Post your country's fascist leaders

Post your country's fascist leaders

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6Ka5LtmlG5Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

No, fuck off.
Only good fascist is a dead one.

...

Communism can only thrive when it becomes a crypto-fascist regime.

8)

Miten lapuan liikettä voi edes pitää fasistisena liikeenä, eritotten ottaen huomioon sen anti-hitleristiset suuntaukset ja uskonnollisuus joka oli laajalti universalista?

Stalin was lot more nationalistic than Tito for one.

t. banking shill

...

Wait... oh lord no that's not right. That's not right at all.

...

How is this even relevant? Firstly, Bolsheviks were mostly funded by the Imperial Germany priori to the revolution and secondly, Fascist counter-parts were far more involved with the bourgeois and their investments in their representative countries.

Prove to me Tito and Ho were Jewish puppets. Inspired by Lenin, sure, but they fought against being controlled by foreigners.

Yes, keep sucking that jewish wall street dick, bootlicker.

sounds like communism can't work properly unless you become a revisionist

Stallmann was no jew. wtf are you posting about?

McCarthy did nothing wrong.

Are you calling Stalin a revisionist? Fuck off torskite.

...

I'm sorry, I thought communism couldn't be nationalistic in nature. I also recall Marxism-Leninism and Stalinism being unorthodox.

...

>Castro a national socialist
Is that why he was prepared for Cuba to become a nuclear wasteland and for all of his people to burn in nuclear fire if it destroyed the United states and spread Socialism in the chaos after Americans imperialist goals and allies collapsed in the power struggle of which the Soviets would eat into.

Also nationalism can be used in Socialism to attain it more easy. See IRA Socialism in one country

Donald Trump

>Honecker
>nationalist
>Pol Pot and Rosa Luxemburg
>not nationalist
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Stalin isn't jewish

Marx claims the workers have no nation. Anything in the pursuit of nationalism is, by default, revisionism. Tying back to my original point, communism is crypto-fascism.

Pol Pot was so nationalist that he had people with international ties and fluency in other languages killed.

and anyone who wasn't a Khmer (except for himself and all the other KR members with Chinese or Vietnamese ancestry)

not my OC but my point still stands

regardless of her Jewishness she was a Polish nationalist in addition to her socialism. She was literally a nationalist socialist

Wrong, that is Communism, and as you know you can't simply get elected into Power then BAMM Communism. You must get there. If a country such as Ireland has to use nationalism to kick the Brits out to introduce Socialism then by all means Communists approve of it. Or the Kurds or Vietnam with French and American imperialists

>In Marxist sociopolitical thought, the dictatorship of the proletariat refers to a state in which the proletariat, or the working class, has control of political power. The term, coined by Joseph Weydemeyer, was adopted by the founders of Marxism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in the 19th century. In Marxist theory, the dictatorship of the proletariat is the intermediate system between capitalism and communism, when the government is in the process of changing the ownership of the means of production from private to collective ownership. It is termed dictatorship because it retains the 'state apparatus' as such, with its implements of force and oppression.

In fact what your doing is calling Marxist/Leninism crypto-fascism which is incredibly retarded and screams le fish hook theory

...

What's gonna make nationalists turn into internationalist communists though

Siktir git all*hını m*hammedini siktiğimin yobazı

ATATÜRK ULUDUR
ATATÜRKTEN BAŞKA YOKTUR TAPACAK

Exactly
some points to do in a national planification of a socialist state
1-Internationalism isn''t transnationalism, having allies to certain countries isn't the same as letting them enter to your country and make them doing everything they wan't
2-There are more commies that become nationalist atracted to fascism and all the 3rd and 4th possition stuff than the fascist than consider becoming commies
3-There's a good reason for the last one is because all leftie generical parties and organization are just stupid

>What's gonna make nationalists turn into internationalist communists though
Well that's not the argument. But education once these nationalist shake off the threats to them people would be educated on Socialism and Marxist theory destroying borders and states in the process. Unless a nation wants to denounce and remove itself from Marxism and reaching Communism a breakdown of Nationality and global solidarity is a inevitable end point.
Your argument was Marxist/Leninism is neo fascism and Castro and the others were nationalists against the internationalist cause which is so wrong it's not funny and yes Socialists are more then willing to use nationalism to reach Socialism.
>If you remove the English army tomorrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle, unless you set about the organization of the Socialist Republic your efforts would be in vain. England would still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs.
See the Easter rising in Ireland a nationalist cause with heavy ties to Socialism and aims to introduce a Socialist peoples republic of Ireland

