Are right-wingers the real cucks? I actually think they are. Think about the typical Sup Forums shitposter...

Are right-wingers the real cucks? I actually think they are. Think about the typical Sup Forums shitposter. He will denounce any higher education which isn't STEM because it leads to a secure career path. Basically a safe bet, without much risk. "OMFG YOU STUDIED PSYCHOLOGY? HAVE A NICE TIME IN MCDONALDS MATE".

The ring wing mind is scared and afraid, and sees hostility everywhere, which makes them bad at handling risk. That's why they want to work towards a risk free utopia, which is somehow thought to have existed in the past, when America was white and shit.

cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/differences-in-negativity-bias-underlie-variations-in-political-ideology/72A29464D2FD037B03F7485616929560

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-E-P_g75ciM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

living proof that the left cant meme

Its not an attempt to meme. These are facts well-documented by research.

>Bad at handling risk
Handling risk is literally what free market capitalism is you dummy, unless you're talking about natsoc right wingers which I dont think you are.

I know spelling errors lol its past 4 AM

Literally my brain

youtube.com/watch?v=-E-P_g75ciM

I am not talking about the economic left and right, no. I am talking about value based conservatism and its rebirth in the various alt-right movements.

The leftists who make these types of images are sheltered though.
Usually they are latte sipping nu-male cuck soyboys who live in gated sheltered white communities or in posh rich areas of cities where they usually associate with other white people and maybe a few token minorities for posture.
Leftists can mock us from their ivory tower pedestal because we ensure that they are protected in a comfy decadent society.
Take away the Conservative White Man and leftists would be stomped into jelly within a few minutes by various minorities.

>pic related
>not pityfull attempt to meme
goyim i

>implying any of those things are wrong
A thread died for this
Sega

>"...isn't STEM because it leads to a secure career path. Basically a safe bet, without much risk."
holy fuck nice try with the bait you dumb nigger

The (((alt-right))) have always been here. THey have been just in different forms; the Democrats, the KKK, the Communists, the Nazis, you name it. Nothing has changed except name and figurehead.

this

I just found a random pic to fit my argument. This isn't a meme.

I will answer all of you soon.

Even different from the (((alt-right))) to its predecessors is that they are the underdogs in modern politics, a direct reaction to the anit-white, anti-straight, and anti-male hatred circulated in the educated system and in the job market. The reason of their "hatred and bigotry" is entirely your party's fault, OP.

Found the original

Is this a poe? I can't tell.
Its like they are trying to take the flaws of the left and project them onto the right.

>He will denounce any higher education which isn't STEM because it leads to a secure career path.
Incorrect. We mostly mock art studies, feminist/race studies.
>The ring wing mind is scared and afraid, and sees hostility everywhere, which makes them bad at handling risk.
Ohoho. You really think fear motivates people on the right? Really? It's disgust. Right-wingers getting pissed off when someone burns their flag or mocks things they deem sacred: that's disgust. And what do you do with things that disgust you? Send them away or move away, and if you can't do that: destroy it.

You forgot reliance on welfare.

Don't forget forget blatant racism as well.

...

I'm waiting, DemOP, still here.

This would be true if Sup Forums and Sup Forums was exclusively a place for fascism to organise. This is of course not the case. My case is clear and explicit, and I want a proper debate on the issue.

Just read the link I provided.

>Incorrect. We mostly mock art studies, feminist/race studies.
Ok? What about for instance political science? Sociology? Anthropology? Philosophy?

Fear is healthy. Individuals and species without fear go extinct. Leftists don't fear enough. It's not a cowardly fear, like the left has with their tendency to try to promote peace and love in a species hostile to itself. It's an existential fear needed for survival.
However leftists want to believe, with all these laws and international agreements, we are still cavemen inside. Our tech changed but our instincts and behavior didn't. Conservatives come from ancestors that defended the tribe from the dangers of outside tribes. Leftists come from ancestors that often turned on their own tribe to ally with stronger invaders. Both may be viable survival strategies in a pre-industrial civilization.
However, only one promotes the defense and order of civilization while the other promotes the breakdown and turnover of civilizations. The inevitability of civilization turnover could be prevented if leftists were not so existentially bored, quick to break down traditions that work, and always tempted to aid and abet enemies of civilization or their home civilization to one-up and remove their internal political enemies.

