Boogie is right.
Why do trumpkins always mindlessly agree with Trump even if it goes against their best interests?
Boogie is right.
Why do trumpkins always mindlessly agree with Trump even if it goes against their best interests?
youtube.com
Bend over for zuckerberg's cock.
I was very much against net neutrality long before Trump ran for President.
...
Remember how censored the internet was before 2014?
Can Boogie off himself? Nothing of value would be lost.
Tell me why net neutrality is bad, and why it's not going to result in a huge money grab for as many things as possible
They charge an absolute fucking shitload for mobile data, so why won't they now?
No one is agreeing with trump on this only shills
Why is net neutrality all the sudden the second coming of Jesus Christ? There was an Internet before 2015, you realize? Plus, that fucking cock sucking vampire George Soros wants net neutrality. That's more than enough reason to oppose it.
Nobody cares what Jabba The Hutt has to say. The video game industry is the heart of the SJW cuck world. Littery the bigist screeching SJW's are video game commentators, reviewers or whatever the fuck you call them.
Net Neutrality is a democratic scam to get the web under their control, I hope to god that the Republicans can see through this and finally control at least one part of popular american culture, if the can't then they will be done, we will be done.
I only voted trump for maximum chaos
>Net neutrality existed during Obongo's 8 years
LOL
They USED to charge a shit ton of money for data, now it's cheap as hell. Remember when you had 300 minutes for your phone for the month and you had to end every conversation quickly to conserve? That doesn't exist anymore, thanks to competition.
The last thing we need is the government involved in something that isn't a specifically enumerated power under the constitution. We don't need to keep raping the commerce clause to further government influence in the private sector.
I'm glad that my services and sites aren't going to be "subject to the needs of law enforcement" or "determined to be harmful to the network."
Explain how that would be a good thing?
This
Tell me why the biggest censors of free speech online shill for net neutrality around the clock.
I still don't know what any of this means. This thing been shilled back and forth so hard that I can honestly say I have no idea what the fuck is going on. Arguments and reasoning for both have gone to the point that I'm not sure which is which.
Even if you consider Boogie to be a gelatinous lardberg and should keel over ASAP, keep in mind it's OK to agree with him on this one small thing.
Endless access and comsumption of food, this is what allows you to share your disgust of him online while maintaining the moral high ground. Fight for it!
No, that fat fuck is totally wrong. People act like the web was communist Russia before 2015. More censorship (google, facebook, twitter) and website takes downs after NN than before! NNiger is for the left to slowly take control of the web, just like TV and radio. "Oh, you cant say or show that on TV, its offensive." "you cant say its ok top be white on TV, but its ok to be a race mixing, confused faggot!" Fuck off kikes! NN is going to die, no matter how much money soros, google, facebook and twitter flood into this, it will not change the 3-2 vote. EAT SHIT AND DIE YOU FUCKING FAGGOT DEGENERATE! You're first to be gassed!
more government control, thats all they want
Calling still costs money, apparently you don't talk to people. As a Canadian I had to pay $60 for 15 minutes to Buffalo, which is an hour away from where I live.
300 minutes a month is still universal, and depending on your carrier it's 50c-$1.50/minute after that.
So, no, competition DIDN'T magically lower those prices- they're still the same as they were BEFORE.
Net neutrality is corporate welfare. It also helps to artificially keep Internet speeds low. Government regulation in general is a big reason why US Internet is such dogshit compared to other countries.
This. All our jewish Telecom companies. Bell. Rogers etc. all have unlimited usage with their plans. Before it was 300gb for their most expensive plan. The 3rd party resellers also help in this regard.
Now they are competing with Fiber to the home, scared of Google coming up here and doing it
These are apples and oranges. Telling a corporation not to overcharge people does not equate to censoring regular people.
I oppose NSA, censorship, and all of that shit- but that's not what net neutrality is. Net neutrality is specifically on providers so they don't throttle you and charge for dumb shit.
But we are being censored already by google, twitter, facebook..
The very same companies that are shilling for NN
What plan do you have that you have unlimited data?
Point me to this website and the cost of it, because I call bullshit.
