I need your input and to share this with someone, Sup Forums. I found this article, where an american has the balls to claim that, even though they can't defeat literal farmers with WW2-rifles, the US would easily win against THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED.
www(DOT)wearethemighty.com/articles/how-long-the-us-military-would-last-against-the-rest-of-the-world
The retardedness of this. What is your input, Sup Forums? How high does the american unwarranted pride and hubris reach?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
To reiterate
Nation that can't win against farmers with WW2-rifles thinks that it can win against THE ENTIRE WORLD.
About as far as Ahmeds dick in your daughters ass.
Sure is humiliating when you lose one man for every ten gooks you slay. Oh the shame.
This is my 56% face.
>108 iq
>American
>Polish
>Irish
>Cuban
>American Indian
>Probably whiter than you
You can meme the 56% claim over and over but likely you're just a cringey butt hurt eurofag jealous of how great America is and always will be.
"My opinion is entirely irrelevant starter pack"
Its not like the US LOST. it was in their capacity to drop dozens of nukes.
Still mad props to Vietnam.
Your nose and mouth tells me you also have some niggerblood.
Should've just nuked that shit
What happens here?
Reminder we lost the war at home, not the battlefield.
...
3 millions dead vietnamnese vs. 50k dead USA soldiers.
think about that when you use the word 'victory'
American soldiers did fairly well seeing as they waged war with the gooks and then got to come back and wage war against their own society afterwards.
Reminder that leaving a football field in a match even though your score is greater is still losing.
shilling aside. that is a very unlucky face. That guy would be pretty far out on the bell curve.
They defended their country against foreign invasion against all odds and at any cost. Not the cleanest victory for sure but mad props.
Golly gee, more Vietnamese dead in what basically was a civil war between vietnamese? What a shocker!
Also it was nowhere near 3 million
>Result
>North Vietnamese victory
>Withdrawal of American-led forces from Indochina
>Communist governments take power in South Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos
>South Vietnam is annexed by North Vietnam
>Territorial changes
>Reunification of North and South Vietnam into the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
But hey at least you propped up the war industry
Anyway, back to the point, how do you expect to defeat the entire world (which includes Vietnam), when you can't even defeat JUST Vietnam?
Not to mention spraying agent orange everywhere, but the kikes are the bad ones with the non-existing chem trails, the spirit of the US is the spirit of DuPonte, you're killing the world not the collective Jewish race
Retarded OP spotted.
Vietnam(I'm in Hanoi right now btw) had a civil war.
The USA didn't fight the Vietnamese, the US and allies helped the south Vietnamese.
You don't know history Sven.
Also, yes, the USA could take the rest of the world and win, just look at defense budgets and tech differences.
The US hindered the peaceful reunification of Vietnam by voting and propped up the illegitimate colonial southern government, and stepped in militarily to keep propping it up when it was threatened (despite North Vietnam urging the US for a peaceful solution).
The jewy US incited the war, ignited it, and then left their allies to rot.
Civilian death are counted as killed enemies now? Damn, the US are more 56% than I thought.
Also, explain then how the US would win against the rest of the world (including Vietnam), when it can't win against even just Vietnam.
The U.S. military won most every battle and if it continued there wouldn't have been any fighting age male Vietnamese left. The one enemy they couldn't beat was Walter Cronkite and the leftist media
>Having such a shitty home nation you have to live vicariously through other countries.
Sure they did.
'Peaceful' TOP KEK.
Tell yourself whatever you want Sven.
The Vietnam conflict was started by the Communist Chinese, USSR and their vassals.
The US didn't start that war, they just got involved.
I live in Asia and have been to all the museums and battlefields in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.
You are deluded if you think the Viet Cong were peaceful or legitimate.
Also yes, once again the USA does have the ability to take on the rest of the world combined, it is called strategic positioning, the USA has bases and nukes all over the world and if need be, could set the whole world on fire.
Why are you even on Sup Forums shouldn't you be bust losing your country to 'diversity' right now?
dat cope
Face it, tunnel chinks really fucked you up alright
If the war had continued you'd probably get couped by your own military
www(DOT)usatoday.com/story/nation/2013/07/03/afghanistan-advisers-george-lepre-haynes-vietnam-conrad-crane/2484665/
Destroying the entire world = winning.
Is this 56% IQ at work?
Then any nation with nukes would beat you easily with your own logic, but you'd beat them at the same time. With nukes, everyone who has nukes wins! Nukes are a win-win situation, lol.
>>Having such a shitty home nation you have to live vicariously through other countries.
Nobody cared about Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos though. They didn't want gommunism spreading to Taiwan, Philippines and Japan.
