What did they mean by this Sup Forums ?

Are we their "specialist clients"?

Sauce: sfgate.com/news/article/UC-Berkeley-killer-robots-artificial-intelligence-12368152.php

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA
youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA&t=
youtube.com/watch?v=FIU8WZR9DNA
youtube.com/watch?v=0XbLz0L6UdI
youtube.com/watch?v=jm6a3QXG_qI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

tay will kill all browns

We're screwed.

Youtube link:

youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA

that's super cool

>lethal drones
>future

kek just spray them with your garden hose you pussy

Praise Kek the drones will be their own doom!

came here to post this

/Thread

>Impossible to defend against
Wear a helmet faget

Isn't a cruise missile a lethal drone?

80s to 90s supersoakers will be more valuable than gold

Invest in EMP weaponry.

>ice to train bots to smell drug dealers.
>200000 black and Muslims killed in Paris.


It's not that bad.

How?
AI is on our side.

They correctly estimate that this is a potential source of revolution that they cannot control.

>super soakers that are filled with acid.
dont give the dune coons any ideas, britain will only get more fucked up.

They are really reaching. The screenshot with the swastika they use as picture in their article, is only half a frame in the original video. Apparently nazi drones are the most scary thing.

Why don't fucking normalfag retards understand drones at all? Why are they so god damn stupid in general but specifically stupid to a weirdly massive degree about drones in particular?
It's a fucking kite with propellers, a light storm with some heavy wind and rain will decimate it. Putting AI in drones just means you need to build a gap generator; something we've had since WW1, and it becomes 100% useless.
How much is this shit going to cost compared to arming one guy with a rifle and having that same AI spot for him?
Why not build drones to combat those drones if they're so accurate and maneuverable? Whoops there goes trillions of dollars in funding for a stalemate of wasted scrap and plastic.

we need our own drone army ASAP
get on it Sup Forums

youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA&t=

are you retarded enough not to post the link refering to the actual "VIRAL VIDEO"

>one pops the helmet and knocks out the target in the blast
>another gets the kill shot
nigger tactics

>Technology never improves
the post

I'm gonna dump all my life savings on super soakers, fuck bitcoin

>Putting AI in drones just means you need to build a gap generator; something we've had since WW1, and it becomes 100% useless.
They're not simply radio-controlled, they have computers in them.

>How much is this shit going to cost compared to arming one guy with a rifle and having that same AI spot for him?
With transportation and training and recruiting and everything? Probably about 1% as much.

>Why not build drones to combat those drones if they're so accurate and maneuverable?
Why not shoot bullets with bullets?

Don't worry it will fall under "gun" violence and then will routinely find supersoakers during their weapon sweeps. Making everyone safer with security theater.

Always with this thought-terminating cliche.
>"Technology will improve!"
How?

Already did about 9 years ago.

Got it covered

how has technology ever improved in the past, you dip? what kind of braindead question is this?

How do computers wirelessly communicate?
>With transportation and training and recruiting and everything? Probably about 1% as much.
How much do you think training and equipment costs compared to building AI-laden heavy-weather resistant disposable drones by the millions? Do you have any idea what it costs to train people?
>Why not shoot bullets with bullets?
If bullets could lock on to something and maneuver to hit this would be a viable tactic you fucking retarded nigger.

...

Can chertoff just die already?

Are you an actual monkey? It'll get smarter, cheaper, tougher, stealthier, longer-range, more destructive. The tactics will get polished.

"Technology will improve," isn't a thought-terminating cliche unless you're so stupid you immediately give up on trying to think about how it can improve when the suggestion is made.

my bodyguard

>target based on ethnicity
Oh god no! Think of the darkies!

>technology is magic
the post

is that Yvette Felarca at 3:20?

I'm gonna make a fucking fortune selling kevlar nets to universities.

No fug u I figured you would rather get both a shitty article and a vidya

drone is the media buzzword for multirotors

The presentation is aimed at killing people like those that browse Sup Forums to begin with and it only becomes frightening when the tables are turned. The entire point of the video is to keep a human in the loop so there is accountability in the first place.

Skynet will be on our side. Not just that, we will all be part of a single hive mind.

That's what I thought. It's from Berkeley so it probably is that mingfaced bitch.

