Theory tying Saudi Arabia in with Mandalay Bay Shooting

I'll repost with a recap for discussion, thanks to the first user for the cap

>be Saudi Arabia, afraid of fracking overtaking oil empire
>donate fuck me money to HRC so she will illegalize fracking when she wins election
>Trump wins, oh fuck
>we'll wait it out and make oil cheap so fracking flunks
>US estimates 50 years of energy from fracking alone, just as cheap
>oh.
>have to make deal with Trump
>he says ok, but only if they stop Syrian terrorists, become more liberal
>also no more giving money to American politicians
>that's fine
>suddenly women can drive, Syria clearing out ISIS
>some princes don't like it and plan to assassinate the king and another lib prince to secure a stricter throne via the next heir
>one prince (unsure if pro or anti liberal) owns Four Seasons atop Mandalay Bay and the lib prince may have booked it for a week, total speculation
>angry princes hire assassins, all plan to buy guns to kill lib prince
>set up deal with CIA disguised as terrorists with Paddock as the contact
>room is just a few floors below Four Seasons
>some private intel team learns of it and literally nothing goes according to plan
>try to extract lib prince
>assassins try to intercept in the airport and other places, some die but prince is intact, whisked away
>meanwhile two princes heading assassination left alone in Mandalay, no prince to assassinate
>can't get caught, wing it
>kill Paddock, fire on crowd (mags weren't loaded hence ridiculous time span between volleys)
>SWAT shows up, they becomes an heroes
>SWAT sees two dead Saudi princes and Paddock, hide princes and snap photos of Paddock only
>one month later, missile intercepted in SA, may have been Hail Mary to kill the King
>the next heir who promised to instill a stricter throne dies the same day, along with massive raid of other Saudi princes

>what's next? maybe indirect exposition of Saudi Arabian ties to DNC after interrogating those princes

Discuss.

Other urls found in this thread:

28pages.org/the-declassified-28-pages/
youtu.be/0u9zEmEIVi4
youtube.com/watch?v=YVHmshtmDqo
twitter.com/AnonBabble

you're doing tl;dr wrong. have a bump, but do it right next time faggot

yeah maybe, cap is kind of dense

That's the best theory I've seen so far. I'm a conspiracy theorist, not a coincidence theorist, so it'd be foolish to ignore the Saudi connections and happenings.

I'm always skeptical when someone proposes that the DNC is somehow going to be outed for anything, seems like too big a web to unweave for the American people.

Also may hold some corroborative info

The lib prince in the OP is actually the Crown Prince in that thread, who made the arrests. Talal owns the Four Seasons

Also this

FFS I'm starting to think this is all leaked info. Multiple posts on /pol throughout the weeks all say the same thing

Oh shit

thanks for the bump, lots of slide threads on /pol tonight

there's no such thing as a tl;dr for this tbqhfam
>we know we have big issues, and this "theory" flows smoothly
>we have a problem at the Feeb-level, that no one seems to have the blalls to address
>we have serious issues with CIANiggers, who forgot why they ever existed. now mired in spy v. spy for so long, they don't really know who to trust, until that individual is dirty and has something on this rock which they love, care about and don't want to lose
>when law enforcement neither obeys nor enforces the law; we are living under anarchy/WROL by definition and by default

>the theory is that each party is controlled opposition for the other
>thus; if one wing of the same bird is damaged beyond repair, the whole bird is lost

this is the most interesting theory i've seen so far

hey retard, actual leftist here. Hillary Clinton loves fracking, her state dept brought fracking to the world. she was never going to make it illegal. Your theory makes no fucking sense.

>illegalize
she was also considering banning it i heard
>ban off
bannon
>ban off
>bannon
>ban off
>bannon

Why so upset faggot? It's not even my story

Yes but how would this blow up into something bigger than the DNC getting funded by a country who in turn funds terrorists? No one would care all that much

because Saudi Arabia did 9/11 and I want you idiots to get it right. Read the 28 pages- start there.

28pages.org/the-declassified-28-pages/

uh guys.. have you seen this?
youtu.be/0u9zEmEIVi4

>I want you idiots to get it right
You're not just some normal shill, you're a LARPer! The sure sign of a LARPer is one who claims to have insider info but is also unbelievably condescending to /pol users for "not getting it right"

Fuck outta here

there doesn't seem to be a downside to getting rid of the entire bird, kicking out the legacy players, and bringing in new blood that hasn't had a chance yet to become corrupted

But it's that step from rounding up corrupt Saudi princes to exposing DNC officials that I'm not understanding here. What could DNC have done with SA that would get the legacy players kicked out? Not asking you just generally

this is anecdotal, however;
>if we can established a trend where politicians bow out due to allegations/charges of "inappropriate touching", imagine something much worse could come from taking Billions to deceive the US public
>currently, the low hanging fruits are the Feebs and LVMPD. both have some splainin ado
>read: take out the foundation and the whole structure weakens

If the FBI had anything to do with the gun deal, I wonder if it could have been exposed by the Saudi princes

>believing the incoherent ramblings of a psychotic incel

Everytime..

