Why do republicans vote againist their own economic interests?

>trump tax plan raises taxes on middle class and poor, slash social safety net
>gets rid of net neutrality

Is is race, religion, or a combination of both?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pmCibWptzZQ
youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c
youtube.com/watch?v=8ywsSInVMF8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

id rather live in a country where the rich take all my money and oppress me, but without fags and liberals, than the opposite

>don't campaign in a way that sparks an interest from voters
>blame voters for voting against their interests

...

>but without fags and liberals

We aren’t going anywhere

still preferrable to living with fags and liberals sorry

why do white people vote for liberals. its against their continued existence

im pretty sure dems wouldve won if they didnt pick hillary desu

Commiefornia getting nuked, what's the problem here?

>why do white people vote for liberals. its against their continued existence

Point out where liberals want to “whip out” white people. Interesting I missed that in the platform.

low skilled third world immigration displaces the poor working class that the left claims to care about

they don't
democrats are just parasite farmers

Because they have been brainwashed and don't have the education necessary to understand politics and economics properly

Because they see themselves as human beings first.

Ideology out of exclusivity is antithetical to the success of humanity. It's in our genes to combat it. Progress is like the tide though, it ebbs and flows, eroding the mistakes of our past

This they hate Democrats so much they'll burn alive before voting for them. Fox news is hate speech toward liberals.

>a leftist can't comprehend voting for any reason beyond self interest

It seems true. Why are republicans either rich people looking for tax breaks or poor dumb rednecks who don't realize they would benefit from dems.

Because Republishitters are uneducated retards who think they're going to be rich some day so long as the brown people go away. Thankfully the party is dying and in a generation we'll finally be a leftist majority.

Does Trump's tax plan actually raise taxes on the middle class and poor or is that was Huffpo said? And social safety nets need to not only be slashed but done away with completely, at least coercive welfare that you have to pay into.

>trump tax plan raises taxes on middle class and poor, slash social safety net
False, it raises taxes on single mothers and those living in states with high state taxes (AKA democrats). It cuts taxes for everyone else.
>Gets rid of net neutrality
Good, I have yet to see someone using logic or economic theory explain why this is a bad thing. It's all scare tactics over some illegal legislation that was only put into place 2 years ago.

That is why liberals supported Clinton over Bernie. Think we forgot op?

>We aren’t going anywhere
that's what republicans are here for

corruption, destruction of nature and money the wealthy take from the average joe is just tax to keep liberals and fags at bay

It raises everyone's taxes but the super rich because the depression that occurs after the short term boom is going to pop the education bubble which will pop the housing bubble.

Jesus Christ, did the left not go to meme school. What the fuck is that font?

>trump tax plan raises taxes on middle class and poor, slash social safety net
False, it raises taxes on single mothers and those living in states with high state taxes (AKA democrats). It cuts taxes for everyone else.
>Gets rid of net neutrality
Good, I have yet to see someone using logic or economic theory explain why this is a bad thing. All existing arguments only boil down to scare tactics. These scare tactics are being used to support illegal legislation that was put into place just 2 short years ago and have barely even begun taking effect.

Keeping none whites out
Removing homosexuals
Women should be home makers
Family units
No section 8 niggers

Should I continue?

Two biggest things is that it removes state tax deductions and single mothers can no longer claim head of household.

It's basically forcing democrats to pay for their social programs which is hilarious. They're all squealing like little pigs.

Republicans don't use state tax deductions?

Democrats stopped representing the blue-collar working man

Bill Clinton was the cocksucker who passed most of those trade deals that. The Clinton democrats had a phrase: "These blue collar voters have no where else to go."

So if the democrats weren't going to represent them in economic matters they started voting republican anyways for other reasons. That's where we're at now.

It's a complete insult to suggest that the democratic party still represents the economic interests of ordinary people.

youtube.com/watch?v=pmCibWptzZQ

wrong

>So if the democrats weren't going to represent them in economic matters

But that’s wrong you fucking retard.

Not sure why I'm humoring you leaf, but you'll find that Democrats have much higher state taxes on average.

What is quantitative easing.. rigging the libor... And borrowing from social security to fun socialist healthcare for the unemployable welfare class...

Non whites.. Muslims who were told to collect welfare.. and children of the 70s.. liberals in their parents basement.

republicans tend to live in states with low to no state taxes

There aren't lots of Republican voters in blue states?

>Create part time jobs that are only good if you work 2-3 or rely on government to sustain self

Yeah good jobs got created. Lets work on creating careers and long term stability next time fucko

Low nigger tier IQ.

welcome back obongoleaf

No one's ruining my life. I'd like to keep it that way. Which is why I vote for pro-American candidates. Your picture is stupid and irrelevant.

...

but the entire point is that the bottom feeders will end up gassed beside the Jews..?

