Why did Americans re-elect him in 2004?

Why did Americans re-elect him in 2004?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aqzzWr32srk
youtube.com/watch?v=QkkLUP-gm4Q
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Cuz 'murica

We didn't. Elections have been rigged for a long time.

Because it's funny. Why you think Trump president ?

incumbent, active war, john kerry was a boring frankenstein

Most presidents win their second term. Much harder to win when against someone already in that seat.

John Kerry, and Swiftboat Veterans for Truth or whatever they were called.

(Kerry basically got a Purple Heart medal, usually awarded for being wounded in combat, because he got a splinter.)

The Republican Party pushed a constitutional amendment to forever ban gay marriage. It happened at the state level in most states and was voted on nationally, but fell short of the required supermajority.

2000 elections were obviously rigged.

Skull & Bones candidate A vs. Skull & Bones candidate B.

The swing votes all go to the lesser of two evils, but they're both part of a satanic death cult anyway.

Also, how does John Kerry get away with wearing a John Kerry mask all the time?

1. Idiots thought Bush was a Tough Guy Who Would Keep Us Safe despite the fact that he's a cowardly pussy who let 9/11 happen.
2. Kerry was a shit candidate, almost as bad as Hillary. Hopefully we'll get another Kerry-Gore -Clinton type Dem in 2020.

Kerry couldn't even articulate why the war was a bad policy.

Because Trump didn't run until last year

He started the "war on terror"? Easy strategy to get re-elected.

>Bush let 9/11 happen
Wrong, Silly Willy Clinton just forgot to let him in on it, since Gore was supposed to win in 2000 anyway. Also, Bush probably had a better relationship with Putin that even Trump does, which helped to relieve tensions between the USA and Russia.

I (((wonder))).

Where democrats against the war by 04. I know that a lot of democrats voted yes for Iraq war.

same reason Trump will be re-elected: the economy was strong

Because no one, not liberals not rural retards, wants a change of the guard in the middle of a war that we weren't explicitly losing. We wanted to project strength and continuity.

Appeasement was Chamberlain's downfall. Vietnam stagnation was fuel for Nixon. That's just how it works. Kerry didn't have enough fuel with Iraq and Afghanistan to play up his Vietnam persona. We would learn later how perpetual the conflict would be, but just a couple years after 9/11 wasn't enough time for it to sink in or for the conspracy theories to fester.

Another thing to consider is that Edwards was an effeminate joke. Cheney wiped him at the VP debate. Without a strong running mate, Kerry was not flipping disgruntled neocons in Ohio, where the race was won.

Cock size

Cause Kerry was shit.

for the lols

>Dubya
>John Kerry
Easy choice.

he made a big fuss about gays marrying and redneck evangelical trash took the bait and came out and voted for him.

incumbent election
in the middle of iraq war (this was before we all found out it was bullshit, and we traditionally always reelect a war-time president for continuity)
economy was doing okay
john kerry wasn't inspirational

>this was before we all found out it was bullshit

Somehow I doubt this.

Economy still doing fine, war still ongoing. We still wanted some vengeance for 9/11, and john kerry was just another typical neo lib so yea about sum it up?

The Iraq War is in its 14th year now (really 27th, but let's not split hairs), but then it was only 1 year old. It was a baby war.

Why did Americans re-elect him in 2012?

you ever hear John Kerry speak? look into that asshole

I clearly remember telling americans that this war was bullshit on this very site.

Not my fault if you pretend to be retarded.

because of le magical underpants man romney.

Non re-election is actually an exception in Murrica. The real question is why his father wasn't re-elected, aside from Ross Perot issue.

We don't pretend. We are retarded. Even retards get tired of bullshit though. Most Americans weren't really upset with the Iraq War until around 2006 when everything went totally crazy.

Iraq War started in 2003. Election was 2004, only a year later. It wasn't until the war dragged on and on and we realized that there were never any WMDs and that it was all a lie that popular opinion reversed.

At the time, there was still blood in the water and everyone was mad as fuck about 9/11 and everything else. The politicians were always corrupt kikes lying to us, but it was easy at the time to get people to go along with their bullshit, and anyone who didn't was deemed "unamerican" and a communist shill or whatever.

