FACTS on Net Neutrality

Unlike all the other NN threads, im going to give you a trust worthy source to make up your mind on NN.

Here eff.org/deeplinks/2017/11/today-and-every-day-we-fight-defend-open-internet

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) support NN, and these guys have a powerful legal team and truly want an open and free internet.

Repealing Net Neutrality = (((corporations))) can throttle traffic to sites they dont like.

Keep NN, internet stays neutral. BUT the (((corporations))) are actively trying subvert the FCC legislation.

> How would repealing NN HELP the consumer????

It WOULDN'T!! I't will leave us defenceless against internet kikery.

> Joogle & Cuckbook support NN because they are confident they can subvert the FCC.

So we need FIGHT TO KEEP NN, And to STOP FCC Subversion. It's clear with no NN, the kike owned corporations have free reign to Jew us all

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/WaNW8O_9J8A
eff.org/deeplinks/2012/06/defending-privacy-israeli-border-information-travelers-carrying-digital-devices
eff.org/es/node/80436
eff.org/deeplinks/2015/11/palestine-3g
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>goyim start to use internet to organize themselves
>knowledge of jews spreading faster than ever
>suddenly, everybody wants to lock the internet down and kill all non-kosher media

gee, I wonder why...

really makes you think

EFF isn't unbiased anymore. they used to talk about negative aspects of NN but now they beg for government regulations alongside other leftists.

>not paying premium to kikes to expose kikes on Sup Forums

Are you a kike?
Pay a kike you kike sucker!

List me a negative for a real consumer, then. Don't try to pull any tricks like "muh price", because the price will always rise regardless of which way this goes.

We should give the government control so they can save us from the evil corporations.

How many fucking Net Neutrality post do we need on this website. Do your fing job mods.

>open and free internet
>tell people what they can do with their own internet company
pick one

M8 ISPs have at least 3000% profit margin on you.

BooHoo we can't itemize the internet to make the goyim pay more while providing less service

>muh free market

Many parts of america are home to regional monopolies. And companies will fight hard to defend them. . Remember the Media blitz Canadian Telecom companies launched against Verizon when they tried to set up in canada? Notice how shit cell phone plans are in Canada? These companies don't want a free market. They want a Safe Space free of competition.

When municipalities attempt to launch services they lobby to pass laws preventing them. While I think that government shouldn't run any business (since it would be shit and would be counter to a free market) it is indicative of the problem. Monopolies are preventing a free market.

In the absence of a free market the government must set the stage on which capitalism dances.

Net Neutrality is only necessary because of the lack of a free market.

We have too little competition in many parts of America to have a free market and thus we need net neutrality for now.

>their own

You mean (((their))) own, pathetic scum-class goyim.

>be pol
>talk about anarchist views or libertarian views
>rail against a policy that reduces government control
yep nu-pol

Soros's shit blue spamming the net again. Net neutrality is a LIE

The telco's and other big players will collude and get what they want rammed through, one way or another, if not this time then next. Thinking we have any say in the matter is nonsense. They will notice when people cancel their internet subs and replace it with nothing, which I think may be feasible with the next generation.

Look i dont trust government either, BUT we the people have some control over government

We have ZERO control over private corporations without NN

OP is a faggot and a shill.

EFF are kikes too.

You present a FALSE choice.

Dont Conflate Freedom of internet CONTENT, with freedom to be a greedy kike & charge for priority data stream.

This restriction on corporations IMPROVES internet freedom (if not subverted).

The challenge is in the people holding the FCC feet to the fire, and stop them selling out.

Personally i would like a constitutional amendment that made it IMPOSSIBLE for the internet to be censored, throttled, prioritised etc.

>>the consumer can't use their money to decide what they like best

Break up the biggest ISPs in order to spark competition. Free up the market.

With an actual free market net neutrality is unnecessary. But we do not have a free market.

Without net neutrality in place things will go to shit. They will try to itemise the internet. And vultures like the MPAA will force ISPs to shoah access to sites they don't like. With ISPs in control of access they open themselves up to getting sued for providing access to things like copyrighted materials. This will get scores of sites banned or black listed by ISPs. And it's only a matter of time before the "that's offensive" fags get involved.

