NET NEUTRALITY

>Sup Forums is so autistically contrarian that you guys are actually happy that youre about to be absolutely JEWED
kek,this board is cancer since all the T_D fags came last year

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8j95dVw6Kbc
youtube.com/watch?v=5Z_nBhfpmk4&t=254s
google.com/search?q=comcast throttling netflix&oq=comcast throttling ne&aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57j0l4.3967j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
youtube.com/watch?v=8bUuvfDmsAs
youtube.com/watch?v=-uK4uo77i9M
youtube.com/watch?v=0kkaY5lJLMk
nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/godaddy-daily-stormer-white-supremacists.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Sup Forums.org has been blocked for : hate speech, piracy, heterosexual pornography, free software

>fuck states rights

Any monopoly is bad for our capitalist society

Fuck ISP’s monopoly, and fuck you for being an ISP shill

You're a pretty smart shill. Get fucked Statist cuck.

>one state should be able to block sites hosted in another state
that violates the interstate commerce act retard

you dont know what youre talking about, but believe what you want, not like anyone can do anything about it at this point

Im sure you'll all be happy when (((Comcast))) either blocks access to evil nazi Sup Forums or makes you pay $200 a month for the incel altright package , you fucking corporate bootlickers

Change ISPs or boycott them you dumb double nigger. You can't do the same with government.

You can vote in different government. When theres a corporate monopoly that all agree on what sites should be banned, what are you gonna do? Do you have the capital to ceate your own ISP? Lmfao @ you retard

The first company that will start blocking websites will get fucked.

Yeah Im sure, because the general population will obviously defend the most vilified website in modern history (this one)

No one is going to block normiebook and youtube you fucking clown, theyre going to ban fringe websites like this and no one will hear about it or care

>monopolies are bad
>fighting against an agency dedicated to breaking up monopolies
imagine being this much of a brainlet

this, Sup Forums is literally letting a poo in loo fuck them in the ass just to piss off reddit

bump you faggots need to understand that youre retarded and wrong

>all providers switch to le meme image pay per website plan
>literally one company makes a normal plan, doesnt change anything to nowadays
>instantly gains 100% of marketshare
WOOOOOOW SO HARD
The free market finds solutions to everything

>most people have joint packages for phone/tv/internet and cant just switch providers at will
>implying large companies will opt to do that and risk not getting that many more customers, instead of keeping their already sizable market share and making everything more expensive instead, thus making more money

Youre being retarded.
>hurr you had a contract with us and now we just wont let you acces the things we agreed you could acces lol its legal

Nobody wants this.
If the opportunity arises for a free monopoly, any sane company will jump on it.
99% of people at 75€ > 20% of people at 200 €

>In news today, Time warner has blocked Sup Forums, Brietbart and Infowars and hundreds of "Alt-Right", hateful websites.

No one is going to come out in public and defend this place.

You *could* change ISPs but you have no options to choose from because they have an established monopoly in their areas.

And it won't be a block, it'll be a slow suffocation. This site will start to be slower and slower, so much so you won't bare to come here. Eventually with enough people not visiting, the ad revenue will dry up and Sup Forums will die, as will other sites.

Didn't Verizon throttle or block access to Sup Forums at one point

Read up on the conflict between Comcast and Netflix, it is not really about Net Neutrality, but the fucking shitheads at Netflix is giving the commies a reason to further regulate the internet.

Things has been great the last 10 years and I don't see how the status quo is unbearable.

AHAHAHA
>amerimutts will defend this

show your real flag ultra nigger

What would no net neutrality do to VPNs? Would satellite internet become the best alternative if NN is repealed?Also, NN is necessary for for when ISP companies have a monopoly or duopoly on consumers, which is what legislation mandates for in most states/counties.

stfu and never quote me again you nigger

totally normal all these posts

And Google abusing isps is somehow a good thing? I hope you understand that net neutrality is just as much of a corporate ploy as no net neutrality.

Anytime you think government is the solution to a problem, you are already fucked. Net neutrality was government pretending to be your hero while sucking facebook cock for cash.

How is Google abusing ISPs? The only content they send out is in response to requests for content from customers who paid the isp for access to the net, and Google and the like also pay for fat pipes to the internet themselves. Side with whatever side you want but at least make an informed decision. The tech doesn't work that way. If ISPs are clogged it's because they oversold their abilities to actually provide reliably the speed they advertise instead of A ) upgrading their stuff to accommodate more traffic or B ) Telling new customers "fuck off, we're full".