Obama job creation was 95% full time. You fucktards should try pulling up the actual job data instead of falling for fake news headlines from ZeroBrain and Investors.com

You take a small segment in time, with no relational data, and expect to make a point with it?

u never thought of that did u

Obama started in a recession, meaning jobs were unusually low. Then it took him 8 years to get back to normal. Stop sucking Obama's dick over his anemic recovery.

it's obama leaf

this statistic is shit because under democrat regime many people were forced to make their one full time job into 3 part time jobs. this increased the number of jobs but didn't change the amount of hours worked.
if we look at the amount of hours worked under those regimes it barely changed. thus the increased number of jobs didn't cause any increase in productivity. it just created working poor.

that's what happens when you implement leftist policies.

it completely blows my mind how any white person could vote democrat in the modern era

The Democrats ditched the white working class long ago. The idea that unions and poor people are all voting Democrat was the meme in the 90's. Hearing these arguments is a clear sign you are dealing with a boomer or Gen Xer.

The platform of the Democrat party these days is basically: fuck white people
if you are white and voting Democrat, you are voting against your interests

Because "triggering libruls" is more important than improving their country. These are people who's own positions and identities are constructed merely as a response to the positions and identities of "liberals". Whatever the democrats/liberals/left go for, the republican chooses the opposite instinctively, despite it probably being against their own interest.

>thinks that the republicans care about the working class
The republicans try to tap into white identity politics to gather the poor and stupid whites who can't see that the republicans serve the CEO's and not the working class. The republicans don't care about poor and middle class people, white or otherwise.

>republicans serve the CEO's
in the 90's this was the case, but not anymore

West Virginia used to be a deep blue stronghold you know, now it's the opposite. What changed?
For fuck's sake, West Virginia's governor literally changed to be a Republican due to massive political pressure.

The Democrats are full on anti-white. They are foaming at the mouth with their anti-white hatred, which is why 60% of whites vote Republican

according to the bible, the poor exist to allow the rich to exercise the virtue of charity.

by creating more poor people, the republicans are doing god's work

>would you rather be rich and live around niggers or poor and live around whites?

pro-tip: if you are rich and live around niggers they will zerg rush you, rape you, kill you, steal your shit, rape and kill your family, then blow all your money in a week and be back to starving.

>creating more poor people
pic related

Democrats
>Fuck white people! We need to flood the country with non whites
Republicans
>We feel the same way but at least we lie about it

>235 million white people in the US
>5 million Syrian refugees, total, worldwide

admitting literally every Syrian refugee on the planet would change the racial make-up of the US by about half a percent.

Yep, we're being flooded with non-whites

Earth to libfag. The federal tax policies really don't matter or make any difference since the rich pay most of them anyway. Not to mention you fucking babies aren't entitled to anything in the first place. Like most pinkos you also assume higher rates of taxation will benefit you which is horseshit. Most of your tax dollars are wasted on the kikes wars, medicaid/SS( which you can't even use unless you're completely indigent or 65) or embezzled in outrageous salaries and pensions. Just look at CA where the white middle class is fleeing precisely because of it's bloated, parisitic bureaucracy and outragous local taxes, fines and regulations. Homeless everywhere and 1/3 of all welfare recipients in the US along with probably a quarter of the population foreign born. You fucking morons aren't qualified to run a dairy queen let alone a state or country.

If you are poor in America you already get free healthcare/food and that will likely never change. King niggers "health care plan" just made insurance more expensive for the middle class or forced those who can't afford it to buy it via a tax penalty.

Net neutrality is a fag meme and I could care less which group of giant corporations wins. If anything I'll go with the ISP's over cocksucking jew vermin like Bezos or Cuckerberg who are already censoring us.

We would vote for right wing candidates forever based on the immigration or social issues alone.

Get it through your fucking head. We hate you and everything you stand for and always will.

Now fuck off and don't be going around trying to tell people what you think is good for them OK faggot?

Doing exactly that is yet another reason why we hate people like you.

youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c

>Why do republicans vote againist their own economic interests?

Because the GOP appeals to them on social issues. It sucks but it's the system that we live in.

Like looking at the 2016 election, Trump was the only one saying the right things about Islam, illegal immigrants, China and interventionism that he won. But people are forced to live with all the other baggage, including the EPA destruction, tax cuts, and etc.

Move to africa then.

Why do unoriginal megafaggots
post this same shit thread every day?

because in two party system both parties are against the interests of the majority and people vote for the lesser of two evils which at the moment is republicans.

voting democrats as a white working class person is like voting nazis while being jewish sodomite.

it's good for redpilling
easy softballs

Conservatives could ask similar questions to liberals about economics, ironically. They could aks more things. Like asking why liberals are voting against their own survival by opposing the Muslim ban, for example.

Don't you see how what you posted isn't an argument in the slightest, and therefore has no ability to change anyone's mind?