You make it sound like all the rich people vote Democrats and all the working class votes Republican. This is ridiculous.

thats white hate

or you mean how they treat niggers as pets?

White hate. It's still racism if the hatred is directed toward what would be considered the majority.

If this was true and deterministic to the degree you suggest, it would be impossible for someone to change their political position. It would also be close to impossible to be left wing if both your parents were right wing.

Your pseudo-intellectual quasi-evolutionary babble has nothing to do with reality.

it does actually. Those behavioral genes pass down as sure as eye color.

that is, you can change your position, but you will always lean one way because of your genetic behavioral markers borne of ancient survival strategies that are now obsolete.

Your way of thinking is yet another example of the refusal of uncertainty of the right wing mind. Since it is impossible for you to accept that the world around you is complex and multi-faceted, you just go for the simple, reductionist, "common sense" view of some outdated evolutionary model, and then you call it truth.

Lazy.

Those are decent, barring maybe philosophy on the grounds that I don't really think it's currently reasonable taking on a six figure debt to quote Epictetus. If money in time aren't a constraint: learn whatever you want, just don't expect it to put a roof over your head.

>Psychology degree
>Safe bet, without much risk

You have a useless degree confused with a business degree and social competence, the real easy peazy secure career path.

You're either an autist in STEM or the trades, a retard in the trades, or a normie in business.

Understood.

If you have a pair of balls and some ambition, and you like Philosophy, you do a PhD and become a Professor. That's not a bad career.

what if political positions are mediated by levels of various hormones?

>oxytocin increases racism

Not impossible. I do not discard explanatory models with strong biological variables. What I denounce is this ever-speculating evolutionary babble about tribes and shit, like one of the previous posts.

But at the same time, I am convinced that political opinion can be rendered from experiences too. If your ideology is based on prejudice, it might suddenly implode when presented with enough experiences suggesting otherwise.

The point of communism is to eliminate the “risk”.
Sage

Yeah, I agree. But the risk I was talking about initially is a different type of risk. This is one involving normative positions on career paths, and the dangers of different races -- well generally people that are different from yourself. They are dangerous, according to the right. And paradoxically, these policies (based on fear) makes them dangerous.

Come on Sup Forums, roast me.

Democrat policies make niggers not dangerous right ? Like in Detroit Chicago and Baltimore

We need a more long-term change and elimination of structural racism, and enable real social mobility. Only then can niggers be un-niggered.

>We need a more long-term change and elimination of structural racism
Whites have left Detroit for 50 years, it has only become worse.
Niggers gonna nig

conservatives have always been more keen to weed out "threats"

it's why liberals seem so ungrateful to most conservatives, liberals never realize the achievements it took to make this society and keep it safe and sane.

nor are liberals willing to consider risks or take on the burdens of accomplishing those achievements.

I agree, but there's a matter of degree. Ideologically I'm a centrist, and I do think we need some Conservatism.

And pic related is why fascism is a right wing ideology. It is order on steroids, and this absurd degree of order and control is legitimized through issues of security.

>go 30k into debt just to get a job at starbucks
>conservatives are bad at handling risk

Well move to detriot then, nigger

>Conservatives are ok with them going 30k into debt because they want to avoid the risk of inflation associated with subsidized education.

I think you have a point but conservatives can't accept it, because for them might makes right and under that pretense their fellow citizens and taxpayers are there to take advantage of their weakness and not to live their own fulfilling life.

Conservatives don't have brains that big

>And pic related is why fascism is a right wing ideology.
Nah, that is why it is an ideology that stemmed from the reality of industrialism and modernism.

The most liberal of societies (Africa) is a shitfest, Their liberty is reduced by the liberty of others.
Fascism could have born out into a greater freedom after analysis and propogation of a stable sensibility in people (internal order) by the system.

Now you just have an order of neoliberal manipulation anyway. It favours those at the top and they instill order to secure their position.

why am I considered to be greedy for wanting to keep my money, while you aren't greedy for wanting to take my money?

