Marxist socialism:

Marxist socialism:

"from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION"

The nigger doesn't contribute and therefore becomes extinct because doesn't receive.

why don't you support Marxism again?

That's not marxism, that's capitalism

I see, they don't teach marxism is school of course that's why you are so clueless.

Marxism is principally about revolution not economics.

>Scandinavians aren't taught marxism

You failed the tests then

>from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION
Who determines how much one's abilities are worth? Who determines how much someone contributed? E.g. if a farmer produces X amount of food, who decides the amount of products and services the farmer should receive in return?

If the answer is anything but "the market", your ideology is trash.

Marx was an economist. Though he believed a workers' uprising was inevitable, he thought it would be more evolutionary than revolutionary.

WTF i unironically like communism now

Specifically the NazBol variety

Who cares what he thought. He wrote the communist manifesto which is responsible for well over 100 million deaths. He should be hated more then Hitler yet here we are, debating with brainwashed morons about how good it will be if we do it right this time.

Sounds slavery

I got my own phrase

"Fuck off with your commie bullshit, faggot"

-user

if you reduce a people to economics, they you are a jew.

communists have been hijacked by identity politics that want gibs for niggers. bob avakian thinks the niggers will support him after they get enough gibs

then*

>"from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION"
Two reasons why that's stupid:
1) It ignores need.
2) If contribution is the determining factor in how much to return, why not just take less in the first place and return nothing?

The only context that I think "from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION" could work is as a pension plan!

Blaming the works of Marx for all the deaths caused by communists is like blaming the works of Wagner for the deaths caused by Nazis!

Because you would need absolute power to distribute wealth like that. A redistribution god-program? You'd have to keep everyone in line, wich takes so much resources it would trash your utopia in days. Maybe minutes.

I like this

i support is as long as it's installed in a society that is populated by eugenically refined white people

Only through a strong and spiritual aryan identity can you possibly have an economic system that relies on self-discipline. It cannot be done by amerindian mongrels in latin america no matter how many times they vote for it and experience societal collapse.

capitalism at this stage is a necessary evil, but if genetic engineering and aryan identity ever gets going, we will surely eliminate useless parallel technologies, parasitism and mass production of low time-preference trinkets that profit a jewish class motivated by greed

In a capitalist economy, the value of "contribution" is judged by the input of millions of subjective, voluntary consumers. In socialism you have some inbred tyrant guessing the value of everything the market balances on its own. Not only is that absolutely retarded and inefficient, but it's subject to massive amounts of corruption.

>"from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION"
This is the first phase of the transition of capitalism to socialism.
>"from each according to their ability. To each according to their NEED"
is the second phase, which is socialism to communism. you are either misinformed or being willfully ignorant. ask yourself, who determines need when the second phase is achieved, and regardless of who decides that need, what makes you think that wont be abusive to society as a whole?

the only issue i have with marxist economics is the negotiation of dominance & competency hierarchies, it will be very difficult to achieve a societal organ excellent enough to reliably pull it off while retaining the trust of the people it dominates

But even a half-baked system would be leaps and bounds better than a system motivated entirely by sloth & greed that rewards neglicence of the general population (who are fed instantly entertaining garbage) and especially the workforce (who are squeezed to fit ever lowering wages)

Marx himself is irrelevant. (He wasn't even the greatest proponent of Marxism; Rodbertus was)
the absolute core of the ideology is jewish ie rebellion against Christ. there is no dancing around that and it's why modern marxists are all queers who cut their dicks off

A "system" motivated by self-sufficiency and voluntary interaction, that rewards people selling what the consumer needs, or atleast what they think they need.
I fail to see how market-intervention is some virtuous bulwark against greed. You're just moving people's lust for power from the market sector and into some state-bureaucracy, making it more susceptible to abuse, since consumers can't simply not purchase the "good" the bureaucrat is delivering when they're being taxed for it.
You fail to see that everything you claim to be a fault of capitalism is an argument against every system (or lack thereof) of government ever. In capitalism the degenerate aspects of human nature has the hardest time to flourish.
>especially the workforce (who are squeezed to fit ever lowering wages)
A marxist prediction that never came true before uncontrolled immigration.

They contribute their diversity you biggot.

Because the people at the top are all jews and they decide that they've made such great contributions that they get it all

from each everything you can give before you drop dead, to each one slice of bread a week

>from each...

Nope. My abilities are my private property you commie filth. You want access to them we shall negotiate on the free market. Until then, gib tendies.

>"from each according to their ability. To each according to their CONTRIBUTION"
That translation is plain wrong.
The original is:
"Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen".
You can not translate "Bedürfnissen" (needs) with contributions.

>They contribute their diversity you biggot.

OP BTFO