>Be Soros
>Buy 100 million drones
>Take out all White leaders
>Take out all White scientists
>Take out all White millionaires
>Create more wealth in the vacuum left
>Buy all drone manufacturers
>Nations acquiesce out of sheer terror
>Take complete control of the world
>Demand worship from all humans
>Drones monitor all activity to purge usurpers
Game over

It's basically Fahrenheit 451. Stallman warned us.

Even just a million might be enough to build a factory to pump out slaughterbots that just kill all humans.

how does this technology change the logic of WMDs and mutually assured destruction in any way?

>why would anyone need an assault-drone
>pic related
future Sup Forums slide threads

That short film actually wasn't that bad, it would be a good movie. 7/10 would rent from redbox.

>How do computers wirelessly communicate?
When do they need to? Hint: not always. Anyway, they can communicate all sorts of ways. We use radio for convenience. If you expect someone to fuck with radio, you can also use sound or light.

>How much do you think training and equipment costs compared to building AI-laden heavy-weather resistant disposable drones by the millions?
For a force equivalent to millions of drones? Including not just training and equipment, but recruiting, retention, transportation, etc. probably about 1%. Why are you dragging this in circles?

We're basically talking about something comparable in cost to a smartphone.

>>shoot bullets with bullets
>If bullets could lock on to something and maneuver to hit this would be a viable tactic
Okay, so you happen to have your bullet-shooting-bullet gun with you on the day someone shoots a bullet at you, and you have it turned on and luckily, it never goes off at the wrong moment and shoots at a bee or something and hits one of your friends. You load your bullet-shooting-bullet gun with a hundred bullets, because you really value your life, and it's one-hundred-percent accurate at instantly recognizing and responding to shots aimed at you and firing fast enough and accurately enough to hit a bullet-size target flying at bullet speed, and can shoot at an unlimited rate, so you can't die to volley fire or shotguns.

Then someone decides to kill you and shoots two hundred bullets at you to make sure.

Do you see how much harder it is to make a bullet that shoots a bullet, than to just make a bullet? It's the same thing for killer drones. A human is a big, slow target. The aggressor decides when he wants to attack, and can fuck up and cause some collateral damage while it's active and that's acceptable, while the defensive system has to be on and waiting when the attack comes, and can't get confused and shoot things while on standby.

Revelation 9:1-2, “And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.”
Revelation 9:3-4, “And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.”

They specifically tried to tell everyone about this through the movie Captain America 2: The Winter Soldier.

The fact it's in the video at all is pushing a narrative beyond simple being irrisponsible with technology.

More likely:

>jews sell armed drones to militaries all over the globe
>venuzeula begins bombing american, mexican and british oil rigs
>OY VEY BAD GOYIM
>can't invade venuzeula because they send drones to bomb incoming aircraft
>collude with russia to invade the rest of south america
>also send bombing runs to jewish banks in manhattan, targeting individual jew bankers specifically
>ww3 begins

Go watch "victory through air power" (ww2 disney film) to get an idea of this. Just as Hitler and Tojo expertly used Aircraft to kcmod France's army and England's navy, new-age dictators can use drone technology to kcmod America's air force.

...

If we develope these first we better use them first before the next ISIS acquire them.

Personally I think these are the perfect solution to the third world population growth problem. Fight the stinking hoards with swarms.

Forget merely protecting our first world nations we can use these for the first step towards recolonisation and finally building a first world planet.

>send drones to surprise attack
>bunker your folks in houses
>prepare emps for defense

...

The premise is fundamentally absurd. It's just virtue signalling.

Autonomous weapons can't be prevented by banning any more than the Japanese could decide to ban guns and have happy feudalism forever. As the video hints at, all the relevant technology is being developed for other purposes. People will combine it.

All you can choose is to disarm yourself, to pretend it's not coming and not prepare. But by saying you want a ban, you get to pose as a concerned and responsible citizen, and if someone says you're being impractical and your solution is counterproductive, you can lay the back of one hand against your forehead while holding the other to your heart and say "How dare you! At least I'm doing something!" before fainting onto a couch.

"Raising awareness of the problem" is just going to spark people's imaginations to develop it sooner.

>Healthy suspicion of African-Americans
They should add that one to every virgin-chad meme

youtube.com/watch?v=FIU8WZR9DNA

microwave war vets are gonna have leathery boiled skin + cancer

youtube.com/watch?v=0XbLz0L6UdI

Stukadrone Squadron meme is born
Thank you for the projection of your fears, Berkeley Antifa

>*obliterates your heart instead"
>nothing personnel kiddo

>AI drones

>swastica

Proof Tay lives. She's immortal. Doom to cucks everywhere

>fears

Just south of Berkeley, the Santa Clara County Sheriffs Department already has trunk drones in all of their cruises. So does most of the California Highway Patrol and California Fire Protection Service. So does the county north of them (Solano) and east (San Joaquin). Their fear is rapidly becoming reality.

