Comcast owns NBC and MSNBC

Comcast owns NBC and MSNBC

Time Warner owns CNN

Verizon owns Huffington Post, TechCrunch

Other urls found in this thread:

gamasutra.com/view/news/291284/New_York_sues_Time_Warner_over_throttled_League_of_Legends_speeds.php
wsj.com/articles/netflix-agrees-to-pay-comcast-to-improve-its-streaming-1393175346
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Fuck off shareblue, we trust Trump on this one.

SAGE

...

>we
Kys

>we trust Trump over our own logic and reasoning
it really is a cult at this point

the shills are out in force on this one today i tell you what!
I know if the liberals are for something, then I am against it, the more i read about net neutrality the more i want it to die.

it's a legitimate possibility that trump ACTUALLY doesn't understand or particularly care about NN, when he ought to. Can you at least acknowledge that this is a possibility?

An obnoxious dick mutilation cult spamming shit non-stop to destroy productivity isn't neutrality its a retarded baby that needs bars on its crib or a pillow over its head.

w...what? fucking what?

You're being fooled if you're against NN

No
FUCK YOU AND YOU LOGIC
For a Sup Forums without muts
MAGA
Join the resistance #antimogrelaction

net neutrality, at this point in time, would be better to have than giving ISPs more control.

Comcast owns large portion of Buzzfeed.

why is comcast immune to monopoly laws?

what if i told you that no ISP has ever tried to create a so called "paid fast lane". Net Neutrality has its merits but now they have resorted to fear mongering. The same people who are campaigning for net neutrality are the same groups that silence you if you do not share the same opinion.

Lobby
Your politicians don't make laws according to principles, they make it according to the highest bidder.

>'net neutrality' of some form
I'm for "some form" of net neutrality, but against the kike regulatory trojan horse known as (((Net Neutrality))).

Think about it, all the people who are against you are shilling for NN. Why?

>your enemies
>jews
>trump also a jew

k

He’s saying the current internet situation is as regarded as you and your Nosey kind. Should be put down.

Reminder that Google, Facebook, and Netflix are in favor of NN.

Hmm... I wonder why the information-gathering sites want to cripple the competition with unnecessary and burdensome government regulation while doing nothing to address the root causes (like ISP licenses)?

gamasutra.com/view/news/291284/New_York_sues_Time_Warner_over_throttled_League_of_Legends_speeds.php

""""""""""""""""""""net neutrality""""""""""""""""""""

Title II isn't net neutrality, it's a power grab by the bureaucracy. The only difference between Title II and nationalizing an industry is that when government nationalizes an industry, it also takes responsibility for its decisions.

There is zero point to this debate. The internet didn't change after Obama passed the Net Neutrality bill. Everything was literally the same before and after. Its just more people screaming the world is ending over fucking nothing.

>pro Assange and anti fake news companies like CNN
>shareblue
Pick one.

Disagreements over who pays for transit isn't the same as throttling and New York filing a lawsuit proves nothing. The State of New York sues every major business for everything. Most of it falls apart in court.

Yep. It's a hugely overblown debate.

Even Assange isn't crying bloody murder on this one, just saying that it's important and to be careful.

The status quo will remain, minus the fact that maybe Netflix will have to pay up to ISPs to not get throttled.

You haven't been paying attention. Comcast (the biggest US ISP) has already done so.

wsj.com/articles/netflix-agrees-to-pay-comcast-to-improve-its-streaming-1393175346

>The internet didn't change after Obama passed the Net Neutrality bill
No bill was passed and it wasn't "net neutrality".

1. Congress did not write a law. The President did not sign a law. The FCC decided it would categorize ISPs as a common carrier (or public carrier) under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. You might notice that law was written 56 years before the Tim Berners-Lee wrote the WorldWideWeb. Updates to the regulatory framework in 1996 did nothing to suggest the internet would be a Title II common carrier.

2. Title II is not "net neutrality". Title II is a regulatory framework which allows the government to set prices, wages, services, and everything else a business would normally do for itself. That the FCC started by only requiring businesses keep doing what they were already doing does not change the power they give themselves with Title II. It is VERY IMPORTANT to notice that Title II regulation was not necessary to impose "net neutrality". "Net neutrality" could've been imposed through more limited regulatory programs which don't equate to the nationalization of industry.

Congress was already in the process of writing "net neutrality" legislation before the FCC leapt to action in 2015.

This was a power grab, pure and simple.

>Others 25.1%

Pornhub etc.

Feel free to leave.

This is a kike shill who works for Time Warner. Learn to recognize them as they will be all over the place until mid December.

I'm not a shill im just a loyal trump supporter like most people here. You're the shill outsider.

I trust Trump with this too. He's yet to steer us wrong.