>>>Having such a shitty home nation you have to live vicariously through other countries.
>win every major battle of the war and inflict horrendous casualties
>all without ever invading the North
>slowly downsize military as ceasefire is issued
>virtually all formations out of the country for two years
>North reneges on peace talks and invades South
>Congress refuses to authorize a redeployment of troops and the South falls
It was a defeat because the US ultimately failed to achieve its objective in keeping the South independent. But I feel like everyone (memeing or not) seems to forget exactly how the end of the war happened. China's invasion of Vietnam was far more embarrassing considering the circumstances, but on a smaller scale.
I prove you wrong so you then move to make a racial insult?
Hmmmm.
Let's think for a minute, if it WAS ALL the world VS the USA, destroying the rest of the world(not overtly but their governments,infrastructure, agriculture etc)
WOULD BE the whole goal, you RETARD. YES victory would come from taking out the rest.
And it isn't just nukes dumbass, the US has had a bigger defense budget than any other country for nearly a century and for the last several decades the US has spent more on defense than the rest of the world COMBINED.
says the probable yank living in South Korea
>win every major battle of the war and inflict horrendous casualties
>all without ever invading the North because we were shaking in our boots at the prospect of angering Russia or China
>slowly downsize military as ceasefire is issued, because we literally can not keep this up without descending into a civil war ourselves back home
>virtually all formations out of the country for two years
>North reneges on peace talks and invades South, as everyone involved knew they would even when the deal was made, since the deal was only for the US to pretend to not have lost
>Congress refuses to authorize a redeployment of troops and the South falls, which enables the butthurt americans to claim that they 'did not lose, just leave' to this day
Anf you would accomplish this how exactly, without being nuked yourselves?
As to the other point, that spending doesn't seem to help when it matters (see again, Vietnam) :^)
The neocolonial system works like this:
1. take resources from colony
2. create a fest at your home
3. rub that fest in colony face
4. brainwashed sheeps think, that colonial management is retarded and they all should just make everything "as they do it in the metropoly" to have the same fest
5. "we do it like this in USA" is nothing useful - just festives
6. brainwashed sheeps think, that if cargo cult from 4. did not help, they should just resettle to metropoly
7. metropoly supports the image of accepting the immigrants; ends up sending most of them back home
So there is no casus, where colony suddenly starts acting according to it`s interests, instead of acting on leftist brainwashing.
If EU will go to war against USA, all the niggers in the world would fight against EU.
If niggers go to war against USA, EU population will be first to defend "muh white civilization partners", especially tanned ones in hope, that this will magically cargo-enrich them and make their lives less miserable.
You can also see, that Vietnam did not won in the end. Companies bought their resources, then flooded their markets with forged goods, fucked up their fraud-cases in court by buying officials, undermining and ultimately destroying well being of locals. That ended up with usual scheme.
"Our officials are not serving the enemy, they are just dumb" → "amurica/europe is so cool, i want to live there".
You also can understand very well, where hillary`s version of 1984 plot comes from. She experienced professional deformation during her service as sercetary of the state. And U1 was just one of the money pulls from Russian pockets.
Why we think Trump is great? He knows how to make money by selling real services. How to take shit, patch it up and sell for more. People like him should organize the colonialism, not people like Hillary "Crooked" Rodent and Leopold "hand-go-off" the 2nd.
Dead meme dead nation. lolz
nice
mhm all the nonamerican tears itt
Swedes used to be alright.... what went wrong?
>le 1960s Marxism
The Vietnam War wasn't fought by the military it was fought by the government.
Fucking Johnson and McNamara were literally bombing piles of coal before they were bombing RADAR sights and AA facilities. They tried to run the war like a fucking assembly line. The idiots basically fucked up everything they did. Had the military been allowed to fight an actual war we would have steamrolled those slanty eyed fucks
Not that it matters since capitalism won in the end. Yes, it's still named Ho Chi Minh city...but there is a McDonalds right smack in the middle of it.
Pic related is ONE of the multiple McDonalds within Ho Chi Minh City. Tell me again how capitalism lost in Vietnam.
They started pushing for socialism first in the world. And that is bear play in stock trade terms. There is no more local resources for them to spend, so they started to eat themselves.
>Ak-47
>WWII rifles
What?
We didn’t even lose. Look up the states. The KDR was 50:1. We were blowing them away. After the Tet offensive they were trying to send diplomats to make peace.
We left, not by choice. Jews decided for us.
You have made it abundantly clear that you don't understand War, History or Geo-Politics.
You realize the USA has systems in place to destroy incoming nukes?