Specific bills aside, the concept of net neutrality isn't a left/right partisan issue. For people who have been on the Internet for a while, traffic shaping is AIDS. I've had ISPs where everything except port 80 is throttled. Fuck that shit.
There's some room for quality of service traffic shaping, such as de-prioritizing torrent traffic when bandwidth is limited in order to keep HTTP responsive, but that's not what people are upset about. They're upset when Netflix is throttled to 2 Mbps but when they go to speedtest.net the faggots remove the cap and say you're getting 100.
my internet is clearly doing this to me how do i stop it?
Internet is a privilege. not a right. ISP's can do whatever the fuck they want since they are the ones who have spent money to let you be able to shitpost and share photos of your cat.
if you don't like what your ISP is doing.. change providers or shut up.
If you argue that internet is a basic human right.. then why doesnt the government make their own internet and give it for free?
...
Total fucking lie, like the patriot act was to protect us, and the affordable care act was supposed to reduce medical cost.
NNigger was the first step towards leftest control of the internet, just like TV and radio. "No, you cant say its ok to be white on TV, that offensive!!!" While at the same time saying..."We all know its ok to be race mixing, confused degenerate faggot cuck #diversity (white genocide)."
Change your ISP to the competition in your area that doesn't exist.
There's a big thread on reddit detailing how the FTC already has jurisdiction over isp's preventing them from throttling websites.
So I don't care.
These companies don't compete, though. Most of the people affected by this live in areas where the big telecoms have 'paid' for a specific area - so no one can switch their plans without paying to move entirely. In other words, they're only going to get fucked by the destruction of net neutrality.
Because it's contrary to what reddit thinks. Sup Forums would shit in their mouths to prove that they hate normies, if given the opportunity.
Wireless and Satellite means you don't have to get internet from a ISP in your area.
But I'm censored every place on the Internet except here. I'm not allowed to discuss anything I believe in online.
That's not mobile data you fucking retard.
The entire premise of keeping net neutrality is so those prices WOULDN'T change and your ISP wouldn't start charging for accessing specific services, locations, and throttling your connection- something they ISPs were FAMOUS for.
Where were these cocksuckers when Fuck White People was the flavor of the month?
No. I'm out for revenge now.
you realise why mobile data costs so much right?
Not sure if Boogie is a shill, or just retarded.
>without being censored
what did he mean b this
>I won't want me 100 Mbps line throttling so I'll swap to 25 Mbps satellite instead
Exactly, this isnt about open internet, its the exact opposite. Its so the left can control all forms of online media. Hence, why google, facebook, twitter, soros and every leftist totalitarian asshole is in total support of it.
Everyone of these fucks are already censoring us, and they say NNigger is to protect free speech? LOL! Fucking kikes, being kikes. Accuse those of what they're already doing!
idk but i tend to not care what someone who let themselves get to over 400lbs and let his wife cuck him has to say.
Because all of the providers decided on what they would charge for it; similarly how one gas station in your city doesn't charge 20c less than everyone else- despite making a killing off of it.
They're called monopolies. Or, feel free to educate me on it.
1st world problems.
>shitlibs
>concerned about censorship
Fuck right the fuck off.
"Why do you think net neutrality is bad?"
*explains why we think it's bad*
"A-a-apples and oranges!!!!"
Every time. The fact still remains that boogie was wrong and therefore you should be angry at people like him for lying about net neutrality and selling it based on blatant falsehoods, not us for criticizing it.
The pro-NN censorship companies are monopolies too.
>inb4 they're not because you can make another youtube if you wanted to
Well cox just put a cap in our area charge out of the ass for overage. Yea net neutrality realy stopped that. Dumb nigger
Mobile infrastructure costs a fuck ton to maintain. data is limited due to the technology. if everyone had unlimited data the congestion would be unbearable.
A provider in australia gave all their customers free unlimited data for just a day and it crashed the entire network.
'm sorry I've drank to much silly slush.
Though if want unlimited data usage you can go with shitskin wind mobile or the like which have next to no coverage
As for minutes on mobile. I have unlimited Canada wide calling for an extra $5. Unlimited US can be added for about $5-$10.