STOP SPAMMING THIS BOARD WITH SHITPOSTS ABOUT NET JEWTRALITY YOU FUCKING FAGGOTS

NO ONE CARES GO BACK TO R3DDIT YOU FUCKING NERDS

FUCK OFF REEEEE

Blocking vpns or attempts to go to unintended places is pleb tier for a provider.

Government issued NN in response to ISPs attempting to redefine their industry after we taxpayers paid for their backbone on their promises of a free and open internet. We paid for their shit because that's what they promised and then attempted to change the game when the internet got more popular.

NN isn't about blocking sites you retard, they already chased stormfront off WITH NN. fucking kys

To clarify, I would like a real way around NN without govt intervention as long as as could get rid of the bullshit that keeps new ISPs from entering the market.

It will only be easier without NN

go back to The_Donald

Sup Forums got blocked from hosting sites. Service providers under NN are required to give anyone access so if TDS wanted to they could start their own hosting service with a pipe from an ISP and get back online. Without NN they can't even do that. ISPs being unable to throttle or block things maintains the ability of people to still reach a global audience.

THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY, FUCKFACE

...

...

The content of this post is unavailable for standard customers in: United States

Please upgrade your internet subscription to the Comcast Deluxe Package to load this content.

>blocking an autism cancer containment site
Great idea!

>>>/reddit/

Too bad were all block from mainstream sites too bud

Just let amerimutts fuck themselves.

This isn't amazon.com where you can simply buy from another producer if they have a different price. This is YOUR HOUSE. ISP's have monopolies on areas.

Don't like the internet plan? JUST MOVE TO A NEW HOUSE LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. Want another ISP in your area? sorry no local competition allowed and comcast has agreed with us (verizon) not to supply to this area :).

You always know someone's a shill when they start using the "bootlicker" buzzwords. Try and be a bit less obvious.

That isnt what that means moron. It means stats cant force ISPs to allow citizens to access legal content. So now instead of sites just bending to the will of the law they also need to bend to the will of comcast who is the parent company of CNN. Congraats Sup Forums youre being raided and fucked by the parent company of CNN.

Someone redpill me on Nixon, was he impeached because he was against the juice?

notice the lack of reply, it's all shitty trumptard talking points with no merit.

muh obama
muh pre-2015
muh innovation stifling
muh megacorps abusing poor isps

Bitch look at the fucking internet speed in Europe, TRIPLE the speed and 1/3rd the cost and thats because they have actual competition. The ISPs already fuck americans hard and with the NN repeal they will fuck us even harder. I hope Ajit Pai dies in a housefire

>Comcast and Verizon agree not to interfere with each other
>you refuse to speak to them or take their bribes and spread reach all over country
>the eternal cable jew is dead

>more than one company is a monopoly
user you dont seem to know what a monopoly is

Hey retard this is America. ISPs are a monopoly for the majority of citizens, where its either Comcast or no internet. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Yes they throttled the website

move along, shill
Net Neutrality = giving control of the internet to the government, i.e. the same people those big ISPs and shit bribe in their favor.
If you're for NN, you're exact same retards who would vote for anything if it's packaged well enough. The government is not your friend. They are the elite's friend. Once you understand this, you will realize that the only way to keep these corporations accountable is with a robust free market competition. A lack of that is what lead to the problems we could potentially (and I do mean only potentially) have now with the current paradigm. If you're not working to promote less market intervention by the state, you're doing nothing but compounding a problem even further into horror.

>you refuse to speak to them or take their bribes and spread reach all over country
yes goy live without Internet that will show those jews

>3 companies ruled by a couple of fat jews who meet for lunch everyday while pretending to be competiton isnt a monopoly
Ok lad
Its a monopoly because they chose to let it be a monopoly. They work together to maximize profits. If someone didnt work with them and didnt work just to maximize profits, the monopoly is broken
By you i mean another internet/cable company, not a person

we must be NET NEUTRALITY absolutists

THEY CAN DESTROY Sup Forums

Further listening:
youtube.com/watch?v=8j95dVw6Kbc

youtube.com/watch?v=5Z_nBhfpmk4&t=254s

kek

>move along, shill
No Net Neutrality = giving control of the internet to the greedy ISPs, i.e. the same people that payed politicians millions to get this passed
>If you're not for NN, you're exact same retards who would vote for anything if it's packaged well enough and supported by trump. The ISPs are not your friend. They are the elite's friend. Once you understand this, you will realize that the only way to keep these corporations accountable is to keep NN until a robust free market competition can be put in place (repeal local ISP laws preventing local ISP competition). A lack of that is what lead to the problems we could potentially (and I do mean only potentially) have now with the current paradigm. If you're not working to promote less market intervention by the state, you're doing nothing but compounding a problem even further into horror.