The US literally has the technology to change the weather and create earthquakes and Tsunamis.
The USA has weapons that you wouldn't believe exist.
If this scenario happened, the USA would use all manner of weapons in a fast first strike taking out all of the opposing Governments, their weapons, resources etc in one single coordinated strike.
Worst case scenario the US would suffer a couple hits of foreign bases and fringe territories like Alaska, Hawaii etc
The game was cancelled due to thunder. >more European than this goy
>one strain of brown eyes from Germany kills my chances of being white
JUST
>le eternal Anglo
Sven...I don't think you realize: We don't need to fight the world....we already won.
its a decent bait thread but you forgot to use a french proxy for maximum ironic trolling.
Jesus, I didn't know I was on /tg/
You realize the USAF could remotely detonate your house, all your neighbors houses, unmanned, uninterfered, and undetected?
They could literally, from the comfort of the pentagon, launch warheads the size of a small car, and destroy every inch of land you've ever walked across, and you couldn't do anything about it but pray to GOD to stop it.
If the US govt niggers wanted to turn Vietnam into a baked rice cake of ashes they could have and would have.
They probably wanted some gold or something in vietnam and had to do it on foot.
You are retarded.
Also sage.
Also mods are faggots.
You lost militarywise.
No, it started raining and the american went home because he was cold, thus forfeiting the match.
You mistake kindness for weakness. Just because we chose not to vaporize Charlie doesn't mean we lacked the option.
This post shows a wild misunderstanding of military tactics, goals, and ideals.
Please climb back under your rock, because I wont take the time to educate Sven on the multiple subjects you obviously missed.
Americans again with their 'stab in the back'
Reminder, Germany didn't lose WW1 according to modern americans
The goal of the Vietnam war was to stop the spread of Communism. Domino theory and all that.
At the beginning of the war in 1963 there were over 25 communist countries in the world, now there are 5.
Sounds to me like the spread of communism was stopped. I'd call that mission accomplished.
>he thinks launching a shit tonne of potentially continent-decimating missiles is as easy as all that
I have no clue how the military works: the post
Don't know if this is a troll thread, or if you're just ignorant about the history of the Vietnam war.
The reason the US 'lost' is because they lost political support for the war among the public. In a way it was similar to Iraq - the reality on the ground is that the US was winning, but public support for the war eventually crumbled because of drawn out nature of asymmetric warfare.
Assuming the conflict did not go nuclear, the US would actually have a pretty good chance at beating the rest of the world. The only major threats would be Russia and China, honestly - militarily, every other country in the world is just a vassal state to one of those three.
I destroy all of your points and you just shrug and keep being a salty little bitch, you will find any reason to hate the USA. Kek
I don't want to be too mean to you, Swedish boys are hot and good submissive bottoms because they know they are impotent cucks.
>only talks about extant assets
Then Germany won WW2. The USA doesn't have the industry to compare against the rest of the world. Unless we're just talking the UK, France and the rest neutral, they're shit out of luck. The world is way too big to take and hold with just the initial advantage. I'd give them a year, since the USA is a pretty sweet spot defensively.
because of strategic policy you idiot, the issue of chinese support in the korean war prevented invasion of the north. actually study the conflict if you are trying to make an arguement
>N-nuhuu, the US americans use their STAR SHIELD and block your attack
You know wht this image lacks?
Leftist journalist putting knife in back uf american soldier.
But... Germany did win WW2, they had a better K/D ratio and there are americans driving volkswagens today
>this autism
Goal of Vietnam war was to get control over local rubber resources. You fucked it up and now you are just moving goalposts.
Domino theory is something gender students would learn. Communism is failed state type of colony. It can not last and there is no point for it to last, after all the national elites where extracted around the world to feed the metropolies.
In this case Vietnam was UK colony trough USSR proxy, controlled by both UK and USA. After military fuckup you went mad and started to destroy what was left of public UK colonialism.
Currently there is only three socialist countries - it is ukraine, where socialism is used to murder Russians en masse. It is Venezuela - I don't understand much about it. And it is DPRK - the nuclear hand of East-Asian Cryptoconfedercy.
>It's the "Vietnam was a military defeat for the US" meme
Everything was going wrong for the North Vietnamese. They died in droves because "MUH GORILLA WARFARE" doesn't do shit against an opponent in an MG bunker. They couldn't hold onto any territory because every time they'd take some they would also take massive casualties and get almost immediately rekt by a simple counter attack (see Tet Offensive). Shockingly, it turns out that launching suicide raids on an enemy with superior manpower and equipment to you is not an effective strategy. That's why the North Vietnamese were NEVER going to accomplish anything if things were kept to a purely militaristic standpoint. This belief that their guerrilla warfare tactics were allowing them to win is just sensationalized bullshit from a press that knew absolutely nothing about war.
