Net Neutrality

Why is net neutrality repeal even being considered? Communication companies would rake in big bucks at the cost of the people, and the main leader pushing for its repeal, Ajit Pai, used to work for Verizon. Something seems sketchy here.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5fJEFK3htS0
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/fcc-will-also-order-states-to-scrap-plans-for-their-own-net-neutrality-laws/
youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM
youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I
torrentfreak.com/images/DOC-347927A1.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=bMKy0_RE9HM
hackernoon.com/more-than-a-million-pro-repeal-net-neutrality-comments-were-likely-faked-e9f0e3ed36a6
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/B03eByZia5I/
broadbandnow.com/All-Providers
technologyreview.com/s/406079/the-origins-of-the-net-neutrality-debate/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

benis

Yeah I guess benis is a good reason

Companies like Verizon and Comcast want to get rid of it so they can charge you more money depending on the website you go to. That's literally it. If you supporting ending net neutrality you're either a retard or pic related.

corporate takeover
trump is stooge
we will save it

wtf i love soros, google, youtube, twitter, facebook, reddit, netflix and other jewish companies now?

Or Pajeet, obviously.

Because Trump is an idiot and was convinced that Net Neutrality has something to do with the Fairness Doctrine. So he put Ajit Pai in charge of the FCC to get rid of it.

This is what happens when you remove net neutrality.

>carrying about the cost of goyflix and porn
Maybe you, faggot. I’ll be getting cut rate ghetto net, which is all I need to load PDFs and text files, while you pay out your ass to maintain your screen addiction.

Oh fuck off. You literally can't think of any valid reasons to support ending net neutrality so you attack the people in favor of ending it. You're so tribalist towards Trump and Republicans that you are incapable of disagreeing with them on any issue even if they're planning on fucking you over and charging you more money.

You mean just like they did before 2015? Wait......they didn't do that then. wtf I love big government dick in my asshole now!

relly maeks u thingk

Reddit is advertising a bot that you text message, and it will send a fax to your local represenitive sayimg how much your support Net Neutrality, how are these things not equally deplorable?

>formatting a message that you have to opt in to sending
vs
>paid bots

NN wasnt even a thing before 2015 and we were fine.

Its a meme.

yeah I hate pre-2015 internet lmao xD

the agenda ajit is pushing makes zero fucking sense considering his background

someone is paying him big bucks, i wonder who

try new shit leddit

Pai confirmed for AnCap

>It's a meme

Sums it up very well.

its so easy to tell who is a newfag and who isnt

What does net neutrality mean for me working as an artist online drawing furry porn for bux? Am I screwed or is the only thing that's going to change is that facebook and youtube are gonna have to dibby up for using internet?

Someone paid for the website, hosting, programmed a bot, created a pre generated generic forms, indexed every state represenitives contact information, for free...out of the kindness of their hearts.....to benefit a political doctrine?

Can somebody quick rundown me on exactly what "net neutrality" is and what it does? I was under the impression it was some classic, high-octane kikery where it does the opposite of what is implied by the name, and it's named as such so normies 'll throw a shitfit when somebody tries to put a stop to the kikery.

>any valid reasons to support ending net neutrality
It is Federal overreach

there are many parts to it. The most significant is, that Internet Service Providers (ISP's) must allow equal access to the entire internet, and can't throttle certain websites.

For example, Comcast might decide to slow down Facebook if Facebook doesn't pay them enough money. These kind of regulations started with telephone companies over 100 years ago. Some service providers would refuse to put calls through to people that used a competing service.

A trojan horse in response to an imaginary problem to allow more federal regulation

Somebody needs to put this dog down..

Our only hope is that Trump steps in and stops this or gets enough people to come together to stop it by bullhorning on twitter or making a youtube video.. The fcc is totally ignoring us and this Pai dude is fucking bad news. This is EXACTLY the reason I voted for him, if he cant stop this then it really doesnt matter who we have in office, the system is broken beyond repair. Im so sick of this plutocratic crony bullshit.
>youtube.com/watch?v=5fJEFK3htS0

The telecoms have been trying to gut net neutrality since 2005. It's just that now they finally have an environment and a thoroughly emasculated "President" to allow it to happen. The Kike wing (Cohn and the like) of the ruling elite put Pajeet Poo-in-Loo in the FCC for the express purpose of getting us to this point.

Actually no nigger, i work at (((comcast))) and their public statement was "we are in support of net neutrality". Really makes you think about about what the bill does.

>inb4 flag
I work as a phone agent. That's ere I got their info

I have confidence that Trump will take the teeth out of it, if he sees the public is strongly against it

This is what happens when you let the Feds regulate ISPs dipshit NN supporters

>FCC will also order states to scrap plans for their own net neutrality laws

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/fcc-will-also-order-states-to-scrap-plans-for-their-own-net-neutrality-laws/

You seriously think that the only sites that will be affected by a net neutrality repeal and the telecoms gaining even greater control over the internet are "liberal" companies and sites like Faceberg, Goyflix, Jewtube, etc. That's rich.