Until there is a solution to the competition problem, saying "competition will stop the greedy as fuck ISPs that have throttled in the past with proof and do anything to price gouge" is actually retarded and you are an absolute retard if you think anything good will come of repealing NN.

>Posting your fantasy worst case scenario

>Implying that the other user's fantasy best case scenario is incorrect.

Just fucking kill yourself already. Stop implying shit is going to happen before anything happens.

>government creates regulations that cause regional monopolies
But lets give that same government a national monopoly. That definitely couldn’t be a bad idea.

worse, he was a republican

if a Canadian ever quotes my post again I might have to kill myself

>burgers can't afford to post on Sup Forums
>quality of the board goes up 1488%
The sooner you mongrels are gone, the better.
Sup Forums is a white board.

>No Net Neutrality = giving control of the internet to the greedy ISPs, i.e. the same people that payed politicians millions to get this passed
Is that why the top 2 and 3 biggest donators to the in the 2012 election were the the two biggest telco firms Comcast & AT&T, whose contributions went heavily towards the Democrats?

>Until there is a solution to the competition problem, saying "competition will stop the greedy as fuck ISPs that have throttled in the past with proof and do anything to price gouge" is actually retarded and you are an absolute retard if you think anything good will come of repealing NN.
Except that you are not solving the competition problem by giving regulatory control to the state. You are doing the exact opposite. You are making it far worse by centralizing even more power into the hands of fewer people who wield a monopoly on violence. This power is always wielded by the people with the money to influence it. You should be lobbying for an abolition of franchise rights in areas that grant monopolies to a provider from the state. That is the cause of all of our problems, not a lack of government intervention. Net Neutrality is the next logical step from local monopolies. It federalizes the issue.

>no traffic from America
>Sup Forums shuts down because lolnoadrevenue

So when you are going to leave?

I live in NY, anything the fed comes up with will be better than whatever lawmakers here want to anally rape me with, then tax me for cumming into my asshole

>No Net Neutrality = giving control of the internet to the greedy ISPs
Also another thing on this, you are still giving control to the ISPs with NN. You're giving it to the govt, who is in turn bribed by the ISPs to act in their favor. You're going in the wrong direction and playing right into their hands.

Do it cuck. Post proof after you die.

Gonna be laughing when no sites are blocked and faceberg and netflix are forced into bankruptcy. Then you paid corporate shills will have to get real jobs.

ITT: reddit and libtards shilling

Is that why the only people that want this passed are republicans and all the 50 people who wanted to jepordize you internet privacy were all republicans?

I'm not saying all dems are better, in fact a lot of them are also turboshills and should be eradicated. But republicans are FAR worse about it.

>Except that you are not solving the competition problem by giving regulatory control to the state.

No but you are stopping the problem from getting worse.
>You are making it far worse by centralizing even more power into the hands of fewer people who wield a monopoly on violence.

how can you be this stupid, with the government in control (AS IT IS NOW) no content is blocked, you can go make any website you wish and it can be accessed by anyone. You don't get throttled for going to certain websites as well. By giving it to the ISPs you GIVE THEM THE ABILITY TO DO THIS and "oh we promise won't do that" when there is verifyable proof they were throttling netflix back in 2013

google.com/search?q=comcast throttling netflix&oq=comcast throttling ne&aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57j0l4.3967j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

fuck off libtard

We're already Jewed with net neutrality. It would be another story if they disallowed the isp's for lobbying and writing the laws the in first time and changing rules to gain tax payer money and then changing the rules back again after they got the money so they then don't fall under the rules it tries to regulate. Not to mention it stifles competition. And what are these companies doing who are backing net neutrality? They are hypocrites when they cry the isp companies are going to stifle choice. Pfffttt.... They are already doing that totheir customer base by demonetizing and/or banning you because they don't like the content.

As a principle, I don't like Nazi LARP but that image is too great.

Me too. He's so dishonest in his long interview he did saying that only obscure backwoods ISPs tried to implement traffic regulation when fucking Verizon was suing the FCC to be able to do it on a large scale.