There is so much stupid in this meme pic, i don't even know where to begin

LA İLAHE İL BEŞŞAR EL-ESED
LA İLAHE İL HAFIZ EL-ESED
LA İLAHE İL MAHİR EL-ESED

>But education once these nationalist shake off the threats to them people would be educated on Socialism and Marxist theory destroying borders and states in the process
Sure, but look at any communist country whether historical or current. The fact that countries like Vietnam fought for independence for so long, only to become part of the international is the last thing on the Communist Party's mind. Socialist Nationalism is the final step, whether you like it or not. i.e., Crypto-fascism

>Sure, but look at any communist country whether historical or current. The fact that countries like Vietnam fought for independence for so long, only to become part of the international is the last thing on the Communist Party's mind.
Nope not really, nationalism in Communist countries only came out of Oppression and the need to rally the people to throw off the oppressors or from Marxist/Leninism principle which I may remind you Vietnam,China,USSR and Cuba all were followers of.
Where as the Anarchists in Spain had no use of Nationalism and did no such thing, all the while accomplishing many tenets of Marxism.

Once the threats against those Communist countries collapse, the state will wither away.

Antanas Smetona

I'm not denying they follow Marxist-Leninism. What I am saying is that no amount of wishful thinking can cover up the fact that nationalism and the state cannot wither away after a peoples grow accustomed to such ideas. Thus, a form of authoritarian, nationalist government triumphs.
>Once the threats against those Communist countries collapse, the state will wither away.
Wishful thinking. Leaders will always pursue their own agenda. Even if the Spanish anarchists are relevant to this, opportunism arises out of a lack of authority.

...

...

...

>no amount of wishful thinking can cover up the fact that nationalism and the state cannot wither away after a peoples grow accustomed to such ideas
No, see Dialectical materialism and the growing percentage of automation. The state is committed to the theories of Marxist/Leninism and not with profit or maintaing the nation state like in normal """democracies". A simple marxist education would erase all of that
> Thus, a form of authoritarian, nationalist government triumphs
Only when it has enemies around it which is the main reasons for Lenin and Stalin not introducing as many Socialist policies since you know the entire Western world funding the White armies and Nazi's invading

>Leaders will always pursue their own agenda
Nope Castro and Lenin did not, neither did Mao. Or Washington in America
>Even if the Spanish anarchists are relevant to this, opportunism arises out of a lack of authority
And that's why I said once capitalist threats and invasions have been removed the state will wither away.

we need to get some rockwell dna and clone him. America is ready for him now.

...

Impossible, you will need a grouo of people deciding who needs what distributed, and a form of force to make sure people will comply, becoming a functioning state in practice.
>Everyone consents
You are lying to yourself if you believe people will always consentt all the time. Your ideology is incapable of being implemented by humans, partly because they are not equal.

Costume of an inner Fascist group member. National Archives of Australia

...

...

>Impossible, you will need a grouo of people deciding who needs what distributed, and a form of force to make sure people will comply
That exists in Anarcho-communism. Anarcho-Communism isn't mad max it all depends on your definition of Anachism.
Anyway the anarchism your referring too is utopian hence why that happens once we reach post-scarcity
>You are lying to yourself if you believe people will always consentt all the time. Your ideology is incapable of being implemented by humans, partly because they are not equal.
Nope dialectical materialism forms your society. Heck me existing right now is proof your wrong since i am a 100% Communist. My way of upbringing and education could be molded into society

Except Rockwell literally said he's not a fascist. You don't even know what you're talking about, FAG.

youtube.com/watch?v=6Ka5LtmlG5Y

No it proves I am correct, since it shows thst absolute consent is impossible among beings with different experiences and conciousness. This shows that we are not equal in one form or another.

>No it proves I am correct, since it shows thst absolute consent is impossible among beings with different experiences and conciousness
Learn what Anarcho-Communism is first. It is not what your thinking since that is utopia. The utopia anarchism comes after when everyone suited by the materiel world and their upbringing are separate individuals yet share the shame love of Communism and love of other. aka post-scarcity in the far future.
> This shows that we are not equal in one form or another.
Hence why
>From each according to his ability, to each according to his need

So what are the requirements for the society you are advocating for?
And others are incapable of deciding what the individual needs, for what one needs is subjective, what if I need a mansion? What if I need 3 houses?

Castro was an admirer of Primo de Rivera and his Works.

He also pledged himself to the global revolution and was willing to sacrifice Cuba to nuclear hellfire if it meant spreading the revolution. He put Cuba's well being on hold when America was going to unembago them if they stopped spreading the revolution but he decided to keep on funding other communist rebellions.

Rivera got fucked by Franco and I bet you if Rivera was in Nazi Germany he also would of got fucked like the Strassers

>So what are the requirements for the society you are advocating for?
Worker control of the means of production + Anarchism
>And others are incapable of deciding what the individual needs
That's why the commune collectively decides how much tobacco you get for example.

Cheeto Hitler is the closest thing my country's come to facism