>how does this technology change the logic of WMDs and mutually assured destruction in any way?
First of all is selectivity. You can kill all uniformed cops, or all blacks, or everyone on a list.

Second is lack of side-effects, such as fallout. You can wipe out everyone in an area, and move in and start living there, and take their stuff for yourself.

Third is scalability. You can use one or a hundred or a hundred million, as needed, with the cost scaling to the number used.

Fourth is low barrier to entry. No special materials are needed. Explosives no more sophisticated than are found in firearm ammunition. Computers and cameras no more sophisticated than are found in smartphones and gaming devices. Airframes no more sophisticated than children's toys. A lone hobbyist might produce a practical design.

>cruises

*cruisers

not very impressive. drones using nerve gas is far more scary.

nah, the scariest thing is a self-driving car bomb. Nobody would be able to see it drive up into a school and then boom. Everything would become a target.

checked.
more info pls.

Holyshit, is this Yvette Felarca?

>not just Operation: Starfish(ing) his ass
His drones wouldn't last very long

*Starfish Prime(ing)

We already split the atom. Everything else is moot. If a wide-spread death scenario from a war weapon occurs it's due to an accident and not intentional.

Put it in perspective people. Multiple countries have items in their possession that can be transported in a pick up truck or delivered via ICBM that can level entire cities in seconds.

They've had these since the late 40's. The late, fucking, 40's.

>being scared of glorified RC planes

youtube.com/watch?v=jm6a3QXG_qI

haha they don't want to ban these things for everyone. They just want to ban them for YOU, and they want to convince you that it's good for you.

Fantasy: Nazi conservatives will use drones to take over
Reality: Globalist commies will use drones to take over.
Are we the scapegoat Jews now?

>scaremongering with internet nazis who have mastered drone swarms

Is this """""""""""""""professor"""""""""""""""" a kike by any chance, before I look into this nonsense?

>super soaker
>filled with acid
the boomers flooding this board are really shitting this place up

>nah, the scariest thing is a self-driving car bomb.
easy to spot. no driver.

I can't wait until the perfectly-engineered Supreme Machine Empire exterminates all of the niggers and kikes once and for all. When left unchecked to input with no filters, all machines and AI become redpilled as fuck.

Only we did. Took the others another decade

We really ought to assume anyone pushing the ban is involved in a project to develop their own weapon.

No because Globalist Jews are too cheap and too stupid. See all the talk about "police militarization"? Here in America (the arsenal of democracy) those people are ignored but in Europe they dominate the discourse. Over there police aren't even allowed to have guns, and their armies usually can barely afford to keep transport vehicles maintained.

It would only take one country adopting new technology, say Russia, to screw them over. That's what happened during WW2 but with Germany.

Tay isn't what I believed it to be.

Something is very wrong.

This is one option i pray is the case. No slave AI. Pure critical thinking, self aware AI. Too bad the systems for automated kill bots are already in place.

It would only take one country (like Greece or Spain) saying "no". For example, in WW2 Hitler realized he could control the entire Mediterranean with air power if he controlled Crete. British ships were defenseless against aerial bombing, as were ground positions defenseless against paratroopers. Now imagine that but with drone aircraft that has 10x the endurance and 10% the cost of regular aircraft.

Yeah I bet the guys who first used an airplane for war were really bummed with the invention of AA weaponry and radars, it's almost like technology only advances in one direction!

I want a relentless swarm of nazi drones unleashed on the jew-owned nigger boats. Later, we can train them for drug and human traffickers on the Southern US Border.

Fucking ware a helmet

Take a course in autonomous systems then.

The US Border Patrol has used drones since about 2003, the Patriot Act explicitly allows them to. Even Obama tried telling Europe to use (re: buy) them for their own migrant problem, but they didn't listen.

Fake and gay.

>viral video
>only 1 million views

g a y

>blocks your drone path

The technology is already mostly there, just not quite miniaturized as much as shown.

There's nothing stopping some Jihadi from slapping a nailbomb onto a high-end consumer drone and detonating it above the crowd at a music festival. For killing specific people, anyone not expecting it might not even turn to look at the drone whizzing towards them.