Sup Forums home of da ebil far right
Shoah'd
Streaming sites
10 shekels a month goy
File sharing
Shoah'd
Porn
Kike'd
Steam
EA'd
Google maps
Add vz navigator for 7 shekels a month

> implying there will be a real choice for consumers to change to

The (((monopolies))) already own all the infrastructure. And any startup would be connecting to (((THEIR))) backbone.

>renames picture to Net Neutrality Truth.jpg
>picture is revy
Are you that desperate you silly shill

>Unlike all the other NN threads
>I'm so fucking special, look at what a snowflake I am, my opinion is too important to be missed in someone elses thread so I'll make another one

> muh free market

Capitalism ALWAYS leads to monopolies.

You have a sweet period of "competition", but over time the most Jewy companies win out, gobble up the rest, the lobby to protect themselves.

Hence the need for Gov regulation

This 6min video explains it well

youtu.be/WaNW8O_9J8A

yes but minimal government regulation.
there's ALREADY laws against monopolies
but the government doesn't do anything about it just like how them being in charge of net "neutrality" better called net bureaucracy doesn't benefit us in any way except staving off all these hypotheticals that they don't do anything to stop
anyways
and that's why we have all these monopolies in Internet and pharmaceutical companies and plane part manufacturers

>man, I sure drive a rickety piece of shit rustbox
>better not wear a seatbelt

This is you.

why would I wear a seat belt if it doesn't work?

Why wear pants if nobody can see your shriveled dick? Because you have principles.

Why is murder illegal if doesn't stop people from killing

Why do I go to school if I don't learn anything?

Because certain websites will be slowed down to dial up speed or completely blacklisted. Sup Forums will be one of these websites. You will not see Sup Forums in any of their approved packages.

Net Neutrality is how the internet has always functioned.
>inb4 why did we need the law in 2015

because it was to formalize Net Neutrality.

Law A already covered NN vaguely because of it being part of communications previously.

Law B gets created in 2015 to formalize NN, meaning law A no longer covers it. It now is a part of law B.

Law B is now being repealed, law A no longer applies because law B took it's place.

Now ISP can do whatever they want and what they had been trying to do before 2015*, but was blocked by Law A, but now we will end up with neither A nor B.

*Here is a list of what ISP trying shit in past

2005 - Madison River Communications was blocking VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it.

2005 - Comcast was denying access to p2p services without notifying customers.

2007-2009 - AT&T was having Skype and other VOIPs blocked because they didn't like there was competition for their cellphones. 2011 - MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except youtube. (edit: they actually sued the FCC over this)

2011-2013, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were blocking access to Google Wallet because it competed with their bullshit. edit: this one happened literally months after the trio were busted collaborating with Google to block apps from the android marketplace

2012, Verizon was demanding google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. (edit: they were fined $1.25million over this)

2012, AT&T - tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money.

2013, Verizon literally stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place.

...

EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION
>EFF IS A KIKE FOUNDATION

Hey idiot, I was replying to someone who was against NN.

regardless, my post has information others can read too.

Because seeing a man with no visible genitalia would be visibly disturbing and indecent

Murder being illegal curbs the amount of murder

You might learn something in school. You're definitely not going to learn something outside of school

I learned how to drive a car without going to school.

The only answer is to sage these fucking reddit-spaced shill threads. Net neutrality needs to fucking die. Want an easy way to know why? Check every pozzed forum you can think of. They support it. Enough said. If Sup Forums dies with all the cuck and normie .coms in the world, that will be acceptable.

All anti NN threads are fucking shill threads.

Free Market is a fucking meme. You idiots should've all shot yourselves when learning about post-reconstruction American history. It never works in practice because that's completely counter to the interests of a corporation. Adam Smith was wrong.

Just a friendly reminder that 55% of Americans only have one option for a broadband internet provider.

Free market competition doesn't work when there is no competition.

>Guess who organize it?
It looks a lot like when (( T H E Y )) wanted to elect trump.

>"Sites they don't like"

Wow, I'm sure those corporations are really going to target things randomly based off of 'not liking them', and this has nothing to do with huge video streaming sites that consume the vast majority of internet bandwidth. I'm sure these companies have lobbied millions of dollars just so they can slow down traffic to random sites 'they don't like'.