How "right-wing" do you imagine a socialism can be?

State systems are not set up based on what statesmen perceive as what is "safe" against what is "free", those are just silly buzzwords, in reality every issue comes down to what you can do (real or perceived) and what the reaction from the system will be.

Some states consider that rights of an individual to be incomparable to the rights of the State, view them as separate entities. Some states consider rights of individual to be less significant that those of the state (the good of the many, and so forth), those are the socialist states.

Do you know which socialist states practice labor camps, persecution of "undesirables" and such, while destroying social mobility? All of them, every single fucking one. Which wasn't an exception for national-socialism.

Assuming you aren't a shill, you will easily figure out this is the true, even if you don't want to believe it. You have a list of your own of people who deserve the noose.

Although to be fair, it's not a transgression to fall for the subversion bullshit, when you are young. Young people like simple and stupid solutions, that's just how things are.

But no, there is no way to spin fascism as "right-wing" without references to buzzwords that aren't clearly defined, and ultimately mean nothing.

ftfy

I'm not really seeing a problem in your pic there OP. Is there a point you were trying to make or were you just here to prove that, once again, the left can't meme.

Because you are greedy when you overprice me, but I haven't been greedy yet.

>it's all I can figure in muh context
That's because you've a very low IQ.

>arguing with a leftist

bruh dont waste your time

>le brain profile meme
checkmate conservatives

>-phobia
>-phobia
My disgust and hate for mudslimes and faggots are based on facts. They're the irrational ones, not me.

Geez, all those facts you posted that are completely factual and by no means rely on circular reasoning in an echo chamber really made me think.

>IM LITERALLY INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING THE OPINIONS OF MY OPPOSITION
>THIS IS APPARENTLY A GOOD THING SOMEHOW

Regards a full-on Natsoc form spurdoland, not out of hate, but out of love for my own.

Substitute teacher spotted

>now obsolete
good goy

>150583558
I have a pic for this

Attention seeker lol

>If they take out your eyes you stop having an opinion about other people's paintings.

>And become a professor
If that's the only job you can use that skill that's not very useful. One of the biggest issues with relying on jobs that the only real career path is become a teacher is that a lot of other people have thought of this already therefore the positions themselves may not be available since someone else may have already gotten that job at every University you find.

>I blame conservatives for the fact that my shitty degree can't get me a job: the post.

> under that pretense their fellow citizens and taxpayers are there to take advantage of their weakness
Nah. I understand your concepts of "weakness" and "might" though.

CONSERVATIVE thought is that there are forces that take advantage of EVERYONES weakness and that by not "playing it safe" people will fall to those forces, they create a protective barrier to others FOLLY by disincentivizing overly ambitious leaps with reminders that the risks are their own. So it is the weakness in everyone.

think about the issues they revolve around, things like "sin" , "personability", "consistancy", "Values", "Fiscal responsibility"

They don't want them to go into $30k of debt in the first place. This is why having some forms of state intervention is ("should be") consistant with non-nihilist conservative values. You want to make sure you have a consistant roll out of the skills that stabilize society. America never gets reassurances that it is not just another scam that will baloon out of control however.

Exactly hide the slide this place has been flooded, this is the board last night

I don't know if it's my deffective leftist brain.

But those scary things don't seem so scary to me, mostly due to first hand exposure to them, and the measures the right wingers propose to prevent them, sound way more scary than anything they complain about.

The typical Sup Forums user [ The genuine organic ones] are more than likely 20 something, early 30 something oldfags from old Sup Forums . Most of these people made Sup Forums what it was and left when it was infiltrated by trap porn and candy asses.
Sup Forums is closer to what Sup Forums was in 2009 because its the same gents; obsessed with truth and lulz.

its actually quite remarkable to see. but sadly I feel the time here is coming to an end. Sup Forums became too relevant and suffered an influx of summerfags. Looking back I'm sure the trap porn and anti Christian threads were a ploy.

Anyways.. point is you cant tell Sup Forums they are conservatives, that's probably an understatement. We are just the result of hyper subjectiveness to a reality that was attempting to pull wool over the western world.
You can call it conservatism if you want but its simply an acknowledgement of the psyops and resisting them.

candyass candyass
newt gingritch
the people republic
roodypoo roodypoo roodypoo.

You can't meme and be politically correct at the same time, the whole point of a meme to to propagate and cause offense..

>but I haven't been greedy yet.
Unless you were forced to fork over the cash at gunpoint (which would clearly be moving goalposts..), then yes, you have been greedy. The very fact that you gave money with the expectation of something in return implies that you value that good or service more than you value whatever you used to pay for it with. Hence, I find it hard to believe you were "overpriced" given you could have, at any time, turned around and walked away if you truly believed you could get a better deal somewhere else. You are no more exploited by the seller than you are exploited by nature insofar as you are forced to eat, drink water and maintain homeostasis to survive.

I expected better of you augusto...

Only cucked soyboys would study that. Pretty useless.

Yes, it is. It’s on the level of studying women’s or African studies lol.

>Unless you were forced to fork over the cash at gunpoint


Funny use of words.

Bro, here's the thing:

the left can't meme

also,
your projection power is over 9 Gorillion, Schlomo

ancaps believe the only legitimate means of acquiring property is through homesteading and voluntary exchange. since stealing a bunch of (stolen) land with a military coup doesn't exactly fall under either of those categories, no, pinochet wasn't an ancap if that's what you're getting at.

Nope I'm just saying taxation it's thief.

This is projection, but as you’re so sure of yourself, you’ve conflated your opinion as fact. Trying to correlate politics and neurological functions, regardless of where conducted, is apples and oranges.

And condescension via generalizing conservatives’ intellect is justification for your protecting your burnt tendies or, convention. You’d be best off not interpreting data without first drawing correlation as causation, and questioning the conclusion, which was already assumed in the research, itself.

I’d honestly kill myself if I were you.

>Politics aren't neurological functions.

On an individual level they are.

But that’s to assume all conservatives align with alt-right.
1. Define alt-right. I fucking dare you.
2. Define all conservative values.
3. Define all leftist values.
4. Notice the logical fallacy in all 3 of the above.

Generalizations serve to polarize, avoiding finding common ground. While you’re busy taking a shit study out of context to confirm your own bias and opinion, you’re blind to the fact that you’re spouting meaningless platitudes to suffice your ego. You’re a pawn as much as anyone you’re purporting to find so beneath you. The game is meant to suck assholes like you in, so you don’t see the big picture, we all get fucked by the political system unless you’re loaded down with cash and have political pull with said capital.

You’re fucking daft. Spew your shiteous self-righteousness in your tumblr echo chamber. For what it’s worth, just because you see reality for what you think it is, does not mean you’re correct. I can find within 3 clicks of search engines that I possibly have cancer. This does not mean I have fucking cancer. You’re talking out your ass.

Alt right it's being conservative in 2017.

*The context of the study and OP’s interpretation.

...

Again, generalization. Unless you have definitive proof, this is a baseless assertion.

What's with the left and democrats enjoying pedophilia so much?
Don't see that in conservative circles?

That's the common ethos for the word, that's how left wingers use it, that's how the MSM use it and that's why the right wing invented it, to distance themselves from the old right wing.

Shhh, it only works if you associate one side with it, to support a shitty argument not based in realism. Helps the media hysteria and leftists to scream the sky is falling.

>all jobs taken
>invent new position
>profit

>correlation equals causation check mate Sup Forums raycists

everyone just shills, they don't care why people actually have some of these opinions

Yfw you realize your $200,000 debt for your SJW Gender Studies degree is never going to lead to the 6 figure do nothing gummint bureaucrat job you thought was a slam dunk because “she won.”

Word salad and veiled attempt to run your point in a circle. Does your back hurt from moving those goalposts? What is your point, then? You’re trying to poke holes at logic but haven’t a stance beyond being contrarian.

I'm sorry.

Show me an example of the word not being used to describe the right wing in 2017?

You do realize your whole reply is based on a very speculative interpretation of OPs motivations, right?

>le scared and afraid right wingers
>gets triggered from clapping
Yeah sure