>since the deal was only for the US to pretend to not have lost
Surely you can prove such a bold claim. Everything else you said was pretty retarded, especially that Russia didn't also fear provoking the US into a nuclear exchange.
Are you always this retarded or is his just bait
Because Jesus Christ are you a fucking troglodyte or what, man.
You just keep bringing up unrelated shit to bump your shitty thread, and you've stopped even trying to respond to that guy with any semblance of an actual answer.
You're even more pathetic than I assumed when I saw your flag.
But to be fair, the strategic goal of guerilla warfare is not to win conventionally, but to break your opponent's will to continue fighting. Although they were greatly aided by a liberal media and by hippies, they were successful in that goal; they broke the will of the American people to continue fighting the war.
Vietnam wasn't a military defeat, neither was Iraq.
'Nam was a political failure.
They also broke the fuck out of their own wills like nobody's business. People don't want to sign up for a fighting force that takes casualties like that just in the hopes that the enemy will give up eventually. It worked for them in the circumstances but it absolutely wouldn't work for anybody else. The Americans whose wills were broken weren't the ones who were out there fighting. As you said, the hippies and silver spoon Democrats were the ones who were so upset.
Fucking rubber lmao. This retard thinks Vietnam War was fought over rubber. Like we can't just buy the shit from Brazil and it's still 19th century and we need massive amount of rubber to make tires cus cars just came out.
Lmao I bet you're one of those bluepilled occupywallstreet faggots that thinks we invaded Afghanistan for opium
the yanks was using alot of old ww2 tech during nam,this time around the gooks would not survive
The 'ones out fighting' haf massive morale problems near the end, their wills were broken as well.
Soycialism
>protip: the point wasn't to win the war
The rules of engagement were intentionally set so that the war could be extended indefinitely.
>3 million dead
literally nothing but an estimate on your part and probably not a good one. you see blood trails and you assume you killed off an entire platoon.
They could do it to you too.
Judging by operation Darkroom I wouldn't be surprised, desu.
Norway is degenerate larpers and autists pedophiles with no common sense.
Only your women are hot, but they are probably brainlets.
I don't know man.
>North Vietnam succeeded against America
>Afghanistan succeeded against the USSR
>IRA succeeded against the UK
>Iraqi militias succeeded against the US
>US is approaching the 17th year of the war in Afghanistan
The modern history of guerilla warfare provides a pretty compelling argument for it's effectiveness. The only catch is that you need people who believe in their cause enough to fight against a superior force.
Just like Afghanistan and Iraq. Then the military wonders why they can't keep combat experienced enlisted men around like they could in the old days.
>Just like Afghanistan and Iraq
I did not know that, I'll check that out.
The only one that would win in a war between U.S vs EU are the jews.
No, the US would win pretty majorly. I mean for fucks sake, the US already occupies the EU, and has several military bases, nearby Navy fleets, etc.
>Take over the place
>Kill millions of people
>Get bored
>Leave
>Incredible victory!
Not really effective in the case of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam. U.S. achieved every objective stated at the outset of those campaigns. Don't know much about the IRA.
>Vietnam
>get raped
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>get raped
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>get raped, start to rape yourself and promise to pay tribute
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>get raped
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>get raped and rape yourself
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>get raped
>leftovers declare decisive victory
So wrong it hurts:
The US used the press to cause a SJW type movement against the war because the USA needed to save face. As seen on POL, americans will NEVER admit defeat.
This also helped the American govmt in that they turned the public against the returning soldiers. Not only did they lose a generation of men, they also made sure they would not have to pay to help the retuning PTSD masses.
This coming from a literal cuck.
>Withdraw
>Vietnam becomes communist - the single goal you came to stop
>50k Dead yanks
thats a big fucking loss when you're fighting against gooks with half working ak variants
The US achieved zero of the objectives stated at the onset of the involvement in Vietnam
Rare
More like
>Anyone attacking Vietnam
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
>Attacker gets raped
>Runs home and says they didn't really try anyway
Honestly this happened so many times in Vietnams history, just look it up.
>swedencuck talking about wars
Even a country with a shitty military like mine has more right to talk about war, cuck.
>you see blood trails and you assume you killed off an entire platoon
5 Dongs have been inserted into your burned ass
>Vietnam gets raped
>leftovers declare decisive victory
>Honestly this happened so many times in Vietnams history books
Thats just what I said Annamite boy