>(((Net Neutrality)))
(((Net Neutrality)))
Christopher Flores
Evan Sanchez
/thread
Isaiah Clark
Hm I dunno. The way I see it if NN is repealed I've got two oppressors whereas if it stays I've got one that doesn't have a monopoly on domains. To me it's false equivalency.
Bentley Cox
you have no idea so shut the fuck up
educate people and cram your opinion
Joshua Harris
There wouldn't be any packages for any preferred service. No packages, no throttling. It states right there that if they degrade services of Netflix or any other competing service, it'll be challenged as anti-competitive foreclosure.
Everything people have been bitching about when NN ends will not happen. There is already laws protecting consumers. Unfairly block or throttle, it would go under anti-trust laws or anti-consumer laws and that is when the FTC comes in. Want to mislead your consumers and lie to them about said activities? FTC will come in.
Take a gander and read it yourself instead of shilling for Soros for free. Unlike Net Neutrality, we can actually read what the FCC is suggesting.
transition.fcc.gov
Sebastian Torres
>(((educate))) yourself, goy
Chase Martinez
>There's just no evidence that they want to throttle small websites like you claim rather than the large tech monopolies.
Large tech monopolies have tons of money to throw around and have incentives to partner with ISPs to favor their content and tax non-favored content. Tiny companies do not have the power to do this.
>I don't see how helping the corporations who are doing the censoring pay less for bandwidth.
NN requires that all corporations, censoring and non-censoring alike, pay equal amounts for bandwidth. Google's traffic must be carried at the same priority and cost as that of Sup Forums, RT, the Daily Stormer, TPB, whatever; Google will not pay any less than anyone else. Furthermore, many of these "more neutral" websites already exist. You can join VK and discuss with your right-wing friends all the reasons liberalism is a disaster and it costs you nothing.
>Yes, because making the next Google or Amazon involves no significant infrastructure costs whatsoever.
The creation of a small website costs very little. As your userbase grows, if your site is promising, you can acquire capital: investors are looking for such growth opportunities, including right-wing investors such as Peter Thiel and company. By the time you need your own server farm you should already be a major player.
Gabriel Sanchez
thanks for educating
k
Henry Mitchell
>ISPs do exactly what they said they wont
>get sued and lose millions
>who cares lol they made billions doing it
this is what every fucking corporation does
Christopher Garcia
your poorly proofread redditor shite was already debunked in the other thread