Those sites won't actually be affected, they're far too big and powerful to really face any negative effects or anything beyond mere threats of throttling. People won't care when democracy and their vote is subverted right before their eyes but they sure as shit will care when streaming for Orange is the New Black isn't as fast as they'd like. Well they'll care for five minutes, then go for the upgraded Streaming package in their new ISP plans. Companies like that aren't in any danger.

The problem comes in that many of these companies (telecoms too) are responsible for controlling opinion, pushing poz and all the other fun stuff. Imagine when your ISP begins restricting access to certain sites it might deem as "dangerous" or "extremist" for pushing incorrect political views? This will happen both to the right and the left with only the central, amorphous and meaningless centrist-liberal/centrist-conservative labels and views remaining. You think the Intercept wouldn't have gotten shut down once Snowden's stuff started getting out there?

>NN wasnt even a thing before 2015

here is a video from 2014 to educate you about the subject

youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM

>giving a handful of megacorporations the power to regulate what you get access to
wew lad what could go wrong

You're aware that net neutrality has been the default state of the internet since the public internet became a thing right? Obama's act just made it more official. Enjoyed the internet at all in the last 20 years? Then you've been enjoying the internet under big bad net neutrality.

The only sites that are going to be affected are ones that want stream hd video

youtube.com/watch?v=B03eByZia5I

>Obama's act just made it more official
He had no constitutional authority to

not an argument

Because they are open and honest about their intentions. This is different from a shill which is, of course, very Jewish in the way it presents itself as a genuine member of the community. Semitic deception is the big difference.

YFW Daily Stormer ban is cited in the FCC fact sheet.
torrentfreak.com/images/DOC-347927A1.pdf

Correction, they want to keep it to shift that cost vcia the consumer payuikng hhigher ISP costs. If repealed these websites would be forced to pay more instead of the co nsimer.

>suddenly millions of people can no longer afford to have all their data harvested

sounds like a good thing? the internet right now is currently a race to the bottom, it's a race to see which demographics can give up the most agency to the richest jews and the most corrupt surveillance states, the more gsatekeeping on this kind of degeneracy, the better

If this was a year ago I'd have confidence too. That confidence died the minute I saw Trump shilling for an Afghanistan troop surge. He's not the President and holds no real power. The bureaucracy and Deep State are running the show. Little better than a later western Roman emperor who holds no true authority.

ok heres what i dont understand. The internet has billions of websites. Are they just gonna block them all and only allow you to the specific sites in each package? Or is everything still gonna be open except for the specific sites in each package.

because Trump is our only hope but he's not technologically competent

It will suck but the truth is this entire neo-liberal capital-obsessed shithole society needs to be PURGED with great contempt, and if this makes some more poor faggots go outside because they can't afford the Sup Forums package, so much the better, and our board will be less gay for it

This is how it is always framed, but that's not what it is. They can literally decide to throttle any content they don't like. This gives the ISPs total control over what content people are allowed to access.

States can regulate ISPs

And suddenly millions of people are now forced to get CNN bullshit shoveled into their brains now with no legitimate alternative. Good job, user.

Would never happen. Those costs would go to the company and if they want to charge you they would, not your is. These companies are trying to say ISP will to hide the fact they're costing you bank atm.

>Oh fuck off. You literally can't think of any valid reasons to support ending net neutrality so you attack the people in favor of ending it

always do opposite of what trudeau says

Fuck off with this. My point is simply that it is and has always been the default state of the internet. Obama signing it is not something they actually care about, merely it's a weapon they can use to justify their pushing ahead with it because they know they can sell it to most of the Trump base (i.e. The_Donald faggots and the like) because FUCK OBAMA is their overriding mindset even beyond MAGA.

Of course signing it at the very end of his presidency knowing it'd be reversed, I'm half-willing to believe that Obama did it on purpose. He's as much of a shitty globalist and big business whore as anyone so he cuts a deal to sign it knowing his business buddies will then gut it while he can play Mr. Good Guy.

yea goi lets go back to consuming the shit on TV and reading those kike owned newspapers.

The websites that pay the provider go faster. If your small and can’t afford to pay the internet provider, then your site is slower or what they’ll probably call (normal speed). Now imagine trying to compete with a site that pays millions when you can’t afford to. It could also mean they could actively chose to slow down sites they don’t like.

Net neutrality came into act in 2015 when companies sued ISP to get as much bandwidth as they won't without paying more. So ISP began being hjravilyt controlled and shifting the price onto the consumer. Prior to this the internet was free and we had a boom. After this companies like Netflix and Facebook get a free ride while now paui my LESS that they used to because of this ru ling.

