How did Nietzsche become so opinionated on topics 99% of people could care less about?

How did Nietzsche become so opinionated on topics 99% of people could care less about?

autism

no pootang

>Rightly predict a cataclysmic century as a result of nihilism
>Opinion

Okay.

What was his opinion on onions?

...

He only ever addressed the 1%. In his most generous moments.

Nietzsche was shit. Read Kierkegaard.

The Power of German Autism.

people should care that are having slave morality imposed on them. they certainly would care if they had Christianity or Islam imposed on them.

why did nietzsche's sister frame him as an anti-semite

You made this thread last night Christicuck! You don't read philosophy books (the white man's true tradtional religion) and you're dumb

Christcucks > Roasties > Cucks > Trannies > Fags > Spics > Niggers > Soyboys > Muslims > ANTIFA > Jews > Pedos > Spencer

Intelligence > Arrogance > Isolation > Resentment > Extreme Repulsive Horse Shit
Nothing really unusual or valuable there.
All i can say positive about him is: he never despised the success he never got

Kierkegaard was shit. Read the Bible.

>realising that meaninglessness is freedom
>realising that the need for meaning is a primitive flaw
>realising that without meaning there can still be Reason, Ethics, Memory, Imagination and Common Sense

>tips fedora
you're real clever. never heard these arguments before. you must be well read.

>How did Nietzsche become so opinionated on topics 99% of people could care less about?
Your need to ask such questions demonstrates that you heavily overrate that 99%.

Don´t listen to her, i like what you wrote.

>Read the Bible.

>Common Sense
women can be men. white people cause black crime rates. illegal immigrants are the same as legal immigrants. There is Nothing "common sense" about this. In fact the "western intellectual tradition" is now all about arguing around the western intellectual tradition.

>there can still be
there can be, but there generally isn't. notice how all of the meme scientists despise philosophy and any kind of spiritual growth. and notice how scientific advancement and philosophical advancement have grown together--sometimes interfering with and influencing each other. "god is dead" is a challenge and not an excuse.

"The first level is the level of elementary physical processes in quantum mechanics. Matter in quantum mechanics is [...] constantly making choices between alternative possibilities according to probabilistic laws. [...] The second level at which we detect the operations of mind is the level of direct human experience. [...] [I]t is reasonable to believe in the existence of a third level of mind, a mental component of the universe. If we believe in this mental component and call it God, then we can say that we are small pieces of God's mental apparatus"
-Freeman Dyson

leaf post best post

>the need for meaning is a primitive flaw
>without reason there can still be Reason, Ethics, Memory, Imagination, and Common Sense
Wew, what a dip shit you are.

>"god is dead"
It was answered not four sentences after he wrote these words.