Maybe in your crazy faggotland they do
How is the FCC going to control the internet? If it stays or if its repealed?
net neutrality is communism to buffer Google/Youtube/Netfix's operational costs/othervideo streamer/spammers/etc
>KYS
you low tier baity faggot
unlimited data, calls and text.
Lying fat piece of shit, I would shitpost Trump if Twitter didn't kill my five accounts, ban the daily stormer and YouTube my channel
Daily reminder:
GEORGE FUCKING SOROS SUPPORTS NET NEUTRALITY
JUSTIN TRUDEAU SUPPPRTS NET NEUTRALITY
GOOGLE, FACEBOOK, AMD THE BIG DATA HIVE SUPPORT NET NEUTRALITY
REEEEEEEeeee stop liking things I don't liek!!!!111
>apples and oranges
>nuh-uh
How the fuck does telling a corporation not to charge you for something equate to censoring you? You didn't argue your point at all.
I didn't watch the video nor do I know what Boogie said, I'm arguing off what I know.
>The pro-NN censorship companies are monopolies too.
Yes, they are monopolies- however they're pro-NN because their assets would be negatively impacted by repealing NN, which would affect their income.
I don't see how that's an argument though.
>x decides the price because it's a monopoly
>YA WELL THESE PEOPLE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT R MONOPOLY 2
Exactly. kikes being kikes. "we care about muh free speech!" All while cesnsoring the fuck out of us on jewtube, jewgle search, twitter, facistbook and every leftest controlled monopoly. "We at the monopolytube amd jewgle, care about muh free speech, support NNigger now!"
I know this net neutrality shit is probably a big nothing burger like SOPA but if you unironically think Trump knows jack shit about the internet you're retarded
>not to charge you
Actually, NN bans ISPs from charging corporations like Google and Netflix more money.
Which sounds absolutely retarded to most Sup Forumsacks.
>Netflix was a huge burden on Comcast's infrastructure
>Netflix alone took up 37% of peak download traffic
In related news, your local water company has determined that too high of a percentage of the water they're selling is being used for showering.
What's that? You only pay for water because you like showering and occasionally doing the dishes? Fuck you.
No, it doesn't. The mobile infrastructure would mirror their data centers, utilizing the same equipment; they just have more towers spread out.
These towers are already built and paid for, all that they do is maintain them similarly to their regular cable centers. They do NOT cost more than x10 to maintain.
NNiggers should be thrown off buildings.
>hur durr, I know nuffin on sopa or NNigger, but Im exspurt on dRumphs knowledge on teh interwebs... im smart... please clap"
Fucking idiot.
Yes, that's what I pointed out.
Those "other monopolies" you mentioned in an attempt to discredit my "monopolies dictate price" are pro-NN because they and their affiliates/child companies would be paying MORE because NN PROTECTS them.
Stop claiming to know others' interests
Yeah and soon it will cost extra if you want anything other than facebook, youtube, and other mainstream sites (might even cost extra JUST to use netflix)
Enjoy getting butt fucked instead of doing something about the problems we already have that could be corrected but will be hopeless once the additional issues pile on.
1TB of data is going to seem like a fucking blessing by end of 2018.
95% of the public WANTS Net Neutrality. This is an extremely bad sign that the government is willing to go against a fucking super majority.
Netflix google and facebook get discounts because they let ISP's use their own fiber networks.
If the whole point of NN is to stop favoritism then this shouldnt be allowed.
How can a startup compete if the ISP is giving Netflix and google cheaper rates?
>customers using 50GB/mo. may notice reduced speeds until next bill cycle due to data prioritization.
Exactly my point. You get throttled and absolutely fucked when you exceed a certain point, which is why people are pro-NN because ISPs used to have a VERY BIG problem with throttling people and making gaming and streaming impossible, and browsing a huge headache.
>government is the one who allows internet free of censorship
How do you even begin to reason with these people?
The censorship angle is a total red herring, this is really about ISP's being able to throttle customers internet.
