8values results

What does this mean Sup Forums

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5tCMI0uKbBE
tradingeconomics.com/belgium/gdp
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Looks like a typical republican result

...

get?

>prog lefty fag

Accurate.

So... libertarian?

gas

I mean, I guess? there's no result that I could find that says Libertarianism so I guess neoliberalism falls under the same umbrella

that ur a fag

what is this

It means you are for the genocide of white people, making you either a traitor or an enemy.

says the lefty

In my country (and many others) libertarianism=liberalism and (american) liberalism = democratic socialism/progressivism so i guess it's right.

>you're either with me or against me fallacy

...

People don't believe me when I tell them I'm a moderate.
"Yea, yea sure. But, if you HAD to lean one way, which would it be?"
"Depends, but I'd say a little to the right"
"Oh, ok. So you're a Conservative"
"No, fucktard", is what I think to myself

wouldnt really call that 'lefty'
more like centrist authoritarian

Spot on, cucks!

>He doesn't want Utopia on Earth.

Autocracy, Fascism and National Socialism are the only good results.

Use your brain. There is only a "false dilemma" fallacy when there are more than two options. There are only two options here.
The genocide of whites is ongoing, though subtle. The demographic trends are very real, you cannot deny it.
But most of all, whites have been made ACTORS of that genocide (you can call it a suicide if you will but in that case it is a forced suicide), by the enemy, making them traitors.
If you are informed of the situation and you still do not wish to act then you are a fool and should take time to think about it.

left wingers are authoritarians by default

Utopia is a greek word and it means "a place that doesn't/can't exist". Socialist utopias aren't possible if you don't remove human nature

>never had a single economics lesson in his life

Why are "equality" and "markets" opposite? the opposite of a free market is a controlled market, not an equal one.

equality in a sense that the goverment regulates the economy so everyone has equality of outcome

>only knows basic economics making him think that laissez-faire is the answer to everything

I understand the reason they were saying that, but I was attempting to imply that they have a biased perspective.

>laissez-faire is the answer to everything
Well yeah, pretty much

...

Controlled market means that the state provides for people who earn less by placing more taxes on those who earn more. Also when the state controls the means of production it gives people equal quantities of the products. Sounds good in theory but no one has managed to make the system work but it sounds good enough to convince college cucks to follow this ideology.

I don't understand how "Capitalist-Fascism" even makes sense since by definition those two terms are inherently opposed

Keep studying economics and you'll grow out of it.

No they aren't. It's just fascism with low economic interference and low tax and spend. Like Pinochet. It wouldn't be outright Libertarian but there can still be a large degree of economic freedom under a dictatorship.

I don't think anyone has implemented this system. The way I understand is that the state bans immigration, is built on traditional values, owns the media but the rest of the economic activity is unregulated. Doesn't sound like a good system desu.

The problem with the logic behind equality of opportunity, is that not everyone has equal opportunity. Despite being an understandable principle, it's far from anything close to an equal one. Not to mention that a free market will just devolve into crony capitalism anyway, given enough time.

i got libertarian so it's definitely there

>Belgium giving economic advice

M8, people don't ask single moms for advice on relationships...

What do you mean ?

>Doesn't sound like a good system desu
Why not?

it means your a cuck

...

I think posting this video is relevant

youtube.com/watch?v=5tCMI0uKbBE

the reason behind the absence of equality of opportunity is because you're never gonna realistically achieve true equality since even if the less fortunate get just as much wealth as the smart, then the smart will be less fortunate because they had to work harder to get there which is unequal and immoral, inequality of outcome is natural and thats never gonna change

Definitely, user

I mean your economy is stagnant because of it's centralized control (along with most of Europe) so when you criticize laissez-faire people aren't going to take you very seriously. Like a single mom who's obviously a failure in relationships.

Libertarian capitalism and socialism you mean I'm assuming

Huge economic freedom in a dictatorship doesn't sound right. It might be good it just hasn't been tried as far as I know so I can't properly judge its effectiveness.

>I mean your economy is stagnant because of it's centralized control
Have you got any proof of that ?

Well never mind, I am giving you the same advice as the other edgy ultra capitalist faggot

tradingeconomics.com/belgium/gdp

>inequality of outcome is natural and thats never gonna change
It might not, certainly humans would have to drastically change first. But I don't think that means we should give up on attempting to make our societies as equal as we can manage.

getting better

Low tax and spend ultra-capitalism built the greatest countries in the world. High tax and spend socialism always chills economic growth literally every time it's applied. Really makes you think. The principles behind it are so simple and straightforward you really need an education in bullshit to not notice it.

I'm not speaking in terms of morality of people but in the sense that it's an unrealistic scenario to begin with

Nice.

Capitalist fascism really sounds pretty good if I must be honest here senpai.

Once again, go further in your understanding of economics and you will grow out of it.
I've read that book, along with many others. I am a student in economics.
I too used to think that laissez-faire was the answer to most problems, but it was because I was arrogant and knew very little.
Furthermore, I didn't take into account the human side of things, only the economical.

You take it in the butt.

i've been fucking around whit the test to see if there is a monarchist result, got nothing so far

What are all the possible results in this test anyway

Capitalism turns gangrenous and dangerous if unregulated.

>I am a student

There's your problem.

ayylmao

I got the same, it means that you're based af

Rake yourself, Harper Cuck.

>The principles behind it are so simple and straightforward
Shit, I didn't know, has Harvard already offered you a tenure, or maybe you are too good for them ?

damn right it does

It means you won't be thrown out of the helicopter

dunno man

You can go to Harvard and learn all about how there's no biological difference between the genders. I'll stay rooted in the real world ty. The real world where capitalism works every time and socialism shits up the system every damn time as well.

>hating on the free market
you know where you are nigger boy

>rip ron paul god rest his soul

...

...

Mr. H is proud of you

means youre a good guy OP
not some leach who wants to steal other people's money & sell his culture to get cucked

That's gay

thanks user

Hummm?

t. shlomo
It allows for kike monopolies, taking advantage of people and usury to occur there is nothing wrong with regulating it, simple regulation could avoid all these problems.

Cancer... It's terminal.

managed to get fascism after three or four tries

Yeah, no kidding

good job user

Excuse me for being retarded but, what does “Chauvinist” mean?

If momopolies gouge their customers they will inevitably grow competition unless they're favoured by the state, as happen to be the case with any modern monopoly.

The worst modern usury practice is the gigantic exploitation of university students and their debt. Surprise surprise again the cause is the state.

just an exaggerated form of patriotism

Ultra nationalist. Word is derived from a french dude named chauvin (i think that's the way you spell it, french is a retarded language) who lived during france's imperial expansion.

Thanks anons.

thanks, tahts the first time someone callde me user on this website ever since i started posting

Little user has grown up. This makes me so happy

#Itsokaytobeanewfag

Ultra nationalist . Its cool user

i've been lurking for 3-4 years, it's just that noone called me user

I am talking about economics not gender studies.
You are arrogant and think you know better than people who have studied the subject all their lives.

>The real world where capitalism works every time and socialism shits up the system every damn time as well.
This isn't true at all, of course communism is bad for the economy. But it doesn't explain why Canada has the same GDP per capita as Belgium or why Romania, who has the same index of economic liberty as the USA is much poorer, or why China has had such an enormous economic growth.
Fucking Uganda has a better index of economic freedom than Belgium.Guatemala has a better index than Israel.

You are delusional if you think that laissez-faire is the answer. Kikes love ultra-capitalism, it is exactly how they took control of the USA.

Goml, balance is best

...

Checkmate

You're confusing socialism with social democracy desu

How much time do I have left on this precious Earth?