Repealing it would make companies take the costs and allow the internet to expand.

Infrastructure has grinded to a halt as well

we can't send the refugees home until ISIS is gone
Look what happened in Syria as soon as Trump is elected:

youtube.com/watch?v=bMKy0_RE9HM

Most likely what's going to happen is that at the ISP end they'll throttle speeds so if you try to visit them it'll take you so long to get through that you likely just give up. Once this is in place and it becomes the new normal, say by the 2020 election or so, then you'll start seeing China style filtering.

>claim deregulation will produce innovation
>remove NN
>keep all regulation regarding the laying down of new networks and fiber infrastructure.

>Fuck off with this.
Ya fuck the government being restrained by the constitution n shit
Just let them do whatever they want

Are you paid by the post or by the hour?

Protip: sage goes in the options field.

The EU has net neutrality by law, that company is using zero-rating to circumvent it. If you pay for one of those package any traffic you make to the included services are not counted towards your data limit.

regulating monopolies is a necessary part of capitalism.
The US government has been doing it for 150 years or more

You are aware that portugal has net neutrality and this picture actually has nothing to do with nn anyway

Except that the FCC will block states from passing their own laws on the issue.

Oy vey 6 gorillion shill bots attack net neutrality.


hackernoon.com/more-than-a-million-pro-repeal-net-neutrality-comments-were-likely-faked-e9f0e3ed36a6

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/B03eByZia5I/
>5 (five) pages of this spam

go advertise your shit channel somewhere else

shut up shill, don't speak ill of the telecoms. they are the greatest defenders of liberty. just look at some of the businesses owned by them. they're fucking patriots. Trump says they're kosher and so should you. fucking shills.

NN is not about monopolies dipshit

Well that is why should should oppose NN on constitutional grounds
The Feds have no authority to regulate ISPs

Thats pretty much the hope the right now.

yes they do. We've been regulating telecoms for over 100 years

>Net neutrality came into act in 2015
Why do you shills love this bit of gaslighting and disinfo? You can find all sorts of information even from the mid to late 2000s regarding this. This like Dalrymple's (to paraphrase it) "propaganda in a Marxist society is not intended to tell the truth, merely delegitimize you by forcing you to take part in the farce" quote.

This is getting way off track but getting troops in Afghanistan is part of the run up to war with Iran that the Pentagon (through US supplicants Israel and Saudi Arabia) is ramping up efforts to start. We don't give a shit about ISIS considering we were the ones training and supplying them weapons in Syria.

>ahahaha commies btfo no more market regulation for you FREE market not government's market ok?
>ugh what do you mean that they'll abuse their monopolies um like we'll just regulate them and tell daddy Trump to break them up? Market regulation is an important part of capitalism bro

>We've been regulating telecoms for over 100 years
That does not make it constitutional
ISPs are not commerce between the states
They are not the internet
They are just access to it

gora you have it all wrong. the bots were only used to counter pro NN bots. you wouldn't fight a gundam without using another gundam. trust based Pajeet, trust in Trump remember??

Repealing NN could help foster internet monopolies and shut down the little guy all while pushing the average user to sites they deem more “acceptable” through incentive packages (which would end up being Netflix, YouTube, google etc). If you can use a site that your ISP agrees with and thus doubles or triples the speed to it for this reason, why use any other site?

> quit truthsplaining

...

then use another ISP

>ISPs are not commerce between the states
are you retarded? Do you know a single ISP network that's confined to a single state?

Of course not, because they are megacorporations. It's not like you have 1000 different companies competing

if this is true then go for whoever has less money

So is the repeal stopping states from creating their own net neutrality systems

But that is not the reason they are being regulated

But we have seen this in practice for the last 2 years.

CBRS is a clue

Q

Most Americans don’t have that option as their states allow artificial monopolies of only a few ISPs

>. It's not like you have 1000 different companies competing
broadbandnow.com/All-Providers
I hate you redit

>Do you know a single ISP network that's confined to a single state?
ISPs are last mile
Yes

most of America has 1 ISP

That is what state regulation is for

We have two major ones up here in Alaska.

then why in sweet fuck are you asking the state to do something
they have the touch of death as you just stated

technologyreview.com/s/406079/the-origins-of-the-net-neutrality-debate/

Her'es an article from 2006 talking about net neutrality. Want to keep trying with the lazy disinfo?

>Comcast
>80 billion
>Google
>89 billion

→
>thread exposing the truth about the jews
>Sup Forums comes and defends them
do we need further proof this is a paid meme?

you mean 6 percent of america has only one provider

3 mbps is more than enough to shitpost on Sup Forums