Meanwhile Twitter is open and foward about their plan to kick the alt-right off of their website. A site they used to tout as a "bastion of free speech" back when Arab Spring was (supposedly) going on. Now they're cool with political censorship.

Netflix can eat a dick. They did "dear white people", so I hope they get charged out the ass for the bandwidth.

First shillkike, you didn't respond to anything i said in my comment. The internet needs to die until america is completely white. We have obtained enough information from the internet for the required task. The jew is named, nothing more needs to be known.
begone you fucking shill kike.
Oh yeah, like how front page of reddit was pro hillary and now it's pro trump. You shill kikes are so obvious it's painful.

All major websites will be a part of the ISP internet packages. All wrongthinking websites (such as Sup Forums) will be put in the slow lane and be at dial up speed or blacklisted entirely.

ISP's will have a base price (speed + data usage) then on top of your base price, you will pay for what websites packages you want to use. Wrongthinking websites will not be included in packages obviously. So you are paying more money, not less, the bill gets passed onto you - all the websites like netflix, twitter, facebook, etc will retain their users because of course normies are addicted and will keep paying extra for it if they have to.

It is a combination of censorship against wrong think and a cash grab for the ISP's not at the expense of the companies, at the expense of the consumers who will pay for packages.

I would save so much fucking money if your pic was accurate.

Were do you get your crystal balls?

Wrong, you will pay more.

You will pay close to what you do now for your speed and data usage limit, then on top of that you would pay for what packages you want to have access to.

From countries that have done this previously and ISP continuously trying to start to do things like this and being stopped by the FCC.

Finally someone makes a real argument. Fucking shit Ive been trying to look at this shit all day and no one's getting to the actual point. Unless you correct corporate greed (highly unlikely) I don't think we let go of NN.

Thats what I pay.

user Australia is already a gone case i seriously want less American on this website

So let me get this straight. You think that we the people have the ability to hold the FCC over the coals if they do something we don't like, but we cannot stop them from ending net neutrality? How's that work again?

Advocating to give up and accept the death of freedom of speech/internet.

We see (((YOU))) behind that meme flag

The thing is, corporations nowadays are more powerful than they've ever been. The big ISPs actually collectively provide for a larger percentage of the population than all of the railroad barons in the late 1800's. More power is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.

The only saving grace is that Trump seems dead set on Roosevelting big corporations like with the recent TWC merger.

How do you know that? Based on all the shill pictures posted I would save about $20-$30 per month. You're just talking our of your ass anyhow, as I don't see where you are getting these predictions.

>>if your pic was accurate.
>>if your pic was accurate.

are you retarded

If the government isn't on the same page as the cancerous Jews then yes, give them free reign. Government isn't the problem, Leftists having control of the government is the problem.

I guess you'll have to contact me on one of the ISP's pre-approved social media platforms after this goes through so I can say "I told you so".

Net neutrality is for faggy government-trusting bootlicking cunts who need to go kill themselves.

Fuck off, shillfag.

That's the same fucking meme argument people for lootboxes use.

>LOL JUST DON'T BUY IT

Faggot, there are retards with lots of money who in fact WILL buy it, rendering everybody who doesn't moot. Whales support the entire scheme, and the exact same thing will happen here.

So, just to clarify, you do not have a solid argument or ability to answer my questions and you only have doom and gloom predictions?

How the fuck were boomers so stupid to fall for this tactic in the past?

I want to cuddle revy!

Sad truth is I trust corporations more than congress at this point

So i looked into the EFF founders


Mitch Kapor (kike)
John Perry Barlow (Goy?)
John Gilmore (half kike)

So 50% jewish, which shows how this 2% are fucking EVERYWHERE at the top.

BUT, Jewish alone is not the problem. Its the zionist globalist Jews that are the problem. There are high profile good jews that fight against zionism & globalism.

A litmus test for if a Kike is good can be seen if they are against Israel's crimes. EFF seem to be. + they Sue the US Gov for breaches of our rights. IMO EFF can be trusted

eff.org/deeplinks/2012/06/defending-privacy-israeli-border-information-travelers-carrying-digital-devices

eff.org/es/node/80436

eff.org/deeplinks/2015/11/palestine-3g

So wait, you don't have anything but predictions based on nothing and my predictions are based on other countries doing the same thing and what ISP continuously kept trying to do for about 10 years while the FCC stopped them multiple times.
What exactly is on your side exactly?

