They say they have an average IQ of 105, yet they also have the highest cosmetic surgery rates.
Anyone else think that IQ is not a true measure of intelligence?
They say they have an average IQ of 105, yet they also have the highest cosmetic surgery rates.
Anyone else think that IQ is not a true measure of intelligence?
>yet they also have the highest cosmetic surgery rates
you need good doctor to perform surgery
also a meme since USA is more high
>he says while posting on a Mongolian fingerpainting board filled with autists and failures
You're not exactly among the cream of the crop yourself, user.
Also IQ measures logic and critical thinking, not vanity
i train asians to do things (with supposedly higher IQs), and they rush me through it and don't want to understand the fundamentals.
when something out of the norm happens, they can't troubleshoot or get creative. it has to be in the manual or they get stuck - i don't get that problem with whites as they are willing to learn the significance of things.
so i don't think worst koreans have much to brag about. especially considering the amount of resources they dump into vanity. it would be smarter to invest that money in longer-term assets.
a surgeon or doctor are mechanic tier.
they are not likely to innovate.
there will be some amazing ones in there that have a passion for the field and pioneer it, but most of them just follow set patterns.
someone intelligent lives it through and through, not just at their day job.
i study surgery
everyone need to innovate his metods
that's waht a doctor do
I don't post often.
Buy this, OP, and you will have a much better understanding of your question.
i doctar make healty papole
>Anyone else think that IQ is not a true measure of intelligence?
Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.
TL;DR brainlet detected
>Also IQ measures logic and critical thinking, not vanity
and yet focusing so much on vanity appears to be a lapse in logic.
>You're not exactly among the cream of the crop yourself, user.
can't deny that, spending leisure time on Sup Forums is not as beneficial as spending it on getting /fit/
no because money
Good god. What the fuck?
Its mostly a meme. It's only slightly higher than Greece. The vast majority of surgeries aren't even on the face.
Wait, these people are chinese.
I wonder why dick size surgery hasn't caught on then...
>ayy lmao
Cosmetic surgery is the smart thing to do, you would understand that if you weren't a brainlet.
We hear a lot about white privilege and such bullshit whereas stuff like height privilege and beauty/handsomeness privilege are real.
It's generally a good investment unless you go the Bogdanoff route (but these guys have a 200+ IQ so who knows).
read the whole thing and i agree. there's plenty of artists that regard their creativity as a sign of their true intelligence and think IQ misses the spot due to this.
i'll disregard the TL;DR because you've got me wrong. i consider IQ tests useful for sensing how well someone can learn and apply from a curriculum, but not how well they can innovate. i'm no lefty either.
AYYYYYYYYYYY
IQ measures your ability to be autistic.
I have never seen such scary faces.
americans are so insecure that they had to edit this infographic
>everyone need to innovate his metods
how so? incision methods are probably standardized. remembering the patients anatomy is pretty much an exercise in memory. the areas where skin can be pulled or cut from are generally the same, although individual traits would mean that after looking at the usual checklist of places you may need to consider other avenues. this is just speculation though.
Very funny, but here's the original
...
I just read they 100% cheat on tests so believe what you want.
>stuff like height privilege and beauty/handsomeness privilege are real
sure, cosmetic surgery can turn an ugly person into a normal-ish looking person, and this will be better than staying ugly - however - that will only work on tricking normies.
normies will tell you how great you look and you'll gain from the privileges you've aforementioned. but anyone like us with an eye for detail will instantly judge the person as shallow and know that we're not getting what we see genetically.
so it may get you far among normies, but not among smarter people that you may meet in life. seems like selling out to adapt to normies btw.
>recommends to buy an item
>ignores pirate flag
sounds like a good read desu fampai
...