Before 2015, ISP's were unable to do this due to the 1996 telecommunications act, this act was not originally written for the internet, however, the terms that we know as 'Net Neutrality' were contained within it. In 2015 Obama doing some unneeded political grandstanding, decided to consolidate them into a new act.
If the 2015 one goes the 1996 one still will no longer apply, meaning your ISP can charge you a 'package deal' for websites or have different tiers of websites available / microtransactions /any other shit they like to squeeze their customers.
Comcast wants NN gone so it can make a killing because it is a monopoly and always will be. Soros wants it to stay because it means he can spread propaganda easier with an unthrottled internet.
>95% of the public WANTS Net Neutrality.
But they arent getting it with NN, just like they didnt get cheaper medical care under the "affordable care act", didnt get patriotic protection under the "patriot act" and didnt get "free trade" under nafta.
Fuck off shill!
boogie is right. cant just blindly fight everything
once again.. cable style packages and low data quotas WILL NOT happen. the customer backlash will kill any ISP that tries it.
Doesnt even matter if they are the only ISP in an area, the publicity will kill them as people in other areas that are against this practice will switch.
NN doesnt stop download quotas you retard.
This is retarded, Sargon is 100% for net neutrality
Boogie threads are probably the only threads I don’t look at on Sup Forums
I mean who has time to listen to a literal beached whale who complains about the same government that enable his disgusting, filth-ridden ass with food gibs? He should have died on the operating table, fucking waste of skin.
>fuck off
Stop using bullshit propaganda. “Pay extra for...” is never going to happen, NN or not.
>Net neutrality protests free speech!
Tell that to stormfront
> Bu-but private companies have the right-th-the first amendment only-th-the government
So what exactly is net neutrality for again? Either all of it is ok, or none of it is ok.
We already are being censored, fucking retards.
>The customer backlash will kill any ISP that tries it.
See: monopolies, collectively doing this
You must be 14 because there used to be HUGE issues with ISPs throttling people and there wasn't a big customer back-lash that killed ISPs because they did it as a collective.
Nobody gonna say it?
are the leafs waking up?
god emperor trump is a 2015-2017 campaign meme
>NN doesnt stop download quotas you retard.
Yes, it does. That's the entire premise of NN and throttling.
Shit tier trolling
Exactly, these fucking sheep running around talking about how NNiger saved their bandwidth, when all ISP's already have caps and throttling. Fucking parrots, squawking out leftist talking points.
All fucking niggers must fucking hang
>Those "other monopolies" you mentioned in an attempt to discredit my "monopolies dictate price" are pro-NN because they and their affiliates/child companies would be paying MORE because NN PROTECTS them.
And then these companies go on to implement the same hate speech laws that President Hillary certainly would have signed into law herself had she managed to get a couple more justices on the court.
I don't think it's unreasonable to draw a causal relationship between "pro-NN companies save more money" to "pro-NN companies think they can get away with more censorship without facing free market competition". What are the reasons that you think we *should* support net neutrality? And would you agree that net neutrality as-is, without regulating the pro-NN corporations themselves or giving them obligations to uphold in exchange for NN protections, is clearly suboptimal even if you don't support repeal?
>leafs waking up
>no you're wrong, hey remember this thing that the-oh, they still do it?
>o-oh, okay h-heh
There is plenty I disagree with Trump on but net neutrality is not one of them. End net neutrality. It actually DELAYS us from addressing the real problem of monopoly ISPs. End net neutrality and address the ROOT problem, encourage competition and multiple ISPs and if one has tiered pricing then go to a better one instead.
Wow! Why would we want Drumph controlling what we consume?
No its doesn't you stupid fuck!!! ISP's have bandwidth caps RIGHT FUCKING NOW YOU DEGENERATE SHILL!!
Who do you trust, Rand Paul or George Soros?
Because it triggers libtards xDDDD
>Yeah and soon it will cost extra if you want anything other than facebook, youtube, and other mainstream sites (might even cost extra JUST to use netflix)
Is there any reason to believe this?
Also, who cares about Netflix which is literally anti white propaganda?
WHEN YOU WILL LEARN THAT THE MEMES HAVE CONSEQUENCES