I've been in 12 of these threads and I am pretty sure the anti-NN crowd here is no more than a dozen idiots at this point. And like you said, they either don't respond when you actually tell them in detail how their understanding of it is wrong or they just call you a shill.

Your response about someone breaking their stranglehold would be correct but there's so much red tape here that even Google can't break into the market. If we do want NN repealed they need to implement major reforms or reforms first. Also, we taxpayers funded the backbone here that the big 3 own so they can get fucked if they think they can keep that after selling it to the public on the promise of open internet.

>Speeds in Europe
They have a much higher population density and much less land to cover with infrastructure. They can tax more and the money will cover more population than in the US

youtube.com/watch?v=8bUuvfDmsAs

>Support Net Neutrality
>Support the government regulating the shit out of the internet and making it so Comcast is the only ISP that can thrive
Fun fact. The classification of the internet as a telecommunications service rather than an information service ended up allowing the government to instill draconian regulations that fucked with the majority of smaller ISPs that could have competed with Comcast.
But keep fighting the "good fight" backed by your friends at Google and Netflix that use Net Neutrality as an excuse to save money.

>listening to this cringey low test beta fag

>Posting a literal Soros NGO image

You have to go back.

>with the government in control (AS IT IS NOW) no content is blocked
Daily stormer has been kicked off over a dozen domain name registrars since August.

Hillary Clinton was all for Net Neutrality. She even wants to filter content before it even makes it to the internet.

youtube.com/watch?v=-uK4uo77i9M

That should tell you something

You can't reason with redditors. They're actually retarded and just repeat whatever Soros or Ford foundation memes have been astroturfed over at /r/cuckoldry

>Paul Joseph Retard
Discarded

They don't regulate the internet, they regulate the companies to stop them from fucking customers.

>muh stiffling competition meme
get rid of the local ISP bans and then we'll talk about getting rid of regulation, until then, I'll keep NN and so will 99% of the people online that support keeping NN. You are a contrarian because you are a stupid individual that wants to feel smart by thinking he's in "the know". guarantee your iq is below 100

While true, that has nothing to do with it, we, the tax-payers, payed for the US ISP infrastructure, there is no restriction on the speeds they can supply with their current infastructure other than they have no incentive to do so. Notice how in areas with google fiber the ISPs offer faster speeds for lower costs? spoiler alert: Thats the same infrastructure thats in every other town they supply internet to.

That was not the government's doing, that was the domain service that they purchased the name from. Not the government. The Domain Service Providers have nothing to do with the government.

now this I don't agree on.

youtube.com/watch?v=0kkaY5lJLMk

>That was not the government's doing
Yes it was. The only institution with the power to get them kicked off of such a wide range of registrars would be the government. Anguilla actually sent military to force the guy who runs the registrar to shut them down. It's a government shut down.

Say it with me.

>THE

>PATRIOT

>ACT

Maybe we're getting Jewed either way?

>Faceberg asnd Jewtube support "Net Neutrality" and censorship of rightwing opinions
>Trump supports the end of actual Net Neutrality and endorses limits on free speech

Either way we lose. There is no middle ground in this debate.

reddit is actually the one that supports net neutrality

Wrong, you are just misinformed.
nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/godaddy-daily-stormer-white-supremacists.html

>no law that government ever passes has you in mind
>remember, the better sounding the title the worse it is

>FCC Shills have named this the "Restoring Internet Freedom Act".
>passed by government.
>controlling your speech

This retard contradicts himself in the first 3 minutes you expect me to watch the rest of this?

so why change the status quo and let the jew isps that already give you 1/3 of the speed for triple the price?

I would try to defend this couple if it ever came down to it.

This does seem like a setup for a lose-lose situation. Need to just collectively say "FUCK OFF OUR INTERNET"

If only there was an entire world outside of the internet, guess I'll have to give up all my sheckles to continue living behind a computer screen.

Saying net neutralitys bad is like saying the 1st ammendament regulates your speech

Most people don't have a choice in their ISP because the wires in the ground are owned by one or two companies at most.

Will this change that in any way?

>literally only one ISP in my entire area
>Sup Forums tells me to boycott them if they ban anything
so what the fuck am I supposed to do?

I have a dumb question:

How does the government regulate enforce Net neutrality ??

I find it hilarious that many Turks in Turkey appear at least as white as Italians, Spaniards, and Portuguese, but the ones who migrate to Europe all look like Gypsies and Arabs.