That's why BOTH Dubya and Kerry kept trying to one-up each other about how much they support the war, the military, etc.

There was nobody to vote for and Obongo still had the momentum.

Because "elections" are not real. The Council on Foreign Relations chose him for 2 terms. Study the CFR to understand how American government works.

?
America isn't even a democracy.

Main reason why Obama won was because most people didn't blame him for the shit economy at that time considering it was a major recession that occured under Bush.

By 2016 a lot of areas that voted for Obama swung to trump because they finally lost patience considering the shit economic situation that started all the way with outsourcing decades ago.

HW bush was unpopular and got blame for the 1990 recession that occured under his presidency. Plus Clinton was actually the democrat's most conservative candidate since while especially on crime. And won a lot of conservative votes.

He threw up on the Japanese emperor, and was always perceived as a wimpy, weak president.

Bush raised taxes which he promised not to do

They weren't against it until after they lost in 2004. The war started turning into an unpopular quagmire in 2005, which opened them up for huge gains in Congress in 2006.

Oddly enough, Hillary was one of the last to come out against the war on either side. She didn't acknowledge it was a mistake until 2013.

youtube.com/watch?v=aqzzWr32srk

I know they brainwashed you into pretending you didn't watched this, but you watched this.

Spbp

Greatest thing Trump has done has been to pull back the curtains on this

cuz he's lame as fuck

the cool candidate always wins

>HW bush was unpopular and got blame for the 1990 recession that occured under his presidency. Plus Clinton was actually the democrat's most conservative candidate since while especially on crime. And won a lot of conservative votes.

Clinton wasn't as popular as you might remember. Keep in mind that Ross Perot ran as a 3rd party and siphoned away like 20% of the vote, helping throw the election to Clinton because of the way electoral politics works.

Because the US was engaged in WAAAGH! Bush at the time.

Nope, everyone at the time was pro-war. It was the sort of situation where if you didn't clap long and hard enough, you got lambasted as an unpatriotic faggot. Both sides were trying to one-up each other on how much they loved the war.

Of course, we all realized after the fact that this was totally manufactured and it was the kikes and their propaganda pushing this sort of stalin-like situation where you got blacklisted in the public imagine for not supporting wars for ZOG

>It's rigged but my candidate won

GHWB also had the charisma of a damp rag an the manner of a bank clerk. Clinton meanwhile played the sax and felt our pain.

Nearly a month before the election, it came out that there were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq and that the war was a total lie. People underestimate just how difficult it is for an incumbent to lose. It's why places without term limits can never seem to get rid of people.

Because Kerry was literally the same and the "difference" of Dem foreign policy was nonexistent ("We shoulda bombed Afghan more than Iraq!") after they voted for the Iraq War.

And why we need congressional term limits so bad. Even if they can run again as many times as they want after having to take a term off once in a while.

We should just abolish voting already because people are clearly too dumb.

John Kerry was boring and Bush was the incumbent during an active War. Plus Bush was still ridding off the high patriotism from the aftermath of 9/11

For all you john kerry blamers.

You realize that you have primaries?

Polls showed that Perot voters would had split 35-40% for Clinton and 35-40% for HW bush and 20-30% would stay home so it wouldn't change Clinton winning by a meh margin of 5%.

Only democrats vote in those primaries, and they're rigged anyway.

GW Bush is a never trumper so he was a mistake. Wish I had voted for Pat Buchanan in 2000, instead.

>Only democrats.

And anyone with a driver's license.

John Kerry waffled, shifted, and basically became a cuck.

Well 48% of Americans voted for Donald dumbfuck Trump

GWB and Trump have the same exact policies.

Don't even need that much to vote, especially if you're dead, in which case you can vote several times.

But ordinary people here are still largely honest and don't have the capacity to organize enough people to engage in voter fraud to make a difference.

Kerry was seen as a sleekid, deceptive coward.

>John Kerry, and Swiftboat Veteran
Hence the term 'Swiftboated'.

The military don't take kindly to posers, especially those with Stolen Valor.

46% of voters and not americans just 46% of voters that turned out. Saying americans imply you meant all adult americans and turnout in the US is usually around the 50's range.