I'm not larping, I'm just saying read the 28 pages because it lays out pretty clearly where you need to start if you want to understand 9/11 and Saudi... fuckface

Hey kid....enough, ok?

Do me a favor and log off for a bit..

So this is why Sup Forums is being slide.

>bumpity

Thanks guy. Weird shit indeed. Eventually threads like these will harbor shills, once the nn threads die

user, the influx of nn threads in the last 5 minutes are because of this thread. This is the shit they really don't want us talking about, nn is the distraction.

bump

>being this new

I'm really just trying to help you understand, take it or leave it.

Pig

There's no reason to misdirect anyone from this thread, it's a discussion of what has been posted. You're like the shills who say 'time to sleep, I'm so sleepy, don't read this,' etc

Israel did vegas

No I'm not you literal retard. I'm telling you to read the declassified pages of the 9/11 report that directly relate to Saudi Arabia. It is part and parcel with this insane conspiracy you're trying to construct. If you want to actually understand the relationships, you should probably know about how the saudi pilots were being put up by saudi officials on government payroll who mysteriously left the country right before the attacks. Jesus fuck.

They really are making em dumb these days. Not that Sup Forums was particularly smart ever, but you newfags are SO new

Fuck you, you're the one telling me this shit is wrong and that you have the info to prove it, why don't you tell me how you're right faggot

Otherwise fuck off

was the current crown Prince in Las Vegas when this happened?

Yes, that was who they tried to assassinate according to the OP. Some conflicting info out there though, saying that the king was also in LV when the shooting happened, but the OP says he was in Russia

>panicking FBIs first move is to release pic to Sup Forums

lmao COMPED

This theory is what made me finally break and start considering some of the deeper conspiracy shit involving the Vegas shooting.

For all of the people killed, and the sheer ridiculousness of the situation it's simply gone too long without any information coming out. Someone wants this shit to fall off the face of the Earth, and it's someone with a little more authority than fucking MGM Grand.

I don't know if this theory is correct, or partially correct, or if it's something completely different... All I know is that something fucking stinks, and they aren't telling us shit about it.

No motive, no reason, no warning signs, no nothing... Just an old dude, successful, predictable, shoots the fucking shit out of a concert from a high rise hotel, with an absolutely absurd amount of rifles on hand.

It just makes so little fucking sense that there has to be more to it than meets the eye.

The FBI/CIA fronting the guns would be a good reason for them to want this dropped if it's true

The grace.

how do we know that MBS was in vegas?

cuz that certainly changes the game

I'm starting to think Paddock was a spook. Whoever did the actual shooting figured him out, wasted him, and then commenced fire.

Either they got taken out by FBI/CIA and deleted from the crime scene, or they escaped.

FYI Jesus Campos he was not. Whoever he was, they killed him.

Ah, well actually I did say that it was pure speculation. We don't know. Best evidence is pic related in , but it's just a blurry picture. Looks an awful lot like the prince though

That Paddock was a spook has been thrown around too. Honestly even though these small details have huge implications as to how deep the rabbit hole goes, most of the info posted out there is pretty similar

Wow I wonder why this thread is nearly gone.
Bump.

another bump

Thx m8, I'm going to bed. I'm sure there is more to connect here, just have to read between the lines

Bumpadump

Bumpo. The evidence just makes this the most credible theory. Everything about this smells very, very fishy.

Christ, this same bullshit cover story, and always with the same echo-chamber shill support comments.

There is *no* physical evidence showing:

* "Stephen Paddock" is anything other than a burner government identity. So far it's just a name in database fields
* The "Stephen Paddock" identity was a single human being
* That single human being was even in Las Vegas at the time of the government op
* The body in the suite was "Stephen Paddock"
* The body in the suite was in any way associated with what happened on the ground

Any story that speculates about "Paddock" - when there's no evidence showing "Paddock" ever existed - has no more validity than arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. At best it's nonsensical, and at worst it acts as support for the government's cover story by accepting the (utterly unproved) contention "Paddock" was even real, or any of the things in LV that were photographed had the causes the government claims.

The big plan for Las Vegas, the part that was foiled, was that it was supposed to be a new Israeli+Saudi+Deep State 9/11 - destroying parts of LV and pushing the US into world war against Israel's enemy Iran (via North Korea).

And because the US is as likely to expose their Israeli and Saudi partners as they are to reveal who killed Kennedy, the government will push whatever cover story bullshit they feel like until people give up and stop asking questions.

Las Vegas was supposed to be a new 9/11, to wrest control of US military policy away from Trump and start another war for Israel.

youtube.com/watch?v=YVHmshtmDqo
I was seeing a lot of footage of that Saudi "Future Investment Initiative 2017" with the Prince. If the guy in vid↑ is not the Prince, being frantically escorted out, then I'm a goddamn Chinaman.

This theory made a lot of sense to me. But, now, since I heard about Joele Frank muddying the info
waters with shills, idk what to think.

Www.thefreethoughtproject.com/pr-firm-hired-mandalay-bay-exposed-pushing-conspiracy-theories/