>Good, I have yet to see someone using logic or economic theory explain why this is a bad thing.
Literally the only god damn thing net neutrality's demise will do is give ISPs greater control over setting internet speeds and prices.

>Theoretical best case scenario
ISPs will use their greater price flexibility to reduce prices for some consumers and increase prices for others and you could be in the group that sees a price reduction

>Why that best case scenario will not fucking happen
Demand for internet access is basically unlimited except by the price companies set due to how necessary access is in the modern day. Repealing net neutrality won't impact the supply which is purely based around the physical architecture and won't reduce demand. As such the price will not fucking fall. If they thought they could get more money selling bandwidth at a lower price, companies would be fucking doing that already.

>What about the greater control over speeds?
Speeds are capped by physical architecture, throttling, and traffic. Nobody is getting better physical architecture out of this. Companies have zero motivation to lift systematic throttling (the kind that caps you at 50mbps even though the line to your house can handle 100mbps) with the repeal of NN because that's how they create demand for better plans. On top of all of this, repealing NN allows companies to start targeted throttling which will only lower speeds or increase prices if you want to get rid of it. As for traffic, traffic is traffic, the only way that changes is if a lot of somebodies, probably you, are getting fucked.

>Actual best case scenario
Nothing happens

>Worst case scenario
higher prices either from the ISPs extorting you or from the ISPs extorting people you buy from (who then pass on the cost to you) and shittier speeds either from you not paying cable company extortion, the services you use doing that, or some major company paying your ISP to fuck anyone that isn't them

>why don't those poor, dumb, inbred, white trash, redneck hicks vote for us?

It is almost like constantly insulting them an looking down on them is not the best way to convince them that you are looking out for their best interests.

Good. Latinas are hot as fuck

That's all thanks to the millions of shit skins and niggers the Dems keep importing. Also, gen Z is overwhelmingly conservative. You'll face some opposition there.

...

These chicks look like they need to be beat when they get fucked. They will suck their thumb and call you Daddy throughout.

>Also, gen Z is overwhelmingly conservative.
Good to know they won't be voting for the party raising the deficit, taxing the middle class, and running pedophiles for Senate.

Thumb suckers while fucking fuckers.

yep, those are the ones I'm talking about

Tell us how you really feel

Oh, you meant the Castizos with 99% white DNA?

The ones coming over the border are the Mestizo underclass, not the white ruling class
This is what indio blood does to you

If you settle for a latina, you'll settle for any other pretty brown bitch.

>But people are forced to live with all the other baggage, including the EPA destruction, tax cuts, and etc.

Yeah I want the environment protected, the (((rich))) to be taxed, I want social safety nets implemented........but I will damned if I vote for an explicitly anti-white party who wants to flood the country with shitskins and turn my son into a faggot who cuts his own dick off.

Thanks but no thanks. I'd rather just be exploited by the corporate elites.

No, I meant the ones you posted

>shits in your gene pool
Mexico has 1/3 of the USA's population
The USA has won 360 Nobel Prizes, Mexico has won 3, not a single one of them in science

The welfare state is the biggest drain on society and productivity. It encourages single mothers, which produce some of the worst people. Anyone who makes attempts to dismantle that is good. Nobody deserves my tax dollars for not working. You should vote for what makes a better society, not for boondoggles.

Dismantle the welfare state.

>vote againist their own interests?

Maine Democrat Senate Candidate laughs about rising suicide rates among white males

youtube.com/watch?v=8ywsSInVMF8

>stupid whites
spics and niggers have average IQs ranging from 85-90. That's why they aren't graduating at the same rate as Asians and whites, and why they fill up the poor/under working class because they're mentally retarded

The USA and Mexico were founded around the same time.

Literally the only difference is that in Mexico the whites interbred with the natives, producing orc-faced abominations. And in the USA they didn't.
Mean IQ of Mexico is 88

That's the difference between your nation becoming a superpower, and your nation becoming a narco-state

Good luck. once whites aren't the majority, the US is going to turn itself into a massive 3rd world shit hole infested with violent niggers and Muslims terrorizing your streets. I'll be boarding my plane ticket by then

This is definitely a nigger

This is definitely a nigger

>EPA destruction
NPR had a story about the restructuring of the EPA under Trump. It turns out that under the Obama administration the part of the EPA tasked with cleaning up Superfund sites was gutted. The Trump administration restaffed the Superfund part of the agency and pulled people off shit like researching climate change to do it. Under Obama, the EPA was ignoring it's primary mission of cleaning up actual toxins in the environment.

We'll see. White people are getting pissed.

Trump is running the planet and white people think the earth can survive climate change.

We can't sustain our own standard of living with this time of consumption.

first post best post. Im not a conservative but this is an elephant in the room for most, rarely the admit it.
Economics are not the major concern for many I think this is where socialists and libertarians alike have a hard time in understanding certain voting patterns.