Phillippe's on to something here.

We Muricans are natural trolls and jerks. At least for Republicans, we'll elect and reelect presidents based on who the world is telling us not so. Reverse psychology, lulz, bringin the bantz, whatever you want to call it.

Weren't finished beating the terrists yet

Regardless, the point is that Clinton's win is seen as this massive landslide victory, when it was actually fairly narrow.
And those polls after the fact can't really be fully trusted. Too many unknown variable for if perot hadn't run.

After 200 hundred years you just think you can't make a difference, but trump proved that you can.

For good or bad.

We didn't know he was a whiny traitor yet, and his opponent was John Kerry.

Kerry sucked too.

trump wouldve lost if it was rigged you stupid fuck

You might or might not understand what an unusual and massive coordinated effort it took just to get Trump through the primaries.

Seems accurate.

Cuz Romney fucked up with the welfare crack.

This is why.

Romney was too dumb to realize their are cameras everywhere and just because you think you are in a private gathering doesn't mean you can say what you really feel about blacks.

their there whatever
It's too early to spell

I do, but this are the kind of important things you should be doing.

Yup. That's why when I got the signal I rode the Trump Movement hard here. Even brought back awoos after the coordinated effort to discredit them.

>tfw it really was a meme war

Cable News dominated the flow of information.
Fox dominated Cable News.

Sickening to see SJWs cozying up to him just because he blasted Trump recently. If they had a shred of consistency Dubya would represent everything these little Zogbots despise.

Then again, moral and intellectual integrity waved bye bye to them long ago.

Am I the only one who voted for him and thinks he was a relatively good president?

Plenty of sandniggers killed, less evil in the world.

Obama still had the personality cult
Like user said And above all they ran the worst fucking candidate imaginable. Romney was the Republican Hillary, Hillary is the Democratic Romney.

The paradigm shfit really only happened around 2006 or so.

Well you have my support cause this has really fixed more things than I thought possible.

Just get an honest man next time.

All you can do is work with the available options, and there's no such thing as an honest politician anyway. Especially one sitting in one of the most powerful seats in the world.

At this point best we can do is what we can to try to keep him on the right path.

If iraq wasnt invaded we wouldnt had dumped trillions into iraq even to this day all for nothing.

Plus Saddam would destroy ISIS before it even existed. Him being overthrown led to the rise of ISIS as a temper tantrum amongst sunni iraqis.

I know that 2017 they sell red pills on every street corner, but in 2004 they were a little hard to come by.

Your choices basically amounted to Zog or Zog lite. Until Ron Paul started making waves and boy did (((They))) give him hell.

I haven't learned that much since 2004.

He got in because idiots recognized him as Bush senior's son. The name got him votes the first time. The second time, the election was rigged.

Sanctuary cities, open borders, expanded the welfare state, and don't forget his daddy H.W. Bush increasing legal immigration by 40% and dropping English language requirements back in 1991, another bill passed in the dead of night with no overview or press coverage.

From H.W. Bush to Obama, it was thirty years straight of the brownification and demographic transformation of America. Reagan made a mistake on amnesty, but the Bush clan and Clinton put everything into hyperdrive. Dubya and his father should both be loathed by the right.

You're an early adopter. In the US at least it's a massively different situation than before. I was told when I got in to it that things were happening bigger and faster than ever before by guys who had been working at it for 50+ years.

Honestly I didn't believe them until I spent a few years at it and noticed the stark differences in my various hangouts.

This. Big part of this is because internet was still in its infancy and social media hadn't taken off, meaning there was very little anonymous idea sharing going on at the time.

That’s what someone who doesn’t understand how it’s rigged would say.

The rigging isn’t a falsification of the results but a gaming of the voting system in order to sway the results in their favour. What Trump did was enter a rigged voting system and won it by having THAT MUCH of a lead in comparison to his opponents. He won through the power of sheer unity and playing it by the book.

>Kerry would have been better
Both John Kerry and George Bush were two sides of the same shekel. Bush just happens to be more entertaining with his retarded way of speaking.
youtube.com/watch?v=QkkLUP-gm4Q

Because 9/11

Americans love fighting wars for their jew overlords.

He looks like a fucking oak tree.