Should banks be deregulated?

Should banks be deregulated?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loans_and_interest_in_Judaism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Seriously nigga? After 07-08? Are you high?

banks should be dissolved. Giving out other peoples money and collecting interest off it (whilst still applying bank fees) is usury and was considered immoral many centuries ago. funny how we have gone backward and become less moral today.
Government need to grow business to collect tax, they should be giving out interest free loans in the hope of generating business rather than working hand in hand with the banks to keep us in a perpetual state of economic slavery

if you believe this please stay the fuck in Australia and watch the American stock market run circles around your fucking economy

It is not immoral for Juden to collect interest. They are God's Chosen People.

Depends which regulation. Glass-steagall was shit, keep dodd-frank

low energy post

pls dont do thid

>they should be giving out interest free loans in the hope of generating business
This is still just spending other peoples money except no money is being made.

If you gave out zero-interest loans almost there would be almost no loans. You have to be pretty much certain that you'd recoup the loan otherwise you'd be losing money left right and centre. This means only very few (already well-off) people would actually have access to loans making it difficult for people of little financial means to take out loans to start businesses, pay for school, house etc.

Sure.

If they fund ur policies. : )

lol knew that would trigger a semite. your country is in 19 trillion dollars debt, have fun with that

correction. it's not immoral for Juden to harvest from the goyim
What's wrong with your brain dude? that doesn't make any sense. anyone can have a loan, you don't pay it back you go to jail to do slave labour till you pay it off

No they should be fucking hung in public

>that doesn't make any sense
Yes it does, the government will only lend to people if they have a 100% certainty they will get their money back since they're receiving nothing in interest. By charging you're making loans more accessible to the wider population as it lets banks take on riskier investments by charging higher interest.

>anyone can have a loan, you don't pay it back you go to jail to do slave labour till you pay it off
This still leaves you in the same situation. If this is the punishment for not paying back the loan only those who are absolutely certain they can pay it back will ever take out a loan. Nobodies going to take the risk of opening up a business if they have to pay back half a million in slave labour, thats half someones entire life.

no dude you really are retarded. Why wouldn't you be able to pay off a loan unless you are lazy or incompetent or extremely unlucky? The whole purpose of a loan is to help you get up on your own two feet so that you can start contributing tax. the moment a new business opens they have a new source of tax revenue and they also have the cash flow of the loans being repayed. the prison term would really only be necessary to stop people taking advantage of you

Yes they should be deregulated, but they should not be bailed out, if they fuck up their risk management the consequences should reside with the bank and the banks stakeholders, governments should not be in the business of buying and selling risk.

>Why wouldn't you be able to pay off a loan unless you are lazy or incompetent or extremely unlucky?
Plenty of reasons, unforeseen circumstances like financial crashes, change in consumer preferences etc. Maybe the business had a poor model and couldn't compete. There are endless ways a business can fail.

>the moment a new business opens they have a new source of tax revenue and they also have the cash flow of the loans being repayed
So I guess there is interest its just being payed as tax. The 'interest' would still be pretty slim given tax is only payed on income not expenditure.
diture.

They are the biggest and most powerful weapon of the Jews, that and the Federal Reserves (which could be considered banks, although are special cases due to the fact that their balance is 0 every time they print, causing inflation).

They absolutely must be regulated. I would even argue that banks must be nationalized. Never forget that it was banks that were responsible for both the 1929 Great Depression (partially responsible for the stock crash due to overevaluation, but entirely responsible for the proceeding mass bank-runs) and the 2008 housing market bubble (with their subprime CDOs).

As for the Jews running them: gas every single one of them. I know there are "good" Jews and normal Jews, but these are without a doubt the scum-of-the-Earth Jews.

No. They should be destroyed.

errr wrong. I used to do books and there is a lot more than just income tax you have to pay.
I don't see why this is so hard for you to understand. without interest it would be easy to pay back the loan which means more people would be willing to get one

Banks should be nationalized with zero interest.

>No, Banks are Porky.
or, alt-ernatively:
>No, banks or (((banks)))
Or, if you're retarded:
>$ure, we need (((free market$)))

>Should banks be deregulated?

that's the strangest way of spelling "Nationalized" I have ever seen.

Well infact it is in their scriptures that it's a sin. But as always the dodgy fucks argued a loophole and found a way.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loans_and_interest_in_Judaism

Fuck no! Banks should be eliminated. Replaced with banks, which are people oriented and give zero interest loans. The economic paradigm we work within is broken.

One question is why the housing prices fell so much in the 1930s but are still rising in the 2010s.

Probably because of the fact that we now have rampant immigration and back then we didn't. This leads to massively increased US population, with not enough new houses being built.

Not sure if that's why though, just a guess.

The banks should be destroyed.