...

All memeflags, especially Nazi and Republican flags, are shills, especially when they use the, "how do you do fellow kekistanis?" routine.

Net neutrality is good for the same reason democrats thought giving Obama more power would be good. They never thought the other guy would get back into power.

Imagine this passing, Trump cleans house on fake news, what's stopping the next Obama from doing the same with no oversight? At least we could agree that Trump can and will come under extreme scrutiny, I can't say the same for most democrats.

In the end it always comes back to Jews and Jewish behavior that turns capitalism into pure cancer. Capitalism in theory is a solid system. Judeo-Capitalism however is honestly a means to make Communism that much more appealing to the masses.

I'm not making predictions. What the fuck are you on about? All I said was based on the pictures you and others have provided I would save money from net neutrality getting axed. Look up what the word prediction means, you dumb fucking idiot.

they're tinfoiling over fear of ISP's and throttling at the benefit of major sites but i dont know who is screwing who in this so i have to disavow any post i've previously might have made in error on other net neutrality threads, I simply can't figure it out. :(

in b4 nothing happens pass or fail just like that last time the net neutrality meme was hyped up.

You disagreeing with me is also a prediction because you can't know what is going to happen either. Are you retarded?

Current situation:
>stormfront called the chick who died in charlottesville fat
>godaddy terminated their hosting for it
>google refused internet service for it
Scenario without NN:
>some other stormfront mocks the chick for having a heart attack from being fat
>comcast denies access to that site until they take it down and issue a public apology

On our end, it's hardly different. I like net neutrality, but when Silicon Valley is happy to abuse it, the value of it decreases.
That said, if it's actually killed and EFF takes it to court, I plan donate to their legal fund.

probably true. sounds legit.

Revy is the best girl.

"Let's wait and see" is the same thing as "THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER THE WHOLE INTERNET WILL COME CRASHING DOWN ADN COMCAST IS GOING TO SEND DEATH SQUADS TO YOUR HOUSE OT MAKE SURE YOU BUYE HTE DELUX INTERNET PACKAGE" are completely the same, how could I forget?

Why does everyone seem to forget that Net Neutrality as it is today came about because a fucking ISP tried to kill a service, and when the FCC moved in to stop it they sued saying the FCC doesn't have that authority?

Everyone's going on and on about what ifs when it's already fucking happened.

Because the outcome I suggest would probably be unable to ever change back to normal, the outcome you suggest is nothing to worry about. If I am right, then it's too late once it has already happened because places like this will virtually be gone and we won't be able to discuss the issues.

Will this only affect the US?

Ideally, net neutrality should be given a simple, clear law: a USC line saying "Internet service providers may not base pricing or quality of service on the owners of the computers involved in a connection, or the protocol, traffic density, or total throughput of the connection" or something.

To all those who WANT NN GONE....

What's Ur solution to Stop the internet being jewed?

Dont give me that "free market competition" crap. The industry is provably dominated by billion dollar companies. NO NEW player is coming to save the day

So NN is Gone. Then what?

Because we don't care.

So the (((government))) controls everything or the (((corporations))) control everything. Sounds like it really doesn't matter what happens.

What exactly did it protect? Right-wing websites and right-wing media channels are being shut down? as we speak. Under these vaunted net neutrality rules. I am calling bullshit.

>rabbi schlomo of comcast forced rabbi david of netflix, facebook, etc that he has to pay more to peddle his degeneracy

Yeah I don't care. I'll chose whichever side makes normies chimp out because we have no chance if we dont achieve peak chimpout soon.

>implying time warner wouldn't catch an internet-wide DDoS if they tried some funny shit

Pretty sure the point is you would have to pay in addition to what youre already paying.

if it passes enjoy your 56kbps connection to american servers & websites. (this will force your isp to pay up)

Thats just Soros covering his ass. He has the money to burn and best case scenario NN stays and hes a good guy. Worst case, it fails and hes rich and doesnt give a fuck

Yes, that's the point the propaganda is trying to convey. It's directed at the wrong audience when you post it here, however.