and get on with living their life within those boundaries. They don't have the intelligence to build their own world view, nor do they need to have it. As long as they see structure and a higher authority they will be happy to go along with it. Give them the Christian morality set and then tell them to go to church every Sunday (this makes the community bond with each other, it's as much social gathering as it is religious ceremony).

That's it, you're done. Majority of people are now behaving in net positive ways while opposing net negative actions. No fuss, no bullshit, just a simple world view to slot into their lives.

>Authoritarians
Welcome to life child. Authority wins, might IS right. Either you take control and shape things the way they should be or someone else does and shapes things the way they want them to be. Libertarianism larping doesn't work in the real world.

You're right, it's even worse. Cletus on the left votes conservative partly just because he hates gay people and he's easily distracted by that, despite the fact that Republicans are making exactly 0 moves to make same sex marriage illegal again much less homosexuality, and partly because he thinks that if he were to get rich someday he'd like those big tax breaks too, even if it'll probably never happen for him, and in the mean time he's about to find his tax rate go up 2% under the house bill.

So he's literally voting for some rich asshole he doesn't even know, to get richer, with no benefit to himself. Meanwhile he thinks Republicans are gonna make being non white illegal and being gay illegal but nope, not going to happen.

t. no skills loser who blames everyone else for their problems

People do not vote based on who they like in a 2 party system. They vote based on who they hate because it's the only way to have any influence.

>5 party options
>3 of them aren't main and stand on real local issues
>Will only get a handful of votes
>Big Blue will get loads
>Big Red will get loads
>If I wish for my vote to matter I have to pick one of the big parties
>Every other vote is wasted because everyone else sees only the two main parties as being relevant
>Figure which one is the most destructive in their campaign promises
>Vote against them to keep them out of power
>Both parties act the same any way

And you my naive little shit heap larping as a libertarian aren't even aware of libertarian politics. The vast majority of libertarians who get elected do so by using one of the two major party banners. They pay the $100 to join and then run as a Republican or a Democrat depending on which side in the local area has the best hope of winning.

having skills does not translate into having wealth. Chances are even as a skilled laborer or perform a highly trained technical job that required higher education, you're working for someone else, generating wealth for them, and you're getting the short end of the deal. CEO's of companies don't have the skill to do every job they hire other people to do, no, instead they have capital. They had resources to start and develop the company and now they just make money on other people's skills and labor.

>to get richer
If you tax businesses to high, then they don't make new jobs and it's bad for the poor people. Just look at EU.

just because they have cognitive dissonance doesn't mean they don't believe it.

it's actually depressing

>pic related

>Garlic eating faggot
>Thinks taxes are the reason there are no jobs
>Not the fact that they have brought millions of extra people into Europe

Yes, it's taxes. A few extra million per country simply makes no difference

actually what you do is tax income at a high rate and investments at a lower rate.

Republicans think if you tax income at a lower rate that the owners will reinvest into their business.. But instead they pretty much bank it, or invest in real estate instead, directly increasing THEIR wealth. but not increasing jobs or wages.

If income is taxed high but investments taxed low, then it encourages reinvesting, and creating more wealth

best thing is that you constantly refer to "conservativism" "right-wing" "christian-democracy" "authorianism" "nationalism" "republicans" as the exact same thing and be surprised about controversy you discover, some of those terms are not even on the same layer of ideology/politics. It is true that most of those are commonly referred to as right wing ideologies but many have a different goal, and authorianism is not a right exclusive idea, sort these out and try again

Taxes and regulations and minimum wage are what fucks up the economy. If we get 1 million cheap labor then there would be no problem. The problem is that I would have to pay 8.50€ minimum wage if I hire someone at a my startup. (In DE where I normally live, am only in FR for work right now). But 8.50€ is only the money HE gets, then you have to pay all kinds of insurances and shit. It goes up to over 10€ per hour.

I think I already said that both major American political parties are authoritarians, and I never said "christian democracy" and I am myself a nationalist.

Conservatism/right wing are basically synonyms however and Republicans claim to be the conservative party, however as I pointed out earlier, they don't exactly stick with the conservative ideal. We're about to pass a tax "reform" bill that raises taxes on lower income groups and has no spending cuts so it'll raise our national debt by $1.5 trillion dollars in order to give rich fucks a tax break. Tell me how that's small government. and fiscally conservative.

In a nutshell the Republican party has convinced conservatives they're /ourguys/ based on their prejudices and positions on social issues, when all they really care about is getting the Koch bros a tax break.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTyfPrUlOE

You're fucking retarded mate.

>Bring in 1 million more people
>This is now a million more people in supply
>Supply is now more than demand
>Wages drop through the floor
>Single income can no longer support a family
>Wife has to work as well
>This increases the labour force even more
>Which lowers the wages even more
>Now the wives who could afford not to work also need to work
>No one is having kids because they have to work just to pay for 2 of them
>Better import more people to fill in the birth rate problem

It's almost like you're a fucking retard who doesn't understand economics at all. But hey welcome to being a frog

You knew the risks

WTF are you even talking about?

>Wages drop through the floor
That's why minimum wage makes people unemployed.

>Single income can no longer support a family
You realize, that the state will literally pay for your family if you can't support them?
Also if you have an EDUCATION then it can. But if you plan working for your whole life at Mac Donalds and plan to support a family from it, then sure it won't work, but that was NEVER POSSIBLE.

>No one is having kids because they have to work just to pay for 2 of them
Poor families have lots of kids. It's University Graduates and High Skilled workers that don't because they stopped caring.

What you talk has just no relationship with real live.