Wtf I hate net neutrality now

...

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/sdYSL
archive.is/3kApK
archive.is/iezDO
archive.is/zdSTg
archive.is/obODC
archive.is/XaBQA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Isn't that the pro-NN argument? Removing it would mean the government has no power to regulate and control it.

Fake.
Nice try kike.

>removing the gubmint from it means you control and regulate it
at least create a shill post that make some sense

...

...

fake as fuck nigger

Everything need to be controlled at some point. Do you know any aspect of life that is not controlled?

...

>the internet needs to be controlled
Sorry Donny. You can't win this one.

This place.

TOTAL SLAVERY NOW , WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND IT

Lol, it's also controlled by mods, maybe not only by the mods.

Look. Any system that resembles "splitting the bill" is a scam, moreso in USA. NN is "splitting the bill", which is why Jews support it, and that's why it must go down.

Starting threads with a fake Trump tweet should result in a perm ban.

>I support net neutrality

pepe is against net neutrality?

Yup. Kek wills it

He is now that you have summoned him leaf.

The anti-net neutrality stuff is coming from legitimate telecom shills (and AnCap patsies). They like to insist net neutrality is a new thing that Obama only same up with last year and it will hurt the internet even though net neutrality has been a thing since the internet started becoming public and I remember the first rumblings of the battle starting about 11 or 12 years ago.

Basically keeping net neutrality means the internet stays as it was. Getting rid of it means the telecoms get to rape it and gut it like it's a white girl in India. Probably why the pajeet is so for it.

>civic nationalist e-celebs and cuckservatives are against NN

thanks for making me know

kek

More pepe with celebs

They've adapted. Here buddy, did they pay you to actually read the text?
What's the standard for "just and reasonable"? Who decides?

...

That's not a real tweet.. Just FYI CNN is on pol now

This whole net neutrality things smells of psyop to me. I'd rather not take the risk and keeps things as they are now, regardless of Soros' supposed stance on it. Things aren't adding up, but it's far too risky to allow for more monopolies like what happened to the media.

People argue about competition, but the same thing will happen as to what happened when corporations kept buying each other off to become what we see today, 6 large companies dominating the media and working together. No competition at all.

#fakenews, not a real tweet. Just go look at his twitter account.. a teen vogue writer doing py ops on /pol

Also, I've seen lots of obvious "Russian troll" accounts on twitter receiving thousands of upvotes with over 300k followers tweeting about Soros and saying net neutrality is a Soros/Obama operation. I looked at a few of them, and they weren't even active before the election and I didn't see so many that were this blatant (300-800k followers).

Possibly Twitter is using reverse psychology on us?

I'm so confused right now. Title II "net neutrality" is regulation and government control.

And by obvious, I mean that the top replies are normies pointing out the obvious bot. (not troll) I mean they stand out, in the end confirming the normies' doubts about "Le Russianz"

This makes a lot more sense. Thanks for clearing things up.

>Being aware of internets influence on the election
>Wanting to regulate it
Umm no

This is obviously a deal between gov and telecomunication businesses. gov will allow more milking apportunities to the ISPs and they will give up user data in exchange.

It's fucking disgusting how easily people here and on the_donald are shilled into opposing net neutrality with blatant propaganda.

It really makes them look like gullible fools.

Net Neutrality is a fundamental core principle of the internet. It's a fundamental ethical element of cyberspace, in tune with what we called "hacker ethics" back in the day.

Every bit, no matter if it came from google itself or from aunt Selmas knitting homepage, has the same priority when hopping through the web.

It's the same with roads. You can't just buy you way of right on every road and at every crossing, the same road laws and regulations apply to everyone, the google car and the aunt Selmas ford fiesta.

It's a fucking fair System. New guys can enter the market easily and get big if they have a better product. It needs to be defended. It needs to be written in law, and if it was for me, they could make it a fucking Amendment to the constitution.

Reminder that Ajit Pai, the Chairman of the FCC used to be legal consul for Verizon.
Verizon sued the FCC in 2011 claiming that the NN rules put in place a year earlier overstepped the FCCs authority. They lost the case in 2014 with the Supreme Court ruling. Little did they know that their boy Ajit would be appointed FCC commissioner 2 years later.

Or did they?
Dont support corporate sponsored corruption, anons.

Why aren't you faggots reporting fake news?

These anons get it

Personally I think it's fucking hilarious the way so many burgers have been so easily manipulated into believing that Ajit Pai is doing them a favour by allowing corporate monopolies to box in consumers and blackmail (web-based) businesses, all they had to say was "muh fastlanes will be faster"

REALITY CHECK - you never had a choice in the first place, they were always going to get rid of NN... at least most burgers now seem happy to be eternally cucked by AT&T and Comcast while paying for infrastructure upgrades that should have been done years ago

Good Job FCC, you've played these idiots perfectly, reverse shill tactics have paid off this time, CTR take note - this is how it's done

Enjoy your new internet "Freedom" murrica, you earned it

It's coming from people with actual principals.

>I hate socialism except for the internet I need daddy gubmint to protect my internet take my rights away gubmint protect me please telecom guys baddies please gubmint send your police in to control me

>actual principles
you mean people who are too dumb to read into anything themselves so will just blindly follow Trump on everything because "Yeah fuck you Obama" works every time... genius

At least put effort into the bait

Not an argument. Sup Forums has been crying about 'beta cucks' who want the government to protect/provide for them because they can't protect/provide for themselves. These are the socialist soy boys who wants universal min wage, gun restrictions/bans and heavy taxation on the wealthy.

Now suddenly because children like you are worried that mummy won't provide you with the Sup Forums package you, like the soy boys who also can't provide for thgemselves, flock to the government screaming 'PROTECT ME PROTECT ME THE CORPORATIONS ARE EVIL MAN' and you have literally no argument other than memes to support it.

Socialist scum like you should burn.

kill yourself shill rat

Like high school students?

It's the high school students that are so afraid of it because they know mummy won't buy the alt-right script kiddie package.

There's no hidden agenda. George Soros wants Net Neutrality because he owns a gigantic part of Netflix and other media outlets. The tech giants want it because they offer services that use the most bandwidth as well. These outlets would all be hit the hardest if net neutrality is repealed, it's just about money, there isn't some weird political shenanigans going on. You're allowed to share the same opinion as people you hate every once in a while.

pic relevant

In this thread we discuss neighbourhoods and why those overrun with dindus, degeneracy, disease, and desperation are the best ones.

>This historically was the neighborhood where graffiti artists would practice.
Who doesn't appreciate their homes being the practice canvas?
>Katie Leonard, a Denver native just returned after graduating from Harvard with a degree in African-American studies, said the sign “really felt like a fork in my side. This is a historically black neighborhood. Five Points was known as the Harlem of the West.
>Go to Harvard and learn that history only starts when it involves dindus. Pay $252,000.

checked and fake

sage

>not an arguement
neither is your childish ranting nonsense, reminder this website is for over 18s mate
>socialist scum
so wrong it's right
>Sup Forums is a person
erm nope wrong again
>British flag
doubtful but if true then you should know this doesn't affect us in any way yet... you seem pretty mad about it... hmm really makes you think

Consider necking yourself you blatant FCC shill

Retards, giving up net neutrality will result in the quick decline of sites like this one. You can all forget having any sort of "safe space" for so-called extreme free speech once the corporations are controlling everything. You would have to be retarded to think want Pajeet is pushing is a good idea.

what*

Oh fuck sorry cunt I meant to reply to but now my point is invalid as I clicked the wrong post

OK fine Net Nuetrality is bad and if you support it you're a commie soy boy

happy now

Shills can't meme. SAD!

Retarded ad hominem and appeal to authority. Make a coherent argument.

If you support net neutrality you are a fucking newfag from reddit. Years ago Sup Forums and /new/ opposed nn. Dont even pretend you have some oldfag authority and everyone else is a shill.

So now anytime we question what he's doing, all he has to say is "the fake news hates it", and then everyone's like "well then, it must be a good thing. go trump!"

What's the point of changing what isn't broken? The ISPs didn't get their fiefdoms through the free market. Their cleanly divided mini-monopolies are a government program. But now that they've gotten where they have via cronyism, suddenly it's the free market, right? privatize the benefits, socialize the costs. So free market.

Leave the fucking kid actor out of it you degenerate idiot. Why would you make fun of a kid like that just because? He's not even old enough to be political. Fucking kill yourself, bashing children like that and including them in memes disgusts me to the core.

It's low rent genetic fallacy dog shit. Instead of arguing the merits of their case, they just point to Soros.

As soon as she goes OOHHH, face reveals a hook nose.

Seconded for this

Pepe is a shill meme

I love how his sarcasm is so subtle its undetectable to normies.

>expecting Sup Forums to have morals

b-but they subscribed to that girls' youtube channel!

is this, dare I say it, the tweet that destroyed trump?

QUADS HAVE SPOKEN

These are literally the retards fighting for Net Neutrality. They have no idea what it fucking is.

Hint: It's 400 pages of Obama admin regulations. Now you start to wonder why there's so much astro-turfing to keep it.

archive.is/sdYSL
archive.is/3kApK
archive.is/iezDO
archive.is/zdSTg
archive.is/obODC
archive.is/XaBQA

The FTC would be in charge of enforcing net neutrality rules, and the FTC has the power to break up monopolies and separate content providers from service providers